For most of sciÂenÂtifÂic hisÂtoÂry, women who made conÂtriÂbuÂtions to varÂiÂous fields have been sideÂlined or ignored in favor of male colÂleagues, who reaped fame, proÂfesÂsionÂal recogÂniÂtion, and cash rewards that come with presÂtiÂgious prizes like the Nobel. CorÂnell hisÂtoÂriÂan of sciÂence MarÂgaret Rossiter coined the term “The MatilÂda Effect” to describe sexÂist bias in the sciÂences. Rossiter’s work and popÂuÂlar reapÂpraisals like book-turned-film HidÂden FigÂures have inspired othÂer women in acadÂeÂmia to search for forÂgotÂten female sciÂenÂtists, and to find them, litÂerÂalÂly, in footÂnotes.
When sysÂtemÂatÂic disÂcrimÂiÂnaÂtion limÂits opporÂtuÂniÂties for any group, those who do receive recogÂniÂtion, the excepÂtions to the rule, must often be truÂly excepÂtionÂal to sucÂceed. There has been litÂtle doubt, both in her lifeÂtime and in the many decades afterÂward, that Marie Curie was such a perÂson. Although forced to study sciÂence in secret at a clanÂdesÂtine “FloatÂing UniÂverÂsiÂty” in her native Poland—since the uniÂverÂsiÂties refused to admit women—Curie (born Marie Salomea SklodowsÂka in 1867) would achieve such renown in her field that she was awardÂed not one, but two Nobel Prizes.
Curie and her husÂband Pierre shared the Nobel Prize in Physics with Antoine HenÂri BecÂquerÂel, disÂcovÂerÂer of radioacÂtivÂiÂty, in 1903. The secÂond prize, in ChemÂistry, was hers alone in 1911, “in recogÂniÂtion of her serÂvices to the advanceÂment of chemÂistry by the disÂcovÂery of the eleÂments radiÂum and poloÂniÂum, by the isoÂlaÂtion of radiÂum and the study of the nature and comÂpounds of this remarkÂable eleÂment.” Curie was not only the first woman to win a Nobel, but she was also the first perÂson to win twice, and the only perÂson to win in two difÂferÂent sciÂences.
These are but a handÂful of achieveÂments in a string of firsts for Curie: denied posiÂtions in Poland, she earned a Ph.D. in France, awardÂed the degree in 1903 by the SorÂbonne, the same year she won her first Nobel. “Her examÂinÂers,” notes the site Famous SciÂenÂtists, “were of the view that she had made the greatÂest conÂtriÂbuÂtion to sciÂence ever found in a Ph.D. theÂsis.” Three years latÂer, after Pierre was killed in an acciÂdent, Marie was offered his proÂfesÂsorÂship and became the first female proÂfesÂsor at the UniÂverÂsiÂty of Paris.
Curie sucÂceedÂed not in the absence of, but in spite of the sexÂist obstaÂcles placed in her path at nearÂly every stage in her career. After she received her docÂtorÂate, the Curies were invitÂed to the RoyÂal InstiÂtuÂtion in LonÂdon. Only Pierre was perÂmitÂted to speak. That same year, the Nobel ComÂmitÂtee decidÂed to honÂor only her husÂband and BecÂquerÂel. The AcadÂeÂmy relentÂed when Pierre protestÂed. Curie fell vicÂtim to a wave of xenoÂphoÂbia and anti-SemiÂtism (though she was not JewÂish) that swept through France in the 1900s, most famousÂly in the so-called “DreyÂfus Affair.”
In 1911, the year of her secÂond Nobel, Curie was passed over for memÂberÂship in the French AcadÂeÂmy of SciÂences. It would take anothÂer 51 years before the first woman, MarÂguerite Perey, a forÂmer docÂtorÂal stuÂdent of Curie, would be electÂed to that body. That same year, Curie was perÂseÂcutÂed relentÂlessÂly by the French press, the pubÂlic, and her sciÂenÂtifÂic rivals after it was revealed that she had had a brief affair with physiÂcist Paul Langevin, one of Pierre Curie’s forÂmer stuÂdents.
But no matÂter how many men in posiÂtions of powÂer wantÂed to deter Curie, there always seemed to be more influÂenÂtial sciÂenÂtists and politiÂcians who recÂogÂnized the supreme valÂue of her work and the need to help her conÂtinÂue it. After her secÂond Nobel Prize, her native counÂtry finalÂly recÂogÂnized her with the offer to direct her own labÂoÂraÂtoÂry in WarÂsaw. Curie turned it down to focus on directÂing the Curie LabÂoÂraÂtoÂry in the RadiÂum InstiÂtute of the UniÂverÂsiÂty of Paris, which she foundÂed in 1914, a major achieveÂment and, again, only a small part of her legaÂcy.
Curie is known, of course, foreÂmost for her excepÂtionÂal sciÂenÂtifÂic work, but also for openÂing doors for women in sciÂence all over the world, though much of that door-openÂing may only have hapÂpened decades after her death in 1934, and much of it hasn’t hapÂpened at all yet. InciÂdenÂtalÂly, in the folÂlowÂing year, the Curies’ daughÂter Irène Joliot-Curie and her husÂband FrĂ©dĂ©ric Joliot-Curie were jointÂly awardÂed the Nobel Prize in ChemÂistry. Since then, only two othÂer women have claimed that honÂor, and only two women, includÂing Marie Curie, have won the Prize in physics, out of 203 winÂners total.
There may be nothÂing yet like genÂder parÂiÂty in the sciÂences, but those who know where to look can find the names of dozens of women sciÂenÂtists runÂning women-owned comÂpaÂnies, women-foundÂed research instiÂtutes and acaÂdÂeÂmÂic departÂments, and, like the famous Curies, makÂing major conÂtriÂbuÂtions to chemÂistry. PerÂhaps not long from now, many of those excepÂtionÂal sciÂenÂtists will be as well-known and wideÂly celÂeÂbratÂed as Marie Curie.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
And she and her work are the subÂject of the opera Marie Curie Learns to Swim. See http://www.mariecurieopera.com for more info.