William FaulknÂer, 1949:
Almost every year since 1901, the Swedish AcadÂeÂmy has apporÂtioned one fifth of the interÂest from the forÂtune bequeathed by dynaÂmite invenÂtor Alfred Nobel to honÂor, as Nobel said in his will, “the perÂson who shall have proÂduced in the field of litÂerÂaÂture the most outÂstandÂing work in an ideÂal direcÂtion.”
Many of the greatÂest writÂers of the past 112 years have received the Nobel Prize in LitÂerÂaÂture, but there have been some glarÂing omisÂsions right from the start. When Leo TolÂstoy was passed over in 1901 (the prize went to the French poet SulÂly PrudÂhomme) he was so offendÂed he refused latÂer nomÂiÂnaÂtions. The list of great writÂers who were alive after 1901 but nevÂer received the prize is jaw-dropÂping. In addiÂtion to TolÂstoy, it includes James Joyce, VirÂginia Woolf, Mark Twain, Joseph ConÂrad, Anton Chekhov, MarÂcel Proust, HenÂry James, HenÂrik Ibsen, Émile Zola, Robert Frost, W.H. Auden, F. Scott FitzgerÂald, Jorge Luis Borges and Vladimir Nabokov.
But the Nobel comÂmitÂtee has honÂored many worÂthy writÂers, and today we’ve gathÂered togethÂer sevÂen speechÂes by sevÂen lauÂreÂates. Our choice was restrictÂed by the limÂiÂtaÂtions of what is availÂable online in EngÂlish. We have focused on the short speechÂes traÂdiÂtionÂalÂly givÂen on DecemÂber 10 of every year at the Nobel banÂquet in StockÂholm. With the excepÂtion of short excerpts from Bertrand RusÂselÂl’s lecÂture, we have passed over the longer Nobel lecÂtures (which typÂiÂcalÂly run about 40 minÂutes) preÂsentÂed to the Swedish AcadÂeÂmy on a difÂferÂent day than the banÂquet.
We begin above with one of the most often-quotÂed Nobel speechÂes: William FaulknÂer’s eloÂquent accepÂtance of the 1949 prize. There was actuÂalÂly no prize in litÂerÂaÂture givÂen in 1949, but the comÂmitÂtee decidÂed to award that year’s medal 12 months latÂer to FaulknÂer, citÂing his “powÂerÂful and artisÂtiÂcalÂly unique conÂtriÂbuÂtion to the modÂern AmerÂiÂcan novÂel.” FaulknÂer gave his speech on DecemÂber 10, 1950, in the same cerÂeÂmoÂny with Bertrand RusÂsell. UnforÂtuÂnateÂly the audio cuts off just before the finÂish. To folÂlow along and read the missÂing endÂing, click here to open the full text in a new winÂdow. FaulknÂer stumÂbles a few times durÂing his delivÂery. You can lisÂten to his smoother 1954 readÂing of a polÂished verÂsion of the speech here.
Bertrand RusÂsell, 1950:
The British logiÂcian and philosoÂpher Bertrand RusÂsell was one of sevÂerÂal prize-winÂners in litÂerÂaÂture who were priÂmarÂiÂly known for their work in othÂer fields. (The short list includes statesÂman WinÂston Churchill and philosoÂpher HenÂri BergÂson.) In addiÂtion to his ground-breakÂing conÂtriÂbuÂtions to mathÂeÂmatÂics and anaÂlytÂic phiÂlosÂoÂphy, RusÂsell wrote many books for the genÂerÂal readÂer. In 1950 the Nobel comÂmitÂtee citÂed his “varÂied and sigÂnifÂiÂcant writÂings in which he chamÂpiÂons humanÂiÂtarÂiÂan ideals and freeÂdom of thought.” Above are two short audio clips from RusÂselÂl’s DecemÂber 11, 1950 Nobel lecÂture, “What Desires are PolitÂiÂcalÂly ImporÂtant?” You can click here to open the full text in a new winÂdow.
Ernest HemÂingÂway, 1954:
The AmerÂiÂcan writer Ernest HemÂingÂway was awardÂed the 1954 prize “for his masÂtery of the art of narÂraÂtive, most recentÂly demonÂstratÂed in The Old Man and the Sea, and for the influÂence that he has exertÂed on conÂtemÂpoÂrary style.” HemÂingÂway was not feelÂing well enough in DecemÂber of 1954 to travÂel to StockÂholm, so he asked John C. Cabot, UnitÂed States AmbasÂsador to SweÂden, to delivÂer the speech for him. ForÂtuÂnateÂly we do have this recordÂing from someÂtime that month of HemÂingÂway readÂing his speech at a radio staÂtion in Havana, Cuba. You can click here to open the full text in a new winÂdow.
John SteinÂbeck, 1962:
The AmerÂiÂcan writer John SteinÂbeck, author of The Grapes of Wrath and Of Mice and Men, was awardÂed the Nobel in 1962 “for his realÂisÂtic and imagÂiÂnaÂtive writÂings, comÂbinÂing as they do symÂpaÂthetÂic humor and keen social perÂcepÂtion.” To read along as you watch SteinÂbeck give his speech, click here to open the text in a new winÂdow.
V.S. Naipaul, 2001:
JumpÂing ahead from 1962 all the way to 2001, we have video of the speech givÂen by the TrinidaÂdiÂan-British writer V.S. Naipaul, author of such books as In a Free State and A Bend in the RivÂer. Naipaul was citÂed by the Nobel comÂmitÂtee “for havÂing unitÂed perÂcepÂtive narÂraÂtive and incorÂruptÂible scrutiÂny in works that comÂpel us to see the presÂence of supÂpressed hisÂtoÂries.” You can click here to open a text of Naipaul’s banÂquet speech in a new winÂdow.
Orhan Pamuk, 2006:
The TurkÂish writer Orhan Pamuk, author of such books as The MuseÂum of InnoÂcence and Snow, received the prize in 2006. The Nobel comÂmitÂtee praised the IstanÂbul-based writer, “who in the quest for the melanÂcholic soul of his native city has disÂcovÂered new symÂbols for the clash and interÂlacÂing of culÂtures.” To read Pamuk’s banÂquet speech, click here to open the text in a new winÂdow.
Mario VarÂgas Llosa, 2010:
The proÂlifÂic PeruÂvian-SpanÂish writer Mario VarÂgas Llosa, author of such novÂels as ConÂverÂsaÂtion in the CatheÂdral and Death in the Andes, was citÂed by the Nobel comÂmitÂtee in 2010 “for his carÂtogÂraÂphy of strucÂtures of powÂer and his trenÂchant images of the indiÂvidÂuÂal’s resisÂtance, revolt, and defeat.” To read along with VarÂgas Llosa as he speaks, click here to open the text in a new winÂdow.
One might think from the list you have genÂerÂatÂed that there are no female writÂers of note…
David,
Of the 108 writÂers who have received the Nobel Prize in LitÂerÂaÂture, only 12 have been women. That is the sitÂuÂaÂtion as I found it, not as I would make it. As for my list of non-recipÂiÂents, I should first of all remind you that VirÂginia Woolf is near the very top of that list. SecÂondÂly, I can think of a lot of othÂer notable writÂers of both genÂders who were alive after 1901 and whose work I perÂsonÂalÂly love, but my list was meant to reflect writÂers of towÂerÂing stature, hisÂtorÂiÂcalÂly, and not just “writÂers of note” or writÂers I perÂsonÂalÂly approve of. (As a matÂter of fact, I do not like every writer on that list.) So I was aimÂing at a kind of objecÂtivÂiÂty. But of course a thing like this is ultiÂmateÂly subÂjecÂtive, so it would be interÂestÂing if you (and any othÂers) would offer your own list in the space below. Thanks.
It must be so sad to have a mind warped by mis-eduÂcaÂtion that comÂpels you to regurÂgiÂtate warped, twistÂed and meanÂingÂless screeds like this in hopes of getÂting some kind of pelÂlet from your teachÂers.
Thank you for postÂing the speech of SteinÂbeck. It was relevent then and remains relevent now.
WonÂderÂful.
Bev
Thanks for this. SteinÂbeckÂ’s lecÂture is always hauntÂing. Few of us seem to have his trepÂiÂdaÂtion or his faith in humanÂiÂty.
Is there anyÂway one can get them all in CDs or DVDs ?
John hay, it must also be sad to have a mind that attacks rather than eduÂcates. Also, your attack doesÂn’t include your list, thereÂfore your arguÂment falls on it’s face. If you wish to fight mis-eduÂcaÂtion start by comÂmuÂniÂcatÂing inforÂmaÂtion with your mixed metaphors.
How come no one has used the Swedish Chef from The MupÂpets to delivÂer their speech? Out of respect for being in SweÂden?
It is helpÂful for visuÂalÂly impaired.
MissÂing Toni MorÂriÂson, HerÂta MĂĽller and Bob Dylan.
There is black and white, there are men and women, their are writÂers all over this PlanÂet with Nobel SpeechÂes full of WisÂdom, HisÂtoÂry and InspiÂraÂtion for young and old, all over the World
EducaÂtive lecÂtures
Elie Wiesels speech is one of the most emoÂtionÂal and intense speechÂes i have ever read. he also brings great points to the table that can be used in today’s world more than ever.
I want to be famous also and one day clinch that presÂtiÂgious nobel prize in chemÂistry.
Yes — and you sound like a barÂrel of laughs yourÂself