FoundÂed and directÂed by physiÂcist Lawrence Krauss, AriÂzona State’s OriÂgins Project has for sevÂerÂal years brought togethÂer some of the biggest minds in the sciÂences and humanÂiÂties for friendÂly debates and conÂverÂsaÂtions about “the 21st Century’s greatÂest chalÂlenges.” PreÂviÂous all-star panÂels have includÂed Krauss, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Bill Nye, BriÂan Greene, and Richard Dawkins. Stephen HawkÂing has graced the ASU OriÂgins Project stage, as has actor and sciÂence comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtor Alan Alda. And this past March, in a sold-out, highÂly-anticÂiÂpatÂed OriÂgins Project event, Krauss welÂcomed Noam ChomÂsky to the stage for a lengthy interÂview, which you can watch above.
Although Krauss says he’s wary of hero worÂship in his laudaÂtoÂry introÂducÂtion, he nonetheÂless finds himÂself askÂing “What Would Noam ChomÂsky Do” when faced with a dilemÂma. He also points out that ChomÂsky has been “marÂginÂalÂized in U.S. media” for his anti-war, anarÂchist politÂiÂcal views. Those views, of course, come wideÂly into play durÂing the conÂverÂsaÂtion, which ranges from the theÂoÂry and purÂpose of education—a subÂject ChomÂsky has expoundÂed on a great deal in books and interÂviews—to the fate of politÂiÂcal disÂsiÂdents throughÂout hisÂtoÂry.
ChomÂsky also gives us his views on sciÂence and techÂnolÂoÂgy, parÂticÂuÂlarÂly in the Q&A porÂtion of the talk above, in which he answers quesÂtions about artiÂfiÂcial intelÂliÂgence—anothÂer subÂject he’s touched on in the past—and aniÂmal experÂiÂmenÂtaÂtion, among a great many othÂer topÂics. Krauss mostÂly hangs back durÂing the iniÂtial disÂcusÂsion but takes a more active role in the sesÂsion above, offerÂing views on medÂical and sciÂenÂtifÂic ethics that will be familÂiar to those who folÂlow his atheÂist activism and chamÂpiÂoning of ratioÂnalÂiÂty over reliÂgious dogÂma.
What you won’t see in the video above is a conÂverÂsaÂtion ChomÂsky and Krauss had with MothÂerÂboard’s Daniel OberÂhaus, who caught up with both thinkers durÂing the ASU event to get their take on what he calls “anothÂer great space race.” As OberÂhaus makes clear, the curÂrent comÂpeÂtiÂtion is not necÂesÂsarÂiÂly between globÂal superÂpowÂers, but—as with so much modÂern research and development—between pubÂlic and priÂvate entiÂties, such as NASA and Space X. As we briefly disÂcussed in a post yesÂterÂday on the huge amount of pubÂlic domain space phoÂtogÂraÂphy freely availÂable for use, priÂvate space exploÂration makes research proÂpriÂetary, mitÂiÂgatÂing the potenÂtial pubÂlic benÂeÂfits of govÂernÂment proÂgrams.
As ChomÂsky puts it, “the enviÂronÂment, the comÂmons… they’re a comÂmon posÂsesÂsion, but space is even more so. For indiÂvidÂuÂals to allow instiÂtuÂtions like corÂpoÂraÂtions to have any conÂtrol over it is devÂasÂtatÂing in its conÂseÂquences. It will also almost cerÂtainÂly underÂmine seriÂous research.” He refers to the examÂple of most modÂern computing—developed under pubÂlicly-fundÂed govÂernÂment proÂgrams, then marÂketÂed and sold back to us by corÂpoÂraÂtions. Krauss makes a case for unmanned space exploÂration as the cost-effecÂtive option, and both thinkers disÂcuss the probÂlem of milÂiÂtaÂrizÂing space, the ultiÂmate goal of Cold War space proÂgrams before the fall of the SoviÂet Union. The conÂverÂsaÂtion is rich and revealÂing and makes an excelÂlent supÂpleÂment to the already rich disÂcusÂsion Krauss and ChomÂsky have in the videos above.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Noam ChomÂsky Spells Out the PurÂpose of EduÂcaÂtion
Noam ChomÂsky Explains Where ArtiÂfiÂcial IntelÂliÂgence Went Wrong
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness
Leave a Reply