On the Power of Teaching Philosophy in Prisons

Phi­los­o­phy is often seen as an arcane aca­d­e­m­ic dis­ci­pline, in com­pe­ti­tion with the hard sci­ences or laden with abstruse con­cepts and lan­guage inac­ces­si­ble to ordi­nary peo­ple. Such a per­cep­tion may be war­rant­ed. This is not to damn aca­d­e­m­ic phi­los­o­phy but to high­light what has been lost through pro­fes­sion­al­iza­tion: clas­si­cal notions of ethics as “the art of liv­ing” or what Michel Fou­cault called “the care of the self”; the ancient Greek idea of par­rhe­sia—bold, hon­est speech uncloud­ed by pro­pri­etary jar­gon; phi­los­o­phy as a prac­tice like med­i­ta­tion or yoga, a tech­nique for self-knowl­edge, self-con­trol, and wise, just, and con­sid­er­ate rela­tion­ships with oth­ers.

From Socrates to Aris­to­tle to Epi­cu­rus and the Sto­ics, ancient West­ern thinkers believed phi­los­o­phy to be inti­mate­ly rel­e­vant to every­day life. This was very much the case in ancient East­ern thought as well, in the Jain­ist sages, the Bud­dha, or Lao-Tzu, to name a few. We will find some form of pop­u­lar phi­los­o­phy on every con­ti­nent and every his­tor­i­cal age. And while plen­ty of mod­ern teach­ers still believe in phi­los­o­phy for every­one, they oper­ate in a con­sumer cul­ture that often deems them irrel­e­vant, at best. Still, many edu­ca­tors per­sist out­side the acad­e­my, endeav­or­ing to reach not only ordi­nary cit­i­zens but a class of dis­em­pow­ered peo­ple also deemed irrel­e­vant, at best: the impris­oned, many of whom have had few edu­ca­tion­al resources and lit­tle to no expo­sure to philo­soph­i­cal think­ing.

We have many exam­ples of influ­en­tial thinkers writ­ing from prison, whether Boethius’ ear­ly Chris­t­ian Con­so­la­tions of Phi­los­o­phy, Anto­nio Gramsci’s pas­sion­ate Marx­ist prison let­ters, Oscar Wilde’s De Pro­fundis, or Mar­tin Luther King, Jr.’s essen­tial “Let­ter from a Birm­ing­ham Jail.” These have maybe pro­vid­ed read­ers who have nev­er been jailed with trag­ic, yet roman­tic notions of doing phi­los­o­phy while doing time. But the philoso­phers who enter pris­ons to work with peo­ple convicted—justly or otherwise—of all man­ner of crimes can­not afford to have roman­tic ideas. Philoso­pher Alan Smith found this to be espe­cial­ly so after teach­ing in UK pris­ons for 14 years, and writ­ing bold­ly and can­did­ly about the expe­ri­ence in his Guardian col­umn “Phi­los­o­phy for Pris­on­ers.”

Final­ly retir­ing in 2013, Smith con­fessed, “If I car­ried on in prison, I would have to do it dif­fer­ent­ly; I would have to admit that it was prison.” He may have felt burned out at the end of his sojourn, but he had­n’t lost his sense of eth­i­cal pur­pose:

When we don’t know about his­to­ry and art and soci­ety we are adrift. Most of you read­ing this will nev­er have had that expe­ri­ence, but many of the men I taught were igno­rant of just about every­thing, and as grown men felt this keen­ly. Edu­ca­tion was a relief, a route to self-respect.

Those who do this work report on how so many inmates hunger for routes to self-knowl­edge, reflec­tion, and rig­or­ous intel­lec­tu­al exer­cise. Sev­er­al edu­ca­tors at The Phi­los­o­phy Foun­da­tion, for exam­ple, have writ­ten about their expe­ri­ences teach­ing phi­los­o­phy in var­i­ous UK pris­ons. Con­di­tions are dif­fer­ent, and often much bleak­er, in the US—a coun­try with 5% of the world’s pop­u­la­tion and 25% of its prisoners—but here, too, philoso­phers have helped inmates dis­cov­er new truths about them­selves and their soci­ety. In the very short TED talk up top, Damon Horowitz, who teach­es at San Quentin through the Prison Uni­ver­si­ty Project, gives a pas­sion­ate, rapid-fire account­ing of his mis­sion behind bars: “Every­one’s got an opin­ion. We are here for knowl­edge. Our ene­my is thought­less­ness.” A cho­rus of ven­er­a­ble ancients would assured­ly agree.

Fur­ther down, you can see par­tic­i­pants in Prince­ton’s Prison Teach­ing Ini­tia­tive talk about the virtues and rewards of their accred­it­ed pro­gram. That includes teach­ers and stu­dents alike.

Note: You can find 140+ Free Phi­los­o­phy Cours­es in our ever-grow­ing list, 1,700 Free Online Cours­es from Top Uni­ver­si­ties.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Tim Rob­bins’ Improv Class­es Trans­form Pris­on­ers’ Lives & Low­er Recidi­vism Rates

Pat­ti Smith Reads from Oscar Wilde’s De Pro­fundis, the Love Let­ter He Wrote From Prison (1897)

What Pris­on­ers Ate at Alca­traz in 1946: A Vin­tage Prison Menu

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

The Comedic Legacies of Dick Gregory and Jerry Lewis (RIP): A Study in Contrasts

Two titans of com­e­dy passed away this week­end, but the deaths of Dick Gre­go­ry and Jer­ry Lewis have seemed like cul­tur­al foot­notes amidst some of the most anx­ious, angry few days in recent U.S. his­to­ry. Gre­go­ry and Lewis are stars of a bygone era, maybe two full gen­er­a­tions behind con­tem­po­rary pop­u­lar rel­e­vance. And yet, in many ways, the mid-20th cen­tu­ry world where both men got their start feels clos­er than ever.

Both Gre­go­ry and Lewis once wield­ed con­sid­er­able pow­er in the enter­tain­ment indus­try and in their oth­er cho­sen spheres of influence—the civ­il rights move­ment and char­i­ta­ble giv­ing, respec­tive­ly. In near­ly every oth­er respect, the two could not have been more dif­fer­ent.

Gre­go­ry broke into main­stream suc­cess with a new wave of black comics like Bill Cos­by and Richard Pry­or, and like Pry­or, he did so by telling painful truths about racism that many white Amer­i­cans laughed about but were unwill­ing to hon­est­ly con­front or change. You can hear an ear­ly exam­ple in the rou­tine above, from his 1962 album Dick Gre­go­ry Talks Turkey.

Gre­go­ry got his big break in 1961 when he seized the moment in a try­out at Hugh Hefner’s Chica­go Play­boy Club. As he lat­er told CBS Sun­day Morn­ing, “I pushed that white boy out of the way and ran up there…. Two hours lat­er, they called Hefn­er. And Hefn­er came by and they went out of their mind.” That same year, he made his first nation­al TV appear­ance. See it at 15:16 in the doc­u­men­tary Walk in My Shoes just above, which also fea­tures Mal­colm X and Con­gress for Racial Equal­i­ty (CORE) founder James Farmer.

In the playlist  below, you can hear three full Gre­go­ry com­e­dy record­ings, Liv­ing Black & White (1961), East & West (1961), and an inter­view album, Dick Gre­go­ry on Com­e­dy. Through­out his career, Gre­go­ry was an uncom­pro­mis­ing civ­il rights activist who was beat­en and arrest­ed in the six­ties at march­es and protests. He was at the 1963 March on Wash­ing­ton, faced down the Klan to help inte­grate restau­rants, and fast­ed to protest the Viet­nam War. In a review of his provoca­tive­ly-titled auto­bi­og­ra­phy, The New York Times described him as “a man who deeply wants a world with­out mal­ice and hate and is doing some­thing about it.”

He also did some­thing about it in com­e­dy. When Jack Paar’s pro­duc­er called him to appear on the show, Gre­go­ry hung up on him. Then Paar him­self called, and Gre­go­ry told him he wouldn’t come on unless he could sit on the couch, a priv­i­lege afford­ed white comics and denied their black coun­ter­parts. Paar agreed. “It was sit­ting on the couch,” he said, “that made my salary grow in three weeks from $250 work­ing sev­en days a week to $5,000 a night.” For the next sev­er­al decades, he lever­aged his wealth and fame for human­i­tar­i­an and civ­il rights caus­es, and even a run for may­or of Chica­go in 1967 and a pop­u­lar write-in pres­i­den­tial cam­paign in the 1968 elec­tion. He died at 84 a ven­er­at­ed elder states­man of stand-up com­e­dy and of the Civ­il Rights Move­ment.

Jer­ry Lewis’s lega­cy is much more com­pli­cat­ed, and serves in many ways as a “cau­tion­ary tale,” as Nick Gille­spie puts it, for the hubris of celebri­ty. Lewis broke through in the 50s as the ani­mat­ed, rub­bery com­ic foil to Dean Martin’s suave straight man in the huge­ly famous com­e­dy duo of Mar­tin & Lewis. See them above do a standup rou­tine in 1952 on their Col­gate Com­e­dy Hour, with an intro­duc­tion (and inter­ven­tion) from Bob Hope. The act was a phe­nom­e­non. “Com­ing from lit­er­al­ly nowhere,” writes Shawn Levy at The Guardian, “the pair rode a sky­rock­et­ing 10-year career that made them sta­ples of Amer­i­can show­biz for the rest of their lives…. They met when they were just two guys scuf­fling for a break in Times Square, and they helped forge a new brand of pop­u­lar enter­tain­ment suit­ed to the post­war mood.”

In the same year as the broad­cast fur­ther up, Lewis made his first appear­ance, with Mar­tin and Jack­ie Glea­son, on the Mus­cu­lar Dys­tro­phy Asso­ci­a­tions of Amer­i­ca (MDAA) telethon. Just above, see them do a bit while the famil­iar banks of oper­a­tors stand by behind them. Lewis began host­ing his own MDAA telethon in 1966 and did so until 2010, rais­ing bil­lions for the orga­ni­za­tion, which remem­bers him as a “Com­ic genius. Cul­tur­al icon. Human­i­tar­i­an.” Many dis­abil­i­ty activists feel oth­er­wise, includ­ing many for­mer “Jerry’s Kids,” his “pet name,” writes Gille­spie, for the poster chil­dren he recruit­ed to rep­re­sent the MD com­mu­ni­ty on the telethon and relat­ed advo­ca­cy mate­ri­als. “The telethon was wide­ly par­o­died,” and Lewis’s efforts have been seen by many activists and pro­tes­tors as self-serv­ing, per­pet­u­at­ing harm­ful, demean­ing atti­tudes and encour­ag­ing pity for MD suf­fer­ers rather than accep­tance and social equal­i­ty.

As a movie star, Lewis often played an all-Amer­i­can doo­fus whose phys­i­cal antics and stam­mer­ing, boy­ish per­sona endeared him to audi­ences (see above, for exam­ple, from 1952’s Sailor Beware). As a direc­tor, he made tight­ly chore­o­graphed mad­cap come­dies. He also trad­ed in offen­sive stereo­types, par­tic­i­pat­ing in an ugly Hol­ly­wood tra­di­tion that emerged from anti-Chi­nese big­otry of the 19th cen­tu­ry and anti-Japan­ese World War II pro­pa­gan­da. (Lewis was unflat­ter­ing­ly remem­bered in The Japan Times as the “king of low-brow com­e­dy… for­ev­er squeal­ing, gri­mac­ing and flail­ing his way” through var­i­ous roles.) He intro­duced Asian car­i­ca­tures into his act in the Mar­tin & Lewis days (see below) and reprised the shtick in his crit­i­cal­ly-loathed 1980 film Hard­ly Work­ing, in which, writes Paul Maco­v­az at Sens­es of Cin­e­ma, he “real­izes an offen­sive, pro­found­ly racist yel­low-face sashi­mi chef.”

“I imag­ine that most view­ers will be trou­bled by it,” Maco­v­az com­ments, “wrenched vis­cer­al­ly from their enjoy­ment of the Lewisian idiot and pressed squirm­ing into the overde­ter­mined con­cep­tu­al nar­ra­tive zone of Amer­i­can Ori­en­tal­ism.” Those view­ers who know anoth­er of Lewis’s lat­er-career dis­as­ters will rec­og­nize anoth­er awk­ward char­ac­ter in Hard­ly Work­ing, the sad-faced clown of 1972’s dis­as­trous The Day the Clown Died, a film so ill-advised and bad­ly exe­cut­ed that Lewis nev­er allowed it to be released. (Just below, see a short doc­u­men­tary on the abortive effort.)  In the movie, as com­e­dy writer Bruce Handy not­ed in a 1992 Spy mag­a­zine arti­cle, the come­di­an plays “an unhap­py Ger­man cir­cus clown… sent to a con­cen­tra­tion camp and forced to become a sort of geno­ci­dal Pied Piper, enter­tain­ing Jew­ish chil­dren as he leads them to the gas cham­bers.” Meant to be his first “seri­ous,” dra­mat­ic role, the large­ly unseen film now stands as an arche­typ­al epit­o­me of poor taste—an artis­tic fail­ure that Mel Brooks might have dreamed up as a sick joke.

As Gille­spie points out, Lewis’s last years saw him threat­en­ing to punch Lind­say Lohan and telling refugees to “stay where the hell they are.” Long past the time most peo­ple want­ed to hear them, he per­sist­ed in mak­ing “racist and misog­y­nis­tic jokes” and gave “the most painful­ly awk­ward inter­view of 2016” to the Hol­ly­wood Reporter. He became well-known for ver­bal­ly abus­ing his audi­ences. The run­ning joke that Lewis was beloved by the French, which “only made him less respectable in his home coun­try,” may have been run into the ground. But in the lat­ter half of his career, it sums up how much Amer­i­can comedians—even those like Steve Mar­tin, Robin Williams, Jim Car­rey, and Eddie Mur­phy, who were clear­ly influ­enced by his man­ic humor—were often unwill­ing to make too much of the debt. But look­ing back at his 1950s dada zani­ness and at films like The Nut­ty Pro­fes­sor, it’s impos­si­ble to deny his con­tri­bu­tions to 20th cen­tu­ry com­e­dy and even a cer­tain brand of absur­dist 21st cen­tu­ry humor.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Hear 30 of the Great­est Standup Com­e­dy Albums: A Playlist Cho­sen by Open Cul­ture Read­ers

Chris Rock Cre­ates a List of His 13 Favorite Standup Com­e­dy Spe­cials

Bill Hicks’ 12 Prin­ci­ples of Com­e­dy

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

The Case for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts & Doing Valuable “Deep Work” Instead, According to Computer Scientist Cal Newport

A famil­iar ding comes from your pock­et, you look up from what you’re doing and reach for the smart­phone. Before you can think, “it can wait,” you’ve dis­ap­peared into the screen like lit­tle Car­ol Anne Freel­ing in Pol­ter­geist. Tak­en by a ghost­ly pres­ence with designs upon your soul—your time, emo­tion­al well-being, cre­ativ­i­ty—Face­book. Some­one has request­ed my friend­ship! You like my video? I like you! Why, I’ve got an opin­ion about that, and that, and that, and that…. All the lit­tle per­for­ma­tive ges­tures, imprint­ed in the fin­gers and the thumbs.

Twit­ter, Snapchat, Insta­gram, Tum­blr, What­sApp, VKon­tact, Sina Wei­bo…. Just maybe, social media addic­tion is a glob­al epi­dem­ic, a col­lec­tion of emo­tion­al­ly, social­ly, and polit­i­cal­ly, tox­ic behav­iors. As Suren Rama­sub­bu reports, “social media engage­ment has been found to trig­ger three key net­works in the brain” that make us think intense­ly about our self-image and pub­lic per­cep­tion, cre­ate new neur­al path­ways, and release dopamine and oxy­tocin, which keep us com­ing back for more lit­tle red hearts, tiny thumbs-ups, and diminu­tive gold stars (good job!).

While the nature of addic­tion is a con­tro­ver­sial top­ic, it will arouse lit­tle dis­agree­ment to say that we live—as George­town Uni­ver­si­ty Com­put­er Sci­ence Pro­fes­sor Calvin New­port writes in the sub­ti­tle of his book Deep Work—in a “dis­tract­ed world.” (The full title is Deep Work: Rules for Focused Suc­cess in a Dis­tract­ed World.) Newport’s pre­scrip­tion will go down less eas­i­ly. Quit, drop out, tune out, opt out, get out of the Matrix, New­port argues, more or less, in his book and his TEDx talk above. He acknowl­edges the odd­i­ty of being a “mil­len­ni­al com­put­er sci­en­tist book author, stand­ing on a TED stage” who nev­er had a social media account and urges oth­ers to give up theirs.

Any one of his over­lap­ping demo­graph­ics is like­ly to have a sig­nif­i­cant web pres­ence. Put all of them togeth­er and we expect New­port to be pitch­ing a start­up net­work to an audi­ence of ven­ture cap­i­tal­ists. Even the sto­ry about why he first abstained could have made him a minor char­ac­ter in The Social Net­work. But feel­ings of pro­fes­sion­al jeal­ousy soon turned to wari­ness and alarm. “This seems dan­ger­ous,” he says, then lets us know—because we sure­ly wondered—that he’s okay. “I still have friends. I still know what’s going on in the world.” Whether you’re con­vinced he’s hap­pi­er than the rest of us poor saps is up to you.

As for the claim that we should join him in the wilder­ness of the real—his argu­ment is per­sua­sive. Social media, says New­port, is not a “fun­da­men­tal tech­nol­o­gy.” It is akin to the slot machine, an “enter­tain­ment machine,” with an insid­i­ous added dimension—the soul steal­ing. Para­phras­ing tech guru and icon­o­clast Jaron Lanier, New­port says, “these com­pa­nies offer you shiny treats in exchange for min­utes of your atten­tion and bytes of your per­son­al data, which can then be pack­aged up and sold.” But like the slot machine, the social media net­work is a “some­what unsa­vory source of enter­tain­ment” giv­en the express intent of its engi­neers to make their prod­uct “as addic­tive as pos­si­ble,” com­pa­ra­ble to what dieti­tians now call “ultra-processed foods”—all sug­ar and fat, no nutri­ents.

New­port names anoth­er objec­tion to quitting—the neces­si­ty of social media as an essen­tial busi­ness tool—then piv­ots to his book and his com­mit­ment to what he calls “deep work.” What is this? You can read the book to find out, or get a Cliff’s Notes ver­sion in Bri­an Johnson’s video above. John­son begins by con­trast­ing deep work with “shal­low work,” where we spend most of our time, “con­stant­ly respond­ing to the lat­est and loud­est email and push noti­fi­ca­tion for social media, or text mes­sages or phone ring­ing, what­ev­er.”

While we may get lit­tle endor­phin boosts from all of this heav­i­ly medi­at­ed social activ­i­ty, we pay a high price in stress, anx­i­ety, and lost time in our per­son­al, pro­fes­sion­al, and cre­ative lives. The research on over­work and dis­trac­tion sup­ports New­port’s con­clu­sions. The real rewards come from deep work, he argues, that which we do when we have total focus and emo­tion­al invest­ment in a project. With­out get­ting too spe­cif­ic, such work, New­port says, is not only per­son­al­ly ful­fill­ing, but valu­able “in a 21st cen­tu­ry econ­o­my” for its rar­i­ty.

Social media, on the oth­er hand, he claims, con­tributes lit­tle to our work lives. And as you (or maybe it’s me) scan the open social media tabs in your over­loaded brows­er, and tune in to the clut­tered state of your mind, you might find your­self agree­ing with his hereti­cal propo­si­tion. You might even share his talk on social media. Or decide to fol­low us on Face­book and/or Twit­ter.

To delve fur­ther into New­port’s think­ing, see his books: Deep Work: Rules for Focused Suc­cess in a Dis­tract­ed World and Dig­i­tal Min­i­mal­ism: Choos­ing a Focused Life in a Noisy World. Both books are also avail­able in audio for­mat on Audible.com. Sign up for a free tri­al here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Lyn­da Bar­ry on How the Smart­phone Is Endan­ger­ing Three Ingre­di­ents of Cre­ativ­i­ty: Lone­li­ness, Uncer­tain­ty & Bore­dom

How Infor­ma­tion Over­load Robs Us of Our Cre­ativ­i­ty: What the Sci­en­tif­ic Research Shows

New Ani­ma­tion Explains Sher­ry Turkle’s The­o­ries on Why Social Media Makes Us Lone­ly

The Neu­ro­science & Psy­chol­o­gy of Pro­cras­ti­na­tion, and How to Over­come It

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

10 Longevity Tips from Dr. Shigeaki Hinohara, Japan’s 105-Year-Old Longevity Expert

Pho­to by Karsten Thor­maehlen, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

Robert Brown­ing’s poem “Abt Vogler” imag­ines com­pos­er Georg Joseph Vogler as an old man reflect­ing on his dimin­ish­ing pow­ers and the like­li­hood that his life’s work would not sur­vive in the public’s mem­o­ry.

Let us over­look the fact that Vogler was 65 when he died, or that Brown­ing, who lived to 77, was 52 when he com­posed the poem.

What’s most strik­ing these days is its sig­nif­i­cance to longevi­ty expert, physi­cian, and chair­man emer­i­tus of St. Luke’s Inter­na­tion­al Uni­ver­si­ty, Dr. Shigea­ki Hino­hara, who passed away last month at the age of 105:

My father used to read it to me. It encour­ages us to make big art, not small scrib­bles. It says to try to draw a cir­cle so huge that there is no way we can fin­ish it while we are alive. All we see is an arch; the rest is beyond our vision but it is there in the dis­tance.

Like many cen­te­nar­i­ans, Dr. Hino­hara attrib­uted his longevi­ty to cer­tain prac­tices, back­ing it up with numer­ous books on the top­ic (includ­ing Liv­ing Long, Liv­ing Good).

He touched on some of these beliefs in a 2009 Japan Times inter­view with Judit Kawaguchi, from which the fol­low­ing point­ers are drawn.

Ten Tips For a Healthy Old Age from Dr. Shigea­ki Hino­hara

Eat to Live Don’t Live to Eat

As far as Clint East­wood, Sis­ter Wendy Beck­ett and Fred Rogers are con­cerned, Dr. Hino­hara was preach­ing to the choir. Your aver­age Ital­ian great grand­moth­er would be appalled.

For break­fast I drink cof­fee, a glass of milk and some orange juice with a table­spoon of olive oil in it. Olive oil is great for the arter­ies and keeps my skin healthy. Lunch is milk and a few cook­ies, or noth­ing when I am too busy to eat. I nev­er get hun­gry because I focus on my work. Din­ner is veg­gies, a bit of fish and rice, and, twice a week, 100 grams of lean meat.

Keep on Truckin’…

Nor was Dr. Hino­hara a sit-around-the-piaz­za-drink­ing-limon­cel­lo-with-his-cronies kind of guy. For him a vig­or­ous­ly plot­ted out cal­en­dar was syn­ony­mous with a vig­or­ous old age:

Always plan ahead. My sched­ule book is already full … with lec­tures and my usu­al hos­pi­tal work.

Moth­er Was Wrong…

…at least when it comes to bed­time and the impor­tance of con­sum­ing three square meals a day. Dis­co naps and bot­tled water all around!

We all remem­ber how as chil­dren, when we were hav­ing fun, we often for­got to eat or sleep. I believe that we can keep that atti­tude as adults, too. It’s best not to tire the body with too many rules such as lunchtime and bed­time.

To Hell with Obscu­ri­ty!

You may not be able to pull in the same crowds as a man whose career spans found­ing a world class hos­pi­tal in the rub­ble of post WWII Tokyo and treat­ing the vic­tims of the rad­i­cal Aum Shin­rikyo cult’s sarin gas sub­way attack, but you can still share your ideas with those younger than you. If noth­ing else, expe­ri­ence will be on your side:

 Share what you know. I give 150 lec­tures a year, some for 100 ele­men­tary-school chil­dren, oth­ers for 4,500 busi­ness peo­ple. I usu­al­ly speak for 60 to 90 min­utes, stand­ing, to stay strong.

Don’t Slack on Every­day Phys­i­cal Activ­i­ty

Dr. Hino­hara schlepped his own bags and turned his back on such mod­ern con­ve­niences as ele­va­tors and esca­la­tors:

I take two stairs at a time, to get my mus­cles mov­ing.

Hav­ing Fun Is Bet­ter Than Tylenol (Or Bitch­ing About It)

Rather than turn­ing off young friends and rel­a­tives with a con­stant litany of phys­i­cal com­plaints, Dr. Hino­hara sought to emu­late the child who for­gets his toothache through the diver­sion of play. And yes, this was his med­ical opin­ion:

Hos­pi­tals must cater to the basic need of patients: We all want to have fun. At St. Luke’s we have music and ani­mal ther­a­pies, and art class­es.

Think Twice Before You Go Under the Knife

Not will­ing to put all your trust into music ther­a­py work­ing out for you? Con­sid­er your age and how a side dish of surgery or radi­a­tion might impact your all over enjoy­ment of life before agree­ing to rad­i­cal pro­ce­dures. Espe­cial­ly if you are one of those afore­men­tioned sit-around-the-piaz­za-drink­ing-limon­cel­lo-with-your-cronies type of guys.

When a doc­tor rec­om­mends you take a test or have some surgery, ask whether the doc­tor would sug­gest that his or her spouse or chil­dren go through such a pro­ce­dure. Con­trary to pop­u­lar belief, doc­tors can’t cure every­one. So why cause unnec­es­sary pain with surgery? 

Divest of Mate­r­i­al Bur­dens

Best sell­ing author and pro­fes­sion­al orga­niz­er, Marie Kon­do, would approve of her countryman’s views on “stuff”:

Remem­ber: You don’t know when your num­ber is up, and you can’t take it with you to the next place.

Pick a Role Mod­el You Can Be Wor­thy Of

It need not be some­one famous. Dr. Hino­hara revered his dad, who intro­duced him to his favorite poem and trav­eled halfway across the world to enroll at Duke Uni­ver­si­ty as a young man.

Lat­er I found a few more life guides, and when I am stuck, I ask myself how they would deal with the prob­lem.

Find a Poem That Speaks to You and Let It Guide You

The good doc­tor didn’t rec­om­mend this course of action in so many words, but you could do worse than to fol­low his exam­ple. Pick a long one. Reread it fre­quent­ly. For added neu­ro­log­i­cal oomph, mem­o­rize a few lines every day. Bedaz­zle peo­ple half your age with an off-book recita­tion at your next fam­i­ly gath­er­ing. (It’ll dis­tract you from all that turkey and stuff­ing.)

“Abt Vogler”

Would that the struc­ture brave, the man­i­fold music I build,
Bid­ding my organ obey, call­ing its keys to their work,
Claim­ing each slave of the sound, at a touch, as when Solomon willed
Armies of angels that soar, legions of demons that lurk,
Man, brute, rep­tile, fly,—alien of end and of aim,
Adverse, each from the oth­er heav­en-high, hell-deep removed,—
Should rush into sight at once as he named the inef­fa­ble Name,
And pile him a palace straight, to plea­sure the princess he loved!
Would it might tar­ry like his, the beau­ti­ful build­ing of mine,
This which my keys in a crowd pressed and impor­tuned to raise!
Ah, one and all, how they helped, would dis­part now and now com­bine,
Zeal­ous to has­ten the work, height­en their mas­ter his praise!
And one would bury his brow with a blind plunge down to hell,
Bur­row awhile and build, broad on the roots of things,
Then up again swim into sight, hav­ing based me my palace well,
Found­ed it, fear­less of flame, flat on the nether springs.
And anoth­er would mount and march, like the excel­lent min­ion he was,
Ay, anoth­er and yet anoth­er, one crowd but with many a crest,
Rais­ing my ram­pired walls of gold as trans­par­ent as glass,
Eager to do and die, yield each his place to the rest:
For high­er still and high­er (as a run­ner tips with fire,
When a great illu­mi­na­tion sur­pris­es a fes­tal night—
Out­lin­ing round and round Rome’s dome from space to spire)
Up, the pin­na­cled glo­ry reached, and the pride of my soul was in sight.
In sight? Not half! for it seemed, it was cer­tain, to match man’s birth,
Nature in turn con­ceived, obey­ing an impulse as I;
And the emu­lous heav­en yearned down, made effort to reach the earth,
As the earth had done her best, in my pas­sion, to scale the sky:
Nov­el splen­dours burst forth, grew famil­iar and dwelt with mine,
Not a point nor peak but found and fixed its wan­der­ing star;
Mete­or-moons, balls of blaze: and they did not pale nor pine,
For earth had attained to heav­en, there was no more near nor far.
Nay more; for there want­ed not who walked in the glare and glow,
Pres­ences plain in the place; or, fresh from the Pro­to­plast,
Fur­nished for ages to come, when a kind­lier wind should blow,
Lured now to begin and live, in a house to their lik­ing at last;
Or else the won­der­ful Dead who have passed through the body and gone,
But were back once more to breathe in an old world worth their new:
What nev­er had been, was now; what was, as it shall be anon;
And what is,—shall I say, matched both? for I was made per­fect too.
All through my keys that gave their sounds to a wish of my soul,
All through my soul that praised as its wish flowed vis­i­bly forth,
All through music and me! For think, had I paint­ed the whole,
Why, there it had stood, to see, nor the process so won­der-worth:
Had I writ­ten the same, made verse—still, effect pro­ceeds from cause,
Ye know why the forms are fair, ye hear how the tale is told;
It is all tri­umphant art, but art in obe­di­ence to laws,
Painter and poet are proud in the artist-list enrolled:—
But here is the fin­ger of God, a flash of the will that can,
Exis­tent behind all laws, that made them and, lo, they are!
And I know not if, save in this, such gift be allowed to man,
That out of three sounds he frame, not a fourth sound, but a star.
Con­sid­er it well: each tone of our scale in itself is nought;
It is every­where in the world—loud, soft, and all is said:
Give it to me to use! I mix it with two in my thought:
And, there! Ye have heard and seen: con­sid­er and bow the head!
Well, it is gone at last, the palace of music I reared;
Gone! and the good tears start, the prais­es that come too slow;
For one is assured at first, one scarce can say that he feared,
That he even gave it a thought, the gone thing was to go.
Nev­er to be again! But many more of the kind
As good, nay, bet­ter, per­chance: is this your com­fort to me?
To me, who must be saved because I cling with my mind
To the same, same self, same love, same God: ay, what was, shall be.
There­fore to whom turn I but to thee, the inef­fa­ble Name?
Builder and mak­er, thou, of hous­es not made with hands!
What, have fear of change from thee who art ever the same?
Doubt that thy pow­er can fill the heart that thy pow­er expands?
There shall nev­er be one lost good! What was, shall live as before;
The evil is null, is nought, is silence imply­ing sound;
What was good shall be good, with, for evil, so much good more;
On the earth the bro­ken arcs; in the heav­en, a per­fect round.
All we have willed or hoped or dreamed of good shall exist;
Not its sem­blance, but itself; no beau­ty, nor good, nor pow­er
Whose voice has gone forth, but each sur­vives for the melodist
When eter­ni­ty affirms the con­cep­tion of an hour.
The high that proved too high, the hero­ic for earth too hard,
The pas­sion that left the ground to lose itself in the sky,
Are music sent up to God by the lover and the bard;
Enough that he heard it once: we shall hear it by and by.
And what is our fail­ure here but a tri­umph’s evi­dence
For the ful­ness of the days? Have we with­ered or ago­nized?
Why else was the pause pro­longed but that singing might issue thence?
Why rushed the dis­cords in, but that har­mo­ny should be prized?
Sor­row is hard to bear, and doubt is slow to clear,
Each suf­fer­er says his say, his scheme of the weal and woe:
But God has a few of us whom he whis­pers in the ear;
The rest may rea­son and wel­come; ’tis we musi­cians know.
Well, it is earth with me; silence resumes her reign:
I will be patient and proud, and sober­ly acqui­esce.
Give me the keys. I feel for the com­mon chord again,
Slid­ing by semi­tones till I sink to the minor,—yes,
And I blunt it into a ninth, and I stand on alien ground,
Sur­vey­ing awhile the heights I rolled from into the deep;
Which, hark, I have dared and done, for my rest­ing-place is found,
The C Major of this life: so, now I will try to sleep.

- Robert Brown­ing

Relat­ed Con­tent:

New Study: Immers­ing Your­self in Art, Music & Nature Might Reduce Inflam­ma­tion & Increase Life Expectan­cy

Walt Whitman’s Unearthed Health Man­u­al, “Man­ly Health & Train­ing,” Urges Read­ers to Stand (Don’t Sit!) and Eat Plen­ty of Meat (1858)

Ale­jan­dro Jodorowsky’s 82 Com­mand­ments For Liv­ing

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, the­ater mak­er and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine.  Fol­low her @AyunHalliday.

How Leonard Cohen & David Bowie Faced Death Through Their Art: A Look at Their Final Albums

When Leonard Cohen released You Want it Dark­er in late 2016, some sus­pect­ed that it would be his last album. When the 82-year-old singer-song­writer died nine­teen days lat­er, it felt like a reprise of David Bowie’s pas­sage from this mor­tal coil at the begin­ning of that year in which we lost so many impor­tant musi­cians: just two days after the release of his album Black­star, Bowie shocked the world by dying of an ill­ness he’d cho­sen not to make pub­lic. Both Cohen and Bowie’s fans imme­di­ate­ly dou­bled down their scruti­ny of what turned out to be their final works, find­ing in both of them artis­tic inter­pre­ta­tions of the con­fronta­tion with death.

The title track of You Want It Dark­er, says the nar­ra­tor of the Poly­phon­ic video essay above, “is not just any song, but the cul­mi­na­tion of many med­i­ta­tions on Cohen’s own mor­tal­i­ty. The result is a haunt­ing­ly accusato­ry song towards his own god.”

This analy­sis focus­es on lines, deliv­ered by Cohen’s grav­e­li­er-than-ever singing voice, like “If you are the deal­er, I’m out of the game / If you are the heal­er, that means I’m bro­ken and lame” and “If thine is the glo­ry, then mine must be the shame / You want it dark­er, we kill the flame.” Cohen also uses phras­es tak­en from a Jew­ish mourn­er’s prayer as a way of “fac­ing up to his god and sub­mit­ting.”

The non-reli­gious Bowie took a dif­fer­ent tack. “Just take a look at Bowie’s cos­tume,” says the essay’s nar­ra­tor. “He’s ban­daged, frail, and mani­a­cal in the ‘Black­star’ video. While the ban­dage serves to rep­re­sent wounds, it can also be tak­en as a blind­fold,” his­tor­i­cal­ly “worn by those con­demned to exe­cu­tion.” Using Chris­t­ian imagery, Bowie frames his song “in the post-par­adise world of mor­tal life,” in a sense ref­er­enc­ing what Cohen once described as “our blood myth,” the cru­ci­fix­ion. And so Bowie’s song “is using our cul­tur­al vocab­u­lary to explore our rela­tion­ship with death.” And yet, “in the midst of this dark song, Bowie offers opti­mism” in the form of the tit­u­lar Black­star, a “new­ly inspired being” that emerges from death.

“While mankind can’t cheat death, we can still find immor­tal­i­ty in the way peo­ple remem­ber us, the lega­cy that they car­ry on.” And despite rec­og­niz­ing their basic human­i­ty, many of us car­ri­ers of the lega­cy still strug­gle to process the deaths of high-pro­file, sui gener­is per­form­ing artists. Maybe it has to do with their sta­tus as icons, and icons, strict­ly speak­ing, can’t die — but nor can they live. Leonard Cohen and David Bowie, the men, may have fin­ished their days, and what days they were, but Leonard Cohen and David Bowie, the cul­tur­al phe­nom­e­na, will sure­ly out­last us all.

You can lis­ten to Cohen and Bowie’s final albums above. If you need Spo­ti­fy’s free soft­ware, get it here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Leonard Cohen Has Passed at Age 82: His New and Now Final Album Is Stream­ing Free Online

Hear Leonard Cohen’s Final Inter­view: Record­ed by David Rem­nick of The New York­er

Say Good­bye to Leonard Cohen Through Some of His Best-Loved Songs: “Hal­lelu­jah,” “Suzanne” and 235 Oth­er Tracks

David Bowie Sings “Changes” in His Last Live Per­for­mance, 2006

Dave: The Best Trib­ute to David Bowie That You’re Going to See

Death: A Free Phi­los­o­phy Course from Yale

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Miyazaki Meets Warhol in Campbell’s Soup Cans Reimagined by Designer Hyo Taek Kim

M’m! M’m! Good! M’m! M’m! Good!,

That’s what Warhol Campbell’s Soup Cans recon­ceived as Miyaza­ki films are,

M’m! M’m! Good! 

Brazil­ian-Kore­an design­er Hyo Taek Kim has found a con­tin­u­ing font of inspi­ra­tion in his child­hood love of Hayao Miyaza­ki’s ani­mat­ed films.

He has decon­struct­ed them into a series of Pan­tone of col­or palettes and cap­tured sev­er­al favorite moments through the lens of VHS tape glitch­es.

Miyazaki–Special Soup Series, his lat­est explorato­ry jour­ney into the enchant­ed world of the revered mas­ter ani­ma­tor and director–finds him reduc­ing each film to a cou­ple of essen­tial fla­vors.

One can imag­ine Mom call­ing the kids in from an after­noon of sled­ding for a warm, Cream of Toma­to-ish bowl of Totoro.

Spir­it­ed Away and Howl’s Mov­ing Cas­tle are slight­ly more sophis­ti­cat­ed fla­vors, that may involve leafy greens.

Princess Mononoke and Por­co Rosso are Grandpa’s favorites–real stick to your ribs fare.

The sub­tle iconog­ra­phy brings added dimen­sion to the stark prod­uct design Warhol dupli­cat­ed to such acclaim.

As Kim told the Cre­ators Project:

Sim­ple design that works is always so much hard­er to cre­ate than you might expect. It’s just very fun to mar­ry two ideas, artists and/or con­cepts into one big image. Andy Warhol changed the world of phys­i­cal arts. Hayao Miyaza­ki changed the world of ani­mat­ed arts.

This is not Kim’s first go at Campbell’s. His ear­li­er Super­soup Series reduced super­heroes to con­som­mé and cream ofs. Don’t for­get the oys­ter crack­ers.

Posters and t‑shirts of Hyo Taek Kim’s Miyaza­ki Spe­cial Soup and Souper­soup Series can be pur­chased here.

View more of Kim’s soup cans online at the Cre­ators Project.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Roy Licht­en­stein and Andy Warhol Demys­ti­fy Their Pop Art in Vin­tage 1966 Film

Build Your Own Minia­ture Sets from Hayao Miyazaki’s Beloved Films: My Neigh­bor Totoro, Kiki’s Deliv­ery Ser­vice & More

A New Theme Park Based on Hayao Miyazaki’s My Neigh­bor Totoro Set to Open in 2020

Watch Moe­bius and Miyaza­ki, Two of the Most Imag­i­na­tive Artists, in Con­ver­sa­tion (2004)

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, the­ater mak­er and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine.  Fol­low her @AyunHalliday.

Watch Iggy Pop & Debbie Harry Sing a Swelligant Version of Cole Porter’s “Did You Evah,” All to Raise Money for AIDS Research (1990)

Quick sur­vey: Who’s best fit to get at the heart of Cole Porter? The suave sophis­ti­cate who was born in a tux, mar­ti­ni glass clutched in his infant fist? Or punk roy­al­ty? “Well, Did You Evah!” from the 1939 Broad­way musi­cal DuBar­ry Was a Lady, is the brat­ti­er cousin of such Porter hits as “You’re the Top” and “Let’s Do It.” Frank Sina­tra and Bing Cros­by per­formed a boozy cov­er of it for the 1956 film High Soci­ety, but for my mon­ey, the defin­i­tive ver­sion is one Iggy Pop and Deb­bie Har­ry record­ed for a Cole Porter themed AIDS ben­e­fit album, Red Hot + Blue.

Some Porter clas­sics–“Every Time We Say Good­bye,” “So In Love”–demand sin­cer­i­ty. This one calls for a strong dose of the oppo­site, which Pop and Har­ry deliv­er, both vocal­ly and in the barn­storm­ing music video above. They’re dan­ger­ous, fun­ny, and any­thing but canned, weav­ing through rat-glam­my 1980s New York in thrift store fin­ery, with side trips to a ceme­tery and a farm where Pop smooches a goat.

As Alex Cox, who brought fur­ther punk pedi­gree to the project as the direc­tor of Sid and Nancy and Repo Man told Spin: “Iggy had always want­ed to make a video with ani­mals and Deb­bie had always want­ed to pub­licly burn lin­gerie so I let them.”

They also filled Pop’s palms with stig­ma­ta and ants, and swapped Porter’s cham­pagne for a case of gener­ic dog food.

There are a few minor tweaks to the lyrics (“What cocks!”) and the stars inject the pat­ter with a glee­ful­ly louche down­town sen­si­bil­i­ty. Mars ris­es behind the Twin Tow­ers, for a swelli­gant­ly off-beat pack­age that raised a lot of mon­ey for AIDS research and aware­ness. Oth­er gems from the project:

“It’s All Right with Me” per­formed by Tom Waits, direct­ed by Jim Jar­musch

“Night and Day” per­formed by U2, direct­ed by Wim Wen­ders

“Don’t Fence Me In” per­formed and direct­ed by David Byrne

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Iggy Pop Sings Edith Piaf’s “La Vie En Rose” in an Art­ful­ly Ani­mat­ed Video

Tom Waits For No One: Watch the Pio­neer­ing Ani­mat­ed Tom Waits Music Video from 1979

Talk­ing Heads Fea­tured on The South Bank Show in 1979: How the Ground­break­ing New Wave Band Made Nor­mal­i­ty Strange Again

Bill Mur­ray Reads Great Poet­ry by Bil­ly Collins, Cole Porter, and Sarah Man­gu­so

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, the­ater mak­er and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine.  Fol­low her @AyunHalliday.

Salvador Dalí’s Body Gets Exhumed, Revealing That, 28 Years After His Death, His Moustache Remains Perfectly Intact

Image by Allan War­ren, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

Last month, a Span­ish court ordered the exhuma­tion of Sal­vador Dalí’s, to see whether–as a pater­ni­ty case claims–he’s the father of María Pilar Abel Martínez, a tarot card read­er born in 1956. When experts opened his crypt on Thurs­day night, they encoun­tered a pret­ty remark­able scene. Accord­ing to Nar­cís Bardalet, the doc­tor who embalmed the artist’s body back in 1989, Dalí’s face was cov­ered with a silk hand­ker­chief – a mag­nif­i­cent hand­ker­chief.” “When it was removed, I was delight­ed to see his mous­tache was intact … I was quite moved. You could also see his hair.” “His mous­tache is still intact, [like clock hands at] 10 past 10, just as he liked it. It’s a mir­a­cle.”  “The mous­tache is still there and will be for cen­turies.” That’s per­haps the last sur­viv­ing trace of Dalí’s schtick that will remain.

via The Guardian

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Sal­vador Dalí Fig­urines Let You Bring the Artist’s Sur­re­al Paint­ings Into Your Home

The Tarot Card Deck Designed by Sal­vador Dalí

Sal­vador Dalí’s 1973 Cook­book Gets Reis­sued: Sur­re­al­ist Art Meets Haute Cui­sine

Sal­vador Dalí’s Avant-Garde Christ­mas Cards

Walk Inside a Sur­re­al­ist Sal­vador Dalí Paint­ing with This 360º Vir­tu­al Real­i­ty Video

Hierony­mus Bosch Fig­urines: Col­lect Sur­re­al Char­ac­ters from Bosch’s Paint­ings & Put Them on Your Book­shelf

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.