Neil Armstrong Sets Straight an Internet Truther Who Accused Him of Faking the Moon Landing (2000)

Image via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

Peo­ple have been grad­u­at­ing from col­lege this year who are as old as the role of inter­net truther. It is a ven­er­a­ble hob­by (some might call it a cult) lead­ing increas­ing num­bers of peo­ple to bizarre con­clu­sions drawn from dubi­ous evi­dence prof­fered by spu­ri­ous sources; peo­ple con­vinced that some wild alle­ga­tion or oth­er must be true because they saw it on the Inter­net, shared by peo­ple they knew and liked.

Twen­ty years ago, one pio­neer­ing truther wrote Mr. Neil Arm­strong to put him in his place about that bug­bear, the faked moon land­ing. The author of the let­ter, a Mr. Whit­man, iden­ti­fies him­self as a “teacher of young chil­dren” charged with “a duty to tell them his­to­ry as it tru­ly hap­pened, and not a pack of lies and deceit.” His let­ter shows some dif­fi­cul­ty with gram­mar, and even more with crit­i­cal think­ing and stan­dards of evi­dence.

Mr. Whit­man makes his accu­sa­tions with cer­tain­ty and smug­ness. “Per­haps you are total­ly unaware,” he writes, “of all the evi­dence cir­cu­lat­ing the globe via the Inter­net,” which he then sum­ma­rizes.

He also sends Neil Armstrong—an astro­naut who either walked on the Moon or engaged in per­haps the great­est con­spir­a­cy in history—a URL, “to see for your­self how ridicu­lous the Moon land­ing claim looks 30 years on.” Whit­man sent Arm­strong the let­ter on the astro­naut’s 70th birth­day.

Armstrong’s response, via Let­ters of Note, can be read in full above. Per­haps Mr. Whit­man learned some­thing from the exchange—or had a moment of clar­i­ty about his meth­ods of inves­ti­ga­tion. One can hope. In any case, Armstrong’s unspar­ing reply serves as a tem­plate for responding—should some­one be so inclined—to inter­net truthers armed with wild con­spir­a­cy the­o­ries 20 years lat­er. These let­ters have been col­lect­ed in A Reluc­tant Icon: Let­ters to Neil Arm­strong.

via Kot­tke

Relat­ed Con­tent: 

Stan­ley Kubrick Faked the Apol­lo 11 Moon Land­ing in 1969, Or So the Con­spir­a­cy The­o­ry Goes

Watch the Orig­i­nal TV Cov­er­age of the His­toric Apol­lo 11 Moon Land­ing: Record­ed on July 20, 1969

Every Har­row­ing Sec­ond of the Apol­lo 11 Land­ing Revis­it­ed in a New NASA Video: It Took Place 50 Years Ago Today (July 20, 1969)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness


by | Permalink | Comments (4) |

Sup­port Open Cul­ture

We’re hop­ing to rely on our loy­al read­ers rather than errat­ic ads. To sup­port Open Cul­ture’s edu­ca­tion­al mis­sion, please con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion. We accept Pay­Pal, Ven­mo (@openculture), Patre­on and Cryp­to! Please find all options here. We thank you!


Comments (4)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • John Van Allen says:

    If the guy who wrote that let­ter is real­ly a school teacher then we are all in seri­ous trou­ble. It’s bad enough hav­ing peo­ple out there who are une­d­u­cat­ed regard­ing the sub­ject mat­ter but to know they are teach­ing it to our kids is depress­ing. Shame on who­ev­er hired him!!!

  • Mark Gray says:

    I still like Buzz Aldrin’s reac­tion to the per­son who said to his face that the moon land­ings were faked.

  • DANIEL THALER says:

    IF YOU REALLY WANTED TO PROPAGATE A HOAX, YOU’D LAUNCH SECRETLY AND GO TO THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON. “I DON’T SEE ANY EVIDENCE OF A LUNAR LANDING ON THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON.” RIGHT. GET IT. DID YOU SEE THE LIFT OFF OR ANYTHING ELSE? NO. TOTAL SECRECY. OUR LUNAR MISSION WAS FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE, LITERALLY, FROM BEGINNING TO END. SO NOW WE’VE REACHED MARS. THAT MUST BE A HOAX TOO THEN. IF WE COULDN’T GET TO THE MOON HOW THE HELL CAN WE GET TO MARS? UNMANNED TRUE, BUT A CONTROLLED LANDING. GIVE IT SOME TIME. WE’LL COME UP WITH A MARS LANDING HOAX IN DUE TIME AS WELL.

  • Bob says:

    The fun­ni­est part of the the­o­ry is try­ing to explain how our Cold War neme­sis the USSR wouldn’t have jumped all over it if it were fake. What’s sad is that they demean the incred­i­ble work of 400k Amer­i­cans with this baloney.

Leave a Reply

Quantcast