AI Figures Out the Rules of a Mysterious 2,000-Year-Old Board Game from Ancient Rome

Image by Wal­ter Crist

As far as enthu­si­asm for board games goes, no con­ti­nent has yet out­done Europe. Its advan­tage could lie in the high­ly devel­oped cul­ture of low-cost leisure evi­dent in quite a few of its soci­eties; it could also owe to the fact that board games seem to have been played there con­tin­u­ous­ly since antiq­ui­ty. We’ve long had evi­dence of exam­ples like the “Roman mill game,” bet­ter known today as nine men’s mor­ris, which Ovid appears to men­tion in his Ars Ama­to­ria of the very ear­ly first cen­tu­ry. Not that mod­ern knowl­edge of Roman table­top gam­ing is com­plete. In one puz­zling case, the stone board above was unearthed in a for­mer Roman town in the Nether­lands, but how a game was played on it remained a mys­tery — until machine learn­ing came along.

“To exam­ine whether the object may have been used as a game board, we per­formed use-wear analy­sis to iden­ti­fy evi­dence for game­play and we sim­u­lat­ed play using arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence (AI),” write the team of researchers who recent­ly pub­lished a paper on the sub­ject in the jour­nal Antiq­ui­ty. They used a sys­tem called Ludii, engi­neered to ana­lyze board-game rules.

“This soft­ware allows for AI-dri­ven play­out sim­u­la­tion, where two AI agents play a game against one anoth­er, which can gen­er­ate quan­ti­ta­tive data on game­play. In this instance, we explored whether the rules of a game would pro­duce the wear pat­tern seen on the stone.” The idea, in oth­er words, was to let the com­put­er play against itself using dif­fer­ent rules until it came upon a game that would con­tin­ue to abrade away the sur­face of the board in the same fash­ion as it already was.

This process nar­rowed it down to games “in which the goal is to block the oppo­nent from mov­ing, and those in which the goal is to place three pieces in a row.” These have a fair­ly long doc­u­ment­ed his­to­ry, from Scan­di­navi­a’s hare­tavl, to Italy’s gio­co dell’orso to Spain’s liebre persegui­da, to Greece’s kiné­gi tou lagoú. You can down­load what the research sug­gests is the most plau­si­ble rule set for this par­tic­u­lar Roman board game here, board design includ­ed. One play­er takes the side of the “hunter,” with four pieces, and the oth­er the side of the “prey,” with two. The for­mer tries to trap the lat­ter’s pieces, mov­ing only along the board­’s lines; in the next round, the roles reverse. The hunter who does the job in the fewest moves wins. Why not invite friends over to spend an evening play­ing like a Roman? For a thor­ough­ly ancient good time, first recon­struct as best you can the ambi­ence of the ther­mopoli­um at home.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Watch a Playthrough of the Old­est Board Game in the World, the Sumer­ian Roy­al Game of Ur, Cir­ca 2500 BC

Behold the First Amer­i­can Board Game, Trav­ellers’ Tour Through the Unit­ed States (1822)

Monop­oly: How the Orig­i­nal Game Was Made to Con­demn Monop­o­lies & the Abus­es of Cap­i­tal­ism

Kurt Vonnegut’s Lost Board Game Is Final­ly for Sale

The Fiendish­ly Com­pli­cat­ed Board Game That Takes 1,500 Hours to Play: Dis­cov­er The Cam­paign for North Africa

The Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas Board Game, Inspired by Hunter S. Thompson’s Rol­lick­ing Nov­el

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Inside the Automats Where Coin-Operated Machines Created a Modern, Democratic Dining Experience

“Good evening,” said Alfred Hitch­cock to the tele­vi­sion view­ers of Amer­i­ca on March 25, 1959. “Tonight I’m din­ing at my favorite club. There are many advan­tages here. As you can see, infor­mal­i­ty is the rule. There is also the stim­u­la­tion of intel­lec­tu­al com­pan­ion­ship with­out the deaf­en­ing qui­et that per­vades most clubs. Best of all, I like its pri­va­cy: only four per­sons are allowed at a table, and, of course, no one pays any atten­tion to you.” This was an exam­ple of the dead­pan irony with which the film­mak­er intro­duced each broad­cast of Alfred Hitch­cock Presents, for the “club” of which he spoke was clear­ly an automat. Today, many read­ers under about 50 will nev­er have heard the word, but at the time, it referred to a seem­ing­ly per­ma­nent insti­tu­tion in Amer­i­can life.

Or rather, an insti­tu­tion of urban Amer­i­can life, and above all in two cities, Philadel­phia and New York. There, no one could think of automats with­out think­ing of Horn & Hardart, in its hey­day the largest restau­rant chain in the world. The con­cept, which co-founder Joseph Horn import­ed over from Berlin in the ear­ly nine­teen-tens, was of a restau­rant with no wait­ers: rather, you could choose your dish à la carte from a wall of coin-oper­at­ed com­part­ments, pay­ing the nick­el or two that would allow you to take the food inside.

Sal­is­bury steak, creamed spinach, baked beans, a ham-and-cheese sand­wich, mac­a­roni and cheese, choco­late pud­ding, straw­ber­ry rhubarb pie: what­ev­er it was, the behind-the-scenes staff would replace it just as soon as you put the last one on your tray.

Smack of moder­ni­ty though it once did (and in a way, still does), the term automat is some­what mis­lead­ing. We might describe the expe­ri­ence of vis­it­ing one as din­ing inside a giant vend­ing machine, but the actu­al run­ning of the oper­a­tion was quite labor-inten­sive. Most of the work was per­formed out of the cus­tomer’s sight, as far away as in the large cen­tral com­mis­saries that pre­pared many of the dish­es to be trans­port­ed dai­ly to Horn & Hardart’s 88 loca­tions. This sheer scale of oper­a­tion allowed the chain to offer some of the cheap­est meals com­mer­cial­ly avail­able, with the result that its automats boomed even — indeed, espe­cial­ly — dur­ing the Great Depres­sion. Their eco­nom­ic bar­ri­er was low, and of sex and race, nonex­is­tent; those who remem­ber them describe them becom­ing some of the most demo­c­ra­t­ic insti­tu­tions in post­war Amer­i­ca.

You can hear such mem­o­ries recalled in the recent doc­u­men­tary The Automat by fig­ures like Ruth Bad­er Gins­burg, Col­in Pow­ell, and Mel Brooks, who rhap­sodizes about Horn & Hardart’s cof­fee, dis­pensed for just a nick­el from elab­o­rate dol­phin-head­ed spig­ots. That degree of detail was stan­dard in the inte­ri­ors, whose mar­ble, chrome, and glass look pala­tial by the stan­dards of the fast-food joints that ulti­mate­ly replaced the automat. That glo­ry was one casu­al­ty of post­war sub­ur­ban­iza­tion and hol­low­ing-out of cen­tral cities that result­ed. What with the Amer­i­can urban renais­sance of the past few decades, attempts have been made to revive the automat con­cept, but per­haps, as Brooks puts it, “the logis­tics and the eco­nom­ics of today won’t allow any­thing that sim­ple, naïve, and elo­quent and beau­ti­ful to flour­ish again.” Order­ing a meal brought straight to your door may be more con­ve­nient, but even deliv­ery-app addicts have to admit that it will nev­er have the same romance.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Slot Machine Age: A 1964 British News­reel Angsts Over Whether Auto­mat­ed Machines Will Dis­place Peo­ple

How Edward Hopper’s Paint­ings Inspired the Creepy Sus­pense of Alfred Hitchcock’s Rear Win­dow

Watch the “Bib­lio-Mat” Book-Vend­ing Machine Dis­pense Lit­er­ary Delight

Behold the Art-o-Mat: Vin­tage Cig­a­rette Vend­ing Machines Get Repur­posed & Dis­pense Works of Art

How Fast Food Began: The His­to­ry of This Thor­ough­ly Amer­i­can (and Now Glob­al) Form of Din­ing

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Roman Statues Weren’t White; They Were Once Painted in Vivid, Bright Colors

The idea of the clas­si­cal period—the time of ancient Greece and Rome—as an ele­gant­ly uni­fied col­lec­tion of supe­ri­or aes­thet­ic and philo­soph­i­cal cul­tur­al traits has its own his­to­ry, one that comes in large part from the era of the Neo­clas­si­cal. The redis­cov­ery of antiq­ui­ty took some time to reach the pitch it would dur­ing the 18th cen­tu­ry, when ref­er­ences to Greek and Latin rhetoric, archi­tec­ture, and sculp­ture were inescapable. But from the Renais­sance onward, the clas­si­cal achieved the sta­tus of cul­tur­al dog­ma.

One tenet of clas­si­cal ide­al­ism is the idea that Roman and Greek stat­u­ary embod­ied an ide­al of pure whiteness—a mis­con­cep­tion mod­ern sculp­tors per­pet­u­at­ed for hun­dreds of years by mak­ing busts and stat­ues in pol­ished white mar­ble. But the truth is that both Greek stat­ues and their Roman counterparts—as you’ll learn in the Vox video above—were orig­i­nal­ly bright­ly paint­ed in riotous col­or.

This includes the 1st cen­tu­ry A.D. Augus­tus of Pri­ma Por­ta, the famous fig­ure of the Emper­or stand­ing tri­umphant­ly with one hand raised. Rather than left as blank white mar­ble, the stat­ue would have had bronzed skin, brown hair, and a fire-engine red toga. “Ancient Greece and Rome were real­ly col­or­ful,” we learn. So how did every­one come to believe oth­er­wise?

It’s part­ly an hon­est mis­take. After the fall of Rome, ancient sculp­tures were buried or left out in the open air for hun­dreds of years. By the time the Renais­sance began in the 1300s, their paint had fad­ed away. As a result, the artists unearthing, and copy­ing ancient art didn’t real­ize how col­or­ful it was sup­posed to be.

But white mar­ble couldn’t have become the norm with­out some will­ful igno­rance. Even though there was a bunch of evi­dence that ancient sculp­ture was paint­ed, artists, art his­to­ri­ans and the gen­er­al pub­lic chose to dis­re­gard it. West­ern cul­ture seemed to col­lec­tive­ly accept that white mar­ble was sim­ply pret­ti­er.

White stat­u­ary sym­bol­ized a clas­si­cal ide­al that “depends high­ly on the great­est pos­si­ble decon­tex­tu­al­iza­tion,” writes James I. Porter, pro­fes­sor of Rhetoric and Clas­sics at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Cal­i­for­nia, Berke­ley. “Only so can the val­ues it cher­ish­es be iso­lat­ed: sim­plic­i­ty, tran­quil­i­ty, bal­anced pro­por­tions, restraint, puri­ty of form… all of these are fea­tures that under­score the time­less qual­i­ty of the high­est pos­si­ble expres­sion of art, like a breath held indef­i­nite­ly.” These ideals became insep­a­ra­ble from the devel­op­ment of racial the­o­ry.

Learn­ing to see the past as it was requires us to put aside his­tor­i­cal­ly acquired blind­ers. This can be exceed­ing­ly dif­fi­cult when our ideas about the past come from hun­dreds of years of inher­it­ed tra­di­tion, from every peri­od of art his­to­ry since the time of Michelan­ge­lo. But we must acknowl­edge this tra­di­tion as fab­ri­cat­ed. Influ­en­tial art his­to­ri­an Johann Joachim Winck­el­mann, for exam­ple, extolled the val­ue of clas­si­cal sculp­ture because, in his opin­ion, “the whiter the body is, the more beau­ti­ful it is.”

Winck­el­mann also, Vox notes, “went out of his way to ignore obvi­ous evi­dence of col­ored mar­ble, and there was a lot of it.” He dis­missed fres­coes of col­ored stat­u­ary found in Pom­peii and judged one paint­ed sculp­ture dis­cov­ered there as “too prim­i­tive” to have been made by ancient Romans. “Evi­dence wasn’t just ignored, some of it may have been destroyed” to enforce an ide­al of white­ness. While many stat­ues were denud­ed by the ele­ments over hun­dreds of years, the first archae­ol­o­gists to dis­cov­er the Augus­tus of Pri­ma Por­ta in the 1860s described its col­or scheme in detail.

Cri­tiques of clas­si­cal ide­al­ism don’t orig­i­nate in a polit­i­cal­ly cor­rect present. As Porter shows at length in his arti­cle “What Is ‘Clas­si­cal’ About Clas­si­cal Antiq­ui­ty?,” they date back at least to 19th cen­tu­ry philoso­pher Lud­wig Feuer­bach, who called Winckelmann’s ideas about Roman stat­ues “an emp­ty fig­ment of the imag­i­na­tion.” But these ideas are “for the most part tak­en for grant­ed rather than ques­tioned,” Porter argues, “or else clung to for fear of los­ing a pow­er­ful cachet that, even in the belea­guered present, con­tin­ues to trans­late into cul­tur­al pres­tige, author­i­ty, elit­ist sat­is­fac­tions, and eco­nom­ic pow­er.”

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2019.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Why Most Ancient Civ­i­liza­tions Had No Word for the Col­or Blue

Why Ancient Romans Paid a For­tune for the Col­or Pur­ple — More Than Even Sil­ver

How Ancient Greek Stat­ues Real­ly Looked: Reseasrch Reveals Their Bold, Bright Col­ors and Pat­terns

The Met Dig­i­tal­ly Restores the Col­ors of an Ancient Egypt­ian Tem­ple, Using Pro­jec­tion Map­ping Tech­nol­o­gy

Watch Art on Ancient Greek Vas­es Come to Life with 21st Cen­tu­ry Ani­ma­tion

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

Seven Wonders of the Ancient World: From the Walls of Babylon to the Sewers of Rome

You may not be able to name all, or even most, of the sev­en won­ders of the ancient world. But you almost cer­tain­ly know that there were sev­en of them. In a way, that aligns well enough with the world­view of the Greeks who first made ref­er­ence to such a list, giv­en their near-rev­er­ence for that num­ber. Sev­en were the strings of the lyre (unless there hap­pened to be eight or nine), sev­en were the gates of Thebes, and sev­en were the “wan­der­ing stars” in the night sky (if you count the sun and moon). The iden­ti­ty of the won­ders was less impor­tant than the length of their list, and indeed, as ancient-his­to­ry YouTu­ber Gar­rett Ryan explains in his Told in Stone video above, addi­tions and changes were pro­posed since the begin­ning.

The clas­sic sev­en-won­ders ros­ter includes the Hang­ing Gar­dens of Baby­lon, the Stat­ue of Zeus at Olympia, the Tem­ple of Artemis at Eph­esus, the Mau­soleum at Hali­car­nas­sus, the Colos­sus of Rhodes, the Light­house of Alexan­dria, and the Great Pyra­mid of Giza, that last being the only one still in exis­tence today.

Ryan’s alter­na­tive list includes the Egypt­ian labyrinth at Hawara, which Herodotus con­sid­ered supe­ri­or even to the Pyra­mids; the Tem­ple of Zeus at Cyz­i­cus, which Pliny the Elder described as lined by gold tubes to let in the sun­light (sure­ly stripped out as soon as the place fell into dis­use); the sew­ers of Rome, a civ­i­liza­tion­al achieve­ment unto them­selves; and the The­ater of Scau­rus, which, though con­struct­ed out of wood for tem­po­rary use, seat­ed an aston­ish­ing 80,000 peo­ple.

Ryan com­pletes his sev­en oth­er won­ders with the Altar of Horns at Delos, held in myth to have been built by Apol­lo him­self; the Walls of Baby­lon, which actu­al­ly appear on the ear­li­est known ver­sion of the list; and, final­ly, the good old Colos­se­um. As over-famil­iar (not to men­tion over-toured) as it may be, the Fla­vian Amphithe­ater, as the Colos­se­um was known in its day, does make for a wel­come pres­ence among the ancient won­ders, being the only oth­er one apart from the Great Pyra­mid that we can still vis­it today. But if you get into the mood to go mar­vel at thau­ma­ta, to bor­row the Greek word, by no means lim­it your­self to selec­tions already curat­ed by oth­ers. The world is full of won­ders, and your own per­son­al sev­en may not be far away.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Watch Ancient Ruins Get Restored to their Glo­ri­ous Orig­i­nal State with Ani­mat­ed GIFs: The Tem­ple of Jupiter, Lux­or Tem­ple & More

A Walk­ing Tour Around the Pyra­mids of Giza: 2 Hours in Hi Def

Ten Lost Roman Won­ders: The World’s Longest Tun­nel, Tallest Dam, Widest-Span­ning Bridge & More

How the Ancient Greeks Built Their Mag­nif­i­cent Tem­ples: The Art of Ancient Engi­neer­ing

Take a Vir­tu­al Tour of Machu Pic­chu, One of the New 7 Won­ders of the World

The Ancient World Comes to Life in an Ani­ma­tion Fea­tur­ing Istanbul’s Islam­ic, Ottoman, Greek & Byzan­tine Art

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Bertrand Russell’s Advice For How (Not) to Grow Old: “Make Your Interests Gradually Wider and More Impersonal”

Image by Nation­al Por­trait Gallery, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

Advice on how to grow old fre­quent­ly comes from such banal or blood­less sources that we can be for­giv­en for ignor­ing it. Pub­lic health offi­cials who dis­pense wis­dom may have good inten­tions; phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies who do the same may not. In either case, the mes­sages arrive in a form that can bring on the despair they seek to avert. Elder­ly peo­ple in well-lit pho­tographs stroll down gar­den paths, ball­room dance, do yoga. Bul­let­ed lists punc­tu­at­ed by dry cita­tions issue gen­tly-word­ed guide­lines for sen­si­ble liv­ing. Inof­fen­sive bland­ness as a pre­scrip­tion for liv­ing well.

At the oth­er extreme are pro­files of excep­tion­al cases—relatively spry indi­vid­u­als who have passed the cen­tu­ry mark. Rarely do their sto­ries con­form to the mod­el of abstemious­ness enjoined upon us by pro­fes­sion­als. But we know that grow­ing old with dig­ni­ty entails so much more than diet and exer­cise or mak­ing it to a hun­dred-and-two. It entails fac­ing death as square­ly as we face life. We need writ­ers with depth, sen­si­tiv­i­ty, and elo­quence to deliv­er this mes­sage. Bertrand Rus­sell does just that in his essay “How to Grow Old,” writ­ten when the philoso­pher was 81 (six­teen years before he even­tu­al­ly passed away, at age 97).

Rus­sell does not flat­ter his read­ers’ ratio­nal­ist con­ceits by cit­ing the lat­est sci­ence. “As regards health,” he writes, “I have noth­ing use­ful to say…. I eat and drink what­ev­er I like, and sleep when I can­not keep awake.” (We are inclined, per­haps, to trust him on these grounds alone.) He opens with a dri­ly humor­ous para­graph in which he rec­om­mends, “choose your ances­tors well,” then he issues advice on the order of not dwelling on the past or becom­ing a bur­den to your chil­dren.

But the true ker­nel of his short essay, “the prop­er recipe for remain­ing young,” he says, came to him from the exam­ple of a mater­nal grand­moth­er, who was so absorbed in her life, “I do not believe she ever had time to notice she was grow­ing old.” “If you have wide and keen inter­ests and activ­i­ties in which you can still be effec­tive,” Rus­sell writes. “you will have no rea­son to think about the mere­ly sta­tis­ti­cal fact of the num­ber of years you have already lived, still less of the prob­a­ble short­ness of your future.”

Such inter­ests, he argues, should be “imper­son­al,” and it is this qual­i­ty that loosens our grip. As Maria Popo­va puts it, “Rus­sell places at the heart of a ful­fill­ing life the dis­so­lu­tion of the per­son­al ego into some­thing larg­er.” The idea is famil­iar; in Russell’s hands it becomes a med­i­ta­tion on mor­tal­i­ty as ever-time­ly as the so-often-quot­ed pas­sages from Donne’s “Med­i­ta­tion XVII.” Philoso­pher and writer John G. Messer­ly calls Russell’s con­clud­ing pas­sage “one of the most beau­ti­ful reflec­tions on death I have found in all of world lit­er­a­ture.”

The best way to over­come it [the fear of death]—so at least it seems to me—is to make your inter­ests grad­u­al­ly wider and more imper­son­al, until bit by bit the walls of the ego recede, and your life becomes increas­ing­ly merged in the uni­ver­sal life. An indi­vid­ual human exis­tence should be like a riv­er: small at first, nar­row­ly con­tained with­in its banks, and rush­ing pas­sion­ate­ly past rocks and over water­falls. Grad­u­al­ly the riv­er grows wider, the banks recede, the waters flow more qui­et­ly, and in the end, with­out any vis­i­ble break, they become merged in the sea, and pain­less­ly lose their indi­vid­ual being. The man who, in old age, can see his life in this way, will not suf­fer from the fear of death, since the things he cares for will con­tin­ue. And if, with the decay of vital­i­ty, weari­ness increas­es, the thought of rest will not be unwel­come. I should wish to die while still at work, know­ing that oth­ers will car­ry on what I can no longer do and con­tent in the thought that what was pos­si­ble has been done.

Read Russell’s “How to Grow Old” in full here. And see many more elo­quent med­i­ta­tions on aging and death—from Hen­ry Miller, André Gide, Ursu­la K. Le Guin, and Grace Paley—at The Mar­gin­a­lian.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2018.

Relat­ed Con­tent:  

Bertrand Russell’s Advice to Peo­ple Liv­ing 1,000 Years in the Future: “Love is Wise, Hatred is Fool­ish”

Bertrand Rus­sell: The Every­day Ben­e­fit of Phi­los­o­phy Is That It Helps You Live with Uncer­tain­ty

Simone de Beauvoir’s Phi­los­o­phy on Find­ing Mean­ing in Old Age

You’re Only As Old As You Feel: Har­vard Psy­chol­o­gist Ellen Langer Shows How Men­tal Atti­tude Can Poten­tial­ly Reverse the Effects of Aging

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

The First Robot Movie: Watch a Newly Discovered Georges Méliès Film from 1897

Metrop­o­lis, For­bid­den Plan­et, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Star Wars, Blade Run­ner, The Ter­mi­na­tor, Short Cir­cuit, Robo­Cop, Ghost in the Shell, The Iron Giant, WALL‑E, Ex Machi­na: there is a par­al­lel his­to­ry of cin­e­ma to be told entire­ly through its robots. That such a his­to­ry must begin with the work of Georges Méliès may not come as a sur­prise, giv­en that he invent­ed so many of the tech­niques of sci­ence-fic­tion film­mak­ing. But until recent­ly, we did­n’t actu­al­ly know that the cin­e­ma pio­neer who “invent­ed every­thing” ever put a robot onscreen. The evi­dence turned up among a col­lec­tion of “old and bat­tered” reels of film that were “from before World War I and had been shut­tled around from base­ments to barns to garages and had just been dropped off at the Library.”

So writes the Library of Con­gress’ Neely Tuck­er, who goes on to describe the action of one of the films involv­ing “a magi­cian and a robot bat­tling it out in slap­stick fash­ion. It took a bit, but then the gasp of real­iza­tion: They were look­ing at ‘Gugusse and the Automa­ton,’ a long-lost film by the icon­ic French film­mak­er Georges Méliès at his Star Film com­pa­ny.”

Méliès him­self plays the magi­cian, who “winds up an automa­ton dressed like the famous clown Pier­rot, which is stand­ing on a pedestal. Once wound up, the clown begins to beat the magi­cian with his walk­ing stick. The magi­cian retal­i­ates by get­ting a huge sledge­ham­mer and bash­ing the automa­ton over the head, with each blow seem­ing to shrink it in half, until it is just a small doll.”

In just 45 sec­onds, this sim­ple film would have aston­ished audi­ences back in 1897 — and indeed retains the pow­er to impress, pro­vid­ed you con­sid­er that none of the tech­niques to real­ize its effects were wide­ly known before Méliès attempt­ed them. He did so five years before A Trip to the Moon,’ a huge­ly ambi­tious cin­e­mat­ic endeav­or by com­par­i­son, and by far the sin­gle film that best rep­re­sents his lega­cy.’ Yet it and Gugusse and the Automa­ton are clear­ly the work of the same artist-inven­tor, one who pos­sessed that rare com­bi­na­tion of tech­ni­cal know-how and artis­tic dar­ing, and who under­stood the need for an organ­ic rela­tion­ship between spec­ta­cle and nar­ra­tive. Not that either the spec­ta­cle or the nar­ra­tive are high­ly evolved at this stage, but, as Méliès may have sus­pect­ed, the cin­e­ma of robots has as long an evo­lu­tion ahead of it as automa­ta them­selves.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Watch 194 Films by Georges Méliès, the Film­mak­er Who “Invent­ed Every­thing” (All in Chrono­log­i­cal Order)

How Georges Méliès A Trip to the Moon Became the First Sci-Fi Film & Changed Cin­e­ma For­ev­er (1902)

The Word “Robot” Orig­i­nat­ed in a Czech Play in 1921: Dis­cov­er Karel Čapek’s Sci-Fi Play R.U.R. (a.k.a. Rossum’s Uni­ver­sal Robots)

Fritz Lang First Depict­ed Arti­fi­cial Intel­li­gence on Film in Metrop­o­lis (1927), and It Fright­ened Peo­ple Even Then

Watch “The Birth of the Robot,” Len Lye’s Sur­re­al 1935 Stop-Motion Ani­ma­tion

Watch the Sci-Fi Short Film “I’m Not a Robot”: Win­ner of a 2025 Acad­e­my Award

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Download 60,000 Works of Art from the National Gallery, Including Masterpieces by Van Gogh, Gauguin, Rembrandt & More

As a young ama­teur painter and future art school dropout, I fre­quent­ly found myself haunt­ed by the faces of two artists, that famous­ly odd cou­ple from my favorite art his­to­ry novelization—and Kirk Dou­glas role and Iggy Pop song—Lust for Life. Vin­cent van Gogh and Paul Gau­guin, above and below respec­tive­ly, the tor­ment­ed Dutch fanat­ic and burly French bully—how, I still won­der, could such a pair have ever co-exist­ed, how­ev­er briefly? How could such beau­ti­ful­ly skewed visions of life have exist­ed at all?

Van Gogh and Gauguin’s sev­er­al self-por­traits still inspire won­der. My younger self had the lux­u­ry of see­ing these par­tic­u­lar two up close and in per­son at the Nation­al Gallery of Art in Wash­ing­ton, DC: Van Gogh’s gaunt and pierc­ing vis­age, Gauguin’s sneer­ing self-par­o­dy.

Now, thanks to the won­ders of dig­i­tal tech­nol­o­gy, my old­er self, and yours, can view and down­load high-res­o­lu­tion pho­tos of both paint­ings, and over 60,000 more from the museum’s vast hold­ings, through NGA Images, “a repos­i­to­ry of dig­i­tal images of the col­lec­tions of the Nation­al Gallery of Art.”

There you’ll find works by anoth­er obses­sive Dutch self-por­traitist, Rem­brandt van Rijn, such as the lush 1659 paint­ing below. You’ll find paint­ings from the heroes of the var­i­ous Renais­sances and French Impres­sion­ism, from move­ments mod­ern and colo­nial, pas­toral and urban. The col­lec­tion is dizzy­ing, and a lover of art could eas­i­ly lose hours sort­ing through it, sav­ing “open access dig­i­tal images up to 3000 pix­els each […] avail­able free of charge for down­load and use.” The pur­pose of NGA Images is “to facil­i­tate learn­ing, enrich­ment, enjoy­ment, and explo­ration,” and there’s no doubt that it sat­is­fies all of those goals and then some.

Browse the var­i­ous col­lec­tions, includ­ing one devot­ed to self-por­traits. Con­duct advanced search­es, if you have more knowl­edge of the Gallery’s many trea­sures. You are the cura­tor! And the lucky ben­e­fi­cia­ry of the Nation­al Gallery’s benef­i­cence. While I can tell you from expe­ri­ence that it’s noth­ing like stand­ing face to face with these paint­ings in their in-real-life dimen­sions, tex­tures, lines, and colors—despite the throngs of dis­in­ter­est­ed tourists—it’s at least a close sec­ond. And for stu­dents and edu­ca­tors of the visu­al arts, NGA Images offers an oppor­tu­ni­ty like no oth­er to view and share great works of art often hid­den away from even the museum’s vis­i­tors. Enter the col­lec­tion here.

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2014.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bun­dled in one email, each day.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Down­load 1,600+ Pub­li­ca­tions from the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Muse­um of Art: Books, Guides, Mag­a­zines & More

The Met­ro­pol­i­tan Muse­um of Art Puts 490,000 High-Res Images Online & Makes Them Free to Use

The Louvre’s Entire Col­lec­tion Goes Online: View and Down­load 480,00 Works of Art

The Get­ty Makes Near­ly 88,000 Art Images Free to Use How­ev­er You Like

Down­load 100,000 Free Art Images in High-Res­o­lu­tion from The Get­ty

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

The Adventures of Prince Achmed, the Oldest Surviving Animated Feature Film, Is Now in the Public Domain (1926)


Die Aben­teuer des Prinzen Achmed, or The Adven­tures of Prince Achmed, lays fair claim to being the ear­li­est ani­mat­ed fea­ture film in exis­tence. If we do grant it that title, it beats the next con­tender by more than a decade. While Prince Achmed came out a cen­tu­ry ago, in 1926, Snow White and the Sev­en Dwarfs, whose pro­duc­tion was presided over by a cer­tain Walt Dis­ney, did­n’t reach the­aters until 1937. The lat­ter pic­ture holds great dis­tinc­tion in the his­to­ry of cin­e­ma, of course, not least that of being the first fea­ture made with cel ani­ma­tion: the dom­i­nant tech­nique through­out most of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, and one whose dig­i­tal replace­ment has been lament­ed by clas­sic ani­ma­tion enthu­si­asts. But the quiv­er­ing sil­hou­ettes of Prince Achmed show an alter­na­tive.

The mak­ing of Snow White was, by the stan­dards of the day, a vast under­tak­ing, requir­ing Dis­ney to mar­shal artis­tic and indus­tri­al resources at a scale then unknown in ani­ma­tion. Prince Achmed, by con­trast, owes its exis­tence most­ly to the work of one woman: Lotte Reiniger, who first learned the craft of scheren­schnitte sil­hou­ette-mak­ing as a lit­tle girl in Berlin.

Scheren­schnitte was inspired by what was thought to be ancient Chi­nese arts of paper-cut­ting and pup­petry, but when watched today, Prince Achmed or the oth­er ani­ma­tions Reiniger cre­at­ed bring more read­i­ly to mind tra­di­tion­al Javanese wayang kulit shad­ow pup­pet the­ater: an aes­thet­ic that, in a sense, suits the source mate­r­i­al ide­al­ly.

The episodes that con­sti­tute Prince Achmed’s nar­ra­tive are drawn in large part from One Thou­sand and One Nights, a text whose cen­turies-long evo­lu­tion bears the marks of not just many dis­tinct cul­tures across Asia and the Mid­dle East, but also those of more dra­mat­ic trans­for­ma­tion through its folk­tales’ cul­tur­al trans­po­si­tion into French, then oth­er Euro­pean lan­guages. What Reiniger brings to enchant­i­ng hand­made life isn’t any par­tic­u­lar place at any par­tic­u­lar time, but rather an ele­gant, mys­te­ri­ous, quite lit­er­al­ly arabesque realm that nev­er real­ly exist­ed. In oth­er words, Prince Achmed takes place in what can only be called the Ori­ent — which, now that the film has fall­en into the pub­lic domain, we can all vis­it when­ev­er we like. And if such vis­its hap­pen to inspire a new gen­er­a­tion of Lotte Reinigers in this world of mar­ket-researched mega-bud­get ani­ma­tion, so much the bet­ter.

Relat­ed con­tent:

The First Ani­mat­ed Fea­ture Film: The Adven­tures of Prince Achmed by Lotte Reiniger (1926)

The Ground­break­ing Sil­hou­ette Ani­ma­tions of Lotte Reiniger: Cin­derel­la, Hansel and Gre­tel, and More

Ani­ma­tion Pio­neer Lotte Reiniger Adapts Mozart’s The Mag­ic Flute into an All-Sil­hou­ette Short Film (1935)

The Ani­ma­tions That Changed Cin­e­ma: The Ground­break­ing Lega­cies of Prince Achmed, Aki­ra, The Iron Giant & More

Watch the Old­est Japan­ese Ani­me Film, Jun’ichi Kōuchi’s The Dull Sword (1917)

The Beau­ti­ful Anar­chy of the Ear­li­est Ani­mat­ed Car­toons: Explore an Archive with 200+ Ear­ly Ani­ma­tions

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Rome in 1890 Captured in Color Photographs: The Colosseum, Forum, Trevi Fountain & More

1890 Colosseum

For almost two hun­dred years, Eng­lish gen­tle­men could not con­sid­er their edu­ca­tion com­plete until they had tak­en the “Grand Tour” of Europe, usu­al­ly cul­mi­nat­ing in Naples, “raga­muf­fin cap­i­tal of the Ital­ian south,” writes Ian Thom­son at The Spec­ta­tor. Italy was usu­al­ly the pri­ma­ry focus, such that Samuel John­son remarked in 1776, per­haps with some irony, “a man who has not been to Italy is always con­scious of an infe­ri­or­i­ty.” The Roman­tic poets famous­ly wrote of their Euro­pean sojourns: Shel­ley, Byron, Wordsworth… each has his own “Grand Tour” sto­ry.

1890 Trevi Fountain

Shel­ley, who trav­eled with his wife Mary God­win and her step­sis­ter Claire Clair­mont, did not go to Italy, how­ev­er. And Byron sailed the Mediter­ranean on his Grand Tour, forced away from most of Europe by the Napoleon­ic wars. But in 1817, he jour­neyed to Rome, where he wrote the Fourth Can­to of Childe Harold’s Pil­grim­age:

Oh Rome! my coun­try! city of the soul!
The orphans of the heart must turn to thee,
Lone moth­er of dead empires! And con­trol
In their shut breasts their pet­ty mis­ery.

For the trav­el­ing artist and philoso­pher, “Italy,” Thom­son writes, “pre­sent­ed a civ­i­liza­tion in ruins,” and we can see in all Roman­tic writ­ing the tremen­dous influ­ence visions of Rome and Pom­peii had on gen­tle­men poets like Byron. The Grand Tour, and jour­neys like it, per­sist­ed until the 1840s, when rail­roads “spelled the end of soli­tary aris­to­crat­ic trav­el.”

But even decades after­ward, we can see Rome (and Venice) the way Byron might have seen it—and almost, even, in full col­or. As we step into the vis­tas of these post­cards from 1890, we are far clos­er to Byron than we are to the Rome of our day, before Mussolini’s mon­u­ments, noto­ri­ous snarls of Roman traf­fic, and throngs of tourists.

1890 Trumphal Arch

“These post­cards of the ancient land­marks of Rome,” writes Mash­able, “were pro­duced… using the Pho­tochrom process, which adds pre­cise gra­da­tions of arti­fi­cial col­or to black and white pho­tos.” Invent­ed by Swiss print­er Orell Gess­ner Fus­sli, the process involved cre­at­ing lith­o­graph­ic stone from the negatives—“Up to 15 dif­fer­ent tint­ed stones could be involved in the pro­duc­tion of a sin­gle pic­ture, but the result was remark­ably life­like col­or at a time when true col­or pho­tog­ra­phy was still in its infan­cy.”

temple rome

The Library of Con­gress hosts forty eight of these images in their online cat­a­log, all down­load­able as high qual­i­ty jpegs or tiffs, and many, like the stun­ning image of the Colos­se­um at the top (see the inte­ri­or here), fea­tur­ing a pre-Pho­tocrom black and white print as well.

1890 San Lorenzo

Aside from a rare street scene, with an urban milieu look­ing very much from the 1890s, the pho­tographs are void of crowds. In the fore­ground of the Tri­umphal Arch fur­ther up we see a soli­tary woman with a bas­ket of pro­duce on her head. In the image of San Loren­zo, above, a tiny fig­ure walks away from the cam­era.

forum rome 1890

In most of these images—with their dream­like coloration—we can imag­ine Rome the way it looked not only in 1890, but also how it might have looked to bored aris­to­crats in the 17th and 18th centuries—and to pas­sion­ate Roman­tic poets in the ear­ly 19th, a place of raw nat­ur­al grandeur and sub­lime man-made decay. See the Library of Con­gress online cat­a­log to view and down­load all forty-eight of these post­cards.

1890 Great Cascade

 

Note: An ear­li­er ver­sion of this post appeared on our site in 2016.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Venice in Beau­ti­ful Col­or Images 125 Years Ago: The Rial­to Bridge, St. Mark’s Basil­i­ca, Doge’s Palace & More

Bring­ing Tsarist Rus­sia to Life: Vivid Col­or Images from 1905–1915

Beau­ti­ful, Col­or Pho­tographs of Paris Tak­en a Cen­tu­ry Ago—at the Begin­ning of World War I & the End of La Belle Époque

Behold the Very First Col­or Pho­to­graph (1861): Tak­en by Scot­tish Physi­cist & Poet James Clerk Maxwell

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. 

Behold the First Realistic Depiction of the Human Face (Circa 25,000 BCE)

?si=HOvgnTtB4xSNqpNE

In 1894, archae­ol­o­gist Édouard Piette dis­cov­ered the “Venus of Brassem­pouy,” oth­er­wise known as the “Lady with the Hood.” Unearthed in south­west­ern France and dat­ing to around 25,000 BCE, this carv­ing rep­re­sents the ear­li­est real­is­tic depic­tion of a human face. The figure’s fore­head, nose, and brows are care­ful­ly carved in relief, as is the hair, arranged in a neat geo­met­ric pat­tern. But what hap­pened to the mouth? Or the eyes? We’re not sure.

The Venus is carved from mam­moth ivory, like­ly using a stone flint, and stands just 3.65 cm tall. For some, it marks a major devel­op­ment in fig­u­ra­tive art. Or, as his­to­ri­an Simon Schama has sug­gest­ed, this fig­urine may well be the “dawn of the idea of beau­ty” in human cul­ture.

Relat­ed Con­tent 

The World’s Old­est Cave Art, Dis­cov­ered in Indone­sia, Is at Least 67,800 Years Old

Alger­ian Cave Paint­ings Sug­gest Humans Did Mag­ic Mush­rooms 9,000 Years Ago

Was a 32,000-Year-Old Cave Paint­ing the Ear­li­est Form of Cin­e­ma?

A Styl­ish 2,000-Year-Old Roman Shoe Found in a Well

Exquis­ite 2300-Year-Old Scythi­an Woman’s Boot Pre­served in the Frozen Ground of Siberia

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

The Greatest Double Agent Ever: How a Spanish Chicken Farmer Became the Most Important Double Agent in WWII

Juan Pujol Gar­cía was one of the rare indi­vid­u­als whose par­tic­i­pa­tion in World War II made him a Mem­ber of the Order of the British Empire and earned him the Iron Cross. He gained that unlike­ly dis­tinc­tion in per­haps the riski­est of all roles in espi­onage, that of a dou­ble agent. Despite ulti­mate­ly work­ing for the Allied cause, he cre­at­ed an elab­o­rate fic­tion­al per­sona — com­plete with an invent­ed spy net­work oper­at­ing across Great Britain — who pro­fessed loy­al­ty to the Nazi cause. Not only did Pujol get this char­ac­ter plugged into the real Ger­man intel­li­gence sys­tem, he also got him on its pay­roll, receiv­ing what came to the equiv­a­lent of more than $6 mil­lion in today’s U.S. dol­lars for sup­ply­ing infor­ma­tion — infor­ma­tion that ulti­mate­ly con­tributed to the Axis’ loss of the war.

The sto­ry of how this chick­en farmer from Barcelona became the most impor­tant dou­ble agent of World War II is told in the ani­mat­ed Pri­mal Space video above. Unlike many of the spies his­to­ry has remem­bered more clear­ly, Pujol did­n’t begin his espi­onage career in the employ of any gov­ern­ment in par­tic­u­lar.

Rad­i­cal­ized, if that be the word, by the expe­ri­ence of hav­ing been draft­ed into the Span­ish Civ­il War, he vowed to ded­i­cate his life to “the good of human­i­ty.” Turned away by the British embassy, to which he’d offered his ser­vices because Britain opposed Nazi Ger­many, he went free­lance, re-invent­ing him­self as a Third Reich-loy­al Span­ish mil­i­tary man seek­ing an assign­ment in the U.K. Tak­en on by Ger­many, he instead decamped to Lis­bon, where he began man­u­fac­tur­ing ersatz intel­li­gence reports using news­reel footage and tourist brochures.

How­ev­er makeshift, Pujol’s craft proved impres­sive to both Ger­many and Britain, which launched an inter­na­tion­al spy hunt for him. He thus accom­plished his goal of becom­ing an offi­cial British dou­ble agent, in which capac­i­ty he arrived at his finest hour: mis­lead­ing the Ger­mans as to the 1944 “D‑Day” inva­sion of Nor­mandy in an effort called Oper­a­tion For­ti­tude. In Span­ish, that would be For­t­aleza, which became the title of an RTVE doc­u­men­tary about Pujol’s long-untold sto­ry a few years ago. But if any sin­gle word reflects Pujol’s con­tri­bu­tion to his­to­ry, that word must be Gar­bo, the code name assigned him by his first British case offi­cer. After all, what oth­er name — at least in 1942 — could quite so evoca­tive­ly befit an agent whose skills of craft­ing and inhab­it­ing invent­ed char­ac­ters made his han­dlers regard him as “the best actor in the world”?

Relat­ed con­tent:

The CIA’s For­mer Chief of Dis­guise Show How Spies Use Cos­tumes in Under­cov­er Oper­a­tions

The Sto­ry of Elize­beth Fried­man, the Pio­neer­ing Cryp­tol­o­gist Who Thwart­ed the Nazis & Got Burned by J. Edgar Hoover

The French Designed a Fake Repli­ca of Paris to Fool Ger­man Bombers Dur­ing World War I

Dis­cov­er the CIA’s Sim­ple Sab­o­tage Field Man­u­al: A Time­less Guide to Sub­vert­ing Any Orga­ni­za­tion with “Pur­pose­ful Stu­pid­i­ty” (1944)

The CIA’s Rec­tal Tool Kit for Spies — Cre­at­ed for Tru­ly Des­per­ate Sit­u­a­tions Dur­ing The Cold War

Based in Seoul, Col­in Marshall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and cul­ture. He’s the author of the newslet­ter Books on Cities as well as the books 한국 요약 금지 (No Sum­ma­riz­ing Korea) and Kore­an Newtro. Fol­low him on the social net­work for­mer­ly known as Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.


  • Great Lectures

  • Sign up for Newsletter

  • About Us

    Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.


    Advertise With Us

  • Archives

  • Search

  • Quantcast