The dozens of filmÂmakÂers in the diaÂgram above belong to a variÂety of culÂtures and eras, but what do they have in comÂmon? Some of the names that jump out at even the casuÂal filmÂgoÂer — Andrei Tarkovsky, Jim JarÂmusch, Pier PaoÂlo PasoliÂni, TerÂrence MalÂick — may sugÂgest a straightÂforÂward conÂnecÂtion: cinephiles love them. Of course, not every cinephile loves every one of these direcÂtors, and indeed, bitÂter cinephile arguÂments rage about their relÂaÂtive merÂits even as we speak. But in one way or anothÂer, all of them are takÂen seriÂousÂly as auteurs by those who take film seriÂousÂly as an art form — and not least by Paul SchradÂer, one of the most seriÂous auteur-cinephiles alive.
SchradÂer first made his name as a film critÂic, with his 1972 book TranÂscenÂdenÂtal Style in Film: Ozu, BresÂson, DreyÂer. In it he argues that the work of YasuÂjirĹŤ Ozu, Robert BresÂson, and Carl Theodor DreyÂer have in comÂmon a qualÂiÂty that quite litÂerÂalÂly “tranÂscends” their difÂferÂences in oriÂgin.
This tranÂscenÂdenÂtal style in film “seeks to maxÂiÂmize the mysÂtery of exisÂtence; it eschews all conÂvenÂtionÂal interÂpreÂtaÂtions of realÂiÂty: realÂism, natÂuÂralÂism, psyÂcholÂoÂgism, romanÂtiÂcism, expresÂsionÂism, impresÂsionÂism, and, finalÂly, ratioÂnalÂism.” It “stylÂizes realÂiÂty by elimÂiÂnatÂing (or nearÂly elimÂiÂnatÂing) those eleÂments which are priÂmarÂiÂly expresÂsive of human expeÂriÂence, thereÂby robÂbing the conÂvenÂtionÂal interÂpreÂtaÂtions of realÂiÂty of their relÂeÂvance and powÂer.”
45 years on, SchradÂer revisÂits this conÂcept in the ToronÂto InterÂnaÂtionÂal Film FesÂtiÂval interÂview clip above. “Most movies lean toward you. They lean toward you aggresÂsiveÂly with their hands around your throat, tryÂing to grab every secÂond of your attenÂtion.” But tranÂscenÂdenÂtal films “lean away from you, and they use time — and as othÂer peoÂple would call it, boreÂdom — as a techÂnique.” They linger on the everyÂday, the uneventÂful, the repetÂiÂtive. Used adeptÂly, this “withÂholdÂing device” is a way of “actiÂvatÂing” viewÂers and their attenÂtion. Then comes the “deciÂsive action,” the moment in which the film does “someÂthing unexÂpectÂed”: the “big blast of Mozart” at the end of BresÂson’s PickÂpockÂet, the “big blast of emoÂtion” at the end of an othÂerÂwise reserved Ozu picÂture. “What are you going to do with it, now that he has totalÂly conÂdiÂtioned you not to expect it?”
In the new ediÂtion of TranÂscenÂdenÂtal Style in Film pubÂlished in 2018, SchradÂer includes the diaÂgram at the top of the post. It illusÂtrates the three major direcÂtions in which filmÂmakÂers have departÂed from traÂdiÂtionÂal narÂraÂtive, repÂreÂsentÂed by the N at the cenÂter. Ozu, BresÂson, and DreyÂer all go off toward the medÂiÂtaÂtive “manÂdala.” Abbas KiarostaÂmi, Gus Van Sant, and the ItalÂian neoÂreÂalÂists start on path that leads to the “surÂveilÂlance cam,” with its unblinkÂing eye on an unchangÂing patch of realÂiÂty. The likes of KenÂji Mizoguchi, MichelanÂgeÂlo AntoÂnioni, and David Lynch point the way to the audioÂviÂsuÂal abstracÂtion of the “art gallery.” FloatÂing around these aesÂthetÂic end points are the names of filmÂmakÂers known for the “difÂfiÂculÂty” of their work: Stan Brakhage, Wang Bing, James BenÂning.
Their work resides well past what SchradÂer calls the “Tarkovsky Ring,” named for the auteur of MirÂror, StalkÂer, and NosÂtalÂghia. When an artist passÂes through the Tarkovsky Ring, as SchradÂer put it to Indiewire, “that’s the point where he is no longer makÂing cinÂeÂma for a payÂing audiÂence. He’s makÂing it for instiÂtuÂtions, for museÂums, and so forth.” WithÂin the Tarkovsky Ring appear a fair few advenÂturÂous direcÂtors still workÂing today, like Hirokazu Kore-eda, KelÂly Reichardt, AlexanÂder Sokurov, and Hou Hsiao-hsien. SchradÂer has neglectÂed to include his own name on the diaÂgram, perÂhaps leavÂing his exact placeÂment as an exerÂcise for the readÂer. He cerÂtainÂly belongs on there someÂwhere: after all, some critÂics have called his last feaÂture First Reformed his most tranÂscenÂdent yet.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
The ExhilÂaÂratÂing FilmÂmakÂing of Robert BresÂson Explored in Eight Video Essays
How One SimÂple Cut Reveals the CinÂeÂmatÂic Genius of YasuÂjirĹŤ Ozu
Four Video Essays Explain the MasÂtery of FilmÂmakÂer Abbas KiarostaÂmi (RIP)
Watch Online The PasÂsion of Joan of Arc by Carl Theodor DreyÂer (1928)
The 5 EssenÂtial Rules of Film Noir
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall, on FaceÂbook, or on InstaÂgram.
Roy AnderÂsÂson*