Here at Open CulÂture, Richard FeynÂman is nevÂer far from our minds. Though he disÂtinÂguished himÂself with his work on the develÂopÂment of the atomÂic bomb and his Nobel Prize-winÂning research on quanÂtum elecÂtroÂdyÂnamÂics, you need no speÂcial interÂest in either World War II or theÂoÂretÂiÂcal physics to look to him as an intelÂlecÂtuÂal modÂel. In the years after his death in 1988, his legÂend grew as not just a sciÂenÂtifÂic mind but even more so as a verÂiÂtaÂble perÂsonÂiÂfiÂcaÂtion of curiosÂiÂty, surÂroundÂed by stoÂries (delibÂerÂateÂly culÂtiÂvatÂed by him in his lifeÂtime) of safe-crackÂing, bonÂgo-playÂing, and nude modÂel-drawÂing, to the point that FeynÂman the man became someÂwhat hard to disÂcern.
In the view of FreakoÂnomÂics Radio host Stephen DubÂnÂer, FeynÂman’s pubÂlic proÂfile has lateÂly fallÂen into an unforÂtuÂnate desueÂtude. It seems that peoÂple just don’t talk about him the way they used to, hard though that is to imagÂine for any of us who grew up readÂing colÂlecÂtions of anecÂdotes like SureÂly You’re JokÂing, Mr. FeynÂman!.
OperÂatÂing on the supÂpoÂsiÂtion that we could all use more FeynÂman in our lives, FreakoÂnomÂics Radio has, over the past month, put out a three-part series covÂerÂing his life and work, from his recruitÂment to the ManÂhatÂtan Project and latÂer pubÂlic analyÂsis of the ChalÂlenger disÂasÂter to his years teachÂing at CalÂtech to his late-in-life experÂiÂmenÂtaÂtion with psyÂcheÂdelÂic subÂstances (furÂther explored in a fourth, bonus episode).
“The CuriÂous, BrilÂliant, VanÂishÂing Mr. FeynÂman” (also availÂable on Apple and SpoÂtiÂfy) includes a variÂety of interÂviews with its subÂjecÂt’s friends, relÂaÂtives, colÂlabÂoÂraÂtors, and sucÂcesÂsors. All speak highÂly of him, though some comÂpliÂcate the legÂend by lookÂing at the downÂsides of his idioÂsynÂcratÂic attiÂtudes toward both sciÂence and the social world: his insisÂtence on underÂstandÂing everyÂthing by figÂurÂing it out himÂself from scratch may have led to him makÂing fewÂer disÂcovÂerÂies than he would have, had he made more use of the research of othÂers, and his enthuÂsiÂasm for womÂankind, shall we say, manÂiÂfestÂed in ways that would probÂaÂbly genÂerÂate calls for “canÂcelÂlaÂtion” today. But just as FeynÂman eschewed the label of “genius,” he nevÂer claimed to be a perÂfect human being. And besides, it isn’t his social incliÂnaÂtions or even his bonÂgo skills we should admire, but his dedÂiÂcaÂtion to defeatÂing “lousy ideas” — which, as he no doubt expectÂed, have only proÂlifÂerÂatÂed since he left us.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
What Made Richard FeynÂman One of the Most Admired EduÂcaÂtors in the World
How Richard Feynman’s DiaÂgrams RevÂoÂluÂtionÂized Physics
Watch a New AniÂmaÂtion of Richard Feynman’s Ode to the WonÂder of Life, with Music by Yo-Yo Ma
The “FeynÂman TechÂnique” for StudyÂing EffecÂtiveÂly: An AniÂmatÂed Primer
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
ChalÂlenger o‑rings: These were elasÂtomers, which many if not most engiÂneers & sciÂenÂtists know or should know, underÂgo a secÂond-order phase tranÂsiÂtion, a “glass” tranÂsiÂtion at low temÂperÂaÂtures, in which their flexÂiÂbilÂiÂty gives way to britÂtle behavÂior (stick a rubÂber band in your freezÂer & see for yourÂself). This is textÂbook stuff. So why has this nevÂer come up in all that has been writÂten about the ChalÂlenger? And why didÂn’t FeynÂman, although to be sure he was not a conÂdensed matÂter physiÂcist, latch onto this? I dunno–and this realÂly has nothÂing to do with him. I once shared an office with one of his forÂmer stuÂdents, who was full of great stoÂries about FeynÂman.
The real quesÂtion is why this phase tranÂsiÂtion busiÂness didÂn’t come up durÂing the preÂlude to the ChalÂlenger launch or latÂer.
Always love hearÂing a new angle on Richard FeynÂman.