More than 120 years after the end of the VicÂtoÂriÂan era, we might assume that we retain a more or less accuÂrate culÂturÂal memÂoÂry of the VicÂtoÂriÂans themÂselves: of their social mores, their aesÂthetÂic senÂsiÂbilÂiÂties, their ambiÂtions great and small, their many and varÂied hang-ups. Some of the most vivid repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtions of these qualÂiÂties have come down to us through priÂmaÂry sources, which tend to be texts and works of visuÂal art. Late in Queen VicÂtoÂriÂa’s reign came phoÂtographs, and at the very end, even the motion picÂture. But how can we be sure how her peoÂple realÂly soundÂed?
StrictÂly speakÂing, the earÂliÂest process for mechanÂiÂcalÂly recordÂing the sound of the human voice dates back to 1860, not even halfway through the VicÂtoÂriÂan era. But the techÂnolÂoÂgy still had a long way to go at that time, and it wasÂn’t until the 1880s that Thomas EdisÂon’s phonoÂgraph and the wax cylinÂders it played became comÂmerÂcialÂly viable. So explains the King and Things video above, on the spread of audio recordÂing and the earÂliÂest posÂsiÂbilÂiÂties it opened for capÂturÂing the voicÂes of what we now regard as the disÂtant past. Those voicÂes include that of a man introÂduced as “one of EngÂland’s most famous after-dinÂner speakÂers, Mr. Edmund Yates.”
That cylinÂder was recordÂed in 1888, at one of the LonÂdon soirĂ©es held by an AmerÂiÂcan EdiÂson employÂee named George Gouraud. The son of French engiÂneer François Gouraud, who had introÂduced daguerreoÂtype phoÂtogÂraÂphy to the UnitÂed States in the 1830s, he took it upon himÂself to bring the phonoÂgraph to Britain. He did so in a top-down manÂner, invitÂing socialÂly disÂtinÂguished guests to his home for dinÂner so that they might thrill to the novÂelÂty of after-dinÂner speechÂes delivÂered by machine — and then record their own mesÂsages to EdiÂson himÂself. “I can only say that I am astonÂished and someÂwhat terÂriÂfied at the results of this evening’s experÂiÂments,” said one of Gouraud’s guests, the comÂposÂer Sir Arthur SulÂliÂvan.
That astonÂishÂment aside, SulÂliÂvan also admitÂted that he was “terÂriÂfied at the thought that so much hideous and bad music may be put on record forÂevÂer.” Many alive today would credÂit him with conÂsidÂerÂable preÂscience on that count. But he also underÂstood that the phonoÂgraph would proÂduce wonÂders, such as the recordÂings includÂed in this video of such notaÂbles as four-time Prime MinÂisÂter William GladÂstone, FloÂrence NightinÂgale, and Queen VicÂtoÂria herÂself — at least accordÂing to the conÂsenÂsus of the scholÂars who’ve scruÂtiÂnized the highÂly indisÂtinct recordÂing in quesÂtion. Only long after EdisÂon’s time would humanÂiÂty develÂop a recordÂing techÂnolÂoÂgy capaÂble of being replayed again and again withÂout degraÂdaÂtion. But givÂen our image of VicÂtoÂriÂans, perÂhaps it’s suitÂable that their voicÂes should sound ghostÂly.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Thomas Edison’s 1889 RecordÂing of Otto von BisÂmarÂck‎ DisÂcovÂered
Hear the First RecordÂing of the Human Voice (1860)
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities and the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
Leave a Reply