Image via WikiÂmeÂdia ComÂmons
PeoÂple have been gradÂuÂatÂing from colÂlege this year who are as old as the role of interÂnet truther. It is a venÂerÂaÂble hobÂby (some might call it a cult) leadÂing increasÂing numÂbers of peoÂple to bizarre conÂcluÂsions drawn from dubiÂous eviÂdence profÂfered by spuÂriÂous sources; peoÂple conÂvinced that some wild alleÂgaÂtion or othÂer must be true because they saw it on the InterÂnet, shared by peoÂple they knew and liked.
TwenÂty years ago, one pioÂneerÂing truther wrote Mr. Neil ArmÂstrong to put him in his place about that bugÂbear, the faked moon landÂing. The author of the letÂter, a Mr. WhitÂman, idenÂtiÂfies himÂself as a “teacher of young chilÂdren” charged with “a duty to tell them hisÂtoÂry as it truÂly hapÂpened, and not a pack of lies and deceit.” His letÂter shows some difÂfiÂculÂty with gramÂmar, and even more with critÂiÂcal thinkÂing and stanÂdards of eviÂdence.
Mr. WhitÂman makes his accuÂsaÂtions with cerÂtainÂty and smugÂness. “PerÂhaps you are totalÂly unaware,” he writes, “of all the eviÂdence cirÂcuÂlatÂing the globe via the InterÂnet,” which he then sumÂmaÂrizes.
He also sends Neil Armstrong—an astroÂnaut who either walked on the Moon or engaged in perÂhaps the greatÂest conÂspirÂaÂcy in history—a URL, “to see for yourÂself how ridicuÂlous the Moon landÂing claim looks 30 years on.” WhitÂman sent ArmÂstrong the letÂter on the astroÂnaut’s 70th birthÂday.
Armstrong’s response, via LetÂters of Note, can be read in full above. PerÂhaps Mr. WhitÂman learned someÂthing from the exchange—or had a moment of clarÂiÂty about his methÂods of invesÂtiÂgaÂtion. One can hope. In any case, Armstrong’s unsparÂing reply serves as a temÂplate for responding—should someÂone be so inclined—to interÂnet truthers armed with wild conÂspirÂaÂcy theÂoÂries 20 years latÂer. These letÂters have been colÂlectÂed in A RelucÂtant Icon: LetÂters to Neil ArmÂstrong.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
If the guy who wrote that letÂter is realÂly a school teacher then we are all in seriÂous trouÂble. It’s bad enough havÂing peoÂple out there who are uneÂdÂuÂcatÂed regardÂing the subÂject matÂter but to know they are teachÂing it to our kids is depressÂing. Shame on whoÂevÂer hired him!!!
I still like Buzz Aldrin’s reacÂtion to the perÂson who said to his face that the moon landÂings were faked.
IF YOU REALLY WANTED TO PROPAGATE A HOAX, YOU’D LAUNCH SECRETLY AND GO TO THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON. “I DON’T SEE ANY EVIDENCE OF A LUNAR LANDING ON THE DARK SIDE OF THE MOON.” RIGHT. GET IT. DID YOU SEE THE LIFT OFF OR ANYTHING ELSE? NO. TOTAL SECRECY. OUR LUNAR MISSION WAS FOR ALL THE WORLD TO SEE, LITERALLY, FROM BEGINNING TO END. SO NOW WE’VE REACHED MARS. THAT MUST BE A HOAX TOO THEN. IF WE COULDN’T GET TO THE MOON HOW THE HELL CAN WE GET TO MARS? UNMANNED TRUE, BUT A CONTROLLED LANDING. GIVE IT SOME TIME. WE’LL COME UP WITH A MARS LANDING HOAX IN DUE TIME AS WELL.
The funÂniÂest part of the theÂoÂry is tryÂing to explain how our Cold War nemeÂsis the USSR wouldn’t have jumped all over it if it were fake. What’s sad is that they demean the incredÂiÂble work of 400k AmerÂiÂcans with this baloney.