ComÂplaints about the comÂmerÂcial-age corÂrupÂtion of ChristÂmas miss one critÂiÂcal fact: as a mass pubÂlic celÂeÂbraÂtion, the holÂiÂday is a rather recent invenÂtion. Whether we credÂit Charles DickÂens, Bing CrosÂby, or Frank Capra—men not opposed to marketing—we must reckÂon with ChristÂmas as a prodÂuct of moderÂniÂty. That includes the sacred ideas about famÂiÂly, piety, and gratÂiÂtude we attach to the seaÂson.
The PuriÂtans of the MassÂaÂchuÂsetts Bay Colony “despised ChristÂmas,” notes Boing Boing. They assoÂciÂatÂed it with debauchÂery: heavy drinkÂing, glutÂtony, riots, “rowÂdiÂness and sinÂful behavÂior.” Not only that, but they “saw it as a false holÂiÂday with stronger ties to paganÂism than ChrisÂtianÂiÂty,” writes RebecÂca BeatÂrice Brooks at the HisÂtoÂry of MassÂaÂchuÂsetts blog, and “they were corÂrect, accordÂing to the book The BatÂtle for ChristÂmas.”
The HisÂtoÂry Dose video above informs us that in 1659, “the GenÂerÂal Court of MassÂaÂchuÂsetts made it illeÂgal to celÂeÂbrate ChristÂmas.” FeastÂing, or even takÂing off work on DecemÂber 25th would result in a fine of five shillings. It seems extreme, but the holÂiÂday had a carÂniÂvaÂlesque repÂuÂtaÂtion at the time. Not only were revÂelÂers, at the end of a long year’s work, eager to enjoy the spoils of their labor, but their carÂolÂing might even turn into a kind of vioÂlent trick-or-treatÂing.
“On some occaÂsions the carÂolÂers would become rowÂdy and invade wealthy homes demandÂing food and drink,” Brooks writes. They “would vanÂdalÂize the home if the ownÂer refused.” The Puritan’s authorÂiÂtarÂiÂan streak, and respect for the sancÂtiÂty of priÂvate propÂerÂty, made canÂcelÂing ChristÂmas the only seemÂingÂly logÂiÂcal thing to do, with a ban lastÂing 22 years. In any case, explicÂit ban or no, spurnÂing ChristÂmas was comÂmon pracÂtice for two hunÂdred years of New England’s coloÂnial hisÂtoÂry.
In the end, for all its supÂposed intruÂsions into the snow globe of ChristÂmas purism, “we can parÂtialÂly thank comÂmerÂcialÂizaÂtion for susÂtainÂing the domesÂtic brand of ChristÂmas we have today”—the brand, that is, that ensures we can’t stop talkÂing about, readÂing about, and hearÂing about ChristÂmas, whatÂevÂer our beliefs, in the sevÂerÂal weeks leadÂing up to DecemÂber 25th.
via Boing Boing
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness.
To be fair, those CalvinÂists have always been an uptight bunch!
Great artiÂcle. The ChrisÂtÂian right has been engaged in a totalÂly bobus fake camÂpaign claimÂing “that Christ is the reaÂson for the seaÂson” bemoanÂing the comÂmerÂcialÂizaÂtion of ChristÂmas and the increasÂing securlÂizaÂtion of the holÂiÂdays. Not knowÂing or even carÂing that ChristÂmas as we know it is not an ancient reliÂgious fesÂtiÂval datÂing back to the time of Christ! and as this artiÂcle points out was even banned in the US for 22 years and bareÂly celÂeÂbratÂed in coloÂnial times.
of course this won’t change anyÂone’s mind. To the ChrisÂtÂian right this is yet anothÂer examÂple of leftÂists destroyÂing ChrisÂtÂian traÂdiÂtions!
What a wonÂderÂful ChristÂmas spirÂit you have. Great job of demonÂstratÂing the very attiÂtude of conÂstant rage, intolÂerÂance, and sancÂtiÂmoÂniousÂness that conÂserÂvÂaÂtives often point out so typÂiÂfies the left now. Oh well, haters gonna hate.