These obserÂvaÂtions were made by sciÂenÂtists at the GeorÂgia InstiÂtute of TechÂnolÂoÂgy, who recordÂed the video above and preÂsentÂed it at a 2013 meetÂing of the AmerÂiÂcan PhysÂiÂcal SociÂety. WatchÂing the video, you can see ants wieldÂing powÂers that we’ve only othÂerÂwise seen demonÂstratÂed in secÂond tier superÂheroes (no offense to the WonÂder Twins intendÂed). And yet, accordÂing toThe New York Times, these remarkÂable powÂers may have some pracÂtiÂcal impliÂcaÂtions, leadÂing sciÂenÂtists to develÂop self-assemÂbling robots and self-healÂing mateÂriÂals. By watchÂing ants build and repair bridges for themÂselves, we can imagÂine creÂatÂing bridges that autoÂmatÂiÂcalÂly repair their own cracks here in the mateÂrÂiÂal world.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
Full disÂcloÂsure: On my 7th grade report card, a symÂpaÂthetÂic sciÂence teacher temÂpered a shockÂingÂly low grade with a handÂwritÂten note to my parÂents. SomeÂthing to the effect of it being her opinÂion that my interÂest in theÂater would, ultiÂmateÂly, serve me far betÂter than any inforÂmaÂtion she was attemptÂing to ram through my skull.
Thank you, Miss CoopÂer, for your comÂpasÂsion and excepÂtionÂal foreÂsight.
There are times, though, when I do wish I was just a teenÂsy bit betÂter informed about cerÂtain buzzy sciÂenÂtifÂic theÂoÂries. Hank Green’s inforÂmaÂtion-packed sciÂence Crash CoursÂes are helpÂful to a degree, but he talks so damn fast, I often have the senÂsaÂtion of stumÂbling stuÂpidÂly behind…
As long as I don’t lose myself in non-sciÂenÂtifÂic flourÂishÂes like the cat in a box anchorÂing some of Hawking’s equaÂtions or a sweet homage to ET, I may be able to keep hold of this tiger’s tail. Or at least nod with someÂthing resemÂbling interÂest, the next time a sciÂence-obsessed teen is sharÂing his or her pasÂsion…
I once spent a sumÂmer as a secuÂriÂty guard at the Children’s MuseÂum of IndiÂanapoÂlis. A wonÂderÂful place to visÂit, but my workÂday expeÂriÂence proved dreadÂfulÂly dull. By far the highÂlight was being pulled off whatÂevÂer exhibÂit I hapÂpened to be guardÂing to assist in colÂlecÂtions, a cavÂernous backÂstage area where untold treaÂsures were shelved withÂout cerÂeÂmoÂny. The head conÂserÂvaÂtor conÂfidÂed that many of these items would nevÂer be sinÂgled out for disÂplay. The thrift store egalÂiÂtarÂiÂanÂism that reigned here was far more appealÂing than the eye-catchÂing, eduÂcaÂtionÂal sigÂnage in the pubÂlic area. From the oblivÂion of deep storÂage springs the potenÂtial for disÂcovÂery.
You can make new disÂcovÂerÂies in ColÂlecÂtions just like you can out in the field. You can walk around the corÂner and see someÂthing that no one’s quite observed that way before, describe a new species or a new feaÂture that’s imporÂtant to sciÂence.
The instiÂtuÂtion can choose from among more than 33,430,000 goodÂies, from ancient objects they’ve been careÂfulÂly tendÂing for more than two cenÂturies to the samÂples of frozen tisÂsue and DNA comÂprisÂing the bareÂly 13-year-old Ambrose MonÂell Cryo ColÂlecÂtion for MolÂeÂcÂuÂlar and MicroÂbial Research.
Future episodes will call upon in-house ichthyÂolÂoÂgists, paleÂonÂtolÂoÂgists, anthroÂpolÂoÂgists, astroÂphysiÂcists, and herÂpetolÂoÂgists to disÂcuss such topÂics as specÂiÂmen prepaÂraÂtion, taxÂonÂoÂmy, and curaÂtion. Stay abreast (and — bonus!- celÂeÂbrate Nero’s birthÂday with turÂtles) by subÂscribÂing to the museum’s youtube chanÂnel.
Ayun HalÂlÂiÂday is an author, homeÂschoolÂer, and Chief PriÂmaÂtolÂoÂgist of the East VilÂlage Inky zine. She goes into more detail about her short-lived stint as a museÂum secuÂriÂty guard in her third book, Job HopÂper. FolÂlow her @AyunHalliday
This map shows the oldÂest light in our uniÂverse, as detectÂed by the Planck misÂsion. Click on the map for a largÂer image.
By now the Big Bang theÂoÂry is wideÂly acceptÂed sciÂenÂtifÂiÂcalÂly. The idea is that the uniÂverse began to expand rapidÂly about 14 bilÂlion years ago from a dense, hot state and conÂtinÂues to expand to this day.
One of the most telling finÂgerÂprints left behind by the Big Bang is cosÂmic microwave backÂground radiÂaÂtion. This therÂmal radiÂaÂtion was thought to be left over from the Big Bang itself. It fills the uniÂverse almost comÂpleteÂly.
A new map of cosÂmic radiÂaÂtion quesÂtions some of the core conÂcepts of the Big Bang. What if, this preÂcise heat map sugÂgests, the UniÂverse expeÂriÂenced a long, pre-Bang phase? What if the Big Bang wasn’t the first burp of creÂation after all?
The EuroÂpean Space Agency’s Planck spaceÂcraft meaÂsures between infra-red and radio waves, makÂing it posÂsiÂble to see back in time to the first light ever proÂduced.
CosÂmolÂoÂgists released the new images of the earÂly uniÂverse this week. What surÂprisÂes them is that Planck detectÂed stronger light sigÂnals on one half of the sky than the othÂer and picked up a series of anomÂalies or “cold spots.” While this doesn’t chalÂlenge the Big Bang theÂoÂry as a whole, it does heightÂen the mysÂtery around the universe’s birth and develÂopÂment.
The data is still comÂing in. Like the Human Genome Project, Planck stands to genÂerÂate douÂble the amount of data it has proÂduced so far.
This full-sky map from the Planck misÂsion shows matÂter between Earth and the edge of the observÂable uniÂverse. Regions with more mass show up as lighter areas while regions with less mass are darkÂer. The grayed-out areas are where light from our own galaxy was too bright, blockÂing PlanckÂ’s abilÂiÂty to map the more disÂtant matÂter. Click the map for a largÂer image.
Some othÂer surÂprisÂes from the Planck spaceÂcraft data:
• The uniÂverse is about 100 milÂlion years oldÂer and appears to be expandÂing much slowÂer than preÂviÂousÂly thought
• There is less dark enerÂgy and more matÂter in the uniÂverse than preÂviÂous research showed.
RealÂiÂty teleÂviÂsion has been around since at least the late ’40s. First we had CanÂdid CamÂera, where hapÂless, but real, peoÂple became the unwitÂting butt of Allen Funt’s jokes. But it wasn’t until fifty years latÂer that the genre explodÂed, bringÂing us Big BrothÂer and, of course, SurÂvivor.
Now, make way for the unbeÂlievÂable and ultra-expenÂsive marÂriage of realÂiÂty teleÂviÂsion and sciÂence ficÂtion. Mars One, the brainÂchild of Dutch entreÂpreÂneur Bas LansÂdorp, plans to estabÂlish a perÂmaÂnent human setÂtleÂment on the red planÂet in 2023. First, four peoÂple would land on Mars. Every two years, anothÂer group of peoÂple would arrive. The trips would be one-way and all the setÂtlers would live out the rest of their lives on Mars. FundÂing for the first phase is estiÂmatÂed at $6 bilÂlion.
Mars One backÂers say raisÂing $6 bilÂlion will be easy. Every four years the SumÂmer and WinÂter Olympics genÂerÂate milÂlions of dolÂlars in revÂenue because peoÂple all over the world want to watch. The Olympics held in 2005 and 2008 togethÂer made nearÂly $5.5 bilÂlion from proÂgramÂming and sponÂsorÂship.
So, what if there were an event so fasÂciÂnatÂing, so unpreceÂdentÂed and amazÂing, that litÂerÂalÂly every teleÂviÂsion, comÂputÂer, and smart device would be tuned in to watch? What if the entire Mars misÂsion was an interÂnaÂtionÂal realÂiÂty teleÂviÂsion show? That’s the plan. EveryÂthing from the selecÂtion of the first group of astroÂnauts to the launch, landÂing, and daiÂly life on the red planÂet would be teleÂvised. The audiÂence even gets to vote on the final four space travÂelÂers.
InterÂestÂed? Mars One has issued its requireÂments for astroÂnaut selecÂtion. No milÂiÂtary, flight, or sciÂence expeÂriÂence required. AppliÂcants must be at least 18, in good menÂtal and physÂiÂcal health, and willÂing to devote eight years to trainÂing before beginÂning the jourÂney to their new home planÂet. FindÂing this hard to believe? The first quesÂtion in Mars One’s FAQ page sort of says it all. Is this for real? Yes, the plans are for real. Whether any or everyÂthing Mars One imagÂines actuÂalÂly takes place is anybody’s guess.
What’s cerÂtain is that Mars is a hot desÂtiÂnaÂtion at the moment, and not just for aspirÂing realÂiÂty stars. SpaceX funÂder and bilÂlionÂaire Elon Musk wants to build a city for 80,000 on Mars. While acceptÂing an award from the RoyÂal AeroÂnauÂtiÂcal SociÂety, Musk outÂlined his vision to charge $500,000 per perÂson to transÂport peoÂple to the new MarÂtÂian city. He’s menÂtioned wantÂiÂng to retire on Mars and is using SpaceX as a lab to develÂop new interÂplanÂeÂtary rockÂet techÂnolÂoÂgy.
But you don’t need to be rich or popÂuÂlar to see some of the red planÂet.There’s also plenÂty of explorÂing to do on the surÂface of Mars from home. CitÂiÂzen sciÂenÂtists can help PlanÂet Four idenÂtiÂfy fans and blotchÂes in images of the MarÂtÂian surÂface. The picÂtures come from a camÂera aboard the Mars ReconÂnaisÂsance Orbiter, a NASA misÂsion to orbit Mars and transÂmit images and data to Earth using a powÂerÂful radio freÂquenÂcy called the “Ka-band,” which works like an interÂplanÂeÂtary InterÂnet.
Using simÂple markÂing tools, users can mark the surÂface colÂorations and spots that help sciÂenÂtists study changes in the planet’s weathÂer. So-called “spiÂders” of dry ice form on the planet’s poles in the winÂter and then lead to fan-shaped moisÂture footÂprints.
It’s fun to imagÂine that the data you creÂate could bring us closÂer to our disÂtant neighÂbor planÂet. Unless of course you’d rather suit up and start trainÂing to go there yourÂself. In that case, good luck and start savÂing.
Kate Rix writes about digÂiÂtal techÂnolÂoÂgy and eduÂcaÂtion. Read more of her work at .
Albert EinÂstein is the patron saint of slackÂers redeemed. We’ve all heard some verÂsion of his late-bloomer stoÂry: “You know, Albert EinÂstein did terÂriÂbly in high school” (says every high school guidÂance counÂselor at some point). Most of us norÂmals like to see him this way—it bucks us up—even if he was anyÂthing but your averÂage low achievÂer. The above 2006 proÂfile of EinÂstein by PBS’s “AmerÂiÂcan MasÂters” docÂuÂmenÂtary series, Albert EinÂstein: How I See the World, takes the oppoÂsite tack, surÂroundÂing him with the aura of a hero in a HerÂmann Hesse novÂel. The film begins with William Hurt’s narÂraÂtion of Einstein’s solo trek through the Alps at twenÂty-two, durÂing which he “longed to grasp the hidÂden design, the underÂlyÂing prinÂciÂples of nature.” Over the intrigue conÂjured by Michael Galasso’s hauntÂing, minÂiÂmalÂist score and a monÂtage of black-and-white nature films, narÂraÂtor Hurt intones:
Every once in a while there comes a man who is able to see the uniÂverse in a totalÂly new way, whose vision upsets the very founÂdaÂtions of the world as we know it. ThroughÂout his life, Albert EinÂstein would look for this harÂmoÂny, not only in his sciÂence, but in the world of men. The world wantÂed to know Albert EinÂstein, yet he remained a mysÂtery to those who only saw his pubÂlic face and perÂhaps to himÂself as well. “What does a fish know of the water in which he swims?” he asked himÂself.
After this senÂtenÂtious beginÂning, with its strangeÂly outÂdatÂed proÂnoun use, Hurt tells us that those who knew EinÂstein best saw a litÂtle of him, and the film goes on to docÂuÂment those impresÂsions in interÂviews: colÂleague AbraÂham Pais comÂments on Einstein’s love of JewÂish humor (and that his laughÂter soundÂed like “the bark of a conÂtentÂed seal”). HanÂna Loewy, a famÂiÂly friend, describes his abilÂiÂty to look at “many, many dimenÂsions, whether they be proven or not,” and to see the whole. InterÂcut between these stateÂments is archival footage of EinÂstein himÂself and comÂmenÂtary from Hurt, some of it quesÂtionÂable (for examÂple, the idea that EinÂstein was a “sciÂenÂtist who believed in God” is tenÂdenÂtious, at best, but a subÂject best left for the endÂless bickÂerÂing of YouTube comÂmenters).
It’s a bit of an Olympian treatÂment, fitÂting to the subÂject in some respects. But in anothÂer sense, the docÂuÂmenÂtary perÂforms the funcÂtion of a hagiogÂraÂphy, a genre well-suitÂed for encomiÂum and revÂerÂence, but not for “getÂting to know” its subÂject perÂsonÂalÂly. The film places a great deal of emphaÂsis, rightÂly perÂhaps, on Einstein’s pubÂlic perÂsona: his vocal pacifism—in which he joined with MahatÂma Gandhi—and stateÂments against GerÂman milÂiÂtarism, even as the risÂing fasÂcist order disÂmissed his work and denounced the man.
But while Albert EinÂstein: How I See the World proÂvides a comÂpelling porÂtrait and offers a wealth of hisÂtorÂiÂcal conÂtext for underÂstandÂing Einstein’s world, it leaves out the voicÂes of those who perÂhaps knew him best: his chilÂdren, wife Elsa, or his first wife, MilÂeÂva. (Their divorce gets a brief menÂtion at 15:20, along with his subÂseÂquent marÂriage to first cousin Elsa.) Einstein’s trouÂbled perÂsonÂal life, revealed through priÂvate corÂreÂsponÂdence like an angry post-divorce letÂter to MilÂeÂva and an appalling list of demands writÂten to her durÂing the deteÂriÂoÂraÂtion of their marÂriage, has received more scrutiÂny of late. These perÂsonÂal details have perÂhaps promptÂed PBS to reevalÂuÂate MilÂeÂva’s influÂence; rather than “litÂtle more than a footÂnote” in his biogÂraÂphy, MilÂeÂva may have played a role in his sucÂcess for which she nevÂer received credÂit, givÂing Hurt’s genÂdered narÂraÂtion someÂthing of a bitÂter perÂsonÂal twist.
None of this is to say that a docÂuÂmenÂtary treatÂment of any pubÂlic figÂure needs to dredge the famÂiÂly secrets and disÂplay the dirty launÂdry, but as far as learnÂing how EinÂstein, or anyÂone else of his stature, saw the world, the perÂsonÂal seems to me as relÂeÂvant as the proÂfesÂsionÂal. PBS’s docÂuÂmenÂtary is very well-made, howÂevÂer, and worth watchÂing for its proÂducÂtion valÂues, interÂviews with Einstein’s friends and colÂleagues, and archival newsÂreel footage, even if it someÂtimes fails to truÂly illuÂmiÂnate its subÂject. But as Hurt’s narÂraÂtion disÂclaims at the outÂset, maybe EinÂstein was a mysÂtery, even to himÂself.
The film will be added to the DocÂuÂmenÂtary secÂtion of our colÂlecÂtion of Free Movies Online.
Josh Jones is a docÂtorÂal canÂdiÂdate in EngÂlish at FordÂham UniÂverÂsiÂty and a co-founder and forÂmer manÂagÂing ediÂtor of GuerÂniÂca / A MagÂaÂzine of Arts and PolÂiÂtics.
CheeÂtahs are the fastest land aniÂmals on Earth, able to reach speeds of up to 70 miles per hour.
EarÂliÂer this year, the team at NationÂal GeoÂgraphÂic visÂitÂed the CincinÂnati Zoo and filmed cheeÂtahs runÂning at full sprint, as seen in the majesÂtic video above. The NationÂal GeoÂgraphÂicteam used a PhanÂtom camÂera filmÂing at 1,200 frames per secÂond to capÂture every nuance in the cheeÂtah’s galÂlop. The filmÂing took three days and, so as not to burÂden the aniÂmals, five difÂferÂent cheeÂtahs were filmed.
You can read more about this iniÂtiaÂtive here. Also be sure to check out the accomÂpaÂnyÂing NationÂal GeoÂgraphÂic artiÂcle, “CheeÂtahs on the Edge.”
Eugene Buchko is a blogÂger and phoÂtogÂraÂphÂer livÂing in Atlanta, GA. He mainÂtains a phoÂtoÂblog, EruÂdite ExpresÂsions, and writes about what he reads on his readÂing blog.
After a 125-day stay aboard the InterÂnaÂtionÂal Space StaÂtion, ISS ComÂmanÂder SuniÂta (Suni) Williams touched down in KazaÂkhstan on MonÂday, along with Flight EngiÂneers Aki Hoshide and Yuri Malanchenko. Part of what is known as ExpeÂdiÂtion 33, the three boardÂed their Soyuz TMA-05M on SunÂday to return to Earth, but before they left, Williams downÂlinked an extenÂsive tour above of the ISS orbital labÂoÂraÂtoÂry. Williams has givÂen sevÂerÂal interÂviews from her ISS post, so you may have already seen her floatÂing weightÂless in front of the camÂera, a nimÂbus of dark hair around her face.
Here we see a numÂber of interÂestÂing feaÂtures of the staÂtion. She begins with the JapanÂese labÂoÂraÂtoÂry, then moves to the EuroÂpean modÂule, “ColumÂbus,” where many of the medÂical experÂiÂments take place. InterÂestÂingÂly, every surÂface is a suitÂable workÂstaÂtion; since there’s no refÂerÂence for floor, walls, or ceilÂing, and no need for anyÂthing to stand on, one can maneuÂver into any posiÂtion withÂout losÂing a sense of direcÂtion. As Williams demonÂstrates the “sleep staÂtions,” phone booth-size comÂpartÂments with sleepÂing bags, she shows how the astroÂnauts can also sleep in any posiÂtion at all withÂout feelÂing like they’re “upside-down” or disÂoriÂentÂed in any way. There’s also a lengthy tour of the “facilÂiÂties” (in case you’ve ever wonÂdered how that works) and the “cupoÂla,” a small transÂparÂent room like a WWII gunÂnery staÂtion where the astroÂnauts can gaze out at their home planÂet.
So, yes, I will admit, I’ve always liked to imagÂine the inteÂriÂor of the ISS like the smooth, padded corÂriÂdors of StanÂley Kubrick’s 2001, but the realÂiÂty is still seriÂousÂly cool. The WashÂingÂton Post has a slideshow of ExpeÂdiÂtion 33’s touchÂdown near the town of ArkaÂlyk in northÂern KazaÂkhstan, and the video below shows the small cerÂeÂmoÂny that greetÂed the crew hours after their arrival back on Earth.
Josh Jones is a docÂtorÂal canÂdiÂdate in EngÂlish at FordÂham UniÂverÂsiÂty and a co-founder and forÂmer manÂagÂing ediÂtor of GuerÂniÂca / A MagÂaÂzine of Arts and PolÂiÂtics.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.