|
Here is a comÂplete descripÂtion of what ground the course covÂers: “Who was the hisÂtorÂiÂcal Jesus of Nazareth? What did he actuÂalÂly say and do, as conÂtrastÂed with what earÂly ChrisÂtians (e.g., Paul and the Gospel writÂers) believed that he said and did? What did the man Jesus actuÂalÂly think of himÂself and of his misÂsion, as conÂtrastÂed with the mesÂsianÂic and even divine claims that the New TesÂtaÂment makes about him? In short, what are the difÂferÂences — and conÂtiÂnuÂities — between the Jesus who lived and died in hisÂtoÂry and the Christ who lives on in believÂers’ faith? Over the last four decades hisÂtorÂiÂcal scholÂarÂship on Jesus and his times — whether conÂductÂed by Jews, ChrisÂtians, or non-believÂers — has arrived at a strong conÂsenÂsus about what this undeÂniÂably hisÂtorÂiÂcal figÂure (born ca. 4 BCE, died ca. 30 CE) said and did, and how he preÂsentÂed himÂself and his mesÂsage to his JewÂish audiÂence. Often that hisÂtorÂiÂcal eviÂdence about Jesus does not easÂiÂly doveÂtail with the traÂdiÂtionÂal docÂtrines of ChrisÂtianÂiÂty. How then might one adjuÂdiÂcate those conÂflictÂing claims? This is a course about hisÂtoÂry, not about faith or theÂolÂoÂgy. It will examÂine the best availÂable litÂerÂary and hisÂtorÂiÂcal eviÂdence about Jesus and his times and will disÂcuss methodÂoloÂgies for interÂpretÂing that eviÂdence, in order to help parÂticÂiÂpants make their own judgÂments and draw their own conÂcluÂsions.” |
“This is a course about hisÂtoÂry, not about faith or theÂolÂoÂgy.”
…not exactÂly sure how these are disÂcrimÂiÂnate. :) Thanks, howÂevÂer, for the link.
“…not exactÂly sure how these are disÂcrimÂiÂnate.”
It’s an unclear stateÂment, but the most likeÂly interÂpreÂtaÂtion is that by “hisÂtoÂry” the author of the course descripÂtion meant that if hisÂtorÂiÂcal record or eviÂdence conÂtraÂdicts the text of scripÂture (which hapÂpens quite freÂquentÂly), the conÂcluÂsion that has the most supÂportÂing eviÂdence will be affordÂed more credÂiÂbilÂiÂty.