Should intelÂliÂgent life of some form or anothÂer still inhabÂit the planÂet in the year 6939, such beings might come upon an “800-pound tube of an alloy of copÂper and chromiÂum called Cupaloy” that was buried 50 feet beneath what was once Queens. The first time capÂsule, lowÂered under the WestÂingÂhouse exhibÂit at the 1939 New York World’s Fair conÂtains “35 items one might find in any run-of-the-mill Smith famÂiÂly houseÂhold,” as JinÂwoo Chong writes at Untapped Cities, “includÂing copies of Life magÂaÂzine, a Sears and RoeÂbuck catÂaÂlog, cigÂaÂrettes and seeds of wheat, corn, alfalÂfa and soy.”
The Future Library, a time capÂsule-like project presentÂly in the works, takes a very difÂferÂent approach to the conÂcept. “A forÂest is growÂing in NorÂway,” explains an introÂducÂtoÂry video on creÂator Katie Paterson’s webÂsite. “In 100 years it will become an antholÂoÂgy of books.” The books that will be printÂed from 1,000 trees plantÂed in NordÂmarÂka, north of Oslo, will not, howÂevÂer, transÂmit minÂing and navÂiÂgaÂtionÂal instrucÂtions, but a full range of human emoÂtion and perÂsonÂal expeÂriÂence. Or so we might assume. Unlike the 1939 time capÂsule, we’ll nevÂer know what’s inside them.
ScotÂtish artist PaterÂson has planned a library of 100 creÂative works of ficÂtion, non-ficÂtion, and poetry—one manÂuÂscript subÂmitÂted every year until 2114, when she intends them all to be printÂed in 3,000 copies each and read for the first time. Almost none of us will be there to witÂness the event, yet “the timescale is… not vast in cosÂmic terms,” she says. “It is beyond our curÂrent lifesÂpans, but close enough to come face to face with it, to comÂpreÂhend and relÂaÂtivize,” unlike the incomÂpreÂhenÂsiÂble future of H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine or the far-off world for which WestÂingÂhouse designed their capÂsule.
NonetheÂless, techÂnoÂlogÂiÂcal, and perÂhaps even evoÂluÂtionÂary, change has increased expoÂnenÂtialÂly in the past sevÂerÂal decades, as have the posÂsiÂbilÂiÂties for globÂal extincÂtion events. MarÂgaret Atwood, the first author to subÂmit an unpubÂlished, unread manÂuÂscript to the Future Library in 2014, is charÂacÂterÂisÂtiÂcalÂly less than sanÂguine about the exisÂtence of future readÂers for her manÂuÂscript, entiÂtled ScribÂbler Moon. “It’s very optiÂmistic to believe that there will still be peoÂple in 100 years,” she says in the short video above, and “that those peoÂple will still be readÂing.” Atwood imagÂines a near-future that may not even recÂogÂnize our time.
Which words that we use today will be difÂferÂent, archaÂic, obsoÂlete? Which new words will have entered the lanÂguage? We don’t know what footÂnotes we will need. Will they have comÂputÂers? Will they call them someÂthing else? What will they think smartÂphones are? Will that word still exist?
WritÂers for the project are choÂsen by the Future Library’s board of trustees. After the canÂny selecÂtion of Atwood, they chose the equalÂly on-the-nose David Mitchell, author of Cloud Atlas, who calls the library “the Ark of LitÂerÂaÂture.” It is a strange ark, filled with aniÂmals few peoÂple livÂing now will likeÂly ever see. “The world’s most secreÂtive library,” The Guardian calls it. In 2016, IceÂlandic novÂelÂist and poet SjĂłn subÂmitÂted his mysÂteÂriÂous text. The fourth work came from TurkÂish novÂelÂist Elif Shafak, who named the project “a secÂuÂlar act of faith.”
The latÂest writer choÂsen is Man BookÂer-winÂning South KoreÂan novÂelÂist Han Kang, who described the Future Library as a litÂerÂal expresÂsion of the writer’s thoughts on their duty to posÂterÂiÂty: “I canÂnot surÂvive 100 years from now, of course. No one who I love can surÂvive, either. This relentÂless fact has made me reflect on the essenÂtial part of my life. Why do I write? Who am I talkÂing to, when I write?” Did Jane Austen imagÂine her readÂers of 100 years latÂer? Could she ever have imagÂined us?
Not only is the Future Library an act of litÂerÂary faith, but it is an ecoÂlogÂiÂcal one. “The next 96 years do not look promisÂing for the seedlings,” writes Merve Emre at The New York Times, “which are more vulÂnerÂaÂble than their ancesÂtors to all manÂner of man-made disÂasÂters.” The project symÂbolÂiÂcalÂly binds togethÂer the fates of the book and the trees, makÂing “the physÂiÂcalÂiÂty of culÂture palÂpaÂble by insistÂing that we conÂfront the long, laboÂriÂous process of preÂservÂing lanÂguage.”
In 2020, the colÂlecÂtion of manÂuÂscripts will be moved to a “Silent Room” in Oslo, a “womb-shaped chamÂber facÂing the forÂest, lined with wood from its trees.” VisÂiÂtors can come and venÂerÂate these secreÂtive future relics in their ribÂbon-wrapped gray boxÂes. But their contents—should the ambiÂtious endeavÂor go as planned—will remain as eluÂsive as the shape of our colÂlecÂtive future 100 years from now.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Aldous HuxÂley to George Orwell: My HellÂish Vision of the Future is BetÂter Than Yours (1949)
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness