How Information Overload Robs Us of Our Creativity: What the Scientific Research Shows

Flickr Com­mons pho­to by J Stimp

Every­one used to read Samuel John­son. Now it seems hard­ly any­one does. That’s a shame. John­son under­stood the human mind, its sad­ly amus­ing frail­ties and its dou­ble-blind alleys. He under­stood the nature of that mys­te­ri­ous act we casu­al­ly refer to as “cre­ativ­i­ty.” It is not the kind of thing one lucks into or mas­ters after a sem­i­nar or lec­ture series. It requires dis­ci­pline and a mind free of dis­trac­tion. “My dear friend,” said John­son in 1783, accord­ing to his biog­ra­ph­er and sec­re­tary Boswell, “clear your mind of cant.”

There’s no miss­ing apos­tro­phe in his advice. Inspir­ing as it may sound, John­son did not mean to say “you can do it!” He meant “cant,” an old word for cheap decep­tion, bias, hypocrisy, insin­cere expres­sion. “It is a mode of talk­ing in Soci­ety,” he con­ced­ed, “but don’t think fool­ish­ly.” Johnson’s injunc­tion res­onat­ed through a cou­ple cen­turies, became gar­bled into a banal affir­ma­tion, and was lost in a grave­yard of image macros. Let us endeav­or to retrieve it, and rumi­nate on its wis­dom.

We may even do so with our favorite mod­ern brief in hand, the sci­en­tif­ic study. There are many we could turn to. For exam­ple, notes Derek Beres, in a 2014 book neu­ro­sci­en­tist Daniel Lev­itin brought his research to bear in argu­ing that “infor­ma­tion over­load keeps us mired in noise.… This saps us of not only willpow­er (of which we have a lim­it­ed store) but cre­ativ­i­ty as well.” “We sure think we’re accom­plish­ing a lot,” Lev­itin told Susan Page on The Diane Rehm Show in 2015, “but that’s an illu­sion… as a neu­ro­sci­en­tist, I can tell you one thing the brain is very good at is self-delu­sion.”

Johnson’s age had its own ver­sion of infor­ma­tion over­load, as did that of anoth­er cur­mud­geon­ly voice from the past, T.S. Eliot, who won­dered, “Where is the wis­dom we have lost in knowl­edge? Where is the knowl­edge we have lost in infor­ma­tion?” The ques­tion leaves Eliot’s read­ers ask­ing whether what we take for knowl­edge or infor­ma­tion real­ly are such? Maybe they’re just as often forms of need­less busy­ness, dis­trac­tion, and over­think­ing. Stan­ford researcher Emma Sep­pälä sug­gests as much in her work on “the sci­ence of hap­pi­ness.” At Quartz, she writes,

We need to find ways to give our brains a break.… At work, we’re intense­ly ana­lyz­ing prob­lems, orga­niz­ing data, writing—all activ­i­ties that require focus. Dur­ing down­time, we immerse our­selves in our phones while stand­ing in line at the store or lose our­selves in Net­flix after hours.

Sep­pälä exhorts us to relax and let go of the con­stant need for stim­u­la­tion, to take longs walks with­out the phone, get out of our com­fort zones, make time for fun and games, and gen­er­al­ly build in time for leisure. How does this work? Let’s look at some addi­tion­al research. Bar-Ilan Uni­ver­si­ty’s Moshe Bar and Shi­ra Baror under­took a study to mea­sure the effects of dis­trac­tion, or what they call “men­tal load,” the “stray thoughts” and “obses­sive rumi­na­tions” that clut­ter the mind with infor­ma­tion and loose ends. Our “capac­i­ty for orig­i­nal and cre­ative think­ing,” Bar writes at The New York Times, “is marked­ly stymied” by a busy mind. “The clut­tered mind,” writes Jes­si­ca Still­man, “is a cre­ativ­i­ty killer.”

In a paper pub­lished in Psy­cho­log­i­cal Sci­ence, Bar and Baror describe how “con­di­tions of high load” fos­ter uno­rig­i­nal think­ing. Par­tic­i­pants in their exper­i­ment were asked to remem­ber strings of arbi­trary num­bers, then to play word asso­ci­a­tion games. “Par­tic­i­pants with sev­en dig­its to recall resort­ed to the most sta­tis­ti­cal­ly com­mon respons­es (e.g., white/black),” writes Bar, “where­as par­tic­i­pants with two dig­its gave less typ­i­cal, more var­ied pair­ings (e.g. white/cloud).” Our brains have lim­it­ed resources. When con­strained and over­whelmed with thoughts, they pur­sue well-trod paths of least resis­tance, try­ing to effi­cient­ly bring order to chaos.

“Imag­i­na­tion,” on the oth­er hand, wrote Dr. John­son else­where, “a licen­tious and vagrant fac­ul­ty, unsus­cep­ti­ble of lim­i­ta­tions and impa­tient of restraint, has always endeav­ored to baf­fle the logi­cian, to per­plex the con­fines of dis­tinc­tion, and burst the enclo­sures of reg­u­lar­i­ty.” Bar describes the con­trast between the imag­i­na­tive mind and the infor­ma­tion pro­cess­ing mind as “a ten­sion in our brains between explo­ration and exploita­tion.” Gorg­ing on infor­ma­tion makes our brains “’exploit’ what we already know,” or think we know, “lean­ing on our expec­ta­tion, trust­ing the com­fort of a pre­dictable envi­ron­ment.” When our minds are “unloaded,” on the oth­er hand, which can occur dur­ing a hike or a long, relax­ing show­er, we can shed fixed pat­terns of think­ing, and explore cre­ative insights that might oth­er­wise get buried or dis­card­ed.

As Drake Baer suc­cinct­ly puts in at New York Mag­a­zine’s Sci­ence of Us, “When you have noth­ing to think about, you can do your best think­ing.” Get­ting to that state in a cli­mate of per­pet­u­al, unsleep­ing dis­trac­tion, opin­ion, and alarm, requires anoth­er kind of dis­ci­pline: the dis­ci­pline to unplug, wan­der off, and clear your mind.

For anoth­er angle on this, you might want to check out Cal New­port’s 2016 book, Deep Work: Rules for Focused Suc­cess in a Dis­tract­ed World.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Neu­ro­science & Psy­chol­o­gy of Pro­cras­ti­na­tion, and How to Over­come It

Why You Do Your Best Think­ing In The Show­er: Cre­ativ­i­ty & the “Incu­ba­tion Peri­od”

How Walk­ing Fos­ters Cre­ativ­i­ty: Stan­ford Researchers Con­firm What Philoso­phers and Writ­ers Have Always Known

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Free: You Can Now Read Classic Books by MIT Press on Archive.org

FYI. At the end of May, Archive.org announced this on its blog:

For more than eighty years, MIT Press has been pub­lish­ing acclaimed titles in sci­ence, tech­nol­o­gy, art and archi­tec­ture.  Now, thanks to a new part­ner­ship between the Inter­net Archive and MIT Press, read­ers will be able to bor­row these clas­sics online for the first time. With gen­er­ous sup­port from Arca­dia, a char­i­ta­ble fund of Peter Bald­win and Lis­bet Raus­ing, this part­ner­ship rep­re­sents an impor­tant advance in pro­vid­ing free, long-term pub­lic access to knowl­edge.

“These books rep­re­sent some of the finest schol­ar­ship ever pro­duced, but right now they are very hard to find,” said Brew­ster Kahle, founder and Dig­i­tal Librar­i­an of the Inter­net Archive. “Togeth­er with MIT Press, we will enable the patrons of every library that owns one of these books to bor­row it online–one copy at a time.”

This joint ini­tia­tive is a cru­cial ear­ly step in Inter­net Archive’s ambi­tious plans to dig­i­tize, pre­serve and pro­vide pub­lic access to four mil­lion books, by part­ner­ing wide­ly with uni­ver­si­ty press­es and oth­er pub­lish­ers, authors, and libraries.…

We will be scan­ning an ini­tial group of 1,500 MIT Press titles at Inter­net Archive’s Boston Pub­lic Library facil­i­ty, includ­ing Cyril Stan­ley Smith’s 1980 book, From Art to Sci­ence: Sev­en­ty-Two Objects Illus­trat­ing the Nature of Dis­cov­ery, and Fred­er­ick Law Olm­st­ed and Theodo­ra Kimball’s Forty Years of Land­scape Archi­tec­ture: Cen­tral Park, which was pub­lished in 1973. The old­est title in the group is Arthur C. Hardy’s 1936 Hand­book of Col­orime­try.

Through­out the sum­mer, we’ve been check­ing in, wait­ing for the first MIT Press books to hit Archive.org’s vir­tu­al shelves. They’re now start­ing to arrive. Click here to find the begin­nings of what promis­es to be a much larg­er col­lec­tion.

As Brew­ster Kahle (founder of Inter­net Archive) explained it to Library Jour­nalhis orga­ni­za­tion is “basi­cal­ly try­ing to wave a wand over everyone’s phys­i­cal col­lec­tions and say, Blink! You now have an elec­tron­ic ver­sion that you can use” in what­ev­er way desired, assum­ing its per­mit­ted by copy­right. In the case of MIT Press, it looks like you can log into Archive.org and dig­i­tal­ly bor­row their elec­tron­ic texts for 14 days.

Archive.org hopes to dig­i­tize 1,500 MIT Press clas­sics by the end of 2017. Dig­i­tal col­lec­tions from oth­er pub­lish­ing hous­es seem sure to fol­low.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How Brew­ster Kahle and the Inter­net Archive Will Pre­serve the Infi­nite Infor­ma­tion on the Web

An Archive of 3,000 Vin­tage Cook­books Lets You Trav­el Back Through Culi­nary Time

Enter a Huge Archive of Amaz­ing Sto­ries, the World’s First Sci­ence Fic­tion Mag­a­zine, Launched in 1926

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 4 ) |

10 Longevity Tips from Dr. Shigeaki Hinohara, Japan’s 105-Year-Old Longevity Expert

Pho­to by Karsten Thor­maehlen, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

Robert Brown­ing’s poem “Abt Vogler” imag­ines com­pos­er Georg Joseph Vogler as an old man reflect­ing on his dimin­ish­ing pow­ers and the like­li­hood that his life’s work would not sur­vive in the public’s mem­o­ry.

Let us over­look the fact that Vogler was 65 when he died, or that Brown­ing, who lived to 77, was 52 when he com­posed the poem.

What’s most strik­ing these days is its sig­nif­i­cance to longevi­ty expert, physi­cian, and chair­man emer­i­tus of St. Luke’s Inter­na­tion­al Uni­ver­si­ty, Dr. Shigea­ki Hino­hara, who passed away last month at the age of 105:

My father used to read it to me. It encour­ages us to make big art, not small scrib­bles. It says to try to draw a cir­cle so huge that there is no way we can fin­ish it while we are alive. All we see is an arch; the rest is beyond our vision but it is there in the dis­tance.

Like many cen­te­nar­i­ans, Dr. Hino­hara attrib­uted his longevi­ty to cer­tain prac­tices, back­ing it up with numer­ous books on the top­ic (includ­ing Liv­ing Long, Liv­ing Good).

He touched on some of these beliefs in a 2009 Japan Times inter­view with Judit Kawaguchi, from which the fol­low­ing point­ers are drawn.

Ten Tips For a Healthy Old Age from Dr. Shigea­ki Hino­hara

Eat to Live Don’t Live to Eat

As far as Clint East­wood, Sis­ter Wendy Beck­ett and Fred Rogers are con­cerned, Dr. Hino­hara was preach­ing to the choir. Your aver­age Ital­ian great grand­moth­er would be appalled.

For break­fast I drink cof­fee, a glass of milk and some orange juice with a table­spoon of olive oil in it. Olive oil is great for the arter­ies and keeps my skin healthy. Lunch is milk and a few cook­ies, or noth­ing when I am too busy to eat. I nev­er get hun­gry because I focus on my work. Din­ner is veg­gies, a bit of fish and rice, and, twice a week, 100 grams of lean meat.

Keep on Truckin’…

Nor was Dr. Hino­hara a sit-around-the-piaz­za-drink­ing-limon­cel­lo-with-his-cronies kind of guy. For him a vig­or­ous­ly plot­ted out cal­en­dar was syn­ony­mous with a vig­or­ous old age:

Always plan ahead. My sched­ule book is already full … with lec­tures and my usu­al hos­pi­tal work.

Moth­er Was Wrong…

…at least when it comes to bed­time and the impor­tance of con­sum­ing three square meals a day. Dis­co naps and bot­tled water all around!

We all remem­ber how as chil­dren, when we were hav­ing fun, we often for­got to eat or sleep. I believe that we can keep that atti­tude as adults, too. It’s best not to tire the body with too many rules such as lunchtime and bed­time.

To Hell with Obscu­ri­ty!

You may not be able to pull in the same crowds as a man whose career spans found­ing a world class hos­pi­tal in the rub­ble of post WWII Tokyo and treat­ing the vic­tims of the rad­i­cal Aum Shin­rikyo cult’s sarin gas sub­way attack, but you can still share your ideas with those younger than you. If noth­ing else, expe­ri­ence will be on your side:

 Share what you know. I give 150 lec­tures a year, some for 100 ele­men­tary-school chil­dren, oth­ers for 4,500 busi­ness peo­ple. I usu­al­ly speak for 60 to 90 min­utes, stand­ing, to stay strong.

Don’t Slack on Every­day Phys­i­cal Activ­i­ty

Dr. Hino­hara schlepped his own bags and turned his back on such mod­ern con­ve­niences as ele­va­tors and esca­la­tors:

I take two stairs at a time, to get my mus­cles mov­ing.

Hav­ing Fun Is Bet­ter Than Tylenol (Or Bitch­ing About It)

Rather than turn­ing off young friends and rel­a­tives with a con­stant litany of phys­i­cal com­plaints, Dr. Hino­hara sought to emu­late the child who for­gets his toothache through the diver­sion of play. And yes, this was his med­ical opin­ion:

Hos­pi­tals must cater to the basic need of patients: We all want to have fun. At St. Luke’s we have music and ani­mal ther­a­pies, and art class­es.

Think Twice Before You Go Under the Knife

Not will­ing to put all your trust into music ther­a­py work­ing out for you? Con­sid­er your age and how a side dish of surgery or radi­a­tion might impact your all over enjoy­ment of life before agree­ing to rad­i­cal pro­ce­dures. Espe­cial­ly if you are one of those afore­men­tioned sit-around-the-piaz­za-drink­ing-limon­cel­lo-with-your-cronies type of guys.

When a doc­tor rec­om­mends you take a test or have some surgery, ask whether the doc­tor would sug­gest that his or her spouse or chil­dren go through such a pro­ce­dure. Con­trary to pop­u­lar belief, doc­tors can’t cure every­one. So why cause unnec­es­sary pain with surgery? 

Divest of Mate­r­i­al Bur­dens

Best sell­ing author and pro­fes­sion­al orga­niz­er, Marie Kon­do, would approve of her countryman’s views on “stuff”:

Remem­ber: You don’t know when your num­ber is up, and you can’t take it with you to the next place.

Pick a Role Mod­el You Can Be Wor­thy Of

It need not be some­one famous. Dr. Hino­hara revered his dad, who intro­duced him to his favorite poem and trav­eled halfway across the world to enroll at Duke Uni­ver­si­ty as a young man.

Lat­er I found a few more life guides, and when I am stuck, I ask myself how they would deal with the prob­lem.

Find a Poem That Speaks to You and Let It Guide You

The good doc­tor didn’t rec­om­mend this course of action in so many words, but you could do worse than to fol­low his exam­ple. Pick a long one. Reread it fre­quent­ly. For added neu­ro­log­i­cal oomph, mem­o­rize a few lines every day. Bedaz­zle peo­ple half your age with an off-book recita­tion at your next fam­i­ly gath­er­ing. (It’ll dis­tract you from all that turkey and stuff­ing.)

“Abt Vogler”

Would that the struc­ture brave, the man­i­fold music I build,
Bid­ding my organ obey, call­ing its keys to their work,
Claim­ing each slave of the sound, at a touch, as when Solomon willed
Armies of angels that soar, legions of demons that lurk,
Man, brute, rep­tile, fly,—alien of end and of aim,
Adverse, each from the oth­er heav­en-high, hell-deep removed,—
Should rush into sight at once as he named the inef­fa­ble Name,
And pile him a palace straight, to plea­sure the princess he loved!
Would it might tar­ry like his, the beau­ti­ful build­ing of mine,
This which my keys in a crowd pressed and impor­tuned to raise!
Ah, one and all, how they helped, would dis­part now and now com­bine,
Zeal­ous to has­ten the work, height­en their mas­ter his praise!
And one would bury his brow with a blind plunge down to hell,
Bur­row awhile and build, broad on the roots of things,
Then up again swim into sight, hav­ing based me my palace well,
Found­ed it, fear­less of flame, flat on the nether springs.
And anoth­er would mount and march, like the excel­lent min­ion he was,
Ay, anoth­er and yet anoth­er, one crowd but with many a crest,
Rais­ing my ram­pired walls of gold as trans­par­ent as glass,
Eager to do and die, yield each his place to the rest:
For high­er still and high­er (as a run­ner tips with fire,
When a great illu­mi­na­tion sur­pris­es a fes­tal night—
Out­lin­ing round and round Rome’s dome from space to spire)
Up, the pin­na­cled glo­ry reached, and the pride of my soul was in sight.
In sight? Not half! for it seemed, it was cer­tain, to match man’s birth,
Nature in turn con­ceived, obey­ing an impulse as I;
And the emu­lous heav­en yearned down, made effort to reach the earth,
As the earth had done her best, in my pas­sion, to scale the sky:
Nov­el splen­dours burst forth, grew famil­iar and dwelt with mine,
Not a point nor peak but found and fixed its wan­der­ing star;
Mete­or-moons, balls of blaze: and they did not pale nor pine,
For earth had attained to heav­en, there was no more near nor far.
Nay more; for there want­ed not who walked in the glare and glow,
Pres­ences plain in the place; or, fresh from the Pro­to­plast,
Fur­nished for ages to come, when a kind­lier wind should blow,
Lured now to begin and live, in a house to their lik­ing at last;
Or else the won­der­ful Dead who have passed through the body and gone,
But were back once more to breathe in an old world worth their new:
What nev­er had been, was now; what was, as it shall be anon;
And what is,—shall I say, matched both? for I was made per­fect too.
All through my keys that gave their sounds to a wish of my soul,
All through my soul that praised as its wish flowed vis­i­bly forth,
All through music and me! For think, had I paint­ed the whole,
Why, there it had stood, to see, nor the process so won­der-worth:
Had I writ­ten the same, made verse—still, effect pro­ceeds from cause,
Ye know why the forms are fair, ye hear how the tale is told;
It is all tri­umphant art, but art in obe­di­ence to laws,
Painter and poet are proud in the artist-list enrolled:—
But here is the fin­ger of God, a flash of the will that can,
Exis­tent behind all laws, that made them and, lo, they are!
And I know not if, save in this, such gift be allowed to man,
That out of three sounds he frame, not a fourth sound, but a star.
Con­sid­er it well: each tone of our scale in itself is nought;
It is every­where in the world—loud, soft, and all is said:
Give it to me to use! I mix it with two in my thought:
And, there! Ye have heard and seen: con­sid­er and bow the head!
Well, it is gone at last, the palace of music I reared;
Gone! and the good tears start, the prais­es that come too slow;
For one is assured at first, one scarce can say that he feared,
That he even gave it a thought, the gone thing was to go.
Nev­er to be again! But many more of the kind
As good, nay, bet­ter, per­chance: is this your com­fort to me?
To me, who must be saved because I cling with my mind
To the same, same self, same love, same God: ay, what was, shall be.
There­fore to whom turn I but to thee, the inef­fa­ble Name?
Builder and mak­er, thou, of hous­es not made with hands!
What, have fear of change from thee who art ever the same?
Doubt that thy pow­er can fill the heart that thy pow­er expands?
There shall nev­er be one lost good! What was, shall live as before;
The evil is null, is nought, is silence imply­ing sound;
What was good shall be good, with, for evil, so much good more;
On the earth the bro­ken arcs; in the heav­en, a per­fect round.
All we have willed or hoped or dreamed of good shall exist;
Not its sem­blance, but itself; no beau­ty, nor good, nor pow­er
Whose voice has gone forth, but each sur­vives for the melodist
When eter­ni­ty affirms the con­cep­tion of an hour.
The high that proved too high, the hero­ic for earth too hard,
The pas­sion that left the ground to lose itself in the sky,
Are music sent up to God by the lover and the bard;
Enough that he heard it once: we shall hear it by and by.
And what is our fail­ure here but a tri­umph’s evi­dence
For the ful­ness of the days? Have we with­ered or ago­nized?
Why else was the pause pro­longed but that singing might issue thence?
Why rushed the dis­cords in, but that har­mo­ny should be prized?
Sor­row is hard to bear, and doubt is slow to clear,
Each suf­fer­er says his say, his scheme of the weal and woe:
But God has a few of us whom he whis­pers in the ear;
The rest may rea­son and wel­come; ’tis we musi­cians know.
Well, it is earth with me; silence resumes her reign:
I will be patient and proud, and sober­ly acqui­esce.
Give me the keys. I feel for the com­mon chord again,
Slid­ing by semi­tones till I sink to the minor,—yes,
And I blunt it into a ninth, and I stand on alien ground,
Sur­vey­ing awhile the heights I rolled from into the deep;
Which, hark, I have dared and done, for my rest­ing-place is found,
The C Major of this life: so, now I will try to sleep.

- Robert Brown­ing

Relat­ed Con­tent:

New Study: Immers­ing Your­self in Art, Music & Nature Might Reduce Inflam­ma­tion & Increase Life Expectan­cy

Walt Whitman’s Unearthed Health Man­u­al, “Man­ly Health & Train­ing,” Urges Read­ers to Stand (Don’t Sit!) and Eat Plen­ty of Meat (1858)

Ale­jan­dro Jodorowsky’s 82 Com­mand­ments For Liv­ing

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, the­ater mak­er and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine.  Fol­low her @AyunHalliday.

Cindy Sherman’s Instagram Account Goes Public, Revealing 600 New Photos & Many Strange Self-Portraits

The career of Jen­ny Holz­er, the artist who became famous in the 1970s and 80s through her pub­lic instal­la­tions of phras­es like “ABUSE OF POWER COMES AS NO SURPRISE” and “PROTECT ME FROM WHAT I WANT,” has made her into an ide­al Tweet­er. By the same token, the career of Cindy Sher­man, the artist who became famous in the 1970s and 80s through her inven­tive not-exact­ly-self-por­traits — pic­tures of her­self elab­o­rate­ly remade as a vari­ety of oth­er peo­ple, includ­ing oth­er famous peo­ple, in a vari­ety of time peri­ods — has made her into an ide­al Insta­gram­mer.

But though Sher­man had been using Insta­gram for quite some time, most of the pub­lic had no idea she had any pres­ence there at all until just this week. “The account, which mys­te­ri­ous­ly switched from pri­vate to pub­lic in recent months, is a mix of per­son­al pho­tos along­side Sherman’s ever-famous manip­u­lat­ed images of her­self,” reports Art­net’s Car­o­line Elbaor.

“What we see here is some­what of a depar­ture from the artist’s tra­di­tion­al mod­el: the frame is tighter and clos­er to her face, in what is clear use of a phone’s front-fac­ing cam­era. Plus, the sub­ject mat­ter is decid­ed­ly inti­mate in com­par­i­son to her usu­al work — the lat­est posts doc­u­ment a stay in the hos­pi­tal. She may even be hav­ing fun with fil­ters.”

She appar­ent­ly start­ed hav­ing fun with them a few months ago, from one May post whose pho­to she describes as “Self­ie! No fil­ter, haha­ha” — but in which she does seem to have made use of cer­tain effects to give the image a few of the suite of uncan­ny qual­i­ties in which she spe­cial­izes. Though not a mem­ber of the gen­er­a­tions the world most close­ly asso­ciates with avid self­ie-tak­ing, Sher­man brings a unique­ly rich expe­ri­ence with the form, or forms like it. Her “method of turn­ing the lens onto her­self is uncan­ni­ly appro­pri­ate to our times,” writes Elbaor,” in which the stage-man­aged self­ie has become so ubiq­ui­tous that it’s now fod­der for exhi­bi­tions and often cit­ed as an art form in itself.”

Sher­man’s Insta­gram self-por­trai­ture, in con­trast to the often (but not always) glam­orous pro­duc­tions that hung on the walls of her shows before, has entered fas­ci­nat­ing new realms of strange­ness and even grotes­querie. Using the image-mod­i­fi­ca­tion tools so many of us might pre­vi­ous­ly assumed were used only by teenage girls des­per­ate to erase their imag­ined flaws, Sher­man twists and bends her own fea­tures into what look like liv­ing car­toon char­ac­ters. “A bit scary,” one com­menter wrote of Sher­man’s recent hos­pi­tal-bed self­ie (tak­en while recov­er­ing from a fall from a horse), “but I can’t look away.” Many of the artist’s thou­sands and thou­sands of new and cap­ti­vat­ed Insta­gram fol­low­ers are sure­ly react­ing the same way. Check out Sher­man’s Insta­gram feed here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Say What You Real­ly Mean with Down­load­able Cindy Sher­man Emoti­cons

Muse­um of Mod­ern Art (MoMA) Launch­es Free Course on Look­ing at Pho­tographs as Art

See The First “Self­ie” In His­to­ry Tak­en by Robert Cor­nelius, a Philadel­phia Chemist, in 1839

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

DC’s Legendary Punk Label Dischord Records Makes Its Entire Music Catalog Free to Stream Online

Image of Fugazi by Brad Sigal, via Flickr Com­mons

Apart from what­ev­er polit­i­cal night­mare du jour we’re liv­ing in, it can be easy to dis­like Wash­ing­ton, DC. I say this as some­one who grew up out­side the city, called it home for many years, and gen­er­al­ly found its pub­lic face of mon­u­ments, tourists, politi­cos, and waves of lob­by­ists and bureau­crats pret­ty alien­at­ing. The “real” DC was else­where, in the city’s his­toric Black neigh­bor­hoods, many now heav­i­ly gen­tri­fied, which host­ed leg­endary jazz clubs and gave birth to the genius of go-go. And even in the priv­i­leged, mid­dle class neigh­bor­hoods and DMV sub­urbs. Among the skate punks and dis­af­fect­ed mil­i­tary brats who cre­at­ed the DC punk scene, a seething, furi­ous­ly pro­duc­tive punk econ­o­my cen­tered around Dischord Records. The small label has been as huge­ly influ­en­tial in the past few decades as Seat­tle’s Sub Pop or Long Beach’s SST.

Formed in 1980 by Minor Threat’s Ian MacK­aye and his band­mate Jeff Nel­son, Dischord is 6 years old­er than Sub Pop and in sev­er­al ways it inspired a tem­plate for the West Coast. Dave Grohl came from the DC Punk scene, as did Black Flag’s Hen­ry Rollins. Rollins and MacK­aye were child­hood friends and DC natives, and MacK­aye went on to form Fugazi, vir­tu­al­ly a DC insti­tu­tion for well over a decade.


MacKaye’s broth­er Alec was a mem­ber of Dischord band Faith—one of Kurt Cobain’s admit­ted influences—and of Igni­tion with Gray Matter’s Dante Fer­ran­do, who went on, with invest­ments from Dave Grohl, to found the club Black Cat, a cen­tral hub of punk and indie rock in DC for 27 years. The more you dig into the musi­cal fam­i­lies of Dischord, the more you see how embed­ded they are not only in their home city, but in the weft of mod­ern Amer­i­can rock.

Dischord has been cel­e­brat­ed in gallery exhi­bi­tions, the hip doc­u­men­tary Sal­ad Days, and the short An Impres­sion: Dischord Records (watch here). Now they’ve released their cat­a­log to stream for free at Band­camp. The slew of bands fea­tured offers a gallery of nos­tal­gia for a cer­tain brand and vin­tage of DC native. And it offers a pris­tine oppor­tu­ni­ty to get caught up if you don’t know Dischord bands.

Image of Hoover by Dischord Records, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

The com­mon fea­tures of its lineup—political urgency, earnest­ness, melod­ic exper­i­men­ta­tion, unpretentiousness—stand out. Dischord bands could be math‑y and tech­ni­cal, straight edge, veg­an, Bud­dhist, Hare Krish­na, fierce­ly fem­i­nist, anti-cap­i­tal­ist, and anti-war.… These may not sound like the mak­ings of a great par­ty scene, but they made for a com­mit­ted cadre of hard work­ing musi­cians and a wide cir­cle of ded­i­cat­ed fans around the coun­try who have kept the label thriv­ing in its way.

What dis­tin­guish­es Dischord from its more famous peers is the fact that it only releas­es bands from the DC area. Why? “Because this is the city where we live, work, and have the most under­stand­ing,” they write on their site. Still, giv­en the label’s height­ened pro­file in recent years, it’s sur­pris­ing that so much of its music remains unknown out­side of a spe­cif­ic audi­ence. Fugazi is the best-known band on the ros­ter, and for all their major crit­i­cal impor­tance, they have kept a fair­ly low pro­file. But this is the spir­it of the label, whose founders want­ed to make music, not make stars. Bands like Shud­der to Think and Jaw­box may have even­tu­al­ly moved to big­ger labels, but they did their best work with Dischord.

Dag Nasty, Embrace, Gov­ern­ment Issue, Make-Up, Q and Not U, Rites of Spring, Soul­side, Void, Untouch­ables, Slant 6, the Nation of Ulysses.… these are bands, if you don’t know them, you should hear, and already have, in some way, through their enor­mous influ­ence on so many oth­ers: not only Nir­vana, but also a con­tin­gent of deriv­a­tive emo bands some of us might pre­fer to for­get. Still the label’s his­to­ry should not be tak­en as the gospel canon of DC punk. One of the most influ­en­tial of DC punk bands, Bad Brains, came out of the jazz scene, invent­ed a blis­ter­ing mashup of punk and reg­gae, and get cred­it for cre­at­ing hard­core and inspir­ing Rollins, MacK­aye, and their friends. But Bad Brains was “Banned in DC” in 1979, shut out of the clubs. They moved to New York and even­tu­al­ly signed with SST.

Oth­er parts of the scene scorned the clean-liv­ing moral­ism of Dischord, and the label’s sober founders lat­er found them­selves “alien­at­ed by the vio­lent, sub­ur­ban, teenage machis­mo they now saw at their shows,” writes Jil­lian Mapes at Fla­vor­wire. Dischord became known for cham­pi­oning caus­es on the left, a lega­cy that is insep­a­ra­ble from its leg­end. Not every­one loved their pol­i­tics, as you might imag­ine in a city with as many con­ser­v­a­tive activists and polit­i­cal aspi­rants as DC. “Great polit­i­cal punk bands—like Priests—still exist in DC,” writes Mapes—and Dischord con­tin­ues to release great records—“but the ‘80s scene retains its place in his­to­ry as the pin­na­cle of polit­i­cal Amer­i­can hard­core music.” And Dischord remains a some­times unac­knowl­edged leg­is­la­tor of Amer­i­can punk rock in the ‘80s and ’90s. Stream their whole cat­a­log at Band­camp. You can also down­load tracks for a fee.

via @wfmu

Relat­ed Con­tent:

33 Songs That Doc­u­ment the His­to­ry of Fem­i­nist Punk (1975–2015): A Playlist Curat­ed by Pitch­fork

The His­to­ry of Punk Rock in 200 Tracks: An 11-Hour Playlist Takes You From 1965 to 2016

A His­to­ry of Alter­na­tive Music Bril­liant­ly Mapped Out on a Tran­sis­tor Radio Cir­cuit Dia­gram: 300 Punk, Alt & Indie Artists

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

How Leonard Cohen & David Bowie Faced Death Through Their Art: A Look at Their Final Albums

When Leonard Cohen released You Want it Dark­er in late 2016, some sus­pect­ed that it would be his last album. When the 82-year-old singer-song­writer died nine­teen days lat­er, it felt like a reprise of David Bowie’s pas­sage from this mor­tal coil at the begin­ning of that year in which we lost so many impor­tant musi­cians: just two days after the release of his album Black­star, Bowie shocked the world by dying of an ill­ness he’d cho­sen not to make pub­lic. Both Cohen and Bowie’s fans imme­di­ate­ly dou­bled down their scruti­ny of what turned out to be their final works, find­ing in both of them artis­tic inter­pre­ta­tions of the con­fronta­tion with death.

The title track of You Want It Dark­er, says the nar­ra­tor of the Poly­phon­ic video essay above, “is not just any song, but the cul­mi­na­tion of many med­i­ta­tions on Cohen’s own mor­tal­i­ty. The result is a haunt­ing­ly accusato­ry song towards his own god.”

This analy­sis focus­es on lines, deliv­ered by Cohen’s grav­e­li­er-than-ever singing voice, like “If you are the deal­er, I’m out of the game / If you are the heal­er, that means I’m bro­ken and lame” and “If thine is the glo­ry, then mine must be the shame / You want it dark­er, we kill the flame.” Cohen also uses phras­es tak­en from a Jew­ish mourn­er’s prayer as a way of “fac­ing up to his god and sub­mit­ting.”

The non-reli­gious Bowie took a dif­fer­ent tack. “Just take a look at Bowie’s cos­tume,” says the essay’s nar­ra­tor. “He’s ban­daged, frail, and mani­a­cal in the ‘Black­star’ video. While the ban­dage serves to rep­re­sent wounds, it can also be tak­en as a blind­fold,” his­tor­i­cal­ly “worn by those con­demned to exe­cu­tion.” Using Chris­t­ian imagery, Bowie frames his song “in the post-par­adise world of mor­tal life,” in a sense ref­er­enc­ing what Cohen once described as “our blood myth,” the cru­ci­fix­ion. And so Bowie’s song “is using our cul­tur­al vocab­u­lary to explore our rela­tion­ship with death.” And yet, “in the midst of this dark song, Bowie offers opti­mism” in the form of the tit­u­lar Black­star, a “new­ly inspired being” that emerges from death.

“While mankind can’t cheat death, we can still find immor­tal­i­ty in the way peo­ple remem­ber us, the lega­cy that they car­ry on.” And despite rec­og­niz­ing their basic human­i­ty, many of us car­ri­ers of the lega­cy still strug­gle to process the deaths of high-pro­file, sui gener­is per­form­ing artists. Maybe it has to do with their sta­tus as icons, and icons, strict­ly speak­ing, can’t die — but nor can they live. Leonard Cohen and David Bowie, the men, may have fin­ished their days, and what days they were, but Leonard Cohen and David Bowie, the cul­tur­al phe­nom­e­na, will sure­ly out­last us all.

You can lis­ten to Cohen and Bowie’s final albums above. If you need Spo­ti­fy’s free soft­ware, get it here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Leonard Cohen Has Passed at Age 82: His New and Now Final Album Is Stream­ing Free Online

Hear Leonard Cohen’s Final Inter­view: Record­ed by David Rem­nick of The New York­er

Say Good­bye to Leonard Cohen Through Some of His Best-Loved Songs: “Hal­lelu­jah,” “Suzanne” and 235 Oth­er Tracks

David Bowie Sings “Changes” in His Last Live Per­for­mance, 2006

Dave: The Best Trib­ute to David Bowie That You’re Going to See

Death: A Free Phi­los­o­phy Course from Yale

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on the book The State­less City: a Walk through 21st-Cen­tu­ry Los Ange­les, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Watch “The Woodswimmer,” a Stop Motion Film Made Entirely with Wood, and “Brutally Tedious” Techniques

Above you can watch “The Woodswim­mer,” a new stop-motion music video shot by Brett Foxwell. As Foxwell describes it, the film was shot with “a straight­for­ward tech­nique but one which is bru­tal­ly tedious to com­plete.”  Elab­o­rat­ing, he told the web­site This is Colos­sal, “Fas­ci­nat­ed with the shapes and tex­tures found in both new­ly-cut and long-dead pieces of wood, I envi­sioned a world com­posed entire­ly of these forms.”  “As I began to engage with the mate­r­i­al, I con­ceived a method using a milling machine and an ani­ma­tion cam­era set­up to scan through a wood sam­ple pho­to­graph­i­cal­ly and cap­ture its entire struc­ture. Although a dif­fi­cult and tedious tech­nique to refine, it yield­ed gor­geous imagery at once abstract and very real. Between the twist­ing growth rings, swirling rays, knot holes, ter­mites and rot, I found there is a lot going on inside of wood.”

Final­ly, Foxwell notes on his per­son­al web­site: “As a short film began to build from [the filmed sequences], I col­lab­o­rat­ed with bed­times, an ani­ma­tor and musi­cian of spe­cial tal­ents to write a song and help edit a tight visu­al and son­ic jour­ney through this won­drous and fas­ci­nat­ing mate­r­i­al. WoodSwim­mer is the result.”

Watch it, in all of its glo­ry, above.

via This is Colos­sal

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The His­to­ry of Stop-Motion Films: 39 Films, Span­ning 116 Years, Revis­it­ed in a 3‑Minute Video

Watch The Amaz­ing 1912 Ani­ma­tion of Stop-Motion Pio­neer Ladis­las Stare­vich, Star­ring Dead Bugs

Mes­mer­iz­ing GIFs Illus­trate the Art of Tra­di­tion­al Japan­ese Wood Join­ery — All Done With­out Screws, Nails, or Glue

Watch Japan­ese Wood­work­ing Mas­ters Cre­ate Ele­gant & Elab­o­rate Geo­met­ric Pat­terns with Wood

89 Essential Songs from The Summer of Love: A 50th Anniversary Playlist

Image by Bryan Costales, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

The Sum­mer of Love was not just a sea­son of great music and the zenith of the flower child, but the cul­mi­na­tion of a move­ment that start­ed back on a chill­i­er Bay Area day, on Jan­u­ary 14, 1967. That was the month of the Human Be-In, and what must have looked like a full on inva­sion of the coun­ter­cul­ture into Gold­en Gate Park. The back­drop of this out­pour­ing of good vibra­tions was any­thing but lov­ing: Viet­nam, inner city riots, Civ­il Rights, and a huge gen­er­a­tion gap. The crowd size was esti­mat­ed at 100,000, and every­body there sud­den­ly real­ized they weren’t alone. They were a force.

Joel Selvin, inter­viewed by Michael Kras­ny for this KQED seg­ment on the Sum­mer of Love (lis­ten here), says that the real Sum­mer of Love for San Fran­cis­cans at least, hap­pened in 1966, when it was a local secret. One year lat­er, the hip­pie move­ment had become main­stream. And that’s when every band on both sides of the Atlantic had turned on to the zeit­geist, and the gates of psy­che­del­ic music opened up.

Today, we have a playlist of 89 songs to com­mem­o­rate the 50th anniver­sary of that his­toric sum­mer. (Down­load Spo­ti­fy’s free soft­ware here, if you need it.) If you are com­ing to this as a music fan, but not some­body who lived through that era, you might think you know all the songs from that peri­od, hav­ing had them ham­mered into your brain over the years from the ubiq­ui­tous hits of clas­sic rock radio, and nos­tal­gic movies.

There are of course the stone cold clas­sics from 1967, with not one but two Bea­t­les releas­es, includ­ing the icon­ic Sgt. Pep­per album; the best two songs from Jef­fer­son Air­plane; Pro­col Harum’s “A Whiter Shade of Pale”; the Who’s best psy­che­del­ic song “I Can See for Miles”; Jimi Hendrix’s “Are You Expe­ri­enced?” and “Hey Joe”; the Rolling Stones’ move into cham­ber pop with “Ruby Tues­day” and their own trip­py “She’s a Rain­bow” and “We Love You”—the last time they ever felt lovey dovey about any­thing; and the first releas­es by the Doors.

Soul and R’n’B was also at the height of its mid-60s pow­er, with Aretha Franklin’s “Respect,” James Brown’s “Cold Sweat,” Mar­vin Gaye and Tam­mi Terrell’s “Ain’t No Moun­tain High Enough”, and Sam and Dave’s “Soul Man” infect­ing the charts.

“We were rid­ing the crest of a high and beau­ti­ful wave,” is how Hunter S. Thomp­son famous­ly put it in Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, and this playlist might just con­vince you of that con­sid­er­ing how music seemed to frac­ture so soon after—even the Bea­t­les would be deliv­er­ing that strange and some­times fright­en­ing trip of a White Album a year lat­er. Viet­nam would con­tin­ue to drag on, and the decade’s metaphor­i­cal end at Alta­mont was loom­ing on the hori­zon, not that many could see it. (By the way, Joel Selvin just wrote a very good book on that dark, decade-end­ing con­cert.)

Enjoy the playlist and argue over what’s miss­ing in the com­ments. (No “Water­loo Sun­set”? “I Sec­ond That Emo­tion”? “Glo­ria”? Hmmph!)

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Rare Footage of the “Human Be-In,” the Land­mark Counter-Cul­ture Event Held in Gold­en Gate Park, 1967

Jimi Hen­drix Opens for The Mon­kees on a 1967 Tour; Then After 8 Shows, Flips Off the Crowd and Quits

Paul McCart­ney Admits to Drop­ping Acid in a Scrap­py Inter­view with a Pry­ing Reporter (June, 1967)

Ted Mills is a free­lance writer on the arts who cur­rent­ly hosts the FunkZone Pod­cast. You can also fol­low him on Twit­ter at @tedmills, read his oth­er arts writ­ing at tedmills.com and/or watch his films here.

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.