Pink Floyd Performs on US Television for the First Time: American Bandstand, 1967

You may have noticed we’ve been in the midst of a mini-six­ties revival for the past decade or so—what with the retro soul of Alaba­ma Shakes or the late Amy Wine­house, the garage rock of Ty Segall, and the Cal­i­for­nia psych of Aus­trali­a’s Tame Impala. That’s to name but just a few stu­dents of six­ties’ sounds; many hun­dreds more pop­u­late events like the Psych Fests of Austin and Liv­er­pool. And before these bands, late eighties/early nineties brought us a British re-inva­sion of six­ties garage rock and pop like the Jesus and Mary Chain, the Chameleons, the Stone Ros­es, Oasis, and many oth­er jan­g­ly, fuzzy, dreamy bands.

All of that is to say it’s near­ly impos­si­ble to hear any­thing six­ties rock with fresh ears. Not only has the inces­sant nos­tal­gia dimmed our sens­es, but we’ve seen the ideas of the six­ties evolve into myr­i­ad sub­cul­tures var­i­ous­ly indebt­ed to the decade, but no longer even in need of direct ref­er­ence. What would it mean, how­ev­er, to hear the far-out sounds of a band like Pink Floyd for the first time, a band who may at times sound dat­ed now, but much of whose more obscure cat­a­log remains shock­ing. And it’s easy to for­get that when Pink Floyd—or “The Pink Floyd” as they tend­ed to be called—got their start with orig­i­nal singer and song­writer Syd Bar­rett, they made a much dif­fer­ent sound than those we’re famil­iar with from The Wall or Dark Side of the Moon.

If you haven’t heard the sound of the band cir­ca 1967, when they record­ed their first album Piper at the Gates of Dawn, then you may nod along with Dick Clark’s ambiva­lent intro­duc­tion of them to U.S. audi­ences in the ’67 Amer­i­can Band­stand appear­ance above—their first vis­it to the States and first time of TV. They do indeed make “very inter­est­ing sounds”: specif­i­cal­ly, “Apples and Oranges,” the third sin­gle and the final song Bar­rett wrote for the band before he suf­fered a psy­chot­ic break onstage and was replaced by David Gilmour. There isn’t much in the way of per­for­mance. (But stick around for the inter­views around 3:25.) As pret­ty much every­one did at the time, Bar­rett, Roger Waters, Nick Mason, and Richard Wright mime to a pre­re­cord­ed track. And Bar­rett looks par­tic­u­lar­ly out of it. He was close by this point to the crip­pling men­tal health cri­sis that would even­tu­al­ly end his career.

But Syd Bar­rett did not dis­ap­pear from music right away. The unre­leased “Scream Thy Last Scream,” slat­ed to be the next sin­gle released after Piper at the Gates of Dawn, gave much indi­ca­tion of the musi­cal direc­tion he took in two 1970 solo albums, The Mad­cap Laughs and Bar­rett. Like lat­er Bar­rett, ear­ly Pink Floyd is not music for every­one. Instead of the famil­iar stomp­ing funk of “The Wall” or the soar­ing blues of “Com­fort­ably Numb,” the songs mean­der, twist, turn, and wob­ble, often indi­cat­ing the state of Barrett’s trou­bled soul, but just as often show­cas­ing his bril­liant com­po­si­tion­al mind. Bar­rett is gone, as is key­boardist Richard Wright, and Pink Floyd is no more. But their lega­cy is secure. And we still have mad genius­es like Austin psych leg­end Roky Erick­son to kick around, as well as all the many thou­sands of musi­cians he and Bar­rett inspired.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Pink Floyd Plays With Their Brand New Singer & Gui­tarist David Gilmour on French TV (1968)

Pink Floyd’s David Gilmour Sings Shakespeare’s Son­net 18

Hear Lost Record­ing of Pink Floyd Play­ing with Jazz Vio­lin­ist Stéphane Grap­pel­li on “Wish You Were Here”

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

David Bowie Urges Kids to READ in a 1987 Poster Sponsored by the American Library Association

bowieread

If you were Amer­i­can and in school dur­ing the late ‘80s and through the ‘90s, you would have seen the Amer­i­can Library Asso­ci­a­tion’s series of pro­mo­tion­al posters that paired a celebri­ty with his/her favorite book, and a sim­ple com­mand: READ. Need it be point­ed out that the coolest of the batch, and one of the first to be shot for the series, was the one fea­tur­ing David Bowie? (This also prob­a­bly meant your librar­i­an was cool too.)

The ALA con­tin­ues to update the series with stars like Phar­rell, Bel­la Thorne, and Octavia Spencer, but they also rere­leased the Bowie poster in Feb­ru­ary in hon­or of the musi­cian’s pass­ing the month before. Bowie looks like a teenag­er, dressed in his let­ter­man jack­ets (from Cana­di­an com­pa­ny Roots, by the way, still mak­ing such jack­ets).

His pom­padour is on point, not egre­gious like his Glass Spi­der Tour ‘do just around the cor­ner. While oth­er celebs in the series dis­play their books like an award, he’s active, read­ing and jump­ing at the same time. (Not the best way to read, how­ev­er.) And those bare feet (see the full poster here) are a nice touch, just a lit­tle bit of Bowie strange­ness.

And though he’s read­ing Fyo­dor Dos­toyevsky’s The Idiot, the book did not turn up on Bowie’s list of his 100 favorite books, print­ed in 2013. Per­haps it’s a ref­er­ence to the album he co-wrote and pro­duced with Iggy Pop?

You can buy your copy of the Bowie Read poster and sup­port the ALA here. It costs $18 and mea­sures 22″ x 34.”

Relat­ed Con­tent:

David Bowie Releas­es 36 Music Videos of His Clas­sic Songs from the 1970s and 1980s

The Sto­ry of Zig­gy Star­dust: How David Bowie Cre­at­ed the Char­ac­ter that Made Him Famous

The 10 Great­est Books Ever, Accord­ing to 125 Top Authors (Down­load Them for Free)

Ted Mills is a free­lance writer on the arts who cur­rent­ly hosts the artist inter­view-based FunkZone Pod­cast. You can also fol­low him on Twit­ter at @tedmills, read his oth­er arts writ­ing at tedmills.com and/or watch his films here.

Tom Waits Names 14 of His Favorite Art Films

Tom Waits is that rare breed of artist who has equal amounts of cred­i­bil­i­ty in the art house the­aters and on the punk rock street. His depres­sion-era every­man blues and drunk­en skid row laments ring just as true as his high-con­cept vaude­ville the­ater act and cock­tail lounge per­for­mance art. Hav­ing the abil­i­ty to con­vinc­ing­ly set his brow high or low makes Waits an excel­lent ambas­sador for film, a medi­um sad­ly riv­en by brow height. While cable TV and Net­flix may be the art hous­es of the 21st cen­tu­ry, let’s not give up on the cul­tur­al reach of lega­cy archives like the Cri­te­ri­on Col­lec­tion just yet. Not before we hear Waits weigh in on his favorite art films.

Waits’ fil­mog­ra­phy as an actor is itself a tes­ta­ment to his brow-span­ning abilities—from such wide-release fare as Drac­u­la and Sev­en Psy­chopaths to the scrap­py, inti­mate films of Jim Jar­musch, and more or less every­thing in-between. The threads that run through all of his film choic­es as an actor are a cer­tain sur­re­al sense of humor and the off-kil­ter human­i­ty and for­mal anar­chy we know so well from his musi­cal choic­es.

We see sim­i­lar pro­cliv­i­ties in Waits’ film favorites, as com­piled by Chris Ambro­sio at Cri­te­ri­on. Most of the choic­es are of the, “Ah, of course” vari­ety in that these films so per­fect­ly explain, or illus­trate, the Tom Waits uni­verse. We might imag­ine many of them with alter­nate sound­tracks of songs from Real Gone, Sword­fishtrom­bones, Bone Machine, etc.

First, up, of course, Fellini’s neo­re­al­ist La Stra­da, a film about the sad­dest, sweet­est, gruffest trav­el­ing cir­cus act ever. Waits also con­fess­es a pas­sion for all of the beau­ti­ful­ly over­wrought films of Carl Theodor Drey­er, includ­ing the pro­found and dis­turb­ing 1928 The Pas­sion of Joan of Arc and 1932 hor­ror clas­sic Vampyr (both above). You can see the full list of Waits’ favs below. Let your pas­sion for art film be rekin­dled, and when watch­ing the silent films, con­sid­er putting on some Mule Vari­a­tions or Blood Mon­ey. You’ll prob­a­bly find it fits per­fect­ly.

  1. La Stra­da, Fed­eri­co Felli­ni (U.S. read­ers: watch Fellini’s films free on Hulu)
  2. Zato­ichi: The Blind Swords­man
  3. Put­ney Swope, Robert Downey, Sr.
  4. Every­thing by Carl Theodor Drey­er
  5. Amar­cord, Fed­eri­co Felli­ni
  6. 8 1/2, Fed­eri­co Felli­ni
  7. The Night of the Hunter, Charles Laughton
  8. Wise Blood, John Hus­ton
  9. Two-Lane Black­top, Monte Hell­man
  10. Eraser­head, David Lynch
  11. Pick­up on South Street, Samuel Fuller
  12. Ikiru, Aki­ra Kuro­sawa
  13. Ver­non, Flori­da, Errol Mor­ris
  14. In a Lone­ly Place, Nicholas Ray

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Free on Hulu: Stream Fellini’s 8 1/2, La Stra­da & Oth­er Clas­sic & Con­tem­po­rary Films

Tom Waits, Play­ing the Down-and-Out Barfly, Appears in Clas­sic 1978 TV Per­for­mance

The Tom Waits Map: A Map­ping of Every Place Waits Has Sung About, From L.A. to Africa’s Jun­gles

Jim Jar­musch: The Art of the Music in His Films

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Hear the Radical Musical Compositions of Marcel Duchamp (1912–1915)

Erratum Musical

Abstract art, spurred into being by the emer­gence of pho­tog­ra­phy, had by 1912 begun to face an even more tech­ni­cal­ly adroit com­peti­tor for the public’s eye: film. Mar­cel Duchamp respond­ed by super­im­pos­ing all of the dis­crete moments that make up a film reel into one aston­ish­ing image that is both sta­t­ic and always in motion. Over one hun­dred years after its com­po­si­tion, Mar­cel Duchamp’s Nude Descend­ing a Stair­case, No. 2 (below) still amazes view­ers with its absolute nov­el­ty. He was asked to with­draw the paint­ing from a cubist exhi­bi­tion when the com­mit­tee pro­nounced it “ridicu­lous.”

Duchamp_-_Nude_Descending_a_Staircase

Five years lat­er, feel­ing with his fel­low Dadaists that the avant-garde had grown too cozy with the estab­lish­ment, and too pre­cious in its approach and recep­tion, Duchamp sub­mit­ted a signed uri­nal for an exhi­bi­tion, the first of many repli­cas to occu­py gal­leries for the past one-hun­dred years—and a provo­ca­tion once vot­ed the most influ­en­tial mod­ern art work ever. Like some sort of trick­ster god, Mar­cel Duchamp pos­sessed trans­for­ma­tive pow­ers, which also had the effect of dri­ving every­one around him crazy. There seem to be no two ways about it: peo­ple either think Duchamp is a genius, or they con­sid­er him a fraud.

Like most of his Dada con­tem­po­raries, Duchamp left no medi­um untouched, from paint­ing, to sculp­ture, to film. And when it came to music, Ubuweb informs us, he enthu­si­as­ti­cal­ly applied him­self, between the years 1912 and 1915, to “two works of music and a con­cep­tu­al piece—a note sug­gest­ing a musi­cal hap­pen­ing.” Like all of his cre­ative work—love it or hate it—his com­po­si­tions “rep­re­sent a rad­i­cal depar­ture from any­thing done up until that time.” Also like his oth­er works, his music glee­ful­ly tres­passed for­mal bound­aries, antic­i­pat­ing “some­thing that then became appar­ent in the visu­al arts,” ama­teur exper­i­men­ta­tion. Duchamp respect­ed no school and no canon of taste, and his “lack of musi­cal train­ing could have only enhanced his explo­ration.”

The meth­ods employed were, of course, con­cep­tu­al, and seri­ous­ly play­ful. In “Erra­tum Musi­cal,” writ­ten for three voic­es, “Duchamp made three sets of 25 cards, one for each voice, with a sin­gle note per card. Each set of cards was mixed in a hat; he then drew out the cards from the hat one at a time and wrote down the series of notes indi­cat­ed by the order in which they were drawn.” The sec­ond piece, direct­ly above, “La Mar­iée mise à nu par ses céli­bataires même. Erra­tum Musi­cal (The Bride Stripped Bare by Her Bach­e­lors Even. Erra­tum Musi­cal),” con­tains instruc­tions for a “mechan­i­cal instru­ment.” It is also “unfin­ished and is writ­ten using num­bers instead of notes.”

Final­ly, “Sculp­ture Musi­cale (Musi­cal Sculpture)”—vocalized by John Cage above, and recre­at­ed with music box­es below—consists of “a note on a small piece of paper” and antic­i­pates the “Fluxus pieces of the ear­ly 1960s.” While Dada artists near­ly all exper­i­ment­ed with music, most­ly in the form of a kind of con­fronta­tion­al musi­cal the­ater, Duchamp’s cere­bral com­po­si­tions push into the ter­ri­to­ry of pure­ly con­cep­tu­al exer­cis­es cre­at­ed through chance oper­a­tion. In “Erra­tum Musi­cal,” for exam­ple, “the three voic­es are writ­ten out sep­a­rate­ly, and there is no indi­ca­tion by the author, whether they should be per­formed sep­a­rate­ly or togeth­er as a trio.” The arrange­ment depends entire­ly on the time and place of per­for­mance and the intu­itions of the inter­preters.

The Rube Gold­berg machine described by Duchamp’s sec­ond piece, along with the nota­tion sys­tem of his own devis­ing, makes it seem impos­si­ble to per­form; like­wise the entire­ly non-musi­cal “Sculp­ture Musi­cale.” The record­ings we have here rep­re­sent only pos­si­ble ver­sions. Hear oth­ers at Ubuweb, along with sev­er­al inter­views with Duchamp in French and Eng­lish.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Anémic Ciné­ma: Mar­cel Duchamp’s Whirling Avant-Garde Film (1926)

When Bri­an Eno & Oth­er Artists Peed in Mar­cel Duchamp’s Famous Uri­nal

Hear the Exper­i­men­tal Music of the Dada Move­ment: Avant-Garde Sounds from a Cen­tu­ry Ago

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Watch Heavy Metal Parking Lot, the Cult Classic Film That Ranks as One of the “Great Rock Documentaries” of All Time

Grow­ing up in the Wash­ing­ton, DC sub­urbs in the 80s and 90s among a cer­tain sub­cul­ture of dis­af­fect­ed youth meant that the short cult doc­u­men­tary Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot had an espe­cial­ly leg­endary sta­tus. Every­body seemed to know a friend of a friend’s old­er broth­er or sis­ter who had been caught on cam­era by film­mak­ers John Heyn and Jeff Kru­lik out­side that 1986 Judas Priest con­cert at Largo, Mary­land’s Cap­i­tal Cen­tre (RIP). But geo­graph­i­cal prox­im­i­ty alone to the tit­u­lar park­ing lot does not explain the 17-minute video’s pop­u­lar­i­ty.

Since its first screen­ing at a club called DC Space, Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot has become one of the most beloved of rock films world­wide, a “soci­o­log­i­cal study of head­bangers,” writes Rolling Stone, who rank the short at num­ber 33 in their list of the 40 Great­est Rock Doc­u­men­taries. “Decades before the inter­net made shar­ing video clips as sim­ple as post­ing to Twit­ter or Face­book,” writes The Verge, “Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot caught on, not through offi­cial dis­tri­b­u­tion chan­nels, but through an under­ground net­work of fans that would dub VHS copies and pass them along.” (The movie got a big boost when the film­mak­ers gave a copy to DC-area native Dave Grohl, who kept it on reg­u­lar rota­tion on the Nir­vana tour bus.)

What makes this exposé of met­al fans so spe­cial? Although there’s undoubt­ed­ly a seg­ment of its view­ers who laugh at the film’s col­lec­tion of most­ly anony­mous mid-eight­ies met­al fans, for the most part, Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot’s appeal has not been that of so much viral inter­net content—mean-spirited com­e­dy at the expense of naïve ama­teurs. Thought it’s tempt­ing, as Rolling Stone remarks, “to mock these mul­let-afflict­ed met­al­heads… there’s an unde­ni­able sweet­ness that per­me­ates” the mini-doc and its sub­jects’ “inno­cent quest for rock & roll kicks.”

The sheer goofi­ness and joy­ous aban­don that is 80s heavy met­al con­tributes to the film’s char­ac­ter. And much of the love of Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot comes from the same nos­tal­gic place as that for Dazed and Con­fused except that its char­ac­ters are the real deal. The doc­u­men­tary presents an authen­tic record of mid-80s sub­ur­ban youth in Amer­i­ca. It’s like­ly cos­tume design­ers of Richard Lin­klater’s fol­low-up peri­od piece Every­body Wants Some!! stud­ied Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot in detail.

Like Lin­klater’s testos­terone-heavy films, Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot is large­ly dom­i­nat­ed by dudes—metal bros who “may occa­sion­al­ly be inar­tic­u­late, sex­ist and obnox­ious.” And yet, even fans of the film who grew up in more enlight­ened times and places—and who may not have had friends who looked just like these guys—have found much to love in the movie. The slice-of-life char­ac­ter stud­ies and inter­views cre­ate “a time cap­sule,” Kru­lik told the Verge on the doc­u­men­tary’s 30th anniver­sary screen­ing, one sur­pris­ing­ly still “a lit­tle bit shock­ing.”

On the oth­er hand, Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot remains a vital, time­less record of fandom—of the unvar­nished, uncrit­i­cal devo­tion young lovers of any pop cul­ture phe­nom­e­non bestow upon their object. And like cer­tain oth­er doc­u­men­taries about fandom—such as 1997’s TrekkiesHeavy Met­al Park­ing Lot allows its sub­jects to ful­ly be them­selves, with­out judg­ment or con­de­scen­sion. Even as ordi­nary, most­ly name­less, most­ly stoned and shirt­less kids in the sub­urbs, those selves prove to be as at least as enter­tain­ing as the flam­boy­ant band they came to see.

Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot will be added to our list of Free Doc­u­men­taries, a sub­set of our col­lec­tion 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More. Above you can also watch, “Heavy Met­al Park­ing Lot Alum­ni: Where Are They Now,” the sequel to our fea­tured film. 

via The Verge/Dead Spin

Relat­ed Con­tent:

1980s Met­al­head Kids Are All Right: New Study Sug­gests They Became Well-Adjust­ed Adults

Punk & Heavy Met­al Music Makes Lis­ten­ers Hap­py and Calm, Not Aggres­sive, Accord­ing to New Aus­tralian Study

Heavy Met­al: BBC Film Explores the Music, Per­son­al­i­ties & Great Cloth­ing That Hit the Stage in the 1980s

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

David Bowie Dreamed of Turning George Orwell’s 1984 Into a Musical: Hear the Songs That Survived the Abandoned Project

David Bowie’s 1974 album Dia­mond Dogs intro­duced a new hodge­podge of musi­cal styles: “The music,” writes Nicholas Pegg, “was a four-way tus­sle between the reced­ing sounds of glam, the ris­ing influ­ence of black soul, the syn­the­sized night­mares of The Man Who Sold the World, and the ubiq­ui­tous rock’n’roll swag­ger of Jag­ger.” With its echoes of A Clock­work Orange and William S. Bur­roughs’ The Wild Boys, Bowie called the songs on the album part of a “glit­ter apoc­a­lypse” and described its con­cep­tu­al sce­nario as “the break­down of a city… a dis­af­fect­ed youth that no longer had home-unit sit­u­a­tions, but lived as gangs on roofs and real­ly had the city to them­selves.” His “frag­ment­ed lyrics and the por­trait of urban America’s sor­did melt­down,” writes Pegg, “were clear­ly indebt­ed to Bur­roughs.”

This was a mode in step with the late sixties/early 70s deca­dent ethos (and a con­cept antic­i­pat­ing lat­er cult films like The War­riors and Escape from New York.) And yet, far from soci­etal decay, one of Bowie’s orig­i­nal visions for the project was an adap­ta­tion of George Orwell’s nov­el of total­i­tar­i­an social con­trol, 1984. Dia­mond Dogs may work as a con­cept album in an oblique sort of way, but it came togeth­er, writes Bowie blog Push­ing Ahead of the Dame, as “a sal­vage job, a com­pi­la­tion of scraps from still­born Bowie projects.” In addi­tion to the “urban melt­down” sto­ry, an abort­ed Zig­gy Star­dust musi­cal pro­duced two of Dia­mond Dogs’ songs, “Rebel Rebel” and “Rock’n’Roll With Me.” And Bowie’s for­ay into Orwell gave us “We Are the Dead,” “Big Broth­er,” and, of course, the Isaac Hayes-crib­bing “1984.” (Hear the album ver­sion below and an ear­li­er ver­sion at the top of the post, with a few more Orwellian lyrics and joined with an ear­li­er song, “Dodo.”)

Per­haps his first pub­lic men­tion of the project came as “almost an aside,” notes Pegg, when he casu­al­ly men­tioned in a Rolling Stone inter­view with Bur­roughs, “I’m doing Orwell’s Nine­teen Eighty-Four on tele­vi­sion.” At first, the project had a much more ambi­tious scope. Chriso­pher Sand­ford describes Bowie’s planned adap­ta­tion as “a West End musi­cal, with an accom­pa­ny­ing album and film, lit­tle of which ever hap­pened.” Orwell’s wid­ow and execu­tor of his estate, Sonia Brownell con­sid­ered the project in poor taste and refused him the rights to the nov­el. (Her death in 1980 allowed direc­tor Michael Rad­ford to make his film ver­sion, and the Eury­th­mics to record their con­test­ed sound­track album.)

What sur­vives are the songs—as well as the visions of Orwell and Bur­roughs that con­tin­ued to res­onate in Bowie’s work. The mash-up of musi­cal styles and polit­i­cal con­cepts in Dia­mond Dogs sig­nals a kind of con­fu­sion of Bowie’s own politics—or those of his com­pet­ing personae—which his lat­er albums dogged­ly pur­sue.

On the one hand, Dia­mond Dogs sees Bowie hang­ing on to the role of alien dandy Zig­gy Star­dust. He had also embraced the avant-garde para­noia of Bur­roughs’ mag­i­cal belief sys­tem and Orwell’s night­mare of insti­tu­tion­al con­trol and sur­veil­lance. Odd­ly pulling these ten­den­cies togeth­er was the soul music that emerged ful­ly-fledged on Young Amer­i­cans. When it came to Orwell, “what fas­ci­nat­ed Bowie,” writes Push­ing Ahead of the Dame, “what was arguably the only thing that tru­ly inter­est­ed him in the mid-‘70s, was pow­er, and the schiz­o­phrenic man­ner of thinking—double-thought, basically—that allows, even encour­ages its abus­es.”

For a time, as Bowie moved into his Berlin phase, the fas­ci­na­tion with pow­er dom­i­nat­ed his aes­thet­ic, such that he got a lit­tle too car­ried away with his Thin White Duke char­ac­ter’s flir­ta­tions with fas­cism. (“By 1979,” writes Stereo Williams, “Bowie had dropped the Duke image and referred to it as ‘a nasty char­ac­ter for me.’”) But the theme of “dou­ble-thought,” the fas­ci­na­tion with Orwellian dystopias, and the influ­ence of Bur­roughs’ para­noia and cut-up tech­nique sur­vived the death of both the Thin White Duke and of Zig­gy, the inter­stel­lar flâneur.

Twen­ty years after Dia­mond Dogs, strains of Orwell and Bur­roughs came togeth­er in Bowie’s dystopi­an epic Out­side, whose lyrics, writes Sand­ford, “were sub­ject­ed to a spin in his com­put­er, indus­tri­al­iz­ing the tech­nique once lim­it­ed to scis­sors and paste.” Orwellian themes crop up again in oth­er lat­er Bowie con­cept albums, and in a way, he con­tin­ued to adapt the nov­el long after the lit­er­ary exper­i­ments on Dia­mond Dogs, only in cut-up fash­ion rather than as glam musi­cal the­ater.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

David Bowie’s Music Video “Jump They Say” Pays Trib­ute to Marker’s La Jetée, Godard’s Alphav­ille, Welles’ The Tri­al & Kubrick’s 2001

Hear the Very First Adap­ta­tion of George Orwell’s 1984 in a Radio Play Star­ring David Niv­en (1949)

George Orwell’s 1984 Staged as an Opera: Watch Scenes from the 2005 Pro­duc­tion in Lon­don

How David Bowie, Kurt Cobain & Thom Yorke Write Songs With William Bur­roughs’ Cut-Up Tech­nique

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Patti Smith on Virginia Woolf’s Cane, Charles Dickens’ Pen & Other Cherished Literary Talismans

Oh to be eulo­gized by Pat­ti Smith, God­moth­er of Punk, poet, best-sell­ing author.

Her mem­oir, Just Kids, was born of a sacred deathbed vow to her first boyfriend, pho­tog­ra­ph­er Robert Map­plethor­pe.

Its fol­low up, M Train, start­ed out as an exer­cise in writ­ing about “noth­ing at all,” only to wind up as an ele­gy to her late hus­band, gui­tarist Fred “Son­ic” Smith. (Their daugh­ter sug­gest­ed that her dad  “was prob­a­bly annoyed that Robert got so much atten­tion in the oth­er book.”)

Cher­ish­ing the mem­o­ries comes eas­i­ly to Smith, as she reveals in a fas­ci­nat­ing con­ver­sa­tion with the New York Pub­lic Library’s Paul Hold­en­gräber, above.

She and hus­band Smith cel­e­brat­ed their first anniver­sary by col­lect­ing stones from the French Guiana penal colony, Saint-Lau­rent-du-Maroni, in an effort to feel clos­er to Jean Genet, one of her most revered authors.

She believes in the trans­mu­ta­tion of objects, unabashed­ly lob­by­ing to lib­er­ate the walk­ing stick that accom­pa­nied Vir­ginia Woolf to her death from the NYPL’s col­lec­tion in order to com­mune with it fur­ther. She may turn into a gib­ber­ing fan­girl in face to face meet­ings with the authors she admires, but inter­act­ing with relics of those who have gone before has a cen­ter­ing effect.

Need­less to say, her fame grants her access to items the rest of us are lucky to view though the walls of a vit­rine.

She has paged through Sylvia Plath’s child­hood note­books and gripped Charles Dick­ens’ sur­pris­ing­ly mod­est pen. She has ““per­pet­u­at­ed remem­brance” by com­ing into close con­tact with Bob­by Fis­ch­er’s chess table, Fri­da Kahlo’s leg braces, and a hotel room favored by Maria Callas. Her rec­ol­lec­tion of these events is both rev­er­en­tial and imp­ish, the stuff of a dozen anec­dotes.

“I would faint to use (sculp­tor Con­stan­tin) Brân­cuși’s tooth­brush,“ she quips. “I wouldn’t use it though.”

Where tan­gi­ble sou­venirs prove elu­sive, Smith takes pho­tographs.

Inter­view­er Hold­en­gräber is unique­ly equipped to share in Smith’s lit­er­ary pas­sions, egging her on with quotes recit­ed from mem­o­ry, includ­ing this beau­ty by Rain­er Maria Rilke:

Now loss, how­ev­er cru­el, is pow­er­less against pos­ses­sion, which it com­pletes, or even, affirms: loss is, in fact, noth­ing else than a sec­ond acquisition–but now com­plete­ly interiorized–and just as intense.

(The sen­ti­ment is so love­ly, who can blame him for invok­ing it in pre­vi­ous con­ver­sa­tion with NYPL guests, artist Edmund de Waal and pianist Van Cliburn.)

The top­ic can get heavy, but Smith is a con­sum­mate enter­tain­er whose clown­ish brinkman­ship leads her to cite Jimi Hen­drix: “Hooray, I wake from yes­ter­day.”

The com­plete tran­script of the con­ver­sa­tion is avail­able for down­load here, as is an audio pod­cast.

Note: You can down­load Just Kids or M Train as free audio books if you join Audible.com’s 30-day free tri­al.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Mas­ter Cura­tor Paul Hold­en­gräber Inter­views Hitchens, Her­zog, Goure­vitch & Oth­er Lead­ing Thinkers

Pat­ti Smith’s List of Favorite Books: From Rim­baud to Susan Son­tag

Pat­ti Smith and David Lynch Talk About the Source of Their Ideas & Cre­ative Inspi­ra­tion

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

The Math Behind Beethoven’s Music

Almost all the biggest math enthu­si­asts I’ve known have also loved clas­si­cal music, espe­cial­ly the work of Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven. Of course, as San Fran­cis­co Sym­pho­ny music direc­tor Michael Tilson Thomas once put it, you can’t have those three as your favorite com­posers, because “they sim­ply define what music is.” But don’t tell that to the math­e­mat­i­cal­ly mind­ed, on whom all of them, espe­cial­ly Bach and Beethoven, have always exert­ed a strong pull.

But why? Do their musi­cal com­po­si­tions have some under­ly­ing quan­ti­ta­tive appeal? And by the way, “how is it that Beethoven, who is cel­e­brat­ed as one of the most sig­nif­i­cant com­posers of all time, wrote many of his most beloved songs while going deaf?” The ques­tion comes from a TED-Ed seg­ment and its accom­pa­ny­ing blog post by Natalya St. Clair which explains, using the exam­ple of the “Moon­light Sonata,” what the for­mi­da­ble com­pos­er did it using math. (You might also want to see St. Clair’s oth­er vides: The Unex­pect­ed Math Behind Van Gogh’s “Star­ry Night.”)

beethoven music gif

“The stan­dard piano octave con­sists of 13 keys, each sep­a­rat­ed by a half step,” St. Clair writes. “A stan­dard major or minor scale uses 8 of these keys with 5 whole step inter­vals and 2 half step ones.” So far, so good. “The first half of mea­sure 50 of ‘Moon­light Sonata’ con­sists of three notes in D major, sep­a­rat­ed by inter­vals called thirds that skip over the next note in the scale. By stack­ing the first, third, and fifth notes — D, F sharp, and A — we get a har­mon­ic pat­tern known as a tri­ad.” These three fre­quen­cies togeth­er cre­ate “ ‘con­so­nance,’ which sounds nat­u­ral­ly pleas­ant to our ears. Exam­in­ing Beethoven’s use of both con­so­nance and dis­so­nance can help us begin to under­stand how he added the unquan­tifi­able ele­ments of emo­tion and cre­ativ­i­ty to the cer­tain­ty of math­e­mat­ics.”

Explained in words, Beethoven’s use of math­e­mat­ics in his music may or may not seem easy to under­stand. But it all gets clear­er and much more vivid when you watch the TED-Ed video about it, which brings togeth­er visu­als of the piano key­board, the musi­cal score, and even the rel­e­vant geo­met­ric dia­grams and sine waves. Nor does it miss the oppor­tu­ni­ty to use music itself, break­ing it down into its con­stituent sounds and build­ing it back up again into the “Moon­light Sonata” we know and love — and can now, hav­ing learned a lit­tle more about what math­e­mati­cian James Sylvester called the “music of the rea­son” under­ly­ing the “math­e­mat­ics of the sense,” appre­ci­ate a lit­tle more deeply.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Stream the Com­plete Works of Bach & Beethoven: 250 Free Hours of Music

Beethoven’s 5th: The Ani­mat­ed Score

Leonard Bern­stein Con­ducts Beethoven’s 9th in a Clas­sic 1979 Per­for­mance

Beethoven’s Ode to Joy Played With 167 Theremins Placed Inside Matryosh­ka Dolls in Japan

Man Hauls a Piano Up a Moun­tain in Thai­land and Plays Beethoven for Injured Ele­phants

Slavoj Žižek Exam­ines the Per­verse Ide­ol­o­gy of Beethoven’s Ode to Joy

Oliv­er Sacks’ Last Tweet Shows Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” Mov­ing­ly Flash­mobbed in Spain

Does Math Objec­tive­ly Exist, or Is It a Human Cre­ation? A New PBS Video Explores a Time­less Ques­tion

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities, lan­guage, and style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.