Doctor Who’s Tom Baker Plays Douglas Adams’ Digital “Agent” in the AI-Predicting Hyperland (1990)

Cast your mind, if you will, back to the year 2020. It now feels like a dif­fer­ent time, what with the spread­ing COVID-19 pan­dem­ic and the heat­ed sociopo­lit­i­cal bat­tles being waged online, and indeed in the (social­ly dis­tanced) streets. That spring, we fea­tured here on Open Cul­ture an amus­ing retro-tech­no­log­i­cal diver­sion called Hyper­land. First broad­cast on BBC2, the pro­gram stars The Hitch­hik­er’s Guide to the Galaxy author Dou­glas Adams as him­self and Doc­tor Who’s Tom Bak­er as his agent. “You want fif­teen per­cent?” the for­mer asks the lat­ter when they first meet in a vast waste­land of flick­er­ing tele­vi­sion sets. Not at all: “I’m here to do your every slight­est bid­ding,” Bak­er explains, “to fetch and car­ry for you, to work tire­less­ly and self­less­ly on your behalf, always ready, always will­ing, no job too small or too menial.”

Today, we can hard­ly share in Adams’ bewil­der­ment, famil­iar as we are with the notion of what Bak­er calls a “soft­ware agent,” an “arti­fi­cial and com­plete­ly cus­tomiz­able per­son­al­i­ty” with “instant access to every piece of infor­ma­tion stored dig­i­tal­ly any­where in the world: any pic­ture or film, any sound, any book, any sta­tis­tic, any fact, any con­nec­tion between any­thing you care to think of.” We must remind our­selves that Hyper­land was pro­duced in 1990, when these lines would have struck all but the most com­put­er-savvy and for­ward-look­ing view­ers as sheer sci­ence fic­tion. Even three decades there­after, they still sound­ed more or less like an ele­vat­ed ver­sion of ordi­nary late-twen­ti­eth-cen­tu­ry tech­no-opti­mism. Here in 2026, Bak­er’s ser­vices are close to being con­sid­ered a basic neces­si­ty, at least in Sil­i­con Val­ley and its glob­al provinces.

Not so very long ago, Hyper­land looked star­tling­ly pre­scient about the rise of the World Wide Web, which would soon let its users seek out their own desired pieces of infor­ma­tion and media, active­ly mov­ing through links between them, in a man­ner unlike the pas­sive view­ing expe­ri­ence of tele­vi­sion (with which it would, as no one then knew, one day con­verge). This was an unfa­mil­iar idea to most peo­ple in 1990; hence the vari­ety of clear and enter­tain­ing ways in which the pro­gram breaks down its tech­no­log­i­cal basis, pulling up clips from its onscreen “data­base” like an inter­view with Ted Nel­son, who coined the term hyper­text. Like mul­ti­me­dia, that word may car­ry a whiff of antiq­ui­ty today, but it was once on the lips of prac­ti­cal­ly every tech­nol­o­gist in pop­u­lar cul­ture — in a man­ner rem­i­nis­cent of the lex­i­con that has sprung from new devel­op­ments in arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence over the past few years.

At times, Bak­er’s char­ac­ter now looks almost real­is­tic, as when Adams asks him to knock off the obse­quious­ness, or when he pulls up Kurt Von­negut’s the­o­ry of sto­ry form before Adams ful­ly gets the ques­tion out. Yet Hyper­land devotes lit­tle time to AI per se. The pro­gram appeared in the wake of the eight­ies’ AI boom, when “expert sys­tems” promised to solve prob­lems in indus­try, med­i­cine, and oth­er sec­tors, but many of the field­’s larg­er ambi­tions went unre­al­ized. There fol­lowed a long “AI win­ter” in research and devel­op­ment, in whose cli­mate Baker-as-“agent” would have been a means of human­iz­ing an abstract-seem­ing con­cept of orga­niz­ing and nav­i­gat­ing infor­ma­tion. Not that all his enthu­si­as­ti­cal­ly prof­fered ser­vices draw unqual­i­fied enthu­si­asm from Adams, who pos­sessed a rare com­bi­na­tion of Cal­i­forn­ian technophil­ia and British skep­ti­cism. His fas­ci­na­tion with human­i­ty’s dig­i­tal future is ours — and so is his wari­ness.

via Mefi

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Play The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy Video Game Free Online, Designed by Dou­glas Adams in 1984

Sci-Fi Writer Arthur C. Clarke Pre­dict­ed the Rise of Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence & the Exis­ten­tial Ques­tions We Would Need to Answer (1978)

In 1999, David Bowie Pre­dicts the Good and Bad of the Inter­net: “We’re on the Cusp of Some­thing Exhil­a­rat­ing and Ter­ri­fy­ing”

John Tur­tur­ro Intro­duces Amer­i­ca to the World Wide Web in 1999: Watch A Beginner’s Guide To The Inter­net

Pio­neer­ing Sci-Fi Author William Gib­son Pre­dicts in 1997 How the Inter­net Will Change Our World

Sci-Fi Author J.G. Bal­lard Pre­dicts the Rise of Social Media (1977)

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Hear How Clare Torry’s Vocals on Pink Floyd’s “The Great Gig in the Sky” Made the Song Go from Pretty Good to Downright Great

Smack in the mid­dle of Pink Floy­d’s clas­sic Dark Side of the Moon sits a song many lis­ten­ers may hear as an extend­ed bridge between the two true cen­ter­pieces, “Time” and “Mon­ey.” But I’ve always thought of “The Great Gig in the Sky” as the album’s true cen­ter, a swirling, swing­ing, soul­ful prog-rock mas­ter­piece, car­ried to stratos­pher­ic heights by British singer Clare Tor­ry. The song’s word­less gospel vocal makes it an ecsta­t­ic, even hope­ful, tent pole sup­port­ing Dark Side’s bril­liant­ly cyn­i­cal songs about the banal­i­ty and injus­tice of mod­ern life.

“The Great Gig in the Sky,” that is to say, pro­vides much-need­ed emo­tion­al release in an album that can sound, writes Alex­is Petridis, “like one long sigh.” Yet if you know the sto­ry of Dark Side of the Moon and of Clare Torry’s defin­ing con­tri­bu­tion, you’ll know that her incred­i­ble soar­ing vocal was sheer hap­pen­stance, an impro­vi­sa­tion by a young singer brought in at the last minute by pro­duc­er Alan Parsons—and one who wasn’t a par­tic­u­lar fan of the band. (“If it had been The Kinks,” she remem­bered, “I’d have been over the moon.”)

Tor­ry reluc­tant­ly stepped into the stu­dio and asked the band, “Well, what do you want?” Basi­cal­ly, she says, “they had no idea.” An iso­lat­ed track from Alan Par­sons’ 1973 mix (above) strips the song down to piano, drums, slide gui­tar, and Torry’s voice. Ear­ly live ver­sions of the song in 1972 had fea­tured Bible read­ings and record­ed speech­es by con­ser­v­a­tive writer Mal­colm Mug­geridge; in the final ver­sion, these gave way to snip­pets of the band’s crew and friends answer­ing ques­tions about death.

When Tor­ry went into the vocal booth and put on the head­phones, she would have heard an even more stripped-down mix. Giv­en no oth­er instruc­tion than “we don’t want any words,” she decid­ed, “I have to pre­tend to be an instru­ment.”

Torry’s vocal is so dis­tinc­tive that she even­tu­al­ly won a set­tle­ment in 2005 for a co-song­writ­ing cred­it with Wright—an out­come some song­writ­ing experts agree was ful­ly jus­ti­fied since she essen­tial­ly cre­at­ed a new melody for the song. In the inter­view above, hear Tor­ry describe how she “had a lit­tle go” and, after some guid­ance from David Gilmour and a can of Heineken, casu­al­ly knocked out one of the most thrilling vocal per­for­mances in rock his­to­ry.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2017.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Hear Pink Floyd’s “Great Gig in the Sky” Played on the Theremin

Hear Lost Record­ing of Pink Floyd Play­ing with Jazz Vio­lin­ist Stéphane Grap­pel­li on “Wish You Were Here”

Edvard Munch’s Famous Paint­ing “The Scream” Ani­mat­ed to the Sound of Pink Floyd’s Pri­mal Music

Pink Floyd’s “Echoes” Pro­vides a Sound­track for the Final Scene of Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

The Dark Story Behind Edgar Allan Poe’s Most Famous Photograph, Taken Four Days After a Laudanum Overdose

In the Hal­loween sea­son, one Amer­i­can writer comes to mind more often than any oth­er: Edgar Allan Poe. That owes in large part to his famous­ly macabre tales like “The Tell-Tale Heart,” “The Cask of Amon­til­la­do,” and “The Masque of the Red Death,” writ­ten though they may have been with bare­ly con­cealed con­tempt for their sen­sa­tion-seek­ing mag­a­zine read­er­ship. But it also has to do with the image of the man him­self. Or rather, it has to do with one image in par­tic­u­lar: a daguerreo­type pho­to­graph tak­en on Novem­ber 9, 1848, at a Prov­i­dence stu­dio that has inspired prac­ti­cal­ly every rep­re­sen­ta­tion of Poe in pop­u­lar cul­ture since.

Known as Ulti­ma Thule, this famous por­trait was in fact just one of per­haps ten daguerreo­types for which Poe sat in his life­time. Inven­tor Louis Daguer­re’s ear­ly pho­to­graph­ic process, which used sil­ver-coat­ed cop­per plates, fas­ci­nat­ed Poe, who in an 1840 news­pa­per arti­cle called it “the most impor­tant, and per­haps the most extra­or­di­nary tri­umph of mod­ern sci­ence.” He described its prod­uct as “infi­nite­ly more accu­rate in its rep­re­sen­ta­tion than any paint­ing by human hands,” though any­one sit­ting for a pic­ture did have to sit still for min­utes on end, result­ing in not just the unsmil­ing vis­ages we asso­ciate with nine­teenth-cen­tu­ry pho­tog­ra­phy, but also in a com­bi­na­tion of dis­com­fort and slight blur­ring that can look vague­ly oth­er­world­ly.

That qual­i­ty may actu­al­ly have enhanced the aura of Ulti­ma Thule, which painter Michael J. Deas calls “the image of the trag­ic roman­tic poet: solemn, detached, con­sumed by his own wild­ly self-destruc­tive nature.” It sure­ly also made a dif­fer­ence that the por­trait was made, in the words of poet Her­vey Allen, “prob­a­bly at the very hour when he looked the worst that he had ever looked in his life.” He’d been tak­en to the stu­dio by a stranger with whom he’d spent the pre­vi­ous night binge-drink­ing. Just four days before that, he’d unsuc­cess­ful­ly attempt­ed sui­cide by lau­danum over­dose, a rash action tak­en after the rejec­tion of his mar­riage pro­pos­al by Sarah Helen Whit­man, a wid­owed poet he had­n’t known long — and who would give her suit­or’s immor­tal por­trait its Latin name, bor­rowed from his poem “Dream-Land.”

The orig­i­nal daguerreo­type, for which the stu­dio prob­a­bly paid the by-then notable, still per­pet­u­al­ly hard-up Poe to sit, remained with its mak­ers until it van­ished around 1860, and its where­abouts have remained unknown ever since. But copies have allowed gen­er­a­tion after gen­er­a­tion of read­ers to behold Poe’s trou­bled vis­age when what Whit­man called “all the stormy grandeur of that via Dolorosa had left its sullen shad­ow on his brow.” Through the drunk­en chaos and pover­ty of his life, the writer him­self could see things to come. “The con­se­quences of any new sci­en­tif­ic inven­tion will, at the present day exceed, by very much, the wildest expec­ta­tions of the most imag­i­na­tive,” he wrote, an obser­va­tion true enough of pho­tog­ra­phy 178 years ago, and no doubt even truer of what we use to make images today.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Iggy Pop Reads Edgar Allan Poe’s Clas­sic Hor­ror Sto­ry, “The Tell-Tale Heart”

Why Should You Read Edgar Allan Poe? An Ani­mat­ed Video Explains

The Mys­tery of Edgar Allan Poe’s Death: 19 The­o­ries on What Caused the Poet’s Demise

Hear Edgar Allan Poe Sto­ries Read by Iggy Pop, Jeff Buck­ley, Christo­pher Walken, Mar­i­anne Faith­ful & More

7 Tips from Edgar Allan Poe on How to Write Vivid Sto­ries & Poems

The First Pho­to­graph of a Human Being: A Pho­to Tak­en by Louis Daguerre in 1838

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

When a Cat Co-Authored a Paper in a Leading Physics Journal (1975)

Back in 1975, Jack H. Het­her­ing­ton, a physics pro­fes­sor at Michi­gan State Uni­ver­si­ty, wrote a research paper on low–temperature physics for the respect­ed sci­en­tif­ic jour­nal Phys­i­cal Review Let­ters. Before send­ing it off, Het­her­ing­ton asked a col­league to review the paper, just to make sure it cov­ered the right bases. What hap­pened next Het­her­ing­ton explained in the 1982 book, More Ran­dom Walks in Sci­ence:

Before I sub­mit­ted [the arti­cle], I asked a col­league to read it over and he said, ‘It’s a fine paper, but they’ll send it right back.’ He explained that that is because of the Edi­tor’s rule that the word “we” should not be used in a paper with only a sin­gle author. Chang­ing the paper to the imper­son­al seemed too dif­fi­cult now, and it was all writ­ten and typed; there­fore, after an evening’s thought, I sim­ply asked the sec­re­tary to change the title page to include the name of the fam­i­ly cat, a Siamese called Chester, sired one sum­mer by Willard (one of the few unfixed male Siamese cats in Aspen, Col­orado). I added the ini­tials F D in front of the name to stand for Felix Domes­ti­cus and thus cre­at­ed F D C Willard.

The edi­tors even­tu­al­ly accept­ed the paper, “Two‑, Three‑, and Four-Atom Exchange Effects in bcc 3 He.” And the ruse last­ed until, remem­bers Het­her­ing­ton, “a vis­i­tor [came to the uni­ver­si­ty and] asked to talk to me, and since I was unavail­able asked to talk with Willard. Every­one laughed and soon the cat was out of the bag.” (Pun sure­ly intend­ed.) Appar­ent­ly only the jour­nal edi­tors did­n’t find humor in the joke.

Above, you can see F.D.C. Willard’s sig­na­ture (a paw print) on the front page of the arti­cle. The web­site, Today­I­Found­Out, has much more on this enchant­i­ng lit­tle sto­ry.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2017.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Short­est-Known Paper Pub­lished in a Seri­ous Math Jour­nal: Two Suc­cinct Sen­tences 

The Famous Schrodinger’s Cat Thought Exper­i­ment Gets Brought to Life in an Off-Kil­ter Ani­ma­tion

Insane­ly Cute Cat Com­mer­cials from Stu­dio Ghi­b­li, Hayao Miyazaki’s Leg­endary Ani­ma­tion Shop

Nick Cave Nar­rates an Ani­mat­ed Film about the Cat Piano, the Twist­ed 18th Cen­tu­ry Musi­cal Instru­ment Designed to Treat Men­tal Ill­ness

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

How Vincent van Gogh’s Sister-in-Law Worked Tirelessly to Make Him Famous

No artist, no mat­ter how soli­tary by nature, becomes a cul­tur­al phe­nom­e­non alone. That’s even true of such an iso­lat­ed fig­ure as Vin­cent van Gogh, whose death in obscu­ri­ty at the age of 37 left open the ques­tion of who, if any­one, would vouch­safe his paint­ings to pos­ter­i­ty. The sup­port of the artist’s younger broth­er Theo is often giv­en a good deal of cred­it for mak­ing his work pos­si­ble, and not with­out rea­son. What’s some­what less wide­ly known is that Theo, who’d long been in poor health, died less than a year after Vin­cen­t’s sui­cide. The work of ensur­ing the lat­ter’s lega­cy then fell to the for­mer’s wid­ow Johan­na Bonger — or per­haps she under­stood that if she did­n’t stew­ard it, nobody else would.

As Cindy Poh explains in the New­s­think video above, Bonger inher­it­ed a great many of van Gogh’s works and stored them away while devis­ing a plan to make them famous. Prac­ti­cal­ly going door-to-door — and some­times, it seems, lit­er­al­ly going door-to-door — she stayed engaged with the late Theo’s art-world con­tacts. She cut sweet­heart deals with muse­ums and even donat­ed art­works out­right, increas­ing their chance of pub­lic expo­sure. She orga­nized exhi­bi­tions every­where from Paris to Berlin to Lon­don to New York, the most piv­otal being one held at Ams­ter­dam’s Stedelijk Muse­um in 1905. The 484 works put on dis­play made it the largest van Gogh show in his­to­ry, a record it still holds today.

At that time, well before The Star­ry Night and Sun­flow­ers adorned cof­fee mugs in sub­ur­ban house­holds the world over, van Gogh’s art could still shock some crit­ics with its uncon­ven­tion­al­i­ty. Oth­ers, how­ev­er, showed signs of the enrap­ture­ment that Bonger must have sus­pect­ed would one day be pos­si­ble. Think­ing strate­gi­cal­ly, she pre­ferred to sell few­er pieces for high­er prices, pre­serv­ing the val­ue of his work and lim­it­ing its avail­abil­i­ty on the mar­ket. After her sec­ond hus­band’s death, she redou­bled her ded­i­ca­tion to the art that had become her life’s mis­sion, even trans­lat­ing and pub­lish­ing the hun­dreds of let­ters he’d left behind, most of which were sent to Theo. We’ve heard many artists described as mar­ried to their work, a cliché that applies well enough to Vin­cent van Gogh him­self. But to be mar­ried to one’s broth­er-in-law’s work is a rar­er thing indeed — and some­times a more impor­tant one.

Relat­ed con­tent:

1,000+ Art­works by Vin­cent Van Gogh Dig­i­tized & Put Online by Dutch Muse­ums

Vin­cent Van Gogh’s The Star­ry Night: Why It’s a Great Paint­ing in 15 Min­utes

A Com­plete Archive of Vin­cent van Gogh’s Let­ters: Beau­ti­ful­ly Illus­trat­ed and Ful­ly Anno­tat­ed

Behold the New­ly-Dis­cov­ered Sketch by Vin­cent van Gogh Sketch, “Study for Worn Out” (1882)

Dis­cov­er the Only Paint­ing Van Gogh Ever Sold Dur­ing His Life­time

Maria Anna Mozart Was a Musi­cal Prodi­gy Like Her Broth­er Wolf­gang, So Why Did She Get Erased from His­to­ry?

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

 

 

The Megaprojects That Even the Ancient Romans Couldn’t Pull Off: Rerouting the Tiber, Digging a Canal, and More

Some would call the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca the might­i­est empire the world has ever known. Yet over the past half-cen­tu­ry or so, it has shown a strange inabil­i­ty to build domes­tic infra­struc­ture, at least at the effi­cien­cy or on the scale seen else­where in the world. (This will not come as news to Amer­i­can enthu­si­asts of high-speed rail.) Here on Open Cul­ture, we’ve pre­vi­ous­ly fea­tured his­to­ry YouTu­ber Gar­rett Ryan’s take on the ques­tion of whether the U.S. is now declin­ing like the ancient Roman Empire. On a more recent video for his chan­nel Told in Stone, he’s high­light­ed the megapro­jects that even the Romans — who man­aged the Pan­theon, the Colos­se­um, and the Pont du Gard, to say noth­ing of their unique­ly long-last­ing con­crete itself — could­n’t pull off.

The Tiber may seem like a tame riv­er today, but it was­n’t always so placid. In antiq­ui­ty, rains caused it to flood every year. Sen­a­tor-his­to­ri­an Cas­sius Dio record­ed an inci­dent in 54 BC when the sud­den­ly ris­ing waters caused not just hous­es but whole neigh­bor­hoods to col­lapse. The Tiber’s flood­ing wors­ened over time, inspir­ing Julius Cae­sar to pro­pose re-rout­ing it either around Rome or into a tun­nel run­ning beneath the city. Unfor­tu­nate­ly, the Ides of March came before work could get under­way. Augus­tus opt­ed to dredge the riv­er chan­nel, and Tiberius cham­pi­oned divert­ing its trib­u­taries. Only the con­struc­tion of mod­ern embank­ments in the nine­teenth cen­tu­ry brought the reg­u­lar flu­vial dis­as­ters under con­trol, ensur­ing peace for strollers in search of their own dolce vita.

Roman ships sail­ing to Greece had to make their way around the Pelo­pon­nese, the south of the Greek penin­su­la. The dan­gers of that stretch were many, and did their part to sink the ship car­ry­ing the Antikythera Mech­a­nism. The Isth­mus of Corinth held out the promise of safer pas­sage, at least for those will­ing to drag their laden ships over a bit of land. Dig­ging a canal was, in some sense, the obvi­ous solu­tion, con­sid­ered by both Julius Cae­sar and Caligu­la, but “only Nero was mega­lo­ma­ni­a­cal enough to actu­al­ly begin the project.” A decent amount of progress had been made before anoth­er instance of regi­cide (or per­haps, in this par­tic­u­lar case, tyran­ni­cide) put a stop to the work. Rather than being resumed by a lat­er emper­or, the canal “became a byword for hubris” — at least until the job was final­ly done in the uncom­mon­ly ambi­tious nine­teenth cen­tu­ry.

In cen­tral Ger­many, near where the vil­lage of Wald­girmes is today, Romans found­ed a city with many fea­tures of an impe­r­i­al set­tle­ment, such as a clas­sic street grid, pipes run­ning from a cen­tral aque­duct, and a forum, at the cen­ter of which a gild­ed stat­ue of Augus­tus on horse­back once stood. Dat­ing to the year 4 BC, the city was intend­ed as a new cap­i­tal for what the Romans called Ger­ma­nia, though it end­ed up aban­doned after the Bat­tle of the Teu­to­burg For­est only about a decade after its found­ing. “The build­ings were burned,” Ryan says. “The head of Augus­tus’ eques­tri­an stat­ue was thrown down a well,” only to be dis­cov­ered nine­teen cen­turies lat­er. That image could inspire a med­i­ta­tion on what may be the way of all empires — or serve as a warn­ing to any Amer­i­can leader con­sid­er­ing immor­tal­iz­ing him­self and his horse in gold.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Ten Lost Roman Won­ders: The World’s Longest Tun­nel, Tallest Dam, Widest-Span­ning Bridge & More

The Genius Engi­neer­ing of Roman Aque­ducts

How the Ancient Romans Built Their Roads, the Life­lines of Their Vast Empire

The Advanced Tech­nol­o­gy of Ancient Rome: Auto­mat­ic Doors, Water Clocks, Vend­ing Machines & More

The Roman Colos­se­um Decon­struct­ed: 3D Ani­ma­tion Reveals the Hid­den Tech­nol­o­gy That Pow­ered Rome’s Great Are­na

The Mys­tery Final­ly Solved: Why Has Roman Con­crete Been So Durable?

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Watch “The Midnight Parasites,” a Surreal Japanese Animation Set in the World of Hieronymus Bosch’s The Garden of Earthly Delights (1972)

Hierony­mus Bosch’s bizarre paint­ings might have looked per­fect­ly ordi­nary to his con­tem­po­raries, argues Stan­ley Meisler in “The World of Bosch.” Mod­ern view­ers may find this very hard to believe. We approach Bosch through lay­ers of Freudi­an inter­pre­ta­tion and Sur­re­al­ist appre­ci­a­tion. We can­not help “regard­ing the scores of bizarre monsters”—allegories for sins and pun­ish­ments far more leg­i­ble in 15th-cen­tu­ry Netherlands—“as a kind of dark and cru­el com­ic relief.”

While Bosch might have intend­ed his work as seri­ous ser­mo­niz­ing, it is impos­si­ble for us to inhab­it the medieval con­scious­ness of his time and place. There’s just no get­ting around the fact that Bosch is real­ly weird—weird­er even (or more imag­i­na­tive­ly alle­gor­i­cal) than near­ly any oth­er artist of his time. In some very impor­tant ways, he belongs to a 20th-cen­tu­ry aes­thet­ic of post-Freudi­an dream log­ic as much as he belonged to pecu­liar medieval visions of heav­en and hell.

Bosch “described ter­ri­ble, unbear­able holo­causts crush­ing mankind for its sins,” writes Meisler, visions that seemed both stranger and more famil­iar in the wake of so many man-made holo­causts whose absur­di­ties defy rea­son. What mod­ern hor­rors does famed Japan­ese ani­ma­tor Yōji Kuri invoke in his psy­che­del­ic 1972 film “The Mid­night Par­a­sites,” above, a sur­re­al­ist short set in the world of Bosch?

Dan­ger­ous Minds’ Paul Gal­lagher describes the plot, such as it is:

Here Kuri imag­ines what would life might be like if we all lived in Bosch’s paint­ing “Gar­den of Earth­ly Delights.” It’s a basi­cal­ly shit and death or rather a cycle of life where blue fig­ures live and die; eat shit and shit gold; are skew­ered, and devoured; are regur­gi­tat­ed and reborn to car­ry on the cycle once again.

Kuri’s satir­i­cal vision, in films long favored by coun­ter­cul­tur­al audi­ences, has “bite,” writes Ani­ma­tion World Network’s Chris Robin­son: “he helped lift Japan­ese ani­ma­tion out of decades of cozy nar­ra­tive car­toons into a new era of graph­ic and con­cep­tu­al exper­i­men­ta­tion. His films mock and shock, attack­ing tech­nol­o­gy, pop­u­la­tion expan­sion, monot­o­ny of mod­ern soci­ety… Wit­ness­ing the sur­ren­der of Japan dur­ing WW2, the dev­as­ta­tion of his coun­try fol­lowed by the quick rise of West­ern inspired mate­ri­al­ist cul­ture and ram­pant con­sump­tion, Kuri, like many of his col­leagues at the time, ques­tioned the state and direc­tion of his soci­ety and world.”

His cre­ative appro­pri­a­tion of Bosch, “dark, dirty, odd­ly beau­ti­ful, with a groovy sound­track,” Gal­lagher writes, may not, as Meisler wor­ries of many mod­ern takes, get Bosch wrong at all. Though the Dutch artist’s sym­bol­ism may nev­er be comprehensible—or any­thing less than hallucinatory—to us mod­erns, Kuri’s half-play­ful reimag­in­ing uses Boschi­an fig­ures for some seri­ous mor­al­iz­ing, show­ing us a hell world gov­erned by grave laps­es and cru­el­ties Bosch could nev­er have imag­ined.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2018.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Hierony­mus Bosch Fig­urines: Col­lect Sur­re­al Char­ac­ters from Bosch’s Paint­ings & Put Them on Your Book­shelf

The Mean­ing of Hierony­mus Bosch’s The Gar­den of Earth­ly Delights Explained

Hierony­mus Bosch’s Medieval Paint­ing The Gar­den of Earth­ly Delights Comes to Life in a Gigan­tic, Mod­ern Ani­ma­tion

Hierony­mus Bosch’s Medieval Paint­ing, “The Gar­den of Earth­ly Delights,” Comes to Life in a Gigan­tic, Mod­ern Ani­ma­tion

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

Why Cleopatra, Lawrence of Arabia, Ben-Hur & Other Hollywood Classics Still Look So Good

Cleopa­tra cost Twen­ti­eth Cen­tu­ry Fox $44 mil­lion, by the stu­dio’s own esti­mate. That may sound like the bud­get of one of those genre pic­tures that winds up going straight to stream­ing, but if we con­vert those 1963 dol­lars into cur­rent ones, it comes out to $480 mil­lion. The most expen­sive film ever made up to that point, it remained an indus­try sym­bol of near-par­o­d­i­cal­ly trou­bled pro­duc­tion and grotesque cost infla­tion for decades. Like The Wiz­ard of Oz, it failed to recoup its invest­ment dur­ing its ini­tial the­atri­cal run, even­tu­al­ly turn­ing a prof­it thanks only to re-releas­es and tele­vi­sion rights sales. And yet, these six decades lat­er, the invest­ment seems to have proven sound, at least accord­ing to the video above from YouTube chan­nel Wolfcrow, “Why Cleopa­tra Still Looks Like a Tril­lion Bucks.”

Unlike some infa­mous­ly expen­sive movies, Cleopa­tra does­n’t leave you won­der­ing where all the mon­ey went. Wolfcrow cre­ator Sareesh Sud­hakaran points out some of the myr­i­ad ways it man­i­fests onscreen, from the 70-foot-long giant sphinx to the full-scale Alexan­dria har­bor built on the coast to the Roman Forum set designed to be three times larg­er than the actu­al Roman Forum to the 65 or so out­fits Eliz­a­beth Tay­lor wears in the title role (to say noth­ing of the 26,000 oth­er cos­tumes made for all the oth­er char­ac­ters). Even the mat­te paint­ings and opti­cal cam­era tricks still look con­vinc­ing. The film’s pro­duc­tion design­ers knew that noth­ing could be done by half mea­sures, giv­en that the 65mm Todd-AO stock used for film­ing would expose any flim­si­ness on the big screen.

Just as unfor­giv­ing was the ultra-wide aspect ratio used for the 1959 ver­sion of Ben-Hur, which neces­si­tat­ed painstak­ing labor on every­thing that went before the cam­era, but also a new approach to the com­po­si­tion of the shots them­selves. Even those of us who’ve nev­er seen the movie can call to mind images of its cli­mac­tic char­i­ot race, a sequence that earned its cul­tur­al impact the hard way.

It took five months to film on the largest set ever built at that time, with 1,500 extras in its stands. A few years lat­er, Lawrence of Ara­bia took Hol­ly­wood grandeur up to the lev­el of sub­lim­i­ty with its real desert land­scapes. David Lean “was obsessed with scale and detail,” Sud­hakaran explains. “He want­ed the desert to be more than just a back­drop. He want­ed it to be a char­ac­ter in the sto­ry,” which required metic­u­lous plan­ning of all the ways its nat­ur­al light could pos­si­bly be used to dra­mat­ic effect.

Though Sud­hakaran clear­ly has an inter­est in spec­ta­cles from the gold­en age of the Hol­ly­wood his­tor­i­cal epics, he’s also made videos on last­ing­ly impres­sive movies from oth­er times and gen­res. When was the last time you sat down to enjoy the satir­i­cal urban tech­no-dystopia Robo­Cop, the com­ic-strip noir fan­ta­sia of Dick Tra­cy, or the flam­boy­ant de-famil­iar­ized twen­ty-third cen­tu­ry of The Fifth Ele­ment — or bet­ter yet, saw them prop­er­ly screened at a revival house? When they came out, those films met with vary­ing degrees of box-office suc­cess and crit­i­cal praise, if not regard­ed as the absolute peak of cin­e­mat­ic sophis­ti­ca­tion. In our time, their ambi­tion and craft look noth­ing short of aston­ish­ing, espe­cial­ly when we remem­ber that they built their worlds in phys­i­cal real­i­ty with real human beings, most­ly ana­log tech­niques, and a whole lot of labor and imag­i­na­tion. Could even a tril­lion dol­lars buy the same results today?

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Scene That Reveals the Beau­ty of Clas­sic Hol­ly­wood Cin­e­ma

Why Movies Don’t Feel Real Any­more: A Close Look at Chang­ing Film­mak­ing Tech­niques

Why Movies Don’t Feel Like Movies Any­more: The Rise of Meta­mod­ernist Films, and How They Grew Out of Mod­ernism & Post­mod­ernism

The Great­est Cut in Film His­to­ry: Watch the “Match Cut” Immor­tal­ized by Lawrence of Ara­bia

The Cin­e­matog­ra­phy That Changed Cin­e­ma: Explor­ing Aki­ra Kuro­sawa, Stan­ley Kubrick, Peter Green­away & Oth­er Auteurs

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Soviet-Era Illustrations of J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Hobbit (1976)

Hobbit1

Until I read J. R. R. Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings, my favorite book grow­ing up was, by far, The Hob­bit. Grow­ing up in Rus­sia, how­ev­er, meant that instead of Tolkien’s Eng­lish ver­sion, my par­ents read me a Russ­ian trans­la­tion. To me, the trans­la­tion eas­i­ly matched the pace and won­der of Tolkien’s orig­i­nal. Look­ing back, The Hob­bit prob­a­bly made such an indeli­ble impres­sion on me because Tolkien’s tale was alto­geth­er dif­fer­ent than the Russ­ian fairy tales and children’s sto­ries that I had pre­vi­ous­ly been exposed to. There were no child­ish hijinks, no young pro­tag­o­nists, no par­ents to res­cue you when you got into trou­ble. I con­sid­ered it an epic in the truest lit­er­ary sense.

As with many Russ­ian trans­la­tions dur­ing the Cold War, the book came with a com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent set of illus­tra­tions. Mine, I remem­ber regret­ting slight­ly, lacked pic­tures alto­geth­er. A friend’s edi­tion, how­ev­er, was illus­trat­ed in the typ­i­cal Russ­ian style: much more tra­di­tion­al­ly styl­ized than Tolkien’s own draw­ings, they were more angu­lar, friend­lier, almost car­toon­ish. In this post, we include a num­ber of these images from the 1976 print­ing. The cov­er, above, depicts a grin­ning Bil­bo Bag­gins hold­ing a gem. Below, Gan­dalf, an osten­si­bly harm­less soul, pays Bil­bo a vis­it.

2

Next, we have the three trolls, argu­ing about their var­i­ous eat­ing arrange­ments, with Bil­bo hid­ing to the side.

3

Here, Gol­lum, né Sméagol, pad­dles his raft in the depths of the moun­tains.

4

Final­ly, here’s Bil­bo, ful­fill­ing his role as a bur­glar in Smaug’s lair.

5

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2014.

Ilia Blin­d­er­man is a Mon­tre­al-based cul­ture and sci­ence writer. 

Relat­ed Con­tent:

110 Draw­ings and Paint­ings by J.R.R. Tolkien: Of Mid­dle-Earth and Beyond

The Only Draw­ing from Mau­rice Sendak’s Short-Lived Attempt to Illus­trate The Hob­bit

A Long-Lost Sovi­et Adap­ta­tion of The Lord of the Rings Resur­faces on YouTube–and Tolkien Fans Rejoice (1991)

J.R.R. Tolkien, Using a Tape Recorder for the First Time, Reads from The Hob­bit for 30 Min­utes (1952)

Dis­cov­er J.R.R. Tolkien’s Per­son­al Book Cov­er Designs for The Lord of the Rings Tril­o­gy

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

The Names of Nearly 4 Million Enslaved People in Former British Colonies Are Now Searchable Online, Helping Descendants Find Lost Ancestors

A few years ago, we fea­tured here on Open Cul­ture the Freedmen’s Bureau Project data­base, which con­tains search­able infor­ma­tion on for­mer­ly enslaved peo­ple in the Unit­ed States after its Civ­il War. With near­ly 1.8 mil­lion men, women, and chil­dren reg­is­tered there when it first opened to the pub­lic, it has remained a valu­able resource for many Amer­i­cans research­ing their own her­itage, not just descen­dants of for­mer slaves but of oth­er Civ­il War refugees as well. But of course, the U.S. was hard­ly the only coun­try where slav­ery exist­ed. Count­less peo­ple here in the twen­ty-first cen­tu­ry have ances­tors who were enslaved in oth­er for­mer British colonies, and now they’ve got a por­tal through which to do genealog­i­cal search­es of their own.

Launched by a part­ner­ship between the geneal­o­gy com­pa­ny Ances­try and the Cen­tre for the Study of the Lega­cies of British Slav­ery at Uni­ver­si­ty Col­lege Lon­don, the online For­mer British Colonies Enslave­ment Reg­is­ters makes avail­able records on near­ly four mil­lion indi­vid­u­als enslaved between 1813 and 1840 in a host of coun­tries from the Bahamas to Mau­ri­tius to South Africa.

First cre­at­ed by the British gov­ern­ment dur­ing the process of abol­ish­ing the transat­lantic slave trade in 1807 — much as the Freedmen’s Bureau orga­nized its reg­istry of for­mer slaves dur­ing Recon­struc­tion under Abra­ham Lin­coln — the orig­i­nal papers con­tain not just their names and ages, but also mater­nal fam­i­ly con­nec­tions, phys­i­cal descrip­tions, and some­times details about their place of African ori­gin.

In the video above, geneal­o­gist and Ances­try Senior Sto­ry Pro­duc­er Nic­ka Sewell-Smith pro­vides an intro­duc­tion to the For­mer British Colonies Enslave­ment Reg­is­ters, which you can access here. If you’re curi­ous about whether your own ances­tors may appear in its records, you can search by details like name, approx­i­mate date, or loca­tion to nar­row down the poten­tial match­es. The mod­ern descen­dants of peo­ple enslaved in the 20 coun­tries cov­ered by the data­base by no means live exclu­sive­ly, or even pri­mar­i­ly, in those coun­tries or in Great Britain itself. More than two cen­turies lat­er, their descen­dants live all over the world, includ­ing in Latin Amer­i­ca and the Unit­ed States, lead­ing lives very dif­fer­ent from those of their enslaved ances­tors — but the recon­struc­tion of their fam­i­ly sto­ries has only just begun. Enter the data­base here.

via Kot­tke

Relat­ed con­tent:

The Atlantic Slave Trade Visu­al­ized in Two Min­utes: 10 Mil­lion Lives, 20,000 Voy­ages, Over 315 Years

The Names of 1.8 Mil­lion Eman­ci­pat­ed Slaves Are Now Search­able in the World’s Largest Genealog­i­cal Data­base, Help­ing African Amer­i­cans Find Lost Ances­tors

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

The Bialetti Moka Express: The History of Italy’s Iconic Coffee Maker, and How to Use It the Right Way

I am sure that many an Open Cul­ture read­er has a Bialet­ti Moka Express in their kitchen. I know I do, but I must add that I knew lit­tle about its his­to­ry and appar­ent­ly even less about how to prop­er­ly use one. Cof­fee expert and author of The World Atlas of Cof­fee James Hoff­mann intro­duces us to the appli­ance we think we know in the above video.

Alfon­so Bialet­ti didn’t orig­i­nal­ly get into the cof­fee busi­ness. In 1919, the Bialet­ti com­pa­ny was an alu­minum man­u­fac­tur­er, with the Moka Express invent­ed some­where around 1933 by Lui­gi de Pon­ti, who worked for the com­pa­ny. Accord­ing to Decon­struct­ing Prod­uct Design by William Lid­well and Ger­ry Man­ac­sa, the inspi­ra­tion came from Bialetti’s wife’s old-fash­ioned wash­ing machine: “a fire, a buck­et, and a lid with a tube com­ing out of it. The buck­et was filled with soapy water, sealed with the lid, and then brought to a boil over the fire, at which point the vapor­ized soapy water was pushed up through the tube and expelled on to the laun­dry.”

As Hoff­mann shows, ear­li­er cof­fee-mak­ers did use steam and a drip tech­nique, but the Moka Express was the first all-in-one mak­er that could sit on the stove top and do the work. All the user had to lis­ten for was the tell-tale gur­gle when it fin­ished brew­ing.

In 1945, Alfonso’s son Rena­to returned from a pris­on­er-of-war camp and took over the fam­i­ly busi­ness. He was instru­men­tal in focus­ing on the Moka Express and turn­ing it into an inter­na­tion­al cof­fee brand. He hired car­toon­ist Paul Cam­pani to design l’omino coi baf­fi, “the mus­ta­chioed lit­tle man” whose image is on the side of every Moka Express, and who, dur­ing the 1950s, was in a series of humor­ous ani­mat­ed com­mer­cials. Bialet­ti was the pride of Italy, and for Ital­ian immi­grants liv­ing abroad, it was a trea­sured object in the kitchen.

Such was the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of Rena­to Bialet­ti with the Moka Express that when he died in 2016, his ash­es were interred in a giant repli­ca pot. Hoff­mann details the fate of the com­pa­ny after­wards, how it has fared against com­peti­tors in Italy and out­side. Will it still be around in decades? Who knows. But it does make a great cup of cof­fee.

And he shows the cor­rect way to brew a cup with the Moka Express in this oth­er video. Here are a few things I was doing wrong: not using hot water in the bot­tom to start; try­ing to pack in the ground cof­fee like I was mak­ing an espres­so; using too fine a grind; and not cool­ing the bot­tom as soon as it’s done work­ing its mag­ic. (Note: a Moka Express cof­fee is some­where between an espres­so and a pour-over.) All these tips I’m going to try tomor­row morn­ing. Maybe you have been mak­ing your Bialet­ti cup the right way all along. Let me know in the com­ments. I’ll read them over a fresh­ly brewed cup.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2022.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Life and Death of an Espres­so Shot in Super Slow Motion

How to Make the World’s Small­est Cup of Cof­fee, from Just One Cof­fee Bean

The Birth of Espres­so: How the Cof­fee Shots The Fuel Our Mod­ern Life Were Invent­ed

An Espres­so Mak­er Made in Le Corbusier’s Bru­tal­ist Archi­tec­tur­al Style: Raw Con­crete on the Out­side, High-End Parts on the Inside

Philoso­phers Drink­ing Cof­fee: The Exces­sive Habits of Kant, Voltaire & Kierkegaard

Ted Mills is a free­lance writer on the arts.


  • Great Lectures

  • About Us

    Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.


    Advertise With Us

  • Archives

  • Search

  • Quantcast