We live in the age of the smartÂphone, which took more than a few of us by surÂprise. But in all human hisÂtoÂry, not a sinÂgle piece of techÂnolÂoÂgy has actuÂalÂly come out of nowhere. Long before smartÂphones came on the marÂket in the 2000s, those close to the telecomÂmuÂniÂcaÂtions indusÂtry had a sense of what form its most wideÂly used device would evenÂtuÂalÂly take. “Here is my propheÂcy: In its final develÂopÂment, the teleÂphone will be carÂried about by the indiÂvidÂual, perÂhaps as we carÂry a watch today,” said PacifÂic TeleÂphone and TeleÂgraph ComÂpaÂny direcÂtor Mark R. SulÂliÂvan in 1953. “It probÂaÂbly will require no dial or equivÂaÂlent and I think the users will be able to see each othÂer, if they want, as they talk. Who knows but it may actuÂalÂly transÂlate from one lanÂguage to anothÂer?”
SulÂliÂvan’s preÂscient-soundÂing words surÂvive in the clipÂping of the AssoÂciÂatÂed Press artiÂcle seen at the top of the post. It’s worth rememÂberÂing that the speech in quesÂtion dates from a time when the rotary phone was the most advanced perÂsonÂal comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion device in AmerÂiÂcan houseÂholds.
Just three years earÂliÂer, writes KQED’s Rae AlexanÂdra, SulÂliÂvan “appeared in the San FranÂcisÂco ExamÂinÂer talkÂing about the latÂest innoÂvaÂtions in teleÂphone techÂnolÂoÂgy. The advanceÂment he was most proud of was a new device about the size of a small typeÂwriter that autoÂmatÂiÂcalÂly calÂcuÂlatÂed how long people’s phone calls were.” HowÂevÂer logÂiÂcal, pockÂet teleÂphones with video-callÂing and transÂlaÂtion capaÂbilÂiÂties would then have struck many as the stuff of sciÂence ficÂtion.
Though born before the time of houseÂhold elecÂtriÂfiÂcaÂtion, SulÂliÂvan himÂself lived just long enough to see the debut of the first comÂmerÂcial cellÂphone “The MotoroÂla DynaTÂAC 8000X was defÂiÂniteÂly not watch-sized and cost a whopÂping $3,995 in 1983 (about $11,000 today),” writes AlexanÂdra, “but SulÂliÂvan might have seen this develÂopÂment as a step towards his long-ago vision — a sign that every one of his 1953 preÂdicÂtions would evenÂtuÂalÂly come to fruition.” As printÂed in the TacoÂma News TriÂbune, the AP artiÂcle conÂveyÂing those preÂdicÂtions to the pubÂlic appeared under the headÂline “There’ll Be No Escape in Future from TeleÂphones,” which sounds even more chillÂing today — in that very future — than it did nearÂly 70 years ago. But then, even the visions of actuÂal sciÂence ficÂtion are selÂdom wholÂly untrouÂbled.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
A 1947 French Film AccuÂrateÂly PreÂdictÂed Our 21st-CenÂtuÂry AddicÂtion to SmartÂphones
When We All Have PockÂet TeleÂphones (1923)
FilmÂmakÂer Wim WenÂders Explains How Mobile Phones Have Killed PhoÂtogÂraÂphy
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities and culÂture. His projects include the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.