Does polÂiÂtics belong in art? The quesÂtion arousÂes heatÂed debate about creÂative freeÂdom and moral responÂsiÂbilÂiÂty. AssumpÂtions include the idea that polÂiÂtics cheapÂens film, music, or litÂerÂaÂture, or that politÂiÂcal art should abanÂdon traÂdiÂtionÂal ideas about beauÂty and techÂnique. As engagÂing as such disÂcusÂsions might be in the abstract, they mean litÂtle to nothÂing if they don’t account for artists who show us that choosÂing between polÂiÂtics and art can be as much a false dilemÂma as choosÂing between art and love.
In the work of writÂers as varÂied as William Blake, Muriel Rukeyser, James BaldÂwin, and James Joyce, for examÂple, themes of protest, powÂer, privÂiÂlege, and poverÂty are insepÂaÂraÂble from the subÂlimeÂly erotic—all of them essenÂtial aspects of human expeÂriÂence, and hence, of litÂerÂaÂture. ForeÂmost among such politÂiÂcal artists stands Chilean poet Pablo NeruÂda, who—as the TED-Ed video above from Ilan StaÂvans informs us—was a romanÂtic stylÂist, and also a fearÂless politÂiÂcal activist and revÂoÂluÂtionÂary.
NeruÂda won the Nobel Prize for LitÂerÂaÂture in 1971, and, among his many othÂer litÂerÂary accomÂplishÂments, he “resÂcued 2,000 refugees, spent three years in politÂiÂcal exile, and ran for presÂiÂdent of Chile.” NeruÂda used “straightÂforÂward lanÂguage and everyÂday expeÂriÂence to creÂate lastÂing impact.” He began his career writÂing odes and love poems filled with canÂdid sexÂuÂalÂiÂty and senÂsuÂous descripÂtion that resÂonatÂed with readÂers around the world.
Neruda’s interÂnaÂtionÂal fame led to a series of diploÂmatÂic posts, and he evenÂtuÂalÂly landÂed in Spain, where he served as conÂsul in the mid-1930s durÂing the SpanÂish CivÂil War. He became a comÂmitÂted comÂmuÂnist, and helped reloÂcate hunÂdreds of fleeÂing Spaniards to Chile. NeruÂda came to believe that “the work of art” is “insepÂaÂraÂble from hisÂtorÂiÂcal and politÂiÂcal conÂtext,” writes author SalÂvaÂtore BizÂzarro, and he “felt that the belief that one could write soleÂly for eterÂniÂty was romanÂtic posÂturÂing.”
Yet his lifeÂlong devoÂtion to “revÂoÂluÂtionÂary ideals,” as StaÂvans says, did not underÂmine his devoÂtion to poetÂry, nor did it blinkÂer his writÂing with what we might call politÂiÂcal corÂrectÂness. Instead, NeruÂda became more expanÂsive, takÂing on such subÂjects as the “entire hisÂtoÂry of Latin AmerÂiÂca” in his 1950 epic CanÂto GenÂerÂal.
NeruÂda died of canÂcer just weeks after fasÂcist dicÂtaÂtor AugusÂto Pinochet seized powÂer from electÂed presÂiÂdent SalÂvador Allende in 1973. Today, he remains a beloved figÂure for activists, his lines “recitÂed at protests and marchÂes worldÂwide.” And he remains a litÂerÂary giant, respectÂed, admired, and adored worldÂwide for work in which he engaged the strugÂgles of the peoÂple with the same pasÂsionÂate intenÂsiÂty and imagÂiÂnaÂtive breadth he brought to perÂsonÂal poems of love, loss, and desire.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Pablo Neruda’s HisÂtoric First ReadÂing in the US (1966)
Pablo Neruda’s Poem, “The Me Bird,” Becomes a Short, BeauÂtiÂfulÂly AniÂmatÂed Film
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness.
Leave a Reply