As all of us have noticed in recent months, livÂing in a viral panÂdemÂic realÂly messÂes with your sense of time. A few months feels like a decade. Time slows to a crawl. If you’re a parÂent, howÂevÂer, you have before you walkÂing, talkÂing, growÂing, comÂplainÂing reminders that no matÂter what’s hapÂpenÂing in the world, chilÂdren still grow up just the same. They need new expeÂriÂences and new clothes just as before, and they need to keep their brains engaged and try, at least, to build on priÂor knowlÂedge.
Maybe we’re learnÂing new things, too. (Adult brains also need exerÂcise.) Or not. We have some conÂtrol over the sitÂuÂaÂtion; kids don’t. “LearnÂing loss” over inacÂtive months is real, and the govÂernÂment still has the responÂsiÂbilÂiÂty (for what the word is worth) to eduÂcate them. Online learnÂing may feel like a bad comÂproÂmise for many famÂiÂlies, and its sucÂcess seems largeÂly dependent—as in regÂuÂlar school—on parÂent involveÂment and access to resources. But it’s betÂter than eight months of the more mindÂless kind of screen time.
It may help to know that remote learnÂing isn’t new, even if we’re still adjustÂing to techÂnolÂoÂgy that lets teachÂers (and bossÂes) into our homes with camÂeras and microÂphones. The chalÂlenges “may seem unpreceÂdentÂed,” StanÂford proÂfesÂsor Michael Hines writes at The WashÂingÂton Post, but “eduÂcaÂtors may be surÂprised to learn that almost 100 years ago Chicago’s schools faced simÂiÂlar cirÂcumÂstances” durÂing the polio epiÂdemÂic and met them in a simÂiÂlar way. In 1937, an outÂbreak forced the city to close schools, and promptÂed “wideÂspread alarm about lost instrucÂtionÂal time and stuÂdents left to their own devices” (so to speak).
AdminÂisÂtraÂtors were “deterÂmined to conÂtinÂue instrucÂtions for the district’s nearÂly 325,000 eleÂmenÂtary age stuÂdents” through the only remote techÂnolÂoÂgy availÂable, radio, “still fairÂly new and largeÂly untestÂed in eduÂcaÂtion in the 1930s.” AccordÂing to Hines, a hisÂtoÂriÂan of eduÂcaÂtion in the U.S., the proÂgram was very well orgaÂnized, the lessons were engagÂing, and eduÂcaÂtors “activeÂly sought to involve parÂents and comÂmuÂniÂties” through teleÂphone hotÂlines they could call with quesÂtions or comÂments. On the first day, they logged over 1,000 calls and added five addiÂtionÂal teachÂers.
You might be wondering—given digÂiÂtal divide probÂlems of online learnÂing today—whether all the stuÂdents served actuÂalÂly owned a radio and teleÂphone. KatherÂine Foss, a proÂfesÂsor of Media StudÂies at MidÂdle TenÂnessee State UniÂverÂsiÂty, notes that in the late 1930s, “over 80% of U.S. houseÂholds owned at least one radio, though fewÂer were found in homes in the southÂern U.S., in rurÂal areas and among peoÂple of colÂor.” Those who didÂn’t were left out, and school authorÂiÂties had no way to track attenÂdance. “Access issues received litÂtle attenÂtion” in the media. School SuperÂinÂtenÂdent William JohnÂson had no idea how many stuÂdents tuned in.
The local proÂgram lastÂed less than three weeks before schools reopened. Some felt the instrucÂtion moved too quickÂly and “stuÂdents who needÂed more attenÂtion or remeÂdiÂaÂtion strugÂgled through one-size-fits-all radio lessons,” notes Hines. EduÂcaÂtors today will symÂpaÂthize with the overÂall sense at the time that those who benÂeÂfitÂted most from the radio lessons were stuÂdents who needÂed them least.
Learn more about the experÂiÂment in Hines’ hisÂtoÂry lesÂson (also see Foss’ recent artiÂcle), and conÂsidÂer the lessons we can apply to the present. Remote eduÂcaÂtion still has flaws, and parÂents still strugÂgle to find time for involveÂment, but the techÂnolÂoÂgy has made it a viable option for much longer than three weeks, and maybe, givÂen future uncerÂtainÂties, far longer than that.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Free Online DrawÂing Lessons for Kids, Led by Favorite Artists & IllusÂtraÂtors
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
Leave a Reply