The BeaÂtÂles or the Stones? We’ve been debatÂing that quesÂtion for the past 60 years. Above, the LonÂdon-based comÂpaÂny Dog & RabÂbit conÂtinÂues the conÂverÂsaÂtion with a clever video that aniÂmates BeaÂtÂles and Stones album covÂers. From there, all kinds of high jinks ensue.
The “BeaÂtÂles vs The Stones” aniÂmaÂtion has won awards at varÂiÂous fesÂtiÂvals. RecentÂly made availÂable online, you can watch it above.
Alice’s RestauÂrant. It’s now a ThanksÂgivÂing clasÂsic, and someÂthing of a traÂdiÂtion around here. RecordÂed in 1967, the 18+ minute counÂterÂculÂture song recounts Arlo Guthrie’s real encounter with the law, startÂing on ThanksÂgivÂing Day 1965. As the long song unfolds, we hear all about how a hipÂpie-batÂing police offiÂcer, by the name of William “Obie” ObanÂhein, arrestÂed Arlo for litÂterÂing. (CulÂturÂal footÂnote: Obie preÂviÂousÂly posed for sevÂerÂal NorÂman RockÂwell paintÂings, includÂing the well-known paintÂing, “The RunÂaway,” that graced a 1958 covÂer of The SatÂurÂday Evening Post.) In fairÂly short order, Arlo pleads guilty to a misÂdeÂmeanor charge, pays a $25 fine, and cleans up the thrash. But the stoÂry isn’t over. Not by a long shot. LatÂer, when Arlo (son of Woody Guthrie) gets called up for the draft, the petÂty crime ironÂiÂcalÂly becomes a basis for disÂqualÂiÂfyÂing him from milÂiÂtary serÂvice in the VietÂnam War. Guthrie recounts this with some bitÂterÂness as the song builds into a satirÂiÂcal protest against the war: “I’m sitÂtin’ here on the Group W bench ’cause you want to know if I’m moral enough to join the Army, burn women, kids, housÂes and vilÂlages after bein’ a litÂterÂbug.” And then we’re back to the cheery choÂrus again: “You can get anyÂthing you want, at Alice’s RestauÂrant.”
We have feaÂtured Guthrie’s clasÂsic durÂing past years. But, for this ThanksÂgivÂing, we give you the illusÂtratÂed verÂsion. HapÂpy ThanksÂgivÂing to everyÂone who plans to celÂeÂbrate the holÂiÂday today.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
Bugs BunÂny is a quick-thinkÂing, fast-talkÂing, wasÂcalÂly force of nature, and a preterÂnatÂuÂralÂly giftÂed physÂiÂcal comeÂdiÂan, too.
But unlike such lastÂing greats as CharÂlie Chapin and Buster Keaton, it took him a while to find his iconÂic look.
His first appearÂance, as “HapÂpy RabÂbit” in the 1938 black and white theÂatriÂcal short, Porky’s Hare Hunt, might remind you of those yearÂbook phoÂtos of celebriÂties before they were famous.
In a video essay conÂsidÂerÂing how Bugs Bunny’s look has evolved over his eight-decade career, aniÂmaÂtion fan Dave Lee of the popÂuÂlar YouTube series Dave Lee Down Under breaks down some earÂly charÂacÂterÂisÂtics, from an undeÂfined, small body and oval-shaped head to white fur and a fluffy cotÂton ball of a tail.
His voice was also a work in progress, more Woody WoodÂpeckÂer than the hybrid BrookÂlyn-Bronx patois that would make him, and voice actor Mel Blanc, famous.
The folÂlowÂing year, the rabÂbit who would become Bugs BunÂny returned in Prest‑o Change‑o, a MerÂry Melodies TechÂniÂcolÂor short directÂed by Chuck Jones.
A few months latÂer charÂacÂter designÂer (and forÂmer DisÂney aniÂmaÂtor) CharÂlie ThorÂson subÂjectÂed him to a pretÂty noticeÂable makeover for Hare-um Scare-um, anothÂer rabÂbit huntÂing-themed romp.
The two-toned grey and white coat, oval muzÂzle, and misÂchieÂvous buck-toothed grin are much more aligned with the Bugs most of us grew up watchÂing.
His pear-shaped bod’, long neck, high-rumped stance, and ponÂtoon feet allowed for a much greater range of motion.
A notaÂtion on the modÂel sheet alludÂing to direcÂtor Ben HardÂaway’s nickÂname — “Bugs” — gives some hint as to how the world’s most popÂuÂlar carÂtoon charÂacÂter came by his stage name.
For 1940’s Elmer’s CanÂdid CamÂera, the pink-muzÂzled Bugs dropped the yelÂlow gloves ThorsÂen had givÂen him and affectÂed some black ear tips.
Tex Avery, who was in line to direct the pair in the AcadÂeÂmy Award-nomÂiÂnatÂed short A Wild Hare, found this look objecÂtionÂably cute.
He tasked aniÂmaÂtor Bob Givens with givÂing the rabÂbit, now offiÂcialÂly known as Bugs BunÂny, an edgiÂer appearÂance.
In the Givens design, Bugs was no longer defined by ThorÂsonÂ’s tanÂgle of curves. His head was now oval, rather than round. In that respect, Bugs recalled the white rabÂbit in Porky’s Hare Hunt, but GivenÂs’s design preÂserved so many of ThorÂsonÂ’s refinements—whiskers, a more natÂuÂralÂisÂtic nose—and introÂduced so many others—cheek ruffs, less promiÂnent teeth—that there was very litÂtle simÂiÂlarÂiÂty between the new verÂsion of Bugs and the Hare Hunt rabÂbit.
BarÂriÂer also details a numÂber of simÂiÂlarÂiÂties between the titÂuÂlar rabÂbit charÂacÂter from Disney’s 1935 SilÂly SymÂphonies short,The TorÂtoise and the Hare, and forÂmer DisÂney employÂee Givens’ design.
While Avery boastÂed to carÂtoon hisÂtoÂriÂan Milt Gray in 1977 that “the conÂstrucÂtion was almost idenÂtiÂcal”, adding, “It’s a wonÂder I wasÂn’t sued,” Givens insistÂed in an interÂview with the AniÂmaÂtion Guild’s oral hisÂtoÂry project that Bugs wasn’t a Max Hare rip off. ( “I was there. I ought to know.”)
WhatÂevÂer parÂalÂlels may exist between Givens’ Bugs and Disney’s Hare, YouTuÂber Lee sees A Wild Hare as the moment when Bugs Bunny’s charÂacÂter coaÂlesced as “more of a lovÂable prankster than a maliÂcious deviant,” nonÂchaÂlantÂly chompÂing a carÂrot like Clark Gable in It HapÂpened One Night, and turnÂing a bit of regionÂal Texas teen slang — “What’s up, Doc?”- into one of the most immorÂtal catch phrasÂes in enterÂtainÂment hisÂtoÂry.
A star was born, so much so that four direcÂtors — Jones, Avery, Friz FreÂleng and Bob ClamÂpett — were enlistÂed to keep up with the demand for Bugs BunÂny vehiÂcles.
This mulÂti-pronged approach led to some visuÂal inconÂsisÂtenÂcies, that were evenÂtuÂalÂly checked by the creÂation of definÂiÂtive modÂel sheets, drawn by Bob McKimÂson, who aniÂmatÂed the ClamÂpett-directÂed shorts.
HisÂtoÂriÂan BarÂriÂer takes stock:
Bugs’s cheeks were broadÂer, his chin stronger, his teeth a litÂtle more promiÂnent, his eyes largÂer and slantÂed a litÂtle outÂward instead of in. The most expresÂsive eleÂments of the rabÂbit’s face had all been strengthÂened …but because the triÂanÂguÂlar shape of Bugs’s head had been subÂtly accenÂtuÂatÂed, Bugs was, if anyÂthing, futher removed from cuteÂness than ever before. McKimÂson’s modÂel sheet must be givÂen some of the credÂit for the marked improveÂment in Bugs’s looks in all the direcÂtors’ carÂtoons startÂing in 1943. Not that everyÂone drew Bugs to match the modÂel sheet, but the awkÂwardÂness and uncerÂtainÂty of the earÂly forÂties were gone; it was if everyÂone had sudÂdenÂly figÂured out what Bugs realÂly looked like.
Now one of the most recÂogÂnizÂable stars on earth, Bugs remained unmisÂtakÂably himÂself while spoofÂing Charles DickÂens, Alfred HitchÂcock and WagÂnÂer; held his own in live action appearÂances with such heavy hitÂters as Doris Day and Michael JorÂdan; and had a memÂoÂrable cameo in the 1988 feaÂture Who Framed RogerRabÂbit, after proÂducÂers agreed to a deal that guarÂanÂteed him the same amount of screen time as his far squarÂer rival, MickÂey Mouse.
This milÂlenÂniÂum got off to a rockÂiÂer start, owing to an over-reliance on low budÂget, simÂpliÂfied flash aniÂmaÂtion, and the truÂly exeÂcrable trend of shows that reimagÂine clasÂsic charÂacÂters as cloyÂing todÂdlers.
In 2011, on the strength of her 2‑minute aniÂmatÂed short I Like PanÂdas, an iniÂtialÂly relucÂtant 24-year-old JesÂsiÂca BorutÂsÂki was asked to “freshÂen up” Bugs’ look for The Looney Tunes Show,a series of longer forÂmat carÂtoons which required its cast to perÂform such 21st-cenÂtuÂry activÂiÂties as texÂting:
I made their heads a bit bigÂger because I didÂn’t like [how] in the ’60s, ’70s Bugs BunÂny’s head startÂed to get realÂly small and his body realÂly long. He startÂed to look like a weird guy in a bunÂny suit.
Lee’s EvoÂluÂtion of Bugs BunÂny- 80 Years Explained was released in 2019.
In a push led by Looney Tunes CarÂtoons’ Alex Kirwan—who spearÂheads the franchise’s curÂrent slate of shorts on HBO Max—the beloved aniÂmaÂtion icons will soon expand into even more conÂtent. There’s the upcomÂing Tiny Toons LoooniverÂsiÂtyrevival, a HalÂloween speÂcial, Cartoonito’s Bugs BunÂny Builders for kids, and two feaÂture-length aniÂmatÂed movies on the way—and we have a feelÂing that’s not all, folks!
Behold a crowdÂsourced, colÂlabÂoÂraÂtive art project where more than 130 aniÂmaÂtors and filmÂmakÂers from 11 difÂferÂent counÂtries joined togethÂer and remade a full episode of FrasiÂer. (It’s the finale of SeaÂson 1, “My CofÂfee with Niles.”) The proÂjecÂt’s masÂterÂmind, Jacob Reed, asked indiÂvidÂual artists to aniÂmate difÂferÂent scenes, each with a difÂferÂent style, and then he stitched them all togethÂer. Above, you can see how everyÂthing hangs togethÂer.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
Author David FosÂter WalÂlace titled his famous address to KenyÂon ColÂlege’s Class of 2005 “This is Water,” a refÂerÂence to its openÂing joke — self-mockÂingÂly framed as a “didacÂtic litÂtle paraÂble-ish stoÂry” that is “a stanÂdard requireÂment of US comÂmenceÂment speechÂes:”
There are these two young fish swimÂming along and they hapÂpen to meet an oldÂer fish swimÂming the othÂer way, who nods at them and says “MornÂing, boys. How’s the water?” And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then evenÂtuÂalÂly one of them looks over at the othÂer and goes “What the hell is water?”
Mark WoodÂing, founder of After Skool, a YouTube chanÂnel “comÂmitÂted to findÂing the most powÂerÂful conÂtent and delivÂerÂing it in the most engagÂing way posÂsiÂble” gave his whiteÂboard aniÂmaÂtion of the speech a difÂferÂent title: “Your Mind is an ExcelÂlent SerÂvant, but a TerÂriÂble MasÂter.”
It is not the least bit coinÂciÂdenÂtal that adults who comÂmit suiÂcide with firearms almost always shoot themÂselves in: the head. They shoot the terÂriÂble masÂter. And the truth is that most of these suiÂcides are actuÂalÂly dead long before they pull the trigÂger.
WalÂlace himÂself died by suiÂcide a litÂtle more than three years after delivÂerÂing the speech, promptÂing author Tom BisÂsell to write in an essay for the New York Times that “the terÂriÂble masÂter evenÂtuÂalÂly defeatÂed David FosÂter WalÂlace, which makes it easy to forÂget that none of the cloudÂlessÂly sane and true things he had to say about life in 2005 are any less sane or true today, howÂevÂer tragÂic the truth now seems:”
This Is Water does nothÂing to lessen the pain of Wallace’s defeat. What it does is remind us of his strength and goodÂness and decenÂcy — the parts of him the terÂriÂble masÂter could nevÂer defeat, and nevÂer will.
We braced a bit wonÂderÂing how WoodÂing would hanÂdle this porÂtion of the speech.
It would have been a good time for one of his more abstract flights of fanÂcy.
In truth, someÂtimes Wooding’s dry erase drawÂings clutÂtered our headÂspace unnecÂesÂsarÂiÂly, disÂtractÂing from Wallace’s mesÂsage. Isn’t that ironÂic? A large part of the speech deals with choosÂing what to pay attenÂtion to, and how to pay attenÂtion to it.
In an attempt to folÂlow Wallace’s advice and push back against the “basic self-cenÂteredÂness …that is our default setÂting, hard-wired into our boards at birth”, we’ll conÂcede that WoodÂing’s aniÂmaÂtion may help the speech land with those who’d give a pass on lisÂtenÂing to an audio recordÂing or readÂing a tranÂscript.
As WoodÂing told the San FranÂcisÂco ChronÂiÂcle, “Some peoÂple are visuÂal learnÂers, some learn by hearÂing things, some have to do it… what I’ve tried to do with After Skool is comÂbine every style of learnÂing to make the ideas as accesÂsiÂble as posÂsiÂble, to take ideas that are kind of comÂplex and make it so that an eighth-gradÂer can underÂstand it.”
The wickÂet grows a bit stickÂiÂer when WoodÂing delves into the long pasÂsages whereÂin WalÂlace unleashÂes a torÂrent of grouchy self-servÂing thoughts born of boreÂdom, rouÂtine and petÂty frusÂtraÂtion… as an “examÂple of how NOT to think”, he says in an aside.
WalÂlace preÂsentÂed this unvarÂnished ugliÂness as a set up, someÂthing to throtÂtle back from — an illusÂtraÂtion of how our lizard brains’ snap judgÂments need not get the final word:
… if you’re aware enough to give yourÂself a choice, you can choose to look difÂferÂentÂly at this fat, dead-eyed, over-made-up lady who just screamed at her kid in the checkÂout line. Maybe she’s not usuÂalÂly like this. Maybe she’s been up three straight nights holdÂing the hand of a husÂband who is dying of bone canÂcer. Or maybe this very lady is the low-wage clerk at the motor vehiÂcle departÂment, who just yesÂterÂday helped your spouse resolve a horÂrifÂic, infuÂriÂatÂing, red-tape probÂlem through some small act of bureauÂcratÂic kindness…If you’re autoÂmatÂiÂcalÂly sure that you know what realÂiÂty is, and you are operÂatÂing on your default setÂting, then you, like me, probÂaÂbly won’t conÂsidÂer posÂsiÂbilÂiÂties that aren’t annoyÂing and misÂerÂable. But if you realÂly learn how to pay attenÂtion, then you will know there are othÂer options.
We wish WoodÂing had leaned out rather than in when Wallace’s bad mood makes him view the peoÂple sufÂferÂing through trafÂfic jams, crowdÂed aisles, and long checkÂout lines with him as “repulÂsive”, “stuÂpid”, “cow-like”, and “dead-eyed”.
KnowÂing that WalÂlace was windÂing up to reveal these knee jerk assessÂments as the fabÂriÂcaÂtions of a testy, self-absorbed mind operÂatÂing on autopiÂlot, the illusÂtraÂtions might have betÂter served the mesÂsage had they been a step or two ahead of the mesÂsenÂger. DooÂdles depictÂing these peoÂple as far more neuÂtral lookÂing than the delibÂerÂateÂly vitÂriÂolic porÂtrait WalÂlace was paintÂing could have added some dimenÂsion.
It’s imporÂtant to rememÂber that these visuÂals aren’t aniÂmatÂed in the traÂdiÂtionÂal sense. They’re manipÂuÂlatÂed time lapse drawÂings. Unless WoodÂing breaks out the erasÂer and douÂbles back to make modÂiÂfiÂcaÂtions, they’re fixed on the whiteÂboard and in our minds.
This may explain in part why the fed up mom in the check out line appears to get a fairÂer shake in The GlosÂsary’s live action adapÂtaÂtion of excerpts from the same speech, below.
If you’d rather not gild the lily with whiteÂboard aniÂmaÂtion, you can lisÂten to Wallace’s speech and read the tranÂscript here.
The Boy and the Heron, the latÂest feaÂture from masÂter aniÂmaÂtor Hayao MiyazaÂki, opened in Japan this past sumÂmer. In that it marks his latÂest emerÂgence from his supÂposed “retireÂment,” we could label it not just as late MiyazaÂki, but perÂhaps even “post-late” MiyazaÂki. But the film nevÂerÂtheÂless shares sigÂnifÂiÂcant qualÂiÂties with his earÂliÂer work, not least a score comÂposed by Joe Hisaishi. Since NauÂsiÂcaä of the ValÂley of theWind — which opened in 1984, even before the founÂdaÂtion of StuÂdio GhiÂbÂli — Hisaishi’s music has done nearÂly as much to estabÂlish the senÂsiÂbilÂiÂty of MiyazaÂkÂi’s films as their lavÂish, imagÂiÂnaÂtive aniÂmaÂtion, and you can stream hunÂdreds of hours of it with this Youtube playlist.
Each of the playlist’s 121 two-hour videos offers musiÂcal selecÂtions from a mix of GhiÂbÂli movies, includÂing MiyazaÂki favorites like My NeighÂbor Totoro, PorÂco Rosso, and SpirÂitÂed Away, and also the works of othÂer direcÂtors: YoshiÂfuÂmi Kondō’s WhisÂper of the Heart, HiroÂmasa Yonebayashi’s ArriÂetÂty, GorĹŤ MiyazaÂkÂi’s From Up on PopÂpy Hill.
If you’ve seen those picÂtures, these quiÂet, often minÂiÂmal renÂdiÂtions of their music will sureÂly bring their aniÂmatÂed fanÂtasies right back to mind. Even if you haven’t, they can still fulÂfill the funcÂtion promised by the videos’ titles of setÂting a mood conÂducive to study, work, or simÂple relaxÂation.
So beloved are Hisaishi’s scores, for MiyazaÂki and othÂers (most notably comeÂdiÂan-auteur Takeshi Kitano), that it’s posÂsiÂble to know the music long before you’ve seen the movies. And even in perÂforÂmances conÂsidÂerÂably difÂferÂent from the verÂsions heard on the actuÂal soundÂtracks, they always sound immeÂdiÂateÂly recÂogÂnizÂable as Hisaishi’s work. Shaped by an eclecÂtic set of influÂences (born Mamoru FujiÂsawa, he took on his proÂfesÂsionÂal name as an homage to QuinÂcy Jones), he develÂoped a comÂpoÂsiÂtionÂal style neiÂther strictÂly EastÂern nor WestÂern. The same can be said about GhiÂbÂli movies themÂselves, which often posÂsess both fairy-tale EuroÂpean setÂtings and JapanÂese philoÂsophÂiÂcal underÂpinÂnings. WherÂevÂer you place yourÂself on the culÂturÂal map, you’d do well to make their music the soundÂtrack of your own life.
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂterBooks on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
HumanÂiÂty has few fasÂciÂnaÂtions as endurÂing as that with apocÂaÂlypse. We’ve been telling ourÂselves stoÂries of civÂiÂlizaÂtion’s destrucÂtion as long as we’ve had civÂiÂlizaÂtion to destroy. But those stoÂries haven’t all been the same: each era enviÂsions the end of the world in a way that reflects its own immeÂdiÂate preÂocÂcuÂpaÂtions. In the mid nineÂteen-eightÂies, nothÂing inspired preÂocÂcuÂpaÂtions quite so immeÂdiÂate as the prospect of sudÂden nuclear holoÂcaust. The mountÂing pubÂlic anxÂiÂety brought large audiÂences to such major afterÂmath-draÂmaÂtizÂing “teleÂviÂsion events” as The Day After in the UnitÂed States and the even more harÂrowÂing Threads in the UnitÂed KingÂdom.
“As a youngÂster growÂing up in the nineÂteen-eightÂies in a tiny vilÂlage in the heart of the Cotswolds, I can attest to the fact that no part of the counÂtry, howÂevÂer remote and bucolÂic, was imperÂviÂous to the threat of the Cold War escaÂlatÂing into a full-blown nuclear conÂflict,” writes Neil Mitchell at the British Film InstiÂtute.
“PopÂuÂlar culÂture was awash with nuclear war-themed films, comÂic strips, songs and novÂels.” This torÂrent includÂed the artist-writer RayÂmond BrigÂgs’ When the Wind Blows, a graphÂic novÂel about an elderÂly rurÂal couÂple who surÂvive a catÂaÂstrophÂic strike on EngÂland. Jim and Hilda’s optiÂmism and willÂingÂness to folÂlow govÂernÂment instrucÂtions prove to be no match for nuclear winÂter, and howÂevÂer inexÂorable their fate, they manÂage not to see it right up until the end comes.
In 1986, When the Wind Blows was adaptÂed into a feaÂture film, directÂed by AmerÂiÂcan aniÂmaÂtor JimÂmy MurakaÂmi. Among its disÂtincÂtive aesÂthetÂic choicÂes is the comÂbiÂnaÂtion of traÂdiÂtionÂal cel aniÂmaÂtion for the charÂacÂters with phoÂtographed miniaÂtures for the backÂgrounds, as well as the comÂmisÂsionÂing of soundÂtrack music from the likes of Roger Waters, David Bowie, and GenÂeÂsis — propÂer EngÂlish rockÂers for a propÂer EngÂlish proÂducÂtion. If the adapÂtaÂtion of When the Wind Blows is less wideÂly known today than othÂer nuclear-apocÂaÂlypse movies, that may owe to its sheer culÂturÂal speciÂficiÂty. It would be difÂfiÂcult to pick the movie’s most EngÂlish scene, but a parÂticÂuÂlarÂly strong conÂtender is the one in which HilÂda remÂiÂnisces about how “it was nice in the war, realÂly: the shelÂters, the blackÂout, the cups of tea.”
“The couÂple are fruitÂlessÂly nosÂtalÂgic for the Blitz spirÂit of the SecÂond World War, conÂvinced the govÂernÂment-issued ProÂtect and SurÂvive pamÂphlets are worth the paper they’re printÂed on, and blindÂly under the assumpÂtion that there can be a winÂner in a nuclear war,” writes Mitchell. “These sweet, unasÂsumÂing retirees repÂreÂsent an ailÂing, rose-tintÂed worldÂview and way of life that’s woeÂfulÂly unpreÂpared for the magÂniÂtude of devÂasÂtaÂtion wrought by the bomb.” You can see furÂther analyÂsis of the film’s art and worldÂview in the video at the top of the post from aniÂmaÂtion-focused Youtube chanÂnel Steve Reviews. In the event, humanÂiÂty surÂvived the long showÂdown of the Cold War, losÂing none of our penÂchant for apocÂaÂlypÂtic fanÂtaÂsy as a result. HowÂevÂer comÂpulÂsiveÂly we imagÂine the end of the world today, will any of our visions prove as memÂoÂrable as When the Wind Blows?
Based in Seoul, ColÂin Marshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂterBooks on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.
Ah, yes, “AutoÂbahn.” From the moment the door slams and the igniÂtion starts, prog rockÂers and pre-new wavers know a jourÂney is afoot. Though the memÂbers of Kraftwerk made three albums before this, the memÂbers still lookÂing like well meanÂing bookÂish hipÂpies, 1974’s “AutoÂbahn” is conÂsidÂered Year Zero for the denizens of the elecÂtric cafe, the four GerÂman robots who made human music with machines.
CreÂatÂed in 1979, but bopÂping around again in pop culÂture orbit is this cel-drawn aniÂmaÂtion by Roger MainÂwood, creÂatÂed to proÂmote “AutoÂbahn” after most of the culÂture had caught up. By that last year of the ’70s Omni magÂaÂzine was a year old, music was siftÂing through the shockÂwaves left by Bowie’s Low and Heroes, anaÂlog was flirtÂing with digÂiÂtal, and the world was ready to driÂve on that long, elecÂtric highÂway.
Mainwood’s proÂtagÂoÂnist is part alien, part human, and he begins lookÂing around in awe in his hip gogÂgles, then setÂting off for a run straight out of a MuyÂbridge loop, only to wind up floatÂing, flyÂing, sailÂing and swimÂming through a landÂscape indebtÂed to Peter Max, PushÂPin StuÂdios, underÂground comix, and 1930 modÂernism.
MainÂwood avoidÂed any direct repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtion of driÂving or autoÂmoÂbiles, much to his credÂit, which may be why the film holds its fasÂciÂnaÂtion. The aniÂmaÂtor conÂtinÂued in his field, windÂing up a proÂducÂer of sevÂerÂal clasÂsics of British aniÂmaÂtion, includÂing The SnowÂman and the chillÂing When the Wind Blows. As for the meanÂing of “AutoÂbahn,” we’ll let MainÂwood have the last word:
ThinkÂing back to my thought processÂes at that time, I rememÂber wantÂiÂng to specifÂiÂcalÂly not have conÂvenÂtionÂal cars in the film. I wantÂed a sense of a repetÂiÂtive jourÂney, and alienÂation, which I took to be what the music was about…hence the soliÂtary futurÂisÂtic figÂure, proÂtectÂed by large gogÂgles, movÂing through and tryÂing to conÂnect with the jourÂney he is takÂing. The autoÂmoÂbile “monÂsters” are delibÂerÂateÂly threatÂenÂing (I have nevÂer been a big fan of cars or motorÂways!) and when our “hero” tries to make human conÂtact (with difÂferÂent coloured clones of himÂself) he can nevÂer do it. In the end he realisÂes he is makÂing the repetÂiÂtive and cirÂcuÂlar jourÂney alone but strides forÂward purÂposeÂfulÂly at the end as he did in the beginÂning. All of which sounds rather pretentious…but I was a young thing in those days!
Ted Mills is a freeÂlance writer on the arts who curÂrentÂly hosts the artist interÂview-based FunkZone PodÂcast. You can also folÂlow him on TwitÂter at @tedmills, read his othÂer arts writÂing at tedmills.com and/or watch his films here.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.