In his legÂendary MIT lecÂture “How to Speak,” proÂfesÂsor Patrick WinÂston opens with a stoÂry about seeÂing Olympic gymÂnast Mary Lou RetÂton at a CelebriÂty Ski WeekÂend. It was immeÂdiÂateÂly clear to him that he was the betÂter skiÂer, but not because he had more innate athÂletÂic abilÂiÂty than an Olympic gold medalÂist, but because he had more knowlÂedge and pracÂtice. These, WinÂston says, are the key qualÂiÂties we need to become betÂter comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtors. InherÂent talÂent helps, he says, but “notice that the T is very small. What realÂly matÂters is what you know.”
What some of us know about comÂmuÂniÂcatÂing effecÂtiveÂly could fill a greetÂing card, but it’s hardÂly our fault, says WinÂston. Schools that send stuÂdents into the world withÂout the abilÂiÂty to speak and write well are as crimÂiÂnalÂly liable as offiÂcers who send solÂdiers into batÂtle withÂout weapons. For over 40 years, WinÂston has been tryÂing to remÂeÂdy the sitÂuÂaÂtion with his “How to Speak” lecÂture, offered every JanÂuÂary,” notes MIT, “usuÂalÂly to overÂflow crowds.” It became “so popÂuÂlar, in fact, that the annuÂal talk had to be limÂitÂed to the first 300 parÂticÂiÂpants.”
Now it’s availÂable online, in both video and tranÂscript form, in the talk’s final form from 2018 (it evolved quite a bit over the decades). ProÂfesÂsor WinÂston passed away last year, but his wisÂdom lives on. Rather than present us with a dry theÂoÂry of rhetoric and comÂpoÂsiÂtion, the oneÂtime direcÂtor of the MIT’s ArtiÂfiÂcial IntelÂliÂgence LabÂoÂraÂtoÂry offers “a few heurisÂtic rules” disÂtilled from “praxÂis in comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion approachÂes that incorÂpoÂrate NeuÂrolinÂguisÂtics, LinÂguisÂtics, PaleÂoanÂthroÂpolÂoÂgy, CogÂniÂtive SciÂence and ComÂputÂer SciÂence,” writes MinÂnie Kasyoka.
Winston’s research on “creÂatÂing machines with the same thought patÂterns as humans” led him to the folÂlowÂing conÂcluÂsions about effecÂtive speakÂing and writing—observations that have borne themÂselves out in the careers of thouÂsands of pubÂlic speakÂers, job seekÂers, and proÂfesÂsionÂals of every kind. Many of his heurisÂtics conÂtraÂdict decades of folk opinÂion on pubÂlic speakÂing, as well as conÂtemÂpoÂrary techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal trends. For one thing, he says, avoid openÂing with a joke.
PeoÂple still setÂtling into their seats will be too disÂtractÂed to pay attenÂtion and you won’t get the laugh. Instead, open with an analÂoÂgy or a stoÂry, like his Mary Lou RetÂton gamÂbit, then tell peoÂple, directÂly, what they’re going to get from your talk. Then tell them again. And again. “It’s a good idea to cycle on the subÂject,” says WinÂston. “Go around it. Go round it again. Go round it again.” It’s not that we should assume our audiÂence is uninÂtelÂliÂgent, but rather that “at any givÂen moment, about 20%” of them “will be fogged out no matÂter what the lecÂture is.” It’s just how the human mind works, shiftÂing attenÂtion all over the place.
Like all great works on effecÂtive comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion, Winston’s talk illusÂtrates his methÂods as it explains them: he fills the lecÂture with memÂoÂrable images—like “buildÂing a fence” around his idea to disÂtinÂguish it from othÂer simÂiÂlar ideas. He conÂtinÂues to use interÂestÂing litÂtle stoÂries to make things conÂcrete, like an anecÂdote about a SerÂbian nun who was offendÂed by him putting his hands behind his back. This is offered in serÂvice of his lengthy defense of the blackÂboard, conÂtra PowÂerÂPoint, as the ultiÂmate visuÂal aid. “Now, you have someÂthing to do with your hands.”
The talk is relaxed, humorÂous, and inforÂmaÂtive, and not a step-by-step method. As WinÂston says, you can dip in and out of the copiÂous advice he presents, takÂing rules you think might work best for your parÂticÂuÂlar style of comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion and your comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion needs. We should all, he emphaÂsizes, hone our own way of speakÂing and writÂing. But, “while he nevÂer explicÂitÂly stressÂes the ultiÂmate need for rhetorÂiÂcal devices,” Kasyoka points out, he demonÂstrates that they are imperÂaÂtive.
ProÂfesÂsor WinÂston masÂterÂfulÂly uses perÂsuaÂsive techÂniques to hamÂmer on this point. For examÂple, the use of anadiploÂsis, that is the repÂeÂtiÂtion of a clause in a senÂtence for emphaÂsis, is very manÂiÂfest in this snipÂpet from his talk: “Your careers will be deterÂmined largeÂly by how well you speak, by how well you write, and by the qualÂiÂty of your ideas… in that order.”
How do we learn to use rhetoric as effecÂtiveÂly as WinÂston? We lisÂten to and read effecÂtive rhetoric like his. Do so in the video lecÂture at the top and on the “How to Speak” course page, which has tranÂscripts for downÂload and addiÂtionÂal resources for furÂther study.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
LitÂerÂary TheÂoÂrist StanÂley Fish Offers a Free Course on Rhetoric, or the PowÂer of ArguÂments
NovÂelÂist CorÂmac McCarthy Gives WritÂing Advice to SciÂenÂtists … and AnyÂone Who Wants to Write Clear, ComÂpelling Prose
The Shape of A StoÂry: WritÂing Tips from Kurt VonÂnegut
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness