Al Jazeera forced many WestÂerns viewÂers to take their reportÂing seriÂousÂly durÂing the EgyptÂian uprisÂing this spring, and now the Qatar-based news netÂwork has released a timeÂly reportage (Aug. 2) on the fault lines in AmerÂiÂca — on the gap between rich and poor that only grew wider this week. AlexÂis de TocÂqueville they’re not. There’s no subÂtle sociÂolÂoÂgy here. But, at the same time, I susÂpect that this forÂeign perÂspecÂtive on the U.S. won’t appear unfaÂmilÂiar to many AmerÂiÂcans. The proÂgram runs 24 minÂutes, and othÂer shows in the Fault Lines series can be viewed on YouTube here. H/T @courosa
IndiÂvidÂual libÂerÂty –> egoÂcenÂtrism
FreeÂdom of expresÂsion is void in the US
Free comÂpeÂtiÂtion –> MonopÂoÂliÂsaÂtion for the rich
Legal egalÂiÂtarÂiÂanÂism is an illÂlÂluÂsion indocÂtriÂnatÂed into the workÂing class hero
Now, stop watchÂing Fox News :)
How does the accuÂsaÂtion that cerÂtain counÂtries and culÂtures in the midÂdle east treat their peoÂple unfairÂly jusÂtiÂfy the actions of politiÂcians and rich in the US? You are ridicuÂlousÂly sugÂgestÂing that because we aren’t at the botÂtom of your imagÂined social ladÂder that we shouldÂn’t even dare to look at our own probÂlems and improve them.
As a US citÂiÂzen I can’t change the midÂdle east but I should be able to influÂence change in my own nation.
Great docÂuÂmenÂtary — conÂcise and truthÂful. I hope they win an award for it.
“majorÂiÂty of AmerÂiÂcans?” might I point out that in the past five elecÂtions that the “majorÂiÂty” are dividÂed nearÂly straight down the midÂdle in the popÂuÂlar vote between the two major parÂties. The reaÂson such a view would be proÂduced is that most demoÂcÂraÂtÂic states have vast metÂroÂpolÂiÂtan areas whereÂas conÂserÂvÂaÂtives typÂiÂcalÂly live in more rurÂal setÂtings, which most surÂveys have trouÂble reachÂing.
You might also take notice of the fact that most key areas of finanÂcial exchange where I would assume the majorÂiÂty of the top 1% live or spend most of their time(Miami, San FranÂcisÂco, Los AngeÂles, SeatÂtle, D.C., etc) where the majorÂiÂty of the finanÂcial disÂparÂiÂty is felt due to highÂer livÂing costs are already supÂportÂing such meaÂsures for workÂers by havÂing minÂiÂmum wages far beyond the fedÂerÂal limÂit along with many othÂer necesÂsiÂties. To raise the fedÂerÂal minÂiÂmum wage to some of the proÂposed tarÂgets nearÂing $9.00 and othÂer benÂeÂfits would destroy rurÂal area’s means of comÂpetÂing with the cities.
On the othÂer hand, the idea that the rich will invest in the proÂducÂer side of the econÂoÂmy to boost growth before conÂsumer prodÂucts doesÂn’t make sense to me. If we ever do cut taxÂes on the wealthy, I’m hopÂing it’s latÂer on after the econÂoÂmy has staÂbiÂlized. OverÂall, this isn’t just about the poor massÂes vs. the rich (which are very difÂfiÂcult to define based on varÂiÂous areas’ cost of livÂing to income ratio). It’s also about the rurÂal areas vs the cities; inland AmerÂiÂca vs. the coasts. While we talk of the colÂlapse of the econÂoÂmy, the areas that were and to a point, still are, supÂpressed by the cities’ rapaÂcious growth are now bloomÂing with the slow balÂancÂing occurÂring over time between the economies withÂin the U.S.. I like Al Jazeera. The stuff they have reportÂed on in war zones is gold for peoÂple wantÂiÂng to see the unsaid cons of the U.S. milÂiÂtary’s grip in forÂeign nations. HowÂevÂer, this is not their best documentary/newscast. They need to do a litÂtle more digÂging into U.S. regionÂalÂism and ecoÂnomÂic develÂopÂment in the past decade before sumÂming our probÂlems in the plight of the metÂroÂpolÂiÂtan cities’ workÂer popÂuÂlaÂtion. Not all AmerÂiÂcans live like the rich and poor in L.A. and N.Y.C.