Watch Humorous Phases of Funny Faces, the First Animated Movie (1906)

August and Louis Lumière might have made the first film – a sim­ple, sta­t­ic shot of work­ers leav­ing their fac­to­ry for the day – but George Méliès invent­ed the art form of cin­e­ma. Through his exper­i­ments, Méliès dis­cov­ered that mag­ic hap­pened when he turned the cam­era off and on. Peo­ple sud­den­ly dis­ap­peared into thin air. Objects appeared out of nowhere. A famed magi­cian, Méliès knew he was on to some­thing. His dis­cov­ery plant­ed the seeds for just about every cin­e­mat­ic tech­nique in the book — includ­ing ani­ma­tion. You can watch six of Méliès’ films here, includ­ing his land­mark 1902 short A Trip to the Moon.

The per­son cred­it­ed with mak­ing the first film-based ani­ma­tion, how­ev­er, is James Stu­art Black­ton with his film Humor­ous Phas­es of Fun­ny Faces (1906). You can watch it above. The short starts with the artist’s hand draw­ing on a chalk­board. Soon, how­ev­er, the draw­ing starts to move on its own. The film is as prim­i­tive as it is fun. A man in a top hat blows cig­ar smoke into a woman’s face. A clown dances. Imag­ine the shock and awe of an audi­ence not weaned on Pixar and Mick­ey Mouse watch­ing a pic­ture come to life for the first time.

Black­ton start­ed his career as a jour­nal­ist and a vaude­ville car­toon­ist. In 1896, he was assigned to cov­er Thomas Edi­son’s brand new inven­tion – the Vitas­cope, an ear­ly film pro­jec­tor. Edi­son proved to be such a good sales­man that Black­ton end­ed up buy­ing one. Soon he, along with his vaude­ville part­ner Albert Smith, found­ed one of the first ever movie stu­dios — the Amer­i­can Vita­graph Com­pa­ny. The com­pa­ny even­tu­al­ly became known for cre­at­ing some of the first movie adap­ta­tions of Shake­speare and Charles Dick­ens, but before that, they made short “trick” movies — flashy shorts to be shown dur­ing vaude­ville shows. One of those movies, The Enchant­ed Draw­ing (1900) is essen­tial­ly a filmic ver­sion of Blackton’s act with some cin­e­mat­ic sleight-of-hand thrown in. And as you can see below, it points the way to Black­ton’s break­through with Humor­ous Phas­es.

In 1911, Black­ton, along with his co-direc­tor, the spec­tac­u­lar­ly tal­ent­ed Win­sor McCay, made Lit­tle Nemo, a movie that hints at the true poten­tial of ani­ma­tion. Sure, their movie has way too much half-heart­ed live action slap stick, which pads out the run­ning time to an over-stuffed 10 min­utes, but the actu­al ani­ma­tion, which starts around 8:30, is utter­ly gor­geous. Watch it below.

Relat­ed Con­tent: 

Ger­tie the Dinosaur: The Moth­er of all Car­toon Char­ac­ters

Vis­it the World of Lit­tle Nemo Artist Win­sor McCay: Three Clas­sic Ani­ma­tions and a Google Doo­dle

Ear­ly Exper­i­ments in Col­or Film (1895–1935)

How Walt Dis­ney Car­toons are Made

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrowAnd check out his blog Veep­to­pus, fea­tur­ing one new draw­ing of a vice pres­i­dent with an octo­pus on his head dai­ly. 

 

William Gibson Reads Neuromancer, His Cyberpunk-Defining Novel

With 1984’s Neu­ro­mancer, William Gib­son may not have invent­ed cyber­punk, but he cer­tain­ly crys­tal­lized it. The nov­el exem­pli­fies the tra­di­tion’s man­date to bring togeth­er “high tech and low life,” or, in the words of Gib­son him­self, to explore what “any giv­en sci­ence-fic­tion favorite would look like if we could crank up the res­o­lu­tion.”

It may have its direct pre­de­ces­sors, but Gib­son’s tale of hack­ers, street samu­rai, con­spir­acists, and shad­owy arti­fi­cial intel­li­gences against vir­tu­al real­i­ty, dystopi­an urban Japan, and a vari­ety of oth­er inter­na­tion­al and tech­no­log­i­cal back­drops remains not just arche­typ­al but, unusu­al­ly for old­er tech­nol­o­gy-ori­ent­ed fic­tion, excit­ing.

Now you can not only read Gib­son’s cyber­punk-defin­ing words, but hear them in Gib­son’s voice: a 1994 abridged edi­tion, released only on cas­sette tapes and now long out of print, resides in MP3 form online here .

You can get a taste of this par­tic­u­lar Neu­ro­mancer audio­book and its pro­duc­tion in the clip above. I always appre­ci­ate hear­ing authors read their own work, but peo­ple will sure­ly dis­agree about whether the laid-back tones of a man who often describes him­self as thor­ough­ly un-cut­ting-edge ide­al­ly suit the mate­r­i­al. If you think it does­n’t, or if you don’t like the abridged-ness of this edi­tion, you suf­fer no lack of alter­na­tives: Arthur Addi­son read an unabridged one for Books on Tape in 1997, in 2011 Robert­son Dean read anoth­er one for Pen­guin Audio­books, and in 2012 Jeff Hard­ing did yet anoth­er. (Note: You can down­load the Dean edi­tion for free via Audi­ble if you enroll in their 30 Day Free Tri­al. We have more details on that here.) Those who have found them­selves hooked on the inter­net, in any of its mod­ern forms, will cer­tain­ly hear a lot of pre­science in Gib­son’s con­cep­tion of tech­nol­o­gy as addic­tive drug. But in my expe­ri­ence, cyber­punk sto­ries, too, can prove fierce­ly habit form­ing. Rather than the first cyber­punk nov­el, or the most impor­tant one, or the gen­re’s blue­print, let’s just call Neu­ro­mancer the gate­way.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Cyber­punk: 1990 Doc­u­men­tary Fea­tur­ing William Gib­son & Tim­o­thy Leary Intro­duces the Cyber­punk Cul­ture

Take a Road Trip with Cyber­space Vision­ary William Gib­son, Watch No Maps for These Ter­ri­to­ries (2000)

Tim­o­thy Leary Plans a Neu­ro­mancer Video Game, with Art by Kei­th Har­ing, Music by Devo & Cameos by David Byrne

William Gib­son, Father of Cyber­punk, Reads New Nov­el in Sec­ond Life

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

178,000 Images Documenting the History of the Car Now Available on a New Stanford Web Site

revs2

The Revs Pro­gram at Stan­ford, ded­i­cat­ed to pro­duc­ing schol­ar­ship about the past, present and future of the auto­mo­bile, recent­ly advanced its cause by launch­ing a new web­site fea­tur­ing 178,000 images of cars. Divid­ed into 12 col­lec­tions, the Revs Dig­i­tal Library fea­tures lots of race cars, and then some more race cars. But there are some more every­day mod­els too — like the Bee­tle, Cit­roën, Corvette, Mini and even the Grem­lin. You won’t find, how­ev­er, any trace of the much-maligned Edsel.

revs1

The images came to Stan­ford as a gift from the Revs Insti­tute for Auto­mo­tive Research, locat­ed in Naples, Flori­da. If you’d like a quick primer on find­ing and gath­er­ing infor­ma­tion about vin­tage cars in the archive, watch the intro­duc­to­ry video below. It’ll teach you how to sift through the dig­i­tal library in rapid fash­ion.

The images above come from the Revs Dig­i­tal Library.

via Stan­ford News/Coudal

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Yale Launch­es an Archive of 170,000 Pho­tographs Doc­u­ment­ing the Great Depres­sion

UC San­ta Cruz Opens a Deadhead’s Delight: The Grate­ful Dead Archive is Now Online

Young Robert De Niro Appears in 1969 AMC Car Com­mer­cial

The History of Rock n Roll in 10 Songs: A List Created by Legendary Rock Critic Greil Marcus

Rock crit­ic and schol­ar Greil Mar­cus has just released a book with Yale Press called The His­to­ry of Rock ‘n’ Roll in Ten Songs, and it appears to be an unusu­al take on a very hack­neyed sub­ject, as Mar­cus admits in the video trail­er above: “Every­body knows the his­to­ry of rock ‘n’ roll,” he says, “What if it was just about a few songs?” “Unlike all pre­vi­ous ver­sions of rock ‘n’ roll,” writes Yale, “this book omits almost every icon­ic per­former and ignores the sto­ried events and turn­ing points that every­one knows.” This is not entire­ly true—you’ve got your Bea­t­les, you’ve got your Bud­dy Hol­ly, but you’ve also got… Joy Divi­sion. And a num­ber of oth­er sur­pris­ing, off­beat choic­es that don’t nec­es­sar­i­ly sound like rock ‘n’ roll his­to­ry, but cer­tain­ly tell it their var­i­ous ways. “At any giv­en moment,” Mar­cus says above, any of these songs “could con­tain the whole his­to­ry […] the whole DNA of rock ‘n’ roll.”

Some of the choic­es seem like per­son­al quirks. Noth­ing to get too bent out of shape about, if that’s your ten­den­cy, but odd nonethe­less. The Flam­ing Groovies would not be a band I’d choose as rep­re­sen­ta­tive of garage rock, if that’s what they rep­re­sent. Their song “Shake Some Action” above may be bet­ter known for some from Cracker’s work­man­like cov­er on the Clue­less sound­track than as a gen­uine hit in its own right. But the sin­gle sure had a cool cov­er.

It also has some excel­lent gui­tar work and a per­fect­ly dis­tinc­tive tone that Mar­cus can’t for­get. Its lyrics are by turns vapid and creepy, which, now that I think of it, per­haps makes this a per­fect track to define much of rock ‘n’ roll his­to­ry.

No one best­ed post-punk dar­lings Joy Divi­sion when it came to boy­ish good looks and relent­less despair. In an oblique rock his­to­ry sense, they were piv­otal, tak­ing the obscu­ran­tist min­i­mal­ist exper­i­ments of bands like Wire and mak­ing them viable options for an entire genre of music. Mar­cus choos­es “Trans­mis­sion” instead of the much more pop­u­lar “Love Will Tear Us Apart,” which has become almost a musi­cal rite of pas­sage for cer­tain bands to cov­er. This was the last sin­gle the band released before singer Ian Cur­tis killed him­self. “It’s sort of fit­ting then,” writes Con­se­quence of Sound, “that this would be both one of the band’s most pop­u­lar songs and also pave the way for New Order, specif­i­cal­ly in terms of its sound and direc­tion.” Lit­tle live footage of the band exists. See them above in 1979 on UK retro tele­vi­sion pro­gram The Wedge (orig­i­nal­ly broad­cast on Some­thing Else with the Jam).

Mar­cus’ third choice is not real­ly what we think of as rock and roll, but it’s a close cousin, and with­out doo wop, we’d have had no Lou Reed. 1956’s “In the Still of the Night,” writ­ten by Fred Par­ris and record­ed by his Five Satins in a Catholic school base­ment, was a hit in the 90s for Boyz II Men on the R&B and Adult Con­tem­po­rary charts and reli­ably appears in films about the fifties. Mar­cus also refers to a ver­sion record­ed by the Slades, a white vocal group. The pair­ing illus­trates the famil­iar fifties prac­tice of white groups record­ing black artists—and often out­selling them, though cer­tain­ly not in this case—for pre­sum­ably seg­re­gat­ed audi­ences.

Etta James’ 1960 soar­ing lament “All I Could Do Was Cry” again seems a world away from rock and roll, with its lush stu­dio string sec­tion and spa­cious, spare pro­duc­tion. The song lacks the bite and growl of “At Last!” from the same album, but Mar­cus makes a weighty allu­sion in refer­ring to two dif­fer­ent ver­sions. By includ­ing Beyoncé’s take on the song, the list hauls in the his­to­ry of Chicago’s Chess records and Knowles’ out­stand­ing per­for­mance as James in 2008’s Cadil­lac Records, a film that takes us from Mud­dy Water­s’s elec­tric blues to Chuck Berry’s hybrid crossover sound.

Yes, we have Bud­dy Hol­ly, but we don’t have “Peg­gy Sue” or “Not Fade Away.” Instead Mar­cus gives us the B‑side to the posthu­mous­ly released “Peg­gy Sue Got Mar­ried,” a song called “Cry­ing, Wait­ing, Hop­ing.” Orig­i­nal­ly record­ed by Hol­ly alone in a Man­hat­tan apart­ment and mixed with stu­dio back­ing tracks by pro­duc­er Jack Hansen in 1959, the song had noth­ing to do with Holly’s fame in life—hence the bad vocal sync in the video above. The band’s play­ing an entire­ly dif­fer­ent song. Mar­cus chose this as sym­bol­ic of the Hol­ly mythos after his death, which spread across the ocean to Mersey­beat bands like the Bea­t­les, who often cov­ered this song and record­ed it live on the BBC. Like the musi­cians who played on the first record, they aren’t just cov­er­ing Hol­ly, writes Mar­cus, “they’re con­duct­ing a kind of séance with him.”

Speak­ing of the Bea­t­les: every­one knows their “Mon­ey (That’s What I Want),” but did you know that the song, per­formed in 1959 by Bar­rett Strong (above), was the first hit for Berry Gordy’s Motown records (then Tam­la)? A direct link between Amer­i­can R&B and the UK vari­ety, “Mon­ey” was a sta­ple for British inva­sion bands in the ear­ly 60s.

I had nev­er heard of The Brains before read­ing Mar­cus’ list. That’s not say­ing a whole lot, but I had also nev­er heard Cyn­di Lauper’s 1983 hit cov­er of their minor hit “Mon­ey Changes Every­thing,” or even the rare Smiths’ instru­men­tal ver­sion, ardent fan though I am. So chalk that up to a musi­cal blind spot, if you will, or take it as evi­dence of the song’s out­lier sta­tus. Hear the 1978 orig­i­nal above. Mar­cus has said else­where of its raw, cyn­i­cal hon­esty that “there’s no oth­er way the decade could end.”

“This Mag­ic Moment,” the 1960 hit by Ben E. King and the Drifters, sounds like the per­fect choice of song for nos­tal­gic boomers, not so much for jad­ed rock writ­ers telling a new sto­ry of rock ‘n’ roll, but there you have it. Mar­cus also refers to a ver­sion by “Ben E. King with Lou Reed.” As far as I can tell, no such record­ing exists, but we do have a ver­sion by Reed alone. Hear it above.

The only way per­haps to dis­cuss this ninth “song” in any rock ‘n’ roll con­text is by way of Lou Reed, it so hap­pens. Reed’s “thor­ough­ly alien­at­ing” Met­al Machine Music con­sists of 64 min­utes of feed­back and dis­tor­tion caused, some leg­ends have it, by Reed record­ing the sound of his gui­tar lean­ing against a cranked-up amp. Artist Chris­t­ian Mar­clay does him one bet­ter. “Gui­tar Drag” is exact­ly what it adver­tis­es, the sound—and video, above—of a gui­tar dragged behind a truck. Rep­re­sent­ing the pure noise of Met­al Machine Music and the gen­er­al destruc­tive­ness of rock ‘n’ roll, it also re-enacts the absolute­ly hor­ri­fy­ing 1998 drag­ging death of James Byrd, Jr, one of the low­est moments in Amer­i­can racial his­to­ry. Does this dis­turb­ing piece of sound/video art aes­theti­ciz­ing a racist mur­der, chill­ing and grue­some beyond words, belong on any list about rock ’n’ roll his­to­ry? Greil Mar­cus thinks it does.

We return to famil­iar, if cloy­ing ter­ri­to­ry with “To Know Is to Love Him,” an ear­ly hit for Phil Spec­tor and his Ted­dy Bears in 1958 (above)—written not about a crush but about Spector’s deceased father after the words on his head­stone. Next to the quaint­ness of this record­ing, Mar­cus also lists Amy Winehouse’s 2007 cov­er (below). Maybe he hears them at once, both songs haunt­ing each oth­er. Writ­ing on the song in The Guardian after Winehouse’s death, Mar­cus says “it took 48 years to find its voice.” It’s a sto­ry of two incred­i­bly tal­ent­ed, and trag­i­cal­ly dis­turbed, rock ‘n’ roll char­ac­ters, and one of the pain and loss that lie behind even the most bub­blegum of hits. See Yale Press’s web­site for more on Mar­cus’ The His­to­ry of Rock ‘n’ Roll in Ten Songs.


Relat­ed Con­tent:

A His­to­ry of Rock ‘n’ Roll in 100 Riffs

100 Years of Rock in Less Than a Minute: From Gospel to Grunge

Revis­it The Life & Music of Sis­ter Roset­ta Tharpe: ‘The God­moth­er of Rock and Roll’

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

 

How Languages Evolve: Explained in a Winning TED-Ed Animation

Lan­guage. It’s as adapt­able as Darwin’s finch­es.

It’d be inter­est­ing to know how the Inter­net changes the game. Seems like it would go a long way toward democ­ra­tiz­ing the process by which lin­go gets min­gled.

Alex Gendler’s TED-Ed les­son, win­ning­ly ani­mat­ed by Igor Coric, rolls back the clock to a time when com­mu­nal groups would sub­di­vide and strike out on their own, usu­al­ly in order to beef up the food sup­ply.

This sort of geo­graph­ic and tem­po­ral sep­a­ra­tion was bound to take a toll, lin­guis­ti­cal­ly. Evo­lu­tion is need-based. Vocab­u­lary and pro­nun­ci­a­tion even­tu­al­ly betray the specifics of the speak­er’s sur­round­ings, their cir­cum­stances and needs.

It takes some foren­sics to fig­ure out how, or, even if, var­i­ous lan­guages relate to each oth­er. A cun­ning lin­guist (for­give me) will also have the pow­er to fill in his­tor­i­cal gaps, by iden­ti­fy­ing words that have been bor­rowed from neigh­bor­ing cul­tures, as well as more tran­sient acquain­tances.

As a lit­tle exper­i­ment, look at the way you talk! Those of us with­out roy­al blood or a stick up our heinies tend to speak a mon­grel patois cus­tom tai­lored by our own expe­ri­ence. A lit­tle bit of region­al­ism, some pro­fes­sion­al jar­gon, a few col­or­ful words gleaned from life’s char­ac­ters, lines from long ago enter­tain­ments deployed as if the ref­er­ences were fresh.

I’ll bet a lin­guist would have a field day with you, Bub.

Even if you’re the most straight­for­ward con­ver­sa­tion­al­ist on the plan­et, the peo­ple who can’t under­stand a word you say would great­ly out­num­ber those who can.

Maybe we  should all “speak Man­darin,” as per the bill­boards I saw in Sin­ga­pore on a post-col­le­giate trip. (As a West­ern back­pack­er in Birken­stocks and a wrap-around hip­pie skirt, I was exempt, leav­ing me plen­ty of time to wor­ry about being caned for spit­ting gum on the side­walk, a thing I’d nev­er do, by the way.)

Back to the ani­mat­ed les­son, above. While I agree that polit­i­cal and nation­al inter­ests can be huge­ly influ­en­tial with regard to lan­guage devel­op­ment, I’m not sure a pig is the wis­est choice when depict­ing this lin­guis­tic phe­nom­e­non as an ani­mal’s worth of re-zoned pri­mal cuts, labelled a la the for­mer Yugoslavia.

Pork is haraam, and treif, and  ‘pig,’ in and of itself, is hard­ly a flat­ter­ing epi­thet, a sit­u­a­tion that’s sort of insult­ing to a nat­u­ral­ly intel­li­gent and fas­tid­i­ous beast.

I digress.

As does lan­guage, which explains why there could be as many as 8000 of them in use. A more con­ser­v­a­tive esti­mate puts the num­ber at 3000. Not to alarm you, but if the num­ber of peo­ple who speak your lan­guage is what the food­ie hip­sters of Brook­lyn would refer to as “small batch,” there are lin­guists who would down­grade your tongue to mere dialect.

In which case, this list of obscene ges­tures from around the world might well come in handy.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Learn 48 Lan­guages Online for Free: Span­ish, Chi­nese, Eng­lish & More

Ali G and Noam Chom­sky Talk Lin­guis­tics

The Ideas of Noam Chom­sky: An Intro­duc­tion to His The­o­ries on Lan­guage & Knowl­edge (1977)

Ayun Hal­l­i­day’s high­ly idio­syn­crat­ic approach to lan­guage can be stud­ied in sev­en books, a num­ber of antholo­gies, and her long suf­fer­ing zine, the East Vil­lage Inky. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

Kafka’s Parable “Before the Law” Narrated by Orson Welles & Illustrated with Pinscreen Art

On Fri­day, we fea­tured Niko­lai Gogol’s “The Nose,” adapt­ed in 1963 through the work-inten­sive but aes­thet­i­cal­ly stun­ning means of “pin­screen ani­ma­tion” by Alexan­der Alex­eieff and Claire Park­er. But they had­n’t labored over it in total obscu­ri­ty; the year before, no less sol­id a pil­lar of Amer­i­can film than Orson Welles had com­mis­sioned their work for use in his adap­ta­tion of Franz Kafka’s The Tri­al, anoth­er work of lit­er­a­ture deeply con­cerned with the absurd. Crit­i­cal opin­ion varies about the film, which some con­sid­er Welles’ best work, oth­ers con­sid­er his worst, and oth­ers still con­sid­er a mix­ture of the two.

It cer­tain­ly remains one of his least-seen works, and yet it con­tains the most main­stream thing Alex­eieff and Park­er ever did. Very few deny the effec­tive­ness of the film’s pro­logue, which com­bines images straight from the hus­band-and-wife team’s pin­screen with Welles’ unmis­tak­able voice read­ing “Before the Law,” a para­ble from Kafka’s nov­el. Alex­eieff and Park­er’s images are still, rather than ani­mat­ed, which must have cut way down on the pro­duc­tion time.

“Before the law, there stands a guard,” Welles intones. “A man comes from the coun­try, beg­ging admit­tance to the law. But the guard can­not admit him. May he hope to enter at a lat­er time? That is pos­si­ble, said the guard. The man tries to peer through the entrance. He’d been taught that the law was to be acces­si­ble to every man. ‘Do not attempt to enter with­out my per­mis­sion,’ says the guard. I am very pow­er­ful. Yet I am the least of all the guards. From hall to hall, door after door, each guard is more pow­er­ful than the last. By the guard’s per­mis­sion, the man sits by the side of the door, and there he waits.” These words estab­lish the basis for not just The Tri­al, but seem­ing­ly Kafka’s own legal sen­si­bil­i­ty, and indeed world­view. The man waits for years, star­ing at the guard and lav­ish­ing him with bribes. He grows old and enfee­bled. Final­ly, he asks why, despite the fact that “every man strives to attain the law,” nobody else but him has ever come to attempt pas­sage through its doors. “Nobody else but you could ever have obtained admit­tance,” the guard replies. “This door was intend­ed only for you! And now, I’m going to close it.” Welles then com­ments that “the log­ic of this sto­ry is the log­ic of a dream… a night­mare.” One under­stands why the direc­tor, who endured so many futile and absurd expe­ri­ences in the enter­tain­ment indus­try, would feel drawn to such a fable. As for how he chose such appro­pri­ate imagery for it — well, maybe just good luck.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Niko­lai Gogol’s Clas­sic Sto­ry, “The Nose,” Ani­mat­ed With the Aston­ish­ing Pin­screen Tech­nique (1963)

Watch Franz Kaf­ka, the Won­der­ful Ani­mat­ed Film by Piotr Dumala

Kafka’s Night­mare Tale, ‘A Coun­try Doc­tor,’ Told in Award-Win­ning Japan­ese Ani­ma­tion

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Buddy Holly & Waylon Jennings in a Photo Booth (New York, 1959)

buddy and waylon in photobooth

Two Tex­ans, Bud­dy Hol­ly and Way­lon Jen­nings, met in a restau­rant in Lub­bock when they were teenagers. Hol­ly took the younger Jen­nings under his wing: He played gui­tar on Jen­ning’s first record­ing ses­sion in 1958. That same year, they col­lab­o­rat­ed on the song, “You’re the One.”  And, in late Jan­u­ary 1959, Hol­ly began a three-week tour across the Mid­west — dubbed the “Win­ter Dance Par­ty” — and had Jen­nings play bass in his band. Before they left, the two posed for a pic­ture in a pho­to booth at Grand Cen­tral Sta­tion in New York City.

The “Win­ter Dance Par­ty” would end in tragedy when Hol­ly climbed aboard a char­ter plane that crashed near Clear Lake, Iowa on Feb­ru­ary 3, 1959. Jen­nings got bumped from the flight, get­ting a chance to live beyond the Day the Music Died.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

via Red­dit

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Ear­li­est Footage of Elvis Pres­ley, Bud­dy Hol­ly and John­ny Cash (1955)

Bud­dy Hol­ly at Age 12: His First Record­ing

John Lennon and The Rolling Stones Sing Bud­dy Hol­ly

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 4 ) |

Nikolai Gogol’s Classic Story, “The Nose,” Animated With the Astonishing Pinscreen Technique (1963)

A mild-look­ing bar­ber slices into his morn­ing loaf of bread to find a human nose embed­ded with­in. You might imag­ine this image open­ing the next David Lynch movie, but it actu­al­ly sets up a more light­heart­ed, much old­er, and much more Russ­ian sto­ry: Niko­lai Gogol’s “The Nose.” (Find it in our Free eBooks and Free Audio Books col­lec­tions.) The sto­ry soon intro­duces us to the man to whom the nose belongs, a gov­ern­ment offi­cial who wakes to find noth­ing but a smooth patch of flesh in the mid­dle of his face. The quest to reclaim his nose takes him to the archi­tec­tural­ly impos­ing, col­umn-inten­sive hall in which he works, where he finds that the organ through which he once breathed has not only grown a body of its own, but already risen above him in the ranks of the civ­il ser­vice. To find out how this increas­ing­ly bizarre, dream­like sce­nario resolves itself, you can either read Gogol’s sto­ry in the Eng­lish trans­la­tion free in Project Guten­berg’s copy of the Gogol Col­lec­tion The Man­tle and Oth­er Sto­ries, or you can watch Alexan­der Alex­eieff and Claire Park­er’s 1963 short above, which adapts “The Nose” by means of some­thing called pin­screen ani­ma­tion.

Ian Lums­den at Ani­ma­tion Blog describes Alex­eieff and Park­er’s par­tic­u­lar method as a form of “shad­ow ani­ma­tion in effect where­by Alexan­der works on the pos­i­tive side of a large black can­vas full of pins and Claire on the neg­a­tive side; the more the flat head­ed pins are pushed in the lighter is the effect, cre­at­ing the look of mez­zotint with its tex­tured shades of grey.” Lums­den adds that he “can scarce­ly con­ceive of a more labour inten­sive form of ani­ma­tion par­tic­u­lar­ly giv­en that pins num­bered in their hun­dreds of thou­sands are used.” Just try to pay close atten­tion to some of the effects The Nose achieves and try not to wince at how demand­ing and painstak­ing an effort the ani­ma­tors, push­ing these tiny pins in and out to adjust the visu­al tex­tures just so, must have put forth to achieve them. Russ­ian lit­er­ary his­to­ri­an D.S. Mirsky calls the orig­i­nal sto­ry “a piece of sheer play, almost sheer non­sense,” where “more than any­where else Gogol dis­plays his extra­or­di­nary mag­ic pow­er of mak­ing great com­ic art out of noth­ing.” In these fun­ny and daz­zling but no doubt hard-won eleven min­utes Alex­eieff and Park­er express that sheer play with the most inten­sive ani­mat­ing work pos­si­ble.

You can find “The Nose” on our list of Ani­mat­ed Films, part of our larg­er col­lec­tion called 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Revered Poet Alexan­der Pushkin Draws Sketch­es of Niko­lai Gogol and Oth­er Russ­ian Artists

George Saun­ders’ Lec­tures on the Russ­ian Greats Brought to Life in Stu­dent Sketch­es

Two Beau­ti­ful­ly-Craft­ed Russ­ian Ani­ma­tions of Chekhov’s Clas­sic Children’s Sto­ry “Kash­tan­ka”

Three Ani­mat­ed Shorts by the Ground­break­ing Russ­ian Ani­ma­tor Fyo­dor Khitruk

Watch a Hand-Paint­ed Ani­ma­tion of Dostoevsky’s “The Dream of a Ridicu­lous Man”

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Thomas Pynchon Edits His Lines on The Simpsons: “Homer is my role model and I can’t speak ill of him.”

pynchon simpsons edit

In 2002, the elu­sive nov­el­ist Thomas Pyn­chon made two cameo appear­ances on The Simp­sons. Of course, we did­n’t actu­al­ly get to see Pyn­chon. His car­toon depic­tion wore, rather humor­ous­ly, a bag over his head. But, we did get to hear Pyn­chon’s voice. And appar­ent­ly that, alone, was a first.

This past week, Matt Sel­man, an exec­u­tive pro­duc­er for The Simp­sons, shed some more light on those play­ful cameos. On Twit­ter, he post­ed a copy of the script Pyn­chon edit­ed and faxed back to the show’s writ­ers. (Click on the image above to see it in a larg­er for­mat.) In some cas­es, Pyn­chon, always the writer, tweaked the lan­guage to make it flow as he liked. In oth­er cas­es, he added his own mate­r­i­al to the script — new sound effects, jokes, and puns. (The word “Scrump­tious” gets turned into Vi-licious.) And, in one case, he removed a joke. Delet­ing the words “No won­der Homer is such a fat ass,” Pyn­chon scrawled the com­ment: “Sor­ry, guys. Homer is my role mod­el and I can’t speak ill of him.” Final­ly, Homer gets some respect.

Pynchon-simpsons

via The Wall Street Jour­nal

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Before The Simp­sons, Matt Groen­ing Illus­trat­ed a “Student’s Guide” for Apple Com­put­ers (1989)

Before The Simp­sons: Homer Groen­ing Directs a 1969 Short Film, The Sto­ry, Star­ring His Kids Mag­gie, Lisa & Matt 

Take a Cin­e­mat­ic Jour­ney into the Mind of Thomas Pyn­chon and His New Book, Bleed­ing Edge

 

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Help Kickstart Baba Brinkman’s Animated Rap Guide to Religion

If you’ve been fre­quent­ing Open Cul­ture long enough, you’ll know all about the Cana­di­an “geek rap­per” Baba Brinkman and his epic raps. The sub­jects of Brinkman’s raps have includ­ed evo­lu­tion, arti­fi­cial selec­tionThe Can­ter­bury Tales, and British ver­sus Cana­di­an Eng­lish. Now, he’s try­ing to crowd­source a new rap album through Kick­starter. Actu­al­ly it’s an ani­mat­ed rap album about the sci­en­tif­ic study of reli­gion. You can lis­ten to two songs (of an even­tu­al eight) over at Kick­starter. They’re called “Reli­gion Evolves” and “Big Gods.”

Cur­rent­ly, 210 back­ers have pledged $13,419 towards the $20,000 he’s try­ing to raise. Above, Baba explains how the mon­ey will be spent. To move for­ward, the cam­paign needs to be ful­ly fund­ed by . We hope you’ll help push Baba over the top. You can make a con­tri­bu­tion here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

What’s Your Eng­lish? British v. Cana­di­an Rap Bat­tle

Baba Brinkman: The Rap Guide to Evo­lu­tion

The Can­ter­bury Tales Remixed: Baba Brinkman’s New Album Uses Hip Hop to Bring Chaucer Into the 21st Cen­tu­ry, Yo

Free Online Reli­gion Cours­es

David Bowie and Klaus Nomi’s Hypnotic Performance on SNL (1979)

1979 was a strange year in music. A year of end­ings, in a way. Sid Vicious died, Ozzy Osbourne left Black Sab­bath… an old guard fad­ed away. On the oth­er hand, U2 went into the stu­dio for their debut, Kate Bush went on her first tour, and new wave emerged from punk’s end. It was also the year, notably or not, that Berlin/New York cabaret per­former Klaus Nomi broke, sort of. Nomi had been per­form­ing Wag­n­er and Vaude­ville in New York, and David Bowie, always on the make for unusu­al trav­el­ing com­pan­ions, invit­ed him to appear as a back­up singer on Sat­ur­day Night Live. Bowie him­self was in tran­si­tion, leav­ing behind his high con­cept work with Bri­an Eno on his Berlin Tril­o­gy (Low, ”Heroes,” and Lodger) and enter­ing anoth­er high pop phase. It was an abrupt, but nat­ur­al, shift for Bowie; tap­ping into Nomi’s art-pop affec­ta­tions may have seemed a per­fect way to bridge the two.

Bowie, Nomi, and flam­boy­ant New York per­for­mance artist Joey Arias do three songs, reach­ing back to Bowie’s folki­er times for “The Man Who Sold the World.” Bowie launch­es next into Sta­tion to Sta­tion’s “TVC 15” in a skirt and heels, while Nomi and Arias drag around a pink plas­tic poo­dle. For the last num­ber, Lodger’s “When You’re a Boy,” Bowie per­haps invents the look of 80s new wave videos to come—from Peter Gabriel to the Pet Shop Boys—while wear­ing a life-size mar­i­onette cos­tume. Some amaz­ing mech­a­nism, pup­peteers off­stage or Bowie him­self, oper­ates the over­sized arms, and the whole thing takes SNL musi­cal per­for­mances to a place they’d nev­er been. Nomi was so impressed with the cos­tum­ing that he adopt­ed the huge plas­tic tuxe­do Bowie wears dur­ing the first song as his own, wear­ing one on the cov­er of his first album and per­form­ing in it until his death from AIDS in 1983. The broad­cast above took place on Decem­ber 15, 1979.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Klaus Nomi: The Bril­liant Per­for­mance of a Dying Man

Klaus Nomi’s Ad for Jäger­meis­ter (Cir­ca 1980)

David Bowie and Cher Sing Duet of “Young Amer­i­cans” and Oth­er Songs on 1975 Vari­ety Show

David Gilmour & David Bowie Sing “Com­fort­ably Numb” Live (2006)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness


  • Great Lectures

  • Sign up for Newsletter

  • About Us

    Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.


    Advertise With Us

  • Archives

  • Search

  • Quantcast
    Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.