In the New York of old, “one entered the city like a god. One scutÂtles in now like a rat.” When he wrote those words, archiÂtecÂturÂal hisÂtoÂriÂan VinÂcent SculÂly issued what has endÂed up as the definÂiÂtive judgÂment of PennÂsylÂvaÂnia StaÂtion. Or rather, of the PennÂsylÂvaÂnia StaÂtions: the majesÂtic origÂiÂnal buildÂing from 1910, as well as its utilÂiÂtarÂiÂan replaceÂment that has stood in MidÂtown ManÂhatÂtan since 1968. But then, the word “stood” doesÂn’t quite apply to the latÂter, since it resides entireÂly underÂground, below MadiÂson Square GarÂden. Over the years, New YorkÂers have come more and more openÂly to resent the Penn StaÂtion they have and lament the Penn StaÂtion they lost, which archiÂtect Michael WyetÂznÂer introÂduces to us in the ArchiÂtecÂturÂal Digest video above.
“A conÂjecÂturÂal reconÂstrucÂtion of ImpeÂrÂiÂal Rome’s Baths of CaraÂcalla of 212–216 AD,” writes New York Review of Books archiÂtecÂture critÂic MarÂtin Filler, the origÂiÂnal Penn StaÂtion conÂstiÂtutÂed “a harÂmoÂnious synÂtheÂsis of two diverÂgent and supÂposÂedÂly irrecÂonÂcilÂable archiÂtecÂturÂal approachÂes, the ClasÂsiÂcal and the indusÂtriÂal.”
It was comÂmisÂsioned by the PennÂsylÂvaÂnia RailÂroad, which in the late nineÂteenth cenÂtuÂry was “the country’s largest busiÂness enterÂprise, with a budÂget secÂond only to that of the fedÂerÂal govÂernÂment,” writes the New YorkÂer’s William Finnegan, and which at that time had a forÂmiÂdaÂble engiÂneerÂing probÂlem to solve: “Its tracks endÂed, like those of every railÂroad approachÂing New York from the west, in New JerÂsey, on the banks of the HudÂson RivÂer. In 1900, nineÂty milÂlion pasÂsenÂgers were obligÂed to transÂfer to ferÂries to reach ManÂhatÂtan.”
To run the PennÂsylÂvaÂnia RailÂroadÂ’s tracks into the cenÂter of New York City required digÂging a set of tunÂnels under the HudÂson, where, says one hisÂtoÂriÂan on PBS’ AmerÂiÂcan ExpeÂriÂence docÂuÂmenÂtary on the rise and fall of Penn StaÂtion, “nobody thought tunÂnels could be built. It’s almost as though they were going to go to the moon.” The techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal achieveÂment was matched by the aesÂthetÂic: “Its main waitÂing room, panÂeled in ItalÂian traverÂtine, with flutÂed columns and cofÂfered ceilÂings a hunÂdred and fifty feet high, was the world’s largest room,” Finnegan writes. “The train shed was equalÂly grand, with archÂing steel girdÂers, stagÂgered mezÂzaÂnines, and glass-block floors that let sunÂlight through to the tracks. ” Like othÂer major urban rail terÂmiÂnals of its era, writes Tony Judt, Penn StaÂtion “spoke directÂly and delibÂerÂateÂly to the comÂmerÂcial ambiÂtions and civic self-image of the modÂern metropÂoÂlis.”
By the mid-twenÂtiÂeth-cenÂtuÂry, howÂevÂer, trains were facÂing aggresÂsive comÂpeÂtiÂtion from both the priÂvate car and the airÂplane, which disÂplaced their staÂtions from the cenÂter of modÂern life. “Between 1955 and 1975,” Judt writes, “a mix of antiÂhisÂtoriÂcist fashÂion and corÂpoÂrate self-interÂest saw the destrucÂtion of a remarkÂable numÂber of terÂmiÂnal staÂtions.” But prospects for rail of one kind or anothÂer in AmerÂiÂca have looked up in recent years, and “we are no longer embarÂrassed by the rocoÂco or neo-GothÂic or Beaux-Arts excessÂes of the great railÂway staÂtions of the indusÂtriÂal age and can see such ediÂfices instead as their designÂers and conÂtemÂpoÂraries saw them: as the catheÂdrals of their age.” Hence, in New York, the preserÂvaÂtion of Grand CenÂtral StaÂtion — as well as the bitÂter and proÂtractÂed strugÂgle (covÂered extenÂsiveÂly in Finnegan’s New YorkÂer piece) over whether and how to turn the unloved Penn StaÂtion into a catheÂdral of our age.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
An ImmerÂsive ArchiÂtecÂturÂal Tour of New York City’s IconÂic Grand CenÂtral TerÂmiÂnal
New York’s Lost SkyÂscraper: The Rise and Fall of the Singer TowÂer
A SubÂway Ride Through New York City: Watch VinÂtage Footage from 1905
Famous ArchiÂtects Dress as Their Famous New York City BuildÂings (1931)
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
Great piece !!!
There are many accounts on InstaÂgram that docÂuÂment the lost (and still standÂing) archiÂtecÂturÂal marÂvels of NYC in parÂticÂuÂlar and worldÂwide. The amount of beauÂtiÂful buildÂings that saw the wreckÂing ball in the 60’s alone could fill sevÂerÂal volÂumes. (I’m lookÂing at you, Singer BuildÂing) It is seriÂousÂly amazÂing there are any hisÂtoric buildÂings left after that decade. The only posÂiÂtive of the loss of Penn StaÂtion is that it galÂvaÂnized hisÂtoric preserÂvaÂtion, which has saved many more beauÂtiÂful buildÂings.
HelÂlo, my name is Ronald Cesario Colez, I’d like to get in touch with the archiÂtect Michael WyetÂznÂer. It’s about PENN STATION. The PENN STATION, today 2023. I’ve worked there for 23 years and I’ve a lot to ask him.
thank you
Colez
cesarioat52colez@aol.com
1 917 297 3546
http://www.ronaldcesariocolez.com
(under conÂstrucÂtion )
HisÂtoric preserÂvaÂtion in New York is decidÂedÂly ungalÂvaÂnized. We’re losÂing hisÂtoric buildÂings every day.