The techÂnolÂoÂgy we put between ourÂselves and othÂers tends to always creÂate addiÂtionÂal strains on comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion, even as it enables near-conÂstant, instant conÂtact. When it comes to our now-priÂmaÂry mode of interÂactÂing — starÂing at each othÂer as talkÂing heads or Brady Bunch-style galÂleries — those stressÂes have been idenÂtiÂfied by comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion experts as “Zoom fatigue,” now a subÂject of study among psyÂcholÂoÂgists who want to underÂstand our always-conÂnectÂed-but-mostÂly-isoÂlatÂed lives in the panÂdemÂic, and a topÂic for Today show segÂments like the one above.
As StanÂford researcher JereÂmy BailenÂson vividÂly explains to Today, Zoom fatigue refers to the burnout we expeÂriÂence from interÂactÂing with dozens of peoÂple for hours a day, months on end, through pretÂty much any video conÂferÂencÂing platÂform. (But, let’s face it, mostÂly Zoom.) We may be familÂiar with the sympÂtoms already if we spend some part of our day on video calls or lessons. Zoom fatigue comÂbines the probÂlems of overÂwork and techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal overÂstimÂuÂlaÂtion with unique forms of social exhausÂtion that do not plague us in the office or the classÂroom.
BailenÂson, direcÂtor of StanÂford University’s VirÂtuÂal Human InterÂacÂtion Lab, refers to this kind of burnout as “NonÂverÂbal OverÂload,” a colÂlecÂtion of “psyÂchoÂlogÂiÂcal conÂseÂquences” from proÂlonged periÂods of disÂemÂbodÂied conÂverÂsaÂtion. He has been studyÂing virÂtuÂal comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion for two decades and began writÂing about the curÂrent probÂlem in April of 2020 in a Wall Street JourÂnal op-ed that warned, “softÂware like Zoom was designed to do online work, and the tools that increase proÂducÂtivÂiÂty weren’t meant to mimÂic norÂmal social interÂacÂtion.”
Now, in a new scholÂarÂly artiÂcle pubÂlished in the APA jourÂnal TechÂnolÂoÂgy, Mind, and BehavÂior, BailenÂson elabÂoÂrates on the arguÂment with a focus on Zoom, not to “vilÂiÂfy the comÂpaÂny,” he writes, but because “it has become the default platÂform for many in acadÂeÂmia” (and everyÂwhere else, perÂhaps its own form of exhausÂtion). The conÂstituents of nonÂverÂbal overÂload include gazÂing into each othÂers’ eyes at close proxÂimÂiÂty for long periÂods of time, even when we aren’t speakÂing to each othÂer.
AnyÂone who speaks for a livÂing underÂstands the intenÂsiÂty of being stared at for hours at a time. Even when speakÂers see virÂtuÂal faces instead of real ones, research has shown that being stared at while speakÂing causÂes physÂiÂoÂlogÂiÂcal arousal (Takac et al., 2019). But Zoom’s interÂface design conÂstantÂly beams faces to everyÂone, regardÂless of who is speakÂing. From a perÂcepÂtuÂal standÂpoint, Zoom effecÂtiveÂly transÂforms lisÂtenÂers into speakÂers and smothÂers everyÂone with eye gaze.
On Zoom, we also have to expend much more enerÂgy to send and interÂpret nonÂverÂbal cues, and withÂout the conÂtext of the room outÂside the screen, we are more apt to misÂinÂterÂpret them. DependÂing on the size of our screen, we may be starÂing at each othÂer as largÂer-than-life talkÂing heads, a disÂoriÂentÂing expeÂriÂence for the brain and one that lends more impact to facial expresÂsions than may be warÂrantÂed, creÂatÂing a false sense of intiÂmaÂcy and urgency. “When someone’s face is that close to ours in real life,” writes VigÂnesh RamachanÂdran at StanÂford News, “our brains interÂpret it as an intense sitÂuÂaÂtion that is either going to lead to matÂing or to conÂflict.”
Unless we turn off the view of ourÂselves on the screen — which we genÂerÂalÂly don’t do because we’re conÂscious of being stared at — we are also essenÂtialÂly sitÂting in front of a mirÂror while tryÂing to focus on othÂers. The conÂstant self-evalÂuÂaÂtion adds an addiÂtionÂal layÂer of stress and taxÂes the brain’s resources. In face-to-face interÂacÂtions, we can let our eyes wanÂder, even move around the room and do othÂer things while we talk to peoÂple. “There’s a growÂing research now that says when peoÂple are movÂing, they’re perÂformÂing betÂter cogÂniÂtiveÂly,” says BailenÂson. Zoom interÂacÂtions, conÂverseÂly, can inhibÂit moveÂment for long periÂods of time.
“Zoom fatigue” may not be as dire as it sounds, but rather the inevitable triÂals of a tranÂsiÂtionÂal periÂod, BailenÂson sugÂgests. He offers soluÂtions we can impleÂment now: using the “hide self-view” butÂton, mutÂing our video regÂuÂlarÂly, setÂting up the techÂnolÂoÂgy so that we can fidÂget, dooÂdle, and get up and move around.… Not all of these are going to work for everyÂone — we are, after all, socialÂized to sit and stare at each othÂer on Zoom; refusÂing to parÂticÂiÂpate might send uninÂtendÂed mesÂsages we would have to expend more enerÂgy to corÂrect. BailenÂson furÂther describes the pheÂnomÂeÂnon in the BBC BusiÂness DaiÂly podÂcast interÂview above.
“VideoÂconÂferÂencÂing is here to stay,” BailenÂson admits, and we’ll have to adapt. “As media psyÂcholÂoÂgists it is our job,” he writes to his colÂleagues in the new artiÂcle, to help “users develÂop betÂter use pracÂtices” and help “techÂnolÂoÂgists build betÂter interÂfaces.” He mostÂly leaves it to the techÂnolÂoÂgists to imagÂine what those are, though we ourÂselves have more conÂtrol over the platÂform than we colÂlecÂtiveÂly acknowlÂedge. Could we maybe admit, BailenÂson writes, that “perÂhaps a driÂver of Zoom fatigue is simÂply that we are takÂing more meetÂings than we would be doing face-to-face”?
Read about the “Zoom ExhausÂtion & Fatigue Scale (ZEF Scale)” develÂoped by BailenÂson and his colÂleagues at StanÂford and the UniÂverÂsiÂty of GothenÂburg here. Then take the surÂvey yourÂself, and see where you rank in the ZEF catÂeÂgories of genÂerÂal fatigue, visuÂal fatigue, social fatigue, motiÂvaÂtionÂal fatigue, and emoÂtionÂal fatigue.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
This seems to me the same social exhausÂtion that introÂverts like me feel anyÂway and on a daiÂly basis, only ampliÂfied by the Brady Bunch screen.
The artiÂcle says: “Zoom fatigue refers to the burnout we expeÂriÂence from interÂactÂing with dozens of peoÂple for hours a day, months on end, through pretÂty much any video conÂferÂencÂing platÂform.”
Now let’s re-phrase that for an introÂvert: “Social fatigue refers to the burnout we expeÂriÂence from interÂactÂing with dozens of peoÂple for hours a day, months on end, year after year, through pretÂty much any office enviÂronÂment.”
WelÂcome to my world!
Zoom missÂes all the humuan interÂacÂtions othÂer than “face” — how about the effort require to get up, get on the train, sit in the meetÂing, chat inforÂmalÂly as you pick-up your cofÂfee at CosÂta, bump into othÂer peoÂple or just interÂact with othÂer humans?
These all desenÂsiÂtise you from the very full-on glare of the video-conÂferÂence. And this seemÂing need to talk about everyÂthing all the time — what is wrong with getÂting on with your work and sendÂing a quick email rather than conÂstantÂly jabÂberÂing on about what you’re doing, why you’re doing it?
Frankly, I can’t wait to get back to my norÂmal social life so that I can refuse Zoom meetÂings on the basis that I’m in a locaÂtion where I can’t talk or don’t want to be seen. I’ll still do my work, but I’ll do it betÂter if Big BrothÂer, SisÂter, Mum and Dad aren’t watchÂing me…
“disÂemÂbodÂied conÂverÂsaÂtion” like phones haven’t existÂed for nearÂly 150 years.
thanks for info