Like many a great artist, the forÂtunes of MichelanÂgeÂlo Merisi da CarÂavagÂgio rose and fell draÂmatÂiÂcalÂly. After his death, posÂsiÂbly from syphilis or murÂder, his influÂence spread across the conÂtiÂnent as folÂlowÂers called CarÂavaggisti took his extreme use of chiaroscuro abroad. He influÂenced Rubens, RemÂbrandt, and Velázquez—indeed, the entire Baroque periÂod in EuroÂpean art hisÂtoÂry probÂaÂbly would nevÂer have hapÂpened withÂout him. “With the excepÂtion of MichelanÂgeÂlo,” art hisÂtoÂriÂan Bernard BerenÂson wrote, “no othÂer ItalÂian painter exerÂcised so great an influÂence.”
But latÂer critÂics savÂaged his hyper-draÂmatÂic, high-conÂtrast realÂism. His style, called “teneÂbrism” for its use of deep darkÂness in paintÂings like The CallÂing of St. Matthew, is shockÂing by comÂparÂiÂson with the fanÂciÂful ManÂnerÂism that came before. In the video above, Evan Puschak, the NerdÂwriter, explains what makes Caravaggio’s work so strangeÂly hyperÂreÂal. He “preÂferred to paint his subÂjects as the eye sees them,” the CarÂavagÂgio FounÂdaÂtion writes, “with all their natÂurÂal flaws and defects instead of as ideÂalÂized creÂations…. This shift from stanÂdard pracÂtice and the clasÂsiÂcal ideÂalÂism of MichelanÂgeÂlo was very conÂtroÂverÂsial at the time…. His realÂism was seen by some as unacÂceptÂably vulÂgar.”
Also conÂtroÂverÂsial was CarÂavagÂgio himÂself. His wild life made an ideÂal subÂject for Derek Jarman’s 1986 artÂhouse biopic starÂring TilÂda SwinÂton. Famous for brawlÂing, “the tranÂscripts of his police records and triÂal proÂceedÂings fill sevÂerÂal pages.” He nevÂer marÂried or setÂtled down and the male erotiÂcism in his paintÂings has led many to sugÂgesÂtions he was gay .(Jarman’s film makes this an explicÂit part of his biogÂraÂphy.) It’s likeÂly, art hisÂtoÂriÂans think, that the painter had many tumulÂtuous relaÂtionÂships, sexÂuÂal and othÂerÂwise, with both men and women before his earÂly death at the age of 38.
Despite his proÂfane life, Caravaggio’s paintÂings evince a “remarkÂable spirÂiÂtuÂalÂiÂty” and illusÂtrate, as Puschak notes, exactÂly the kind of pasÂsionÂate intenÂsiÂty the counter-RefÂorÂmaÂtion Catholic Church wantÂed to use to stir the faithÂful. Caravaggio’s popÂuÂlarÂiÂty meant comÂmisÂsions from wealthy patrons, and for a time, he was the most famous painter in Rome, as well as one of the city’s most infaÂmous charÂacÂters. CarÂavagÂgio paintÂed from life, stagÂing his intriÂcate arrangeÂments with real modÂels who held the posÂes as he worked.
His figÂures were ordiÂnary peoÂple one might meet on the 17th cenÂtuÂry streets of the city. And CarÂavagÂgio himÂself, despite his enorÂmous talÂent, was an ordiÂnary perÂson as well, stereoÂtypes of tragÂic, torÂtured geniusÂes aside. He was deeply flawed, it’s true, yet driÂven by an incredÂiÂble longÂing to become someÂthing greater.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
LivÂing PaintÂings: 13 CarÂavagÂgio Works of Art PerÂformed by Real-Life Actors
Why Babies in Medieval PaintÂings Look Like MidÂdle-Aged Men: An InvesÂtigaÂtive Video
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
How timeÂly! I just viewed a wonÂderÂful CarÂavagÂgio today, Saint FranÂcis of Assisi in EcstaÂsy at the Wadsworth Atheneum. If you are ever in HartÂford, check it out.
Read Andrew GraÂhahm Dixon’s authriÂtaÂtive biogÂraÂphy of CarÂavgÂgio, then make a CarÂavagÂgio tour in Rome and Naples (Napoli). HighÂly rewardÂing!