Watch the Rolling Stones Write “Sympathy for the Devil”: Scenes from Jean-Luc Godard’s ’68 Film One Plus One

After the Rolling Stones’ part­ly mis­guid­ed, part­ly inspired attempt at psy­che­delia, Their Satan­ic Majesties Request, the band found its foot­ing again in the famil­iar ter­ri­to­ry of the Delta Blues. But with the 1968 record­ing of Beggar’s Ban­quet, they also retained some of the pre­vi­ous album’s exper­i­men­ta­tion, tak­en in a more sin­is­ter direc­tion on the infa­mous “Sym­pa­thy for the Dev­il.” In the stu­dio, with the band dur­ing those record­ing ses­sions, was none oth­er than rad­i­cal French New Wave direc­tor Jean-Luc Godard, who brought his own exper­i­men­tal sen­si­bil­i­ties to a project he would call One Plus One, a doc­u­ment of the Stones’ late six­ties incarnation—including an increas­ing­ly reclu­sive Bri­an Jones. Godard punc­tu­ates the fas­ci­nat­ing stu­dio scenes of the Stones with what Andrew Hussey of The Guardian calls “a series of set pieces—an inco­her­ent stew of Sit­u­a­tion­ism and oth­er Six­ties stuff”:

Black Pan­thers in a dis­used car park exe­cute white vir­gins; a book­seller reads aloud from Mein Kampf to Maoist hip­pies; in the final scene the blood­ied corpse of a female urban guer­ril­la is raised to the Stones’ sound­track as Godard him­self darts about like a dement­ed Jacques Tati wav­ing Red and Black flags. You just don’t find this sort of thing at the local mul­ti­plex any­more.

For all of its heavy use of left­ist Six­ties iconog­ra­phy, its anar­chic attempt to fuse “art, pow­er and rev­o­lu­tion,” and its fas­ci­nat­ing por­trai­ture of rock and roll genius at work, the film crash land­ed in France, earn­ing the con­tempt of arch Sit­u­a­tion­ist the­o­rist Guy Debord, who called it “the work of cretins.”

Crit­ics and audi­ences appar­ent­ly expect­ed more from Godard in the wake of the abortive May ‘68 stu­dent upris­ing in Paris, and the gen­er­al neglect of the film meant that Godard missed his chance to, as he put it, “sub­vert, ruin and destroy all civilised val­ues.”

The film’s pro­duc­er, Iain Quar­ri­er, also found it dis­ap­point­ing. With­out the director’s per­mis­sion, Quar­ri­er decid­ed to reti­tle One Plus One with the more com­mer­cial­ly-mind­ed Sym­pa­thy for the Dev­il and tack a com­plet­ed ver­sion of that song to the last reel, a move that pro­voked Godard to punch Quar­ri­er in the face. But not every­one found Godard’s effort off-putting. In a 1970 review, the New York Times’ Roger Green­spun called it “heav­i­ly didac­tic, even instruc­tion­al…. [T]he prospec­tive text of some ulti­mate, infi­nite­ly com­plex col­lec­tivism.” Green­spun also decried Quarrier’s unau­tho­rized inter­ven­tions.

In his ret­ro­spec­tive take, Andrew Hussey admits that Godard­’s polit­i­cal pos­tur­ing is “bol­locks,” but then con­cludes that One Plus One is “great stuff: a snap­shot of a far-off, lost world where rock music is still a redemp­tive and rev­o­lu­tion­ary force.” And it’s both—ridiculous and sub­lime, a pow­er­ful crys­tal­liza­tion of a moment in time when all the West­ern world seemed poised to crack open and release some­thing strange and new. Watch the trail­er and scenes from Godard’s film above. You can also pick up a copy of the 2018 restora­tion of the film here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Jef­fer­son Air­plane Wakes Up New York; Jean-Luc Godard Cap­tures It (1968)

Meetin’ WA: Jean-Luc Godard Meets Woody Allen in 26 Minute Film

Jean-Luc Godard’s After-Shave Com­mer­cial for Schick

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness


by | Permalink | Comments (26) |

Sup­port Open Cul­ture

We’re hop­ing to rely on our loy­al read­ers rather than errat­ic ads. To sup­port Open Cul­ture’s edu­ca­tion­al mis­sion, please con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion. We accept Pay­Pal, Ven­mo (@openculture), Patre­on and Cryp­to! Please find all options here. We thank you!


Comments (26)
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
  • alanweinkrantz says:

    One small error… at 11:28, the cred­its roll, cit­ing Kei­th Richard. Should have been Kei­th Richards.…

    • Josh Jones says:

      He went by “Kei­th Richard” for a short time. From his Wikipedia page: “After the Rolling Stones signed to Dec­ca Records in 1963 their band man­ag­er, Andrew Loog Old­ham, dropped the s from Richards’ sur­name believ­ing “Kei­th Richard” in his words “looked more pop.” In the ear­ly 1970s Richards re-estab­lished the s in his sur­name.”

    • Peradam says:

      Actu­al­ly it should have been Keef Richards. That’s what he was goin’ by at the time.

  • madisontruth says:

    Out­stand­ing footage.

  • arkman201 says:

    Hea­then dev­il wor­ship­pers…

  • Peradam says:

    There’s a pret­ty cool sto­ry behind the ori­gin of this tune. Mar­i­anne Faith­full gave her boyfriend Mick Jag­ger a copy of Mikhail Bul­gakov’s utter­ly genius mas­ter­piece The Mas­ter and Mar­gari­ta, and Mick dug it so much he decid­ed to pen a song about it. Sym­pa­thy For The Dev­il was the born. Of course, it would have been impos­si­ble to real­ly do jus­tice to that book with a pop/r&r song, but still, both the nov­el and the song are fun as hell!

  • Peradam says:

    There’s a pret­ty cool sto­ry behind the ori­gin of this tune. Mar­i­anne Faith­full gave her boyfriend Mick Jag­ger a copy of Mikhail Bul­gakov’s utter­ly genius mas­ter­piece The Mas­ter and Mar­gari­ta, and Mick dug it so much he decid­ed to pen a song about it. Sym­pa­thy For The Dev­il was the born. Of course, it would have been impos­si­ble to real­ly do jus­tice to that book with a pop/r&r song, but still, both the nov­el and the song are fun as hell!

  • Mercyneal says:

    Mick can’t real­ly play the gui­tar. Bri­an Jones was the musi­cal genius of the group and Mick and Kei­th wre jeal­ous of him.

    • Nils Arne says:

      Good thing he decid­ed to focus on rhythm-instru­ments and the har­mon­i­ca then. Which he plays pret­ty much bet­ter than any­one.

  • rayray says:

    obnox­ious ads

  • Dale says:

    Wow Dai­ly Motion SUCKS. I did­nt watch it through to the end. I agree with rayray — obnox­ious ads. Now when I see that brand I am going to switch off. ahh­h­hh

  • gordobass says:

    the film sound­track is sped up a half-step. Mick­’s voice sounds whack.

  • marti-grecia Odalyz says:

    Jag­ger is an artist. artists are dif­fer­ent­ly wired from oth­ers. I believe the rea­son is-their great invol­un­tary need to tran­scend all con­cepts-then man­i­fest these through what medi­um is theirs-Jag­ger I believe is speak­ing, not of the “dev­il” as a real per­son­age-he is speak­ing about the evil in our own selves-which we take lit­tle or no respon­si­bil­i­ty for. that is why-there is a line in this song about the death of the Kennedy brothers-“when after ALL, it was you and me.” I am Bud­dhist-not theist‑I believe that “God” and the “Dev­il” are sim­ply both halves of our own very con­fused, rather lazy dichoto­my. We are for most a very irre­spon­si­ble gang-we humans. there­fore both good and evil-OUR OWN, THOUGH wreaks hav­oc-or does great good. Oth­er than that, I do not believe in any dev­il.
    we have cre­at­ed such a fig­ure to be respon­si­ble for what harm we OURSELVES can cause.

  • G BURNS XXXXX says:

    Here ‚here

  • samanta says:

    Hel­lo, where can I see the whole film? thanks

  • Caio Fusaro says:

    Kei­th play­ing the bass… I loved it in Live With Me.

  • Moniker Gubnah says:

    I nev­er got the Stones. To me this is just anoth­er hor­ri­ble song from a hor­ri­ble band that can’t play or sing, and their lyrics are stu­pid.

Leave a Reply

Quantcast