What makes film noir film noir? Like Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart making his famous pronouncement on obscenity, we can honestly claim to know it when we see it. But what elements, exactly, do we only see converge in the high, undisputed levels of the film noir canon? Designer Melanie Patrick and writer Adam Frost have, at the behest of the British Film Institute, come up with a handy infographic (click here to view it in a larger format) that explains and visualizes the particulars of the “shadowy world of one of classic Hollywood’s most beloved subgenres.”
First, film noir needs the right cast of characters, including an investigator with “relative integrity” like Sam Spade or Philip Marlowe, a criminal (“usually a murderer”), one “bad, beautiful” woman, and another “good, bland” woman. These characters should come from a script based on a piece of American pulp fiction such as The Maltese Falcon or Double Indemnity, ideally adapted by a European émigré director like Fritz Lang or Billy Wilder and replete with heavy drinking and smoking, “stolen money or valuables,” and obsessions with the past, all wrapped up in a bleak, convoluted story that plays out in an urban setting by night.
The heyday of film noir lasted from the early 1940s to the late 1950s, right in the middle of the tyranny of the Motion Picture Production Code, better known as the Hays Code, which, in limiting “the amount of sex and violence that could be shown on screen,” forced filmmakers to get creative and convey dramatic tension primarily with lighting and composition. It also meant that the finest film noir made maximally effective use of its dialogue, producing such immortally snappy exchanges as the one in Murder My Sweet when Philip Marlowe shoots back to a woman who announces she finds men very attractive, “I imagine they meet you halfway.” The infographic above also highlights the importance of a stylish poster and a startling tagline, ultimately arriving at the name of the sole film that possesses every element of film noir — and hence “the noiriest film ever.”
All this comes as the fruit of research into “around 100 of the most highly regarded film noirs,” and the infographic’s creators have made some of their data available to view on a Google spreadsheet. Should you now feel like conducting a film-noir investigation of your own, we can offer you a few leads, including the five essential rules of film noir, Roger Ebert’s ten essential characteristics of film noir, “noirchaeologist” Eddie Muller’s list of 25 noir films that will stand the test of time, a collection of film noir’s 100 greatest posters, and of course, our collection of 60 film noir movies free to watch online. But stay alert; if we’ve learned one thing from watching film noir, it’s that investigations, no matter the relative integrity with which you conduct them, don’t always go as planned.
Thanks to Melanie for letting us feature her work!
Related Content:
25 Noir Films That Will Stand the Test of Time: A List by “Noirchaelogist” Eddie Muller
The 5 Essential Rules of Film Noir
Roger Ebert Lists the 10 Essential Characteristics of Noir Films
100 Greatest Posters of Film Noir
Based in Seoul, Colin Marshall writes and broadcasts on cities, language, and style. He’s at work on a book about Los Angeles, A Los Angeles Primer, the video series The City in Cinema, the crowdfunded journalism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Angeles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Follow him on Twitter at @colinmarshall or on Facebook.
It is commendable to attempt to look at film noir systematically. However, this has some serious flaws.
Running together different sorts of feature to produce a “score“seems a mistake. Should aspects of the film itself be treated as of equal value to contextual points such as the director’s background or advertising?
Is there really a clear distinction between fully noir films and films with noir “elements”? Since only Double Indemnity achieved the maximum score, surely you should treat all other films as having just “elements” OR decide how many elements are needed for a full noir status?
Why make unsubstantiated prior judgements, such as “Hitchcock did not make noir films?”
An alternative approach to systematic study of noir is my “Dark Corners” web site:
filmnoir.org/dark corners
OOPS, 2 typos!!
The correct address for Dark Corners is:
film-noir.org/darkcorners