Life imiÂtates art, and by art, I mean, of course, The SimpÂsons. More than thirÂty years ago, the show took on the issue of cenÂsorÂship with a stoÂry in which Marge SimpÂson launchÂes an impasÂsioned camÂpaign against carÂtoon vioÂlence, only to find herÂself on the othÂer side of the fence when asked to supÂport a protest against the exhiÂbiÂtion of MichelanÂgelo’s David. This episode returned to culÂturÂal relÂeÂvance just last month, when a parÂenÂt’s comÂplaint about an image of that most renowned nude sculpÂtures — indeed, that most renowned sculpÂture of any kind — being shown in a sixth-grade art-hisÂtoÂry class led to the firÂing of a FloriÂda school prinÂciÂpal.
It seems that the probÂlem wasÂn’t just David: that same lesÂson includÂed BotÂtiÂcelÂli’s paintÂing The Birth of Venus, anothÂer gloÂriÂfiÂcaÂtion of the unclothed human body — and so much more besides, accordÂing to the Great Art Explained video about it preÂviÂousÂly feaÂtured here on Open CulÂture.
That same chanÂnel’s creÂator, galÂlerist James Payne, has also put out a video on David, which you can watch at the top of the post. Though comÂmisÂsioned as a depicÂtion of the Goliath-slayÂing BibÂliÂcal hero, Payne tells us, “in MichelanÂgelo’s hands it becomes someÂthing else entireÂly,” a simulÂtaÂneÂous study and expresÂsion of the potenÂtial of mankind.
David’s oriÂgin preÂfigÂured nothÂing of its legaÂcy. OrigÂiÂnalÂly comÂmisÂsioned to decÂoÂrate the FloÂrence CatheÂdral (which already feaÂtured Brunelleschi’s ingeÂnious dome), the sculpÂture had to be carved out of a much-less-than-prisÂtine block of marÂble already owned by the instiÂtuÂtion, already missÂing chunks removed by sculpÂtors who’d preÂviÂousÂly attemptÂed the job. But to MichelanÂgeÂlo, as to all true artists, such limÂiÂtaÂtions were the stuff of inspiÂraÂtion: the proÂporÂtions of David’s body, and even his iconÂic pose, were ultiÂmateÂly dicÂtatÂed less by MichelanÂgelo’s imagÂiÂnaÂtion than by the nature of the stone itself.
httvs://youtu.be/basNf0KaOrc
MichelanÂgeÂlo was also payÂing tribÂute to clasÂsiÂcal Greek and Roman sculpÂture, hence the statÂue’s nudiÂty. But as Payne says, it is a myth that “RenaisÂsance EuroÂpeans were comÂfortÂable with nude bodÂies in art, parÂticÂuÂlarÂly when disÂplayed in pubÂlic.” FloÂrence’s city fathers “had a garÂland of 28 gildÂed copÂper leaves made, to proÂtect David’s modÂesty, and in latÂer years he wore a fig leaf.” 2023 may not be the first of David’s 500 years of exisÂtence to subÂject him to alterÂation in order to proÂtect the supÂposed senÂsiÂtivÂiÂties of his viewÂers, but nevÂer before, sureÂly, has such an inciÂdent brought him on SatÂurÂday Night Live.
RelatÂed conÂtent:
Michelangelo’s David: The FasÂciÂnatÂing StoÂry Behind the RenaisÂsance MarÂble CreÂation
New Video Shows What May Be Michelangelo’s Lost & Now Found Bronze SculpÂtures
What Made Botticelli’s The Birth of Venus a RevÂoÂluÂtionÂary PaintÂing
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.