ConÂtext may not count for everyÂthing in art. But as underÂscored by everyÂone from MarÂcel Duchamp (or Elsa von FreyÂtag-LorÂingÂhoven) to the jourÂnalÂists who occaÂsionÂalÂly conÂvince virÂtuÂoso musiÂcians to busk in dingy pubÂlic spaces, it cerÂtainÂly counts for someÂthing. Whether or not you believe that works of art retain the same essenÂtial valÂue no matÂter where they’re beheld, some enviÂronÂments are sureÂly more conÂducive to appreÂciÂaÂtion than othÂers. The quesÂtion of just which design eleÂments make the difÂferÂence has occuÂpied museÂum archiÂtects for cenÂturies, and in New York City alone, you can directÂly expeÂriÂence more than 200 years of bold exerÂcisÂes and experÂiÂments in the form.
In the ArchiÂtecÂturÂal Digest video above, archiÂtect Michael WyetÂznÂer (preÂviÂousÂly feaÂtured here on Open CulÂture for his exegeÂses of New York’s apartÂments, bridges, and subÂway staÂtions, as well as CenÂtral Park and the Chrysler BuildÂing) uses his expert knowlÂedge to reveal the design choicÂes that have gone into the MetÂroÂpolÂiÂtan MuseÂum of Art, the MuseÂum of ModÂern Art, the Solomon R. GuggenÂheim MuseÂum, and the Frick ColÂlecÂtion. No two of these famous art instiÂtuÂtions were conÂceived in quite the same periÂod, none look or feel quite the same as the othÂers, and we can be reaÂsonÂably sure that no sinÂgle piece of art would look quite the same if it were moved between any of them.
OccuÂpyÂing five blocks of CenÂtral Park, MoMA is less a buildÂing than a colÂlecÂtion of buildÂings — each added at a difÂferÂent time, in a style of that time — and indeed, less a colÂlecÂtion of buildÂings than “a city unto itself,” as WyetÂznÂer puts it. (No wonÂder ClauÂdia and Jamie KinÂcaid could run away from home and go unnoÂticed livÂing in it.) The comÂparÂaÂtiveÂly modÂest MoMA has also grown addiÂtion-by-addiÂtion, beginÂning with a “stripped-down form of modÂernism” that stood well out on the West 53rd street of the late thirÂties. It opened as the first of the many “clean white boxÂes” that would appear across the counÂtry — and latÂer the world — to show the art of the twenÂtiÂeth and twenÂty-first cenÂturies.
The origÂiÂnal MoMA buildÂing remains strikÂing today, but it’s now flanked by expanÂsions from the hands of Philip JohnÂson, Cesar PelÂli, Yoshio Taniguchi, and Jean NouÂvÂel. Much less likeÂly to have anyÂthing attached to it is the GuggenÂheim, with its instantÂly recÂogÂnizÂable spiÂral design by Frank Lloyd Wright. Based on an idea by Le CorÂbusier, its narÂrow atriÂum-wrapÂping galÂleries do present cerÂtain difÂfiÂculÂties for the propÂer disÂplay of large-scale artÂworks. WyetÂznÂer also menÂtions the oft-heard critÂiÂcism of Wright’s havÂing “creÂatÂed a monÂuÂment to himÂself — but it’s one hell of a monÂuÂment.”
Last comes “the origÂiÂnal buildÂing for the WhitÂney MuseÂum of AmerÂiÂcan Art, which latÂer became the Met Breuer, which now has become the Frick. Who knows what it’ll become next.” The secÂond of its names refers to its archiÂtect, the Bauhaus-trained MarÂcel Breuer (he of the WassÂiÂly chair), whose musÂcuÂlar design “slices off” the museÂum from the brownÂstone neighÂborÂhood that surÂrounds it. With its “open, loft-like spaces,” it proÂvides a conÂtext meant for the art of its time, much as the Met, MoMA, and the GuggenÂheim do for the art of theirs. But all these instiÂtuÂtions have sucÂceedÂed just as much by carvÂing out conÂtexts of their own in the open-air museÂum of archiÂtecÂture and urbanÂism that is New York City.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
ArchiÂtect Breaks Down Five of the Most IconÂic New York City ApartÂments
The 5 InnoÂvÂaÂtive Bridges That Make New York City, New York City
A 3D AniÂmaÂtion Shows the EvoÂluÂtion of New York City (1524 — 2023)
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
“OccuÂpyÂing five blocks of CenÂtral Park, MoMA is less a buildÂing”
The Met is in the park, MoMA is on w 53rd.
In addiÂtion to conÂflatÂing the Met and MOMA is his first descripÂtion (it is the Met in CenÂtral Park, not MOMA), I have to wonÂder why he would choose to write this artiÂcle at this moment, givÂen that the Frick is litÂerÂalÂly closÂing shop at the Breuer in a few weeks, and movÂing the ColÂlecÂtion back to the mansion/museum. In fact, I had thought that his archiÂtecÂturÂal comÂments about the Frick in this artiÂcle would be about the manÂsion, and not the Breuer, which is basiÂcalÂly already “old news.” And givÂen the changes to the manÂsion while the ColÂlecÂtion was at the Breuer, Mr. WyetÂznÂer would have quite a bit to talk about.
I feel like this artiÂcle is outÂdatÂed datÂed and the author conÂfused about his facts
How embarÂrassÂing that you still haven’t corÂrectÂed this…