PubÂlic conÂfiÂdence in the U.S. House and SenÂate is at an all-time low, and, after last week’s Supreme Court deciÂsion, it’s bound to sink even lowÂer. On JanÂuÂary 19th (the day before the deciÂsion), HarÂvard law proÂfesÂsor Lawrence Lessig returned to StanÂford and highÂlightÂed the degree to which “instiÂtuÂtionÂal corÂrupÂtion” — in the form of lobÂbyÂists and corÂpoÂrate influÂence — perÂvades ConÂgress, dicÂtates legÂisÂlaÂtion, and brings large sums of monÂey to camÂpaigns and, yes, even repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtives’ perÂsonÂal bank accounts. (RoughÂly 50% of U.S. SenÂaÂtors become lobÂbyÂists, workÂing for indusÂtries they once assistÂed politÂiÂcalÂly, and earn subÂstanÂtial incomes.) The talk, accomÂpaÂnied by a rapid fire PowÂerÂPoint preÂsenÂtaÂtion, runs a solÂid hour and details varÂiÂous instances in which lobÂbyÂists have shaped unfathÂomably bad legÂisÂlaÂtion. HapÂpiÂly, the talk also ends with Lessig outÂlinÂing posÂsiÂble soluÂtions. PolÂiÂcy changes can offer some answers. But, a lot of it comes down to this: getÂting the pasÂsive privÂiÂleged to rein in a corÂruptÂed elite.
Note: To see Lessig’s immeÂdiÂate response to the SCOTUS deciÂsion, look here.