There may be no more conÂtentious an issue at the levÂel of local U.S. govÂernÂment than eduÂcaÂtion. All of the socioeÂcoÂnomÂic and culÂturÂal fault lines comÂmuÂniÂties would rather paper over become fulÂly exposed in debates over fundÂing, curÂricuÂlum, disÂtrictÂing, etc. But we rarely hear disÂcusÂsions about eduÂcaÂtionÂal polÂiÂcy at the nationÂal levÂel these days.
You’ll hear no major politÂiÂcal canÂdiÂdate delivÂer a speech soleÂly focused on eduÂcaÂtion. Debate modÂerÂaÂtors don’t much ask about it. The UnitÂed States founders’ own thoughts on the subÂject are occaÂsionÂalÂly cited—but only in passÂing, on the way to the latÂest round of talks on war and wealth. Aside from proÂposÂals disÂmissed as too radÂiÂcal, eduÂcaÂtion is mostÂly conÂsidÂered a lowÂer priÂorÂiÂty for the nation’s leadÂers, or it’s roped into highÂly charged debates about politÂiÂcal and social unrest on uniÂverÂsiÂty camÂpusÂes.
This sitÂuÂaÂtion can seem odd to the stuÂdent of politÂiÂcal phiÂlosÂoÂphy. Every major politÂiÂcal thinker—from PlaÂto to John Locke to John StuÂart Mill—has writÂten letÂters, treaÂtisÂes, even major works on the cenÂtral role of eduÂcaÂtion. One conÂtemÂpoÂrary politÂiÂcal thinker—linguist, anarÂchist, and retired MIT proÂfesÂsor Noam ChomÂsky—has also devotÂed quite a lot of thought to eduÂcaÂtion, and has forceÂfulÂly criÂtiqued what he sees as a corÂpoÂrate attack on its instiÂtuÂtions.
ChomÂsky, howÂevÂer, has no interÂest in harÂnessÂing eduÂcaÂtion to prop up govÂernÂments or marÂket economies. Nor does he see eduÂcaÂtion as a tool for rightÂing hisÂtorÂiÂcal wrongs, securÂing midÂdle class jobs, or meetÂing any othÂer agenÂda.
ChomÂsky, whose thoughts on eduÂcaÂtion we’ve feaÂtured before, tells us in the short video interÂview at the top of the post how he defines what it means to be truÂly eduÂcatÂed. And to do so, he reachÂes back to a philosoÂpher whose views you won’t hear refÂerÂenced often, WilÂhelm von HumÂboldt, GerÂman humanÂist, friend of Goethe and Schiller, and “founder of the modÂern highÂer eduÂcaÂtion sysÂtem.” HumÂboldt, ChomÂsky says, “argued, I think, very plauÂsiÂbly, that the core prinÂciÂple and requireÂment of a fulÂfilled human being is the abilÂiÂty to inquire and creÂate conÂstrucÂtiveÂly, indeÂpenÂdentÂly, withÂout exterÂnal conÂtrols.” A true eduÂcaÂtion, ChomÂsky sugÂgests, opens a door to human intelÂlecÂtuÂal freeÂdom and creÂative autonÂoÂmy.
To clarÂiÂfy, ChomÂsky paraÂphrasÂes a “leadÂing physiÂcist” and forÂmer MIT colÂleague, who would tell his stuÂdents, “it’s not imporÂtant what we covÂer in the class; it’s imporÂtant what you discovÂer.” GivÂen this point of view, to be truÂly eduÂcatÂed means to be resourceÂful, to be able to “forÂmuÂlate seriÂous quesÂtions” and “quesÂtion stanÂdard docÂtrine, if that’s approÂpriÂate”… It means to “find your own way.” This defÂiÂnÂiÂtion sounds simÂiÂlar to Nietzsche’s views on the subÂject, though NietÂzsche had litÂtle hope in very many peoÂple attainÂing a true eduÂcaÂtion. ChomÂsky, as you might expect, proÂceeds in a much more demoÂcÂraÂtÂic spirÂit.
In the interÂview above from 2013 (see the secÂond video), you can hear him disÂcuss why he has devotÂed his life to eduÂcatÂing not only his payÂing stuÂdents, but also nearÂly anyÂone who asks him a quesÂtion. He also talks about his own eduÂcaÂtion and furÂther eluÂciÂdates his views on the relaÂtionÂship between eduÂcaÂtion, creÂativÂiÂty, and critÂiÂcal inquiry. And, in the very first few minÂutes, you’ll find out whether ChomÂsky prefers George Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. (Hint: it’s neiÂther.)
Note: An earÂliÂer verÂsion of this post appeared on our site in 2016.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
1,700 Free Online CoursÂes from Top UniÂverÂsiÂties
Noam ChomÂsky Spells Out the PurÂpose of EduÂcaÂtion
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
Leave a Reply