Ask anyÂone who’s purÂsued a career in the sciÂences what first piqued their interÂest in what would become their field, and they’ll almost cerÂtainÂly have a stoÂry. GazÂing at the stars on a campÂing trip, raisÂing a pet frog, foolÂing around with comÂputÂers and their comÂpoÂnents: an expeÂriÂence sparks a desire for knowlÂedge and underÂstandÂing, and the purÂsuit of that desire evenÂtuÂalÂly delivÂers one to their speÂcifÂic area of speÂcialÂizaÂtion.
Or, as they say in sciÂence, at least it works that way in theÂoÂry; the realÂiÂty usuÂalÂly unrolls less smoothÂly. On such a jourÂney, just like any othÂer, it might help to have a map.
Enter the work of sciÂence writer and physiÂcist Dominic WalÂliÂman, whose aniÂmatÂed work on the Youtube chanÂnel Domain of SciÂence we’ve preÂviÂousÂly feaÂtured here on Open CulÂture. (See the “RelatÂed ConÂtent” secÂtion below for the links.)
WalÂliÂman’s videos astuteÂly explain how the subÂfields of biolÂoÂgy, chemÂistry, mathÂeÂmatÂics, physics, and comÂputÂer sciÂence relate to each othÂer, but now he’s turned that same mateÂrÂiÂal into infoÂgraphÂics readÂable at a glance: maps, essenÂtialÂly, of the intelÂlecÂtuÂal terÂriÂtoÂry. He’s made these maps, of biolÂoÂgy, chemÂistry, mathÂeÂmatÂics, physics, and comÂputÂer sciÂence, freely availÂable on his Flickr account: you can view them all on a sinÂgle page here along with a few more of his infoÂgraphÂics..
As much use as WalÂliÂman’s maps might be to sciÂence-mindÂed youngÂsters lookÂing for the best way to direct their fasÂciÂnaÂtions into a propÂer course of study, they also offer a helpÂful reminder to those farÂther down the path — espeÂcialÂly those who’ve strugÂgled with the blindÂers of hyperÂspeÂcialÂizaÂtion — of where their work fits in the grand scheme of things. No matÂter one’s field, sciÂenÂtifÂic or othÂerÂwise, one always labors under the threat of losÂing sight of the forÂest for the trees. Or the realm of life for the bioinÂforÂmatÂics, bioÂphysics, and bioÂmathÂeÂmatÂics; the whole of mathÂeÂmatÂics for the numÂber theÂoÂry, the difÂferÂenÂtial geomÂeÂtry, and the difÂferÂenÂtial equaÂtions; the workÂings of comÂputÂers for the schedÂulÂing, the optiÂmizaÂtion, and the boolean satÂisÂfiÂaÂbilÂiÂty.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
The Map of Physics: AniÂmaÂtion Shows How All the DifÂferÂent Fields in Physics Fit TogethÂer
The Art of Data VisuÂalÂizaÂtion: How to Tell ComÂplex StoÂries Through Smart Design
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities and culÂture. His projects include the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
This sounds very much like the NexÂiÂalÂism that A.E. Van Vogt wrote about in his 1950 SF novÂel The VoyÂage Of The Space BeaÂgle.
These are great. My daughÂter is very interÂestÂed in these (which is unusuÂal!)
Any chance of being able to downÂload largÂer verÂsions so I can print to put up on her bedÂroom wall?
Thanks
Alan
These are great. Thanks
There is an interÂestÂing irony about these “maps”. Unless I’m missÂing it, I don’t see the one field that is actuÂalÂly built on maps — the earth sciences/geophysics like geogÂraÂphy, geolÂoÂgy, enviÂronÂmenÂtal sciÂence (disÂtinct from ecolÂoÂgy), remote sensÂing, astronÂoÂmy, etc The closÂest are ecolÂoÂgy and enviÂronÂmenÂtal biolÂoÂgy but those aren’t the same thing. These are interÂdisÂciÂpliÂnary fields so I could see them being difÂfiÂcult to place on any one “map”, so maybe earth sciÂence needs its own???
Yes how can we get highÂer-resÂoÂluÂtion verÂsions of these? I’d love to print out a few to put on the wall for the kids!!
I’d be willÂing to pay to get proÂfesÂsionÂalÂly printÂed, large verÂsions of these.
This is an outÂdatÂed view of sciÂence with silos for each disÂciÂplines. I’m a biolÂoÂgists and work with chemists, engiÂneers, physiÂcist and comÂputÂer sciÂenÂtists every day. That is the future of sciÂence.
Not such an outÂdatÂed view–all of eduÂcaÂtion is strucÂtured that and will have to be catÂeÂgorÂiÂcal to some degree for learnÂing purÂposÂes. You menÂtion being a biolÂoÂgist. Think of the funcÂtionÂal strucÂture of the human brain’s senÂsoÂry optic area.
Each litÂerÂal locaÂtion on the retiÂna is spaÂtialÂly relatÂed on a graÂdiÂent to the physÂiÂcal brain matÂter. Then via a difÂferÂent, but interÂlockÂing dimenÂsion of physÂiÂcal brain space, there is graÂdiÂent repÂreÂsentÂing the angle of a preÂsentÂed angle bar of light. These are very parÂticÂuÂlar “silos” (catÂeÂgories) to put visuÂal inforÂmaÂtion into, but they cross-refÂerÂence each othÂer in 3D brain matÂter in ways that allow for the comÂpuÂtaÂtion of visuÂal inforÂmaÂtion.
LikeÂwise, the disÂciÂplines have conÂnecÂtions that cross-refÂerÂence one othÂer. (SimÂiÂlar areas are near each othÂer visuÂalÂly in these infoÂgraphÂics). There is no probÂlem with “turnÂing the cube” so to speak so that the focus is on the bar of light (on the cross-refÂerÂences) instead of retiÂnal spaÂtial locaÂtion (stanÂdard disÂciÂpliÂnary lines). In fact, as you describe, such helpÂful conÂcepÂtuÂal re-framÂing is hapÂpenÂing in sciÂences now. The realÂiÂty is though, that no view can be comÂplete at once in 2‑D. A 3D verÂsion of these infoÂgraphÂics would be aweÂsome, but sureÂly conÂfusÂing (if even posÂsiÂble).
Hi