“The first thing to notice about movies made in the clasÂsic HolÂlyÂwood stuÂdio era,” writes New YorkÂer film critÂic Richard Brody, “from the twenÂties through the fifties, is the stillÂness of the actors — not a staÂtÂic, microÂphone-bound stand-and-delivÂer theÂatriÂcalÂiÂty but a lack of fidÂgetiÂness even while in motion, a self-masÂtery that preÂcludes unconÂtrolled or inciÂdenÂtal gesÂtures,” an actÂing style reflecÂtive of the fact, Brody susÂpects, that “AmerÂiÂcan peoÂple of the era realÂly were more tightÂly conÂtrolled, more repressed by the genÂerÂal expecÂtaÂtion of pubÂlic decoÂrum and expresÂsive restraint.”
This has made it tough for filmÂmakÂers (in the case of Brody’s piece, Paul Thomas AnderÂson makÂing The MasÂter, who pulled it off more conÂvincÂingÂly than anyÂone else in recent memÂoÂry) who want to do propÂer periÂod pieces set in those days: “even if stylÂists manÂage to get the clothÂing right, actors today — peoÂple today — have been raised by and large to let their emoÂtions govÂern their behavÂior,” and curÂrent actors “can hardÂly repÂreÂsent the past withÂout investÂing it with the attiÂtudes of our own day, which is why most new periÂod pieces seem either thin or uninÂtenÂtionÂalÂly ironÂic.”
They’d have an espeÂcialÂly forÂmiÂdaÂble task set out for them in speakÂing, withÂout any apparÂent irony, in the mid-atlantic accent, just as much a fixÂture of clasÂsic HolÂlyÂwood actÂing as that physÂiÂcal self-masÂtery. Even if you haven’t heard its name, you’ve heard the accent, which gets examÂined in the HowÂStuffÂWorks video at the top of the post “Why Do PeoÂple in Old Movies Talk Weird?” The “old-timey voice” you hear in newsÂreels from movies like His Girl FriÂday (watch it online here) and figÂures like Katharine HepÂburn, Franklin D. RooÂsevelt, George PlimpÂton, and William F. BuckÂley, hisÂtorÂiÂcalÂly “the hallÂmark of arisÂtoÂcratÂic AmerÂiÂca,” acquired, usuÂalÂly in New EngÂland boardÂing schools, as “an interÂnaÂtionÂal norm for comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion.”
The video points out its sigÂnal qualÂiÂties, from its “quaÂsi-British eleÂments” like a softÂenÂing of Rs to its “emphaÂsis on clipped, sharped Ts,” resultÂing in a speech patÂtern that “isn’t comÂpleteÂly British, not comÂpleteÂly AmerÂiÂcan” — one we can only place, in othÂer words, someÂwhere in the mid-Atlantic ocean. The accent emerged as an optiÂmal manÂner of speakÂing in “the earÂly days of radio” when speakÂers couldÂn’t reproÂduce bass vary well, and it vanÂished not long after the SecÂond World War, when teachÂers stopped passÂing it along to their stuÂdents. Has the time has come for the true iroÂnists among us to bring it back?
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
The Speech Accent Archive: The EngÂlish Accents of PeoÂple Who Speak 341 DifÂferÂent LanÂguages
The LinÂguisÂtics Behind Kevin Spacey’s SouthÂern Accent in House of Cards: A Quick Primer
Watch Meryl Streep Have Fun with Accents: Bronx, PolÂish, Irish, AusÂtralian, YidÂdish & More
A Brief Tour of British Accents: 14 Ways to Speak EngÂlish in 84 SecÂonds
Peter SellÂers Presents The ComÂplete Guide To Accents of The British Isles
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and style. He’s at work on a book about Los AngeÂles, A Los AngeÂles Primer, the video series The City in CinÂeÂma, the crowdÂfundÂed jourÂnalÂism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los AngeÂles Review of Books’ Korea Blog. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
.. this is full of half truths. I would like docÂuÂmenÂtaÂtion on where this was actuÂalÂly TAUGHT. RP in UK is acquired and not taught. Mid AT is non.rhotic but irregÂuÂlarÂly… mostÂly pre conÂsoÂnant and not always in r final posiÂtion. The t’s are not clipped . In US CASUAL speech they are tapped ( like a d but not a d ) .. and in CareÂful speech all the t’s reapÂpear ( this disÂapÂpearÂance of T is before an N as in Atlanta or interÂnaÂtionÂal or twenÂty only ) and only in casuÂal speech. CanaÂdiÂans for examÂple don’t do this or rarely. So.. while this wants to point out it is obsoÂlete.. and the radio freÂquenÂcy does make sense.. it was not taught ( unless in actÂing schools ) .. and the simÂiÂlarÂiÂties with British EngÂlish or RP are limÂitÂed. Look closÂer at CanaÂdiÂan speech ( ToronÂto ) and you’ll see the careÂful proÂnunÂciÂaÂtion of then.. and .. it was a genre of proÂnunÂciÂaÂtion which was HolÂlyÂwood induced to sound like they belonged to the upper-class so.. a conÂtrived way of speakÂing.