More and more, the Dalai Lama has been develÂopÂing an interÂest in what modÂern sciÂence has to say about human emoÂtion — or, more parÂticÂuÂlarÂly, how neuÂroÂscience makes sense of medÂiÂtaÂtion and comÂpasÂsion. PartÂly as a result, StanÂford UniÂverÂsiÂty has launched The CenÂter for ComÂpasÂsion and AltruÂism Research and EduÂcaÂtion, which is delvÂing deepÂer into these quesÂtions. The clip above feaÂtures Daniel GoleÂman, the bestÂselling sciÂence jourÂnalÂist (EmoÂtionÂal IntelÂliÂgenceandDestrucÂtive EmoÂtions), talkÂing about the Dalai Lama’s work on this front. You can find the full conÂverÂsaÂtion with GoleÂman at Bigthink.com, a good resource for thought-proÂvokÂing video.
Bertrand RusÂsell, the Nobel Prize-winÂning philosoÂpher, mathÂeÂmatiÂcian and peace activist, died 40 years ago today. And so, above, we rewind the video tape to 1959, to RusÂsell explainÂing why he doesÂn’t believe in God. This was a viewÂpoint that he othÂerÂwise elabÂoÂratÂed upon in his well-known lecture/essay, Why I Am Not a ChrisÂtÂian. To be sure, some readÂers won’t share RusÂselÂl’s views on reliÂgion. But don’t take umbrage. Just rememÂber, we offer media from across the divide too.
Taught by Yale proÂfesÂsor Dale B. MarÂtin, this course offers an introÂducÂtion to New TesÂtaÂment HisÂtoÂry and LitÂerÂaÂture, and covÂers the folÂlowÂing ground:
This course proÂvides a hisÂtorÂiÂcal study of the oriÂgins of ChrisÂtianÂiÂty by anaÂlyzÂing the litÂerÂaÂture of the earÂliÂest ChrisÂtÂian moveÂments in hisÂtorÂiÂcal conÂtext, conÂcenÂtratÂing on the New TesÂtaÂment. Although theÂoÂlogÂiÂcal themes will occuÂpy much of our attenÂtion, the course does not attempt a theÂoÂlogÂiÂcal approÂpriÂaÂtion of the New TesÂtaÂment as scripÂture. Rather, the imporÂtance of the New TesÂtaÂment and othÂer earÂly ChrisÂtÂian docÂuÂments as ancient litÂerÂaÂture and as sources for hisÂtorÂiÂcal study will be emphaÂsized. A cenÂtral orgaÂnizÂing theme of the course will focus on the difÂferÂences withÂin earÂly ChrisÂtianÂiÂty (-ies).
You can watch the 26 lecÂtures from the course above, or find them on YouTube and iTunes. To get more inforÂmaÂtion on the course, includÂing the sylÂlabus, visÂit this Yale webÂsite.
If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newsletÂter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bunÂdled in one email, each day.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
What crime, what sin, had those young hearts conÂceived
That lie, bleedÂing and torn, on mothÂer’s breast?
Did fallÂen LisÂbon deepÂer drink of vice
Than LonÂdon, Paris, or sunÂlit Madrid?
In these men dance; at LisÂbon yawns the abyss.
TranÂquil specÂtaÂtors of your brothÂers’ wreck,
Unmoved by this repelÂlent dance of death,
Who calmÂly seek the reaÂson of such storms,
Let them but lash your own secuÂriÂty;
Your tears will minÂgle freely with the flood.
Note: Pat RobertÂson’s conÂtroÂverÂsial remarks conÂtained one basic hisÂtorÂiÂcal fact, and it was wrong. He assertÂed that the Haitians brought disÂasÂter upon themÂselves when they broke free from “Napoleon III.” RobertÂson got the wrong guy here. It wasÂn’t Napoleon Lite (1808–1873). It was Napoleon BonaÂparte (1769–1821) who cooptÂed the French RevÂoÂluÂtion 50 years earÂliÂer and tried to impose his will on Haiti. But, whatÂevÂer…
In this clip from Richard Dawkins’ YouTube ChanÂnel, philosoÂpher A.C. Grayling offers an arguÂment for why intelÂliÂgent design should’t be taught alongÂside evoÂluÂtion in the classÂroom. Some will agree with his posiÂtion, and some won’t. And probÂaÂbly few will have no opinÂion. If you have reacÂtions to Grayling’s arguÂment, please state them civilÂly and intelÂliÂgentÂly in the comÂments below.
After he left office in 2007, Tony Blair went across the pond and spent time teachÂing at Yale. Exit Prime MinÂisÂter Blair. Enter ProÂfesÂsor Blair. DurÂing the 2008-09 acaÂdÂeÂmÂic year, Blair and Miroslav Volf co-taught “Faith and GlobÂalÂizaÂtion,” a course designed to help stuÂdents underÂstand the two interÂtwined forces shapÂing our world. In some ways, reliÂgion is the real focus here, and it is Blair’s arguÂment (above, for examÂple) that “If you canÂnot underÂstand the world of faith, whether you are in busiÂness, or in pubÂlic affairs, or in polÂiÂtics, then you actuÂalÂly canÂnot underÂstand the world.” The full course can be accessed on iTunes, and we have also added it to our large colÂlecÂtion of free coursÂes from top uniÂverÂsiÂties. For more inforÂmaÂtion on this course, please visÂit Yale’s Faith and GlobÂalÂizaÂtion webÂsite and also be sure to access Yale’s Open Course iniÂtiaÂtive.
If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newsletÂter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bunÂdled in one email, each day.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
As we menÂtioned last week, Karen ArmÂstrong’s new book, The Case for God, is out. And now you can read the first chapÂter for free. Just click on this link, and then the book viewÂer on the left side of the page. It will expand, and from there you can start flipÂping through the pages. Be warned, the viewer/reader is a litÂtle clunky. The downÂside of free, I guess.
In recent years, we have seen a numÂber of books pubÂlished that have made the case for atheÂism: Richard DawkÂin’s The God DeluÂsion, ChristoÂpher Hitchens’ God Is Not Great, Sam HarÂris’ LetÂter to a ChrisÂtÂian Nation, and Daniel DenÂnetÂt’s BreakÂing the Spell: ReliÂgion as a NatÂurÂal PheÂnomÂeÂnon. It was almost as if a dam had broÂken, and sudÂdenÂly a voice that hadÂn’t been heard in some time, at least not in the US, was let loose. The books hit hard, one after anothÂer, and they made their point. And now Karen ArmÂstrong, who has writÂten more than 20 books on Islam, Judaism and ChrisÂtianÂiÂty, offers a reply. Her new book pubÂlished this week, The Case for God: What ReliÂgion RealÂly Means, takes a hisÂtorÂiÂcal look at God and conÂcludes that we modÂerns (atheÂists, evanÂgelÂiÂcals and the rest) are workÂing with a facile conÂcepÂtion of God. And then she sugÂgests an alterÂnaÂtive way of seeÂing things. You can get a taste for her thinkÂing in this NPR interÂview conÂductÂed this week: LisÂten with the playÂer below, or via these links (MP3 — iTunes — Stream):
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.