Over the half-milÂlenÂniÂum since HieronyÂmus Bosch paintÂed it, The GarÂden of EarthÂly Delights has proÂduced an ever-widenÂing array of interÂpreÂtaÂtions. Is it “a paintÂing about sexÂuÂal freeÂdom”? A “medieval acid trip”? An “erotÂic fanÂtaÂsy”? A “heretiÂcal attack on the church”? The work of “a memÂber of an obscure free-love cult”? James Payne, the LonÂdon curaÂtor behind the Youtube chanÂnel Great Art Explained, rejects all these views. In the openÂing of the in-depth video analyÂsis above, he describes Bosch’s well-known and much-scruÂtiÂnized late-15th or earÂly-16th cenÂtuÂry tripÂtych as, “pure and simÂply, hardÂcore ChrisÂtianÂiÂty.”
DatÂing from “a time when EuroÂpean artists, writÂers, and theÂoloÂgians were shapÂing a new, terÂriÂfyÂing vision of Hell and the punÂishÂment awaitÂing sinÂners,” Payne argues, The GarÂden of EarthÂly Delights is “an intenseÂly moralÂisÂtic work that should be approached as what it is: reliÂgious proÂpaÂganÂda.”
DepictÂing the BibÂliÂcal creÂation of the world on its outÂer panÂels, the work opens up to reveal elabÂoÂrateÂly detailed visions of Adam and Eve in the GarÂden of Eden, then humanÂiÂty indulging in all known earthÂly delights, then the conÂseÂquent torÂments of Hell. It is that last panÂel, with its abunÂdance of perÂverse activÂiÂties and grotesque human, aniÂmal, and human-aniÂmal figÂures (recentÂly made into figÂurines and even piñatas) that keeps the strongest hold on our imagÂiÂnaÂtion today.
Payne’s explaÂnaÂtion goes into detail on all aspects of the work, highÂlightÂing and conÂtexÂtuÂalÂizÂing details that even avowed appreÂciÂaÂtors may not have conÂsidÂered before. While idenÂtiÂfyÂing both the posÂsiÂble inspiÂraÂtions and the posÂsiÂble symÂbolÂic intenÂtions of the figÂures and symÂbols with which Bosch filled the tripÂtych, Payne emphaÂsizes that, as far as the artist was conÂcerned, “his images were a realÂisÂtic porÂtrayÂal of sin and its conÂseÂquences, so in that sense, it wasÂn’t surÂreÂalÂism, it was realÂism.” This bears repeatÂing, givÂen how difÂfiÂcult we modÂerns find it “to look at this paintÂing and not see it as surÂreÂalÂism or a prodÂuct of the subÂconÂscious, not see it as a sexÂuÂal utopia, a criÂtique of reliÂgion, or even a psyÂcheÂdelÂic romp.” Just as The GarÂden of EarthÂly Delights tells us a great deal about the world Bosch lived in, so our views of it tell us a great deal about the world we live in.
If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newsletÂter, please find it here. Or folÂlow our posts on Threads, FaceÂbook, BlueSky or Mastodon.
If you would like to supÂport the misÂsion of Open CulÂture, conÂsidÂer makÂing a donaÂtion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your conÂtriÂbuÂtions will help us conÂtinÂue proÂvidÂing the best free culÂturÂal and eduÂcaÂtionÂal mateÂriÂals to learnÂers everyÂwhere. You can conÂtribute through PayÂPal, PatreÂon, and VenÂmo (@openculture). Thanks!
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Based in Seoul, ColÂin MarÂshall writes and broadÂcasts on cities, lanÂguage, and culÂture. His projects include the SubÂstack newsletÂter Books on Cities, the book The StateÂless City: a Walk through 21st-CenÂtuÂry Los AngeÂles and the video series The City in CinÂeÂma. FolÂlow him on TwitÂter at @colinmarshall or on FaceÂbook.