Hayao Miyazaki Meets Akira Kurosawa: Watch the Titans of Japanese Film in Conversation (1993)

Note: Please scroll to the 6:52 mark where the con­ver­sa­tion begins.

The name Miyaza­ki defines Japan­ese ani­ma­tion not just in its own coun­try, but across the world. The name Kuro­sawa does the same for the rest of Japan­ese cin­e­ma. But giv­en their dif­fer­ences of not just spe­cif­ic art form but of gen­er­a­tion (Aki­ra Kuro­sawa was born in 1910, Hayao Miyaza­ki in 1941), one might won­der whether the men them­selves, were they to meet, would have much to talk about. Nip­pon TV put the idea to the test in 1993 by air­ing Miyaza­ki Meets Kuro­sawa, which sends the already renowned ani­ma­tor, whose sixth film Por­co Rosso had come out the pre­vi­ous year, to the home of the long-reign­ing “Emper­or” of Japan­ese film, whose thir­ti­eth and final film Mada­dayo (a title trans­lat­able as Not Yet!) had come out the pre­vi­ous month. Their con­ver­sa­tion starts at the 6:52 mark above.

After a bit of small talk, most­ly about the mag­nif­i­cent view of Mount Fuji from Kuro­sawa’s front porch, the mas­ters get down to shop talk. Kuro­sawa and Miyaza­ki dis­cuss the dif­fi­cul­ty of speak­ing about one’s own work, the sweet taste of sake at the end of a long shoot, the pain of sit­ting at a desk draw­ing day in and day out, what it took to build a slop­ing street for Mada­dayo or an entire cas­tle for Ran (just to burn it down), how to visu­al­ly and son­i­cal­ly evoke the var­i­ous dif­fer­ent eras of Japan­ese his­to­ry, Miyaza­k­i’s appre­ci­a­tion for Kuro­sawa’s sto­ry­boards, and Kuro­sawa’s appre­ci­a­tion for the cat bus in Miyaza­k­i’s My Neigh­bor Totoro — at which point the trans­lat­ed tran­script at fan site nausicaa.net indi­cates that “Miyaza­ki seems to be at a loss for words.” (You can read the tran­script at the bot­tom of the post.)

Though Japan­ese tra­di­tion, to say noth­ing of the cus­toms of one ded­i­cat­ed artist speak­ing to anoth­er, dic­tates that Miyaza­ki dis­play a cer­tain def­er­ence to Kuro­sawa (an atti­tude cer­tain­ly vis­i­ble in the seg­ments of the broad­cast avail­able on Youtube), the two have plen­ty of insight to offer one anoth­er. And how­ev­er dif­fer­ent their films, they all emerged from the same spir­it of painstak­ing ded­i­ca­tion. “If you let things slide think­ing ‘well, this won’t be in view of the cam­era,’ ” Kuro­sawa warns, “then there’s no end to how lazy you can get. You either give it your all, or don’t even both­er.”

Miyaza­ki, who has since risen to a Kuro­sawa-like promi­nence of his own, offers this clos­ing reflec­tion on his first meet­ing with the direc­tor of the likes of RashomonSev­en Samu­rai, and Ikiru: “Whether a work is a mas­ter­piece or… some­thing more mod­est, I real­ized that they all orig­i­nate at the same place — an envi­ron­ment where peo­ple are con­stant­ly think­ing and rethink­ing their own ideas,” rather than wait­ing around for inspi­ra­tion. Instead, they adopt the atti­tude of, “ ‘Regard­less of what they think… or whether or not they like the way I do things, I’m gonna do what has to be done!’ That’s what’s impor­tant.”

A big hat tip goes to Adri­an.

Tran­script, trans­lat­ed by Yuto Shi­na­gawa.

KUROSAWA — One of the set­tings for our movie — the “Oichi­ni [ah one two]” drug sales­man scene — if you recall, is a rec­tan­gu­lar room. What we’d do is use three cam­eras, all on one side of the room to film every­thing from start to fin­ish… after which we’d move the them to anoth­er side of the room, switch out the lens­es, and film the scene over. We’d do this three times…from all four direc­tions. So in the end, there’d be 36 cuts that we had to look through dur­ing editing…just for one scene.

MIYAZAKI — That’s what bog­gles my mind. How do you pick which cuts to use?

KUROSAWA — Pret­ty much on a first come first serve basis for me.

MIYAZAKI — Is that so?

KUROSAWA — You just skim through them real­ly quick…“toss…keep…toss,” so that all you have to do in the end is just string togeth­er what’s left. That’s all there is to it.

MIYAZAKI — Well yes, but…[Laughs]

KUROSAWA — So we might have one seg­ment that seems like it’s going to be a big hassle…perhaps take days to film…but ends up tak­ing only half a day — from morn­ing to 3 o’clock lat­er that day. The same goes with edit­ing — we’d be expect­ing a big mess, when in fact, we’d be fin­ished by 3 o’clock the same day, only to have every­one go, “what?!”

[Shows clip from Maada­dayo]

KUROSAWA — Bat­tle scenes too. When the cav­al­ry makes a charge or something…we film it three times with three dif­fer­ent cam­eras, each time with dif­fer­ent lens­es. So in the end, we’ll have 9 cuts, and all you have to do is string togeth­er the good ones. It’s not that hard. Aside from that…when some­one falls off a horse…gets shot and falls of a horse… we’ll do a spe­cial take after­wards for those types of scenes. And all you have to do is throw that clip in at the right moment, and that’s it. [Pause] And…if you run out of cuts, just flip the film over…

[Takes a while to get it; Big Laugh]

KUROSAWA — Yeah, just flip it over and now the guy is run­ning from that side to this side. Hey, you’ll nev­er notice the dif­fer­ence.

MIYAZAKI — [Laugh­ing] Even if they’re car­ry­ing their swords on the wrong side? [Usu­al­ly, the left so they can draw it with their right hand]

KUROSAWA — No you won’t notice…because…it’s only when the guy falls off the horse. It’s real­ly absurd if you’re pay­ing close attention…with the sword on the wrong side and all. You should notice it, but…well…[Pause] you just don’t.

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — You know how Mifu­ne’s fight scenes are real­ly intense. Well one time, we were edit­ing one of those scenes and had to stop the reel because some­one came in to ask a ques­tion. And that’s when I hap­pened to look down at the film and notice that… he’s not vis­i­ble on the film itself.

MIYAZAKI — Huh…

KUROSAWA — He’s noth­ing but a blur on each of those frames…and you can’t real­ly see his face either. Only when you play back the film do you actu­al­ly see Mifu­ne in com­bat. That’s how fast he’s mov­ing. That’s why those fight scenes are so intense. Also, when you spend a lot of time edit­ing those scenes, you get the impres­sion that it’s going to be very lengthy, but no…it’s real­ly real­ly short. I’d say the film itself is about 20 feet…no more than 20 feet. Even then, I feel as though I’ve seen plen­ty, and that’s because I’m so ner­vous­ly focused onto the screen.

MIYAZAKI — [Say’s some­thing about the audi­ence’s per­cep­tion, but I’m not sure what he meant]

KUROSAWA — Right, right.

[Shows clip from Tsub­a­ki San­juro (1962)]

MIYAZAKI — Do you make these [sto­ry­board] draw­ings after you fin­ish writ­ing the script?

KUROSAWA — Most of them, yes…but there are a few that I draw while I’m still writ­ing the script. I’ll some­times come across old sketch­es on the back of an enve­lope or some­thing.

MIYAZAKI — [Look­ing at the draw­ings] Real­ly good.

KUROSAWA — Huh?

MIYAZAKI — You’re real­ly good

KUROSAWA — Huh?

MIYAZAKI — You are real­ly good [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — Nawww, I real­ly don’t think…

MIYAZAKI — You don’t think so? I…

KUROSAWA — Well the fun­ny thing is… I was sup­posed to be an artist when I was young. My dream was Paris — to open my own art shop. Mr. Ume­hara would always walk up and com­pli­ment my draw­ings when­ev­er I’d be paint­ing out­side. It was with his and Mr. Cardin’s sup­port that I even­tu­al­ly got the chance to put some of my draw­ings on dis­play at an art exhi­bi­tion over­seas. And to my sur­prise, I was lat­er invit­ed to give a talk at the Lou­vre Muse­um. “But sir, I’m not an artist!” was my response. So odd­ly enough…my dreams did come true.

MIYAZAKI — It sure did!

KUROSAWA — “Your style is real­ly inter­est­ing,” is what Mr. Ume­hara used to always say, and we won­dered why. Well, after much dis­cus­sion, we fig­ured out it’s because they [the paint­ings] aren’t intend­ed to be very high qual­i­ty paint­ings when I draw them. They’re just meant to give my staff a feel­ing for the scene, and noth­ing more, so they tend to be a lit­tle reck­less in style. There might be some that are draw sen­si­bly. It depends; I’ll draw with what­ev­er I have on me at that moment.

MIYAZAKI — [Flip­ping through more draw­ings] From the sound of your sto­ries, the live-action busi­ness sounds like a lot of fun.

KUROSAWA — Huh?

MIYAZAKI — Live-action sounds like a lot of fun. [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — It sure is. For exam­ple, if there’s going to be a film shoot the next day, I want to get out there as ear­ly as pos­si­ble. Though, my assis­tants prob­a­bly don’t like it when I come in ear­ly because they’d rather not have to deal with me. For them, a good day is one where I take my time com­ing into work. So a lot of the time, you’ll find me wait­ing impa­tient­ly at home.

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — Every­one has a lot of fun, real­ly. I always tell my peo­ple, “no mat­ter how gru­el­ing things may be at first, you’ll even­tu­al­ly start to enjoy it if you just keep at it. Once you reach that state, you’ll be putting in a lot of effort with­out evening know­ing it.” And it’s true. I might say “ok, that’s good enough,” but their response will be “just a second…one more thing” They’re that immersed in their work. Con­verse­ly, if you let things slide think­ing “well, this won’t be in view of the cam­era,” then there’s no end to how lazy you can get. You either give it your all, or don’t even both­er.

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — And some­times, ridicu­lous things hap­pen because of it. If you recall Hachi-gat­su no Rapu­so­di [Rhap­sody in August, 1991], there’s a field across the house. Well, long before any film­ing takes place, the first thing we do is ask the local farm­ers to plant the appro­pri­ate crops in each of the fields. You know, “pump­kin fields here…” and so forth. All this so that by the time we come back, all the crops will be ful­ly grown. You just can’t plant these things at the last moment and expect them to look nat­ur­al. Well one time, I look down on what was sup­posed to be a pump­kin patch and “wait a minute, these are gourds!”

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs] Mixed up the seeds did they?

KUROSAWA — “I told you, the gourd goes here on this shelf in the kitchen. The field out there is sup­posed to be pump­kin!” But in the end, we fig­ured that it would all get cov­ered with leaves, and that you would­n’t be able to tell the dif­fer­ence any­way. Peo­ple got the idea to claim their own gourd by writ­ing their name on it, so they could take one home after­wards, and make them into orna­ments or what­ev­er. They all grew up to be pret­ty big. So yeah, we had a big laugh over that — “what kind of fool plants gourds in a field?”

MIYAZAKI — When you’re recruit­ing your staff for a movie, do you just announce it and have peo­ple flock to you?

KUROSAWA — No… in my case, most of my staff mem­bers are peo­ple that I’ve worked with for a very long time. When I announce a new movie, it’s the usu­al gang that rush­es in to help. Oth­er­wise, I don’t think it would go so smooth­ly. “Man, have you lost a lot of hair.” That’s how long I’ve known some of the peo­ple. Like Takao Saito, our cam­era­man who I just refer to as Taka-bou (lit­tle Taka)…he’s already six­ty. It’s just that I’ve known him from when he was that lit­tle, and the name stuck through all these years.

MIYAZAKI — And the cam­era­man’s assistant…Taka-bou-san gets to pick?

KUROSAWA — Yes, he makes those deci­sions. So every­one works their way up the ranks. In that sense, peo­ple will gath­er around if I holler. You know, “we’re gonna start film­ing in how­ev­er many hours so have every­thing ready to go by then.” I’m pret­ty metic­u­lous when it comes to plan­ning and prepa­ra­tion, so I tend to spend more time than most. If the film­ing does­n’t go smooth­ly, it’s usu­al­ly because you did­n’t spend enough time get­ting every­thing ready. You do your home­work, and every­thing goes smooth­ly.

MIYAZAKI — In the old days when movie stu­dios were in much bet­ter shape, we could afford to put up a fight against movie com­pa­nies. That is, even if we went over-budget…even if we did­n’t get along at all, we could still man­age to squeeze the fund­ing out of them to make movies.

KUROSAWA — That was exact­ly what hap­pened when we were work­ing on Sev­en Samu­rai. It was tak­ing a whole lot longer than it was sup­posed to. So much so that we were expect­ing them to cut us off at any moment. In fact, we had­n’t filmed a sin­gle scene from the last bat­tle because of it. And just as we expect­ed, we had a few vis­i­tors come in from Toho: “We’d like to see what you have so far.” “But sir, we haven’t filmed the most impor­tant part of the movie.” “I don’t care; just show us what you have.” “Sir, it’s already Feb­ru­ary. If it starts snow­ing now, we’ll be in big trou­ble when it comes to film­ing the rest of the movie. Are you sure about this?” “Yes, let’s see it.” So we spent an entire week edit­ing what we had of the film so far. And we showed it to them, up towards the end, where Kikuchiyo runs up the roof where the flag is…you know, “ta ta ta tee ta ta ta…[flutter] [flut­ter]” right? “[Points] There they come there they come!” and then…blank, goes the screen.

MIYAZAKI — [Laugh­ing]

KUROSAWA — “[With a con­fused and impa­tient look] so what hap­pens next…?” “We told you, we don’t have a sin­gle scene filmed for the rest of the movie.” So they all gath­ered around…mumbled some­thing and then came back to us and said “Go ahead, film what­ev­er you need…please.”

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — And that’s when it start­ed snow­ing. We all yelled, “Told you so! That’s what you get!” and then pro­ceed­ed to have big binge back at my place lat­er that night.

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — As luck would have it, it snowed pret­ty heav­i­ly that night. We had to bring in the fire depart­ment and spend an entire week melt­ing all that snow. Melt­ing the snow over an area that used to be rice pad­dies to begin with… the muck was unbe­liev­able. That might be part of the rea­son why those scenes were so dynam­ic.

MIYAZAKI — Indeed! [Laughs]

[Shows clip from Sev­en Samu­rai]

KUROSAWA — You know, I real­ly liked that bus in Totoro.

MIYAZAKI — [Glee­ful­ly] Thank you.

[Miyaza­ki seems to be at a loss for words here]

KUROSAWA — Those are the kinds of things that peo­ple like me in this busi­ness can’t do, and that’s some­thing I’m real­ly envi­ous about.

MIYAZAKI — The thing is, I grew up in the city… in a time right after the war…when my only per­cep­tion of Japan was that it was an impov­er­ished and piti­ful­ly hope­less coun­try. [Laughs]. At least that’s what we were always told. It was only after I went over­seas for the first time that I start­ed appre­ci­at­ing Japan’s nat­ur­al envi­ron­ment. That being the case, it’s fun­ny that I keep want­i­ng to make movies with a for­eign [western/European] set­ting. I made Totoro because I felt the need to make a movie that takes place in Japan.

[Shows the Mei-bound Cat­bus scene from Tonari no Totoro (1988)]

MIYAZAKI — Late­ly, I’ve been want­i­ng to make a Jidai-geki [peri­od dra­mas]. Man is it hard! I don’t even know what to do!

KUROSAWA — What I think is real­ly inter­est­ing about the Sen­goku-era [1467–1567] is that…it’s per­ceived to be a time when, for exam­ple, one had to be loy­al to his lord and obey sim­i­lar moral and eth­i­cal codes. But in actu­al­i­ty, those only came into exis­tence dur­ing the Toku­gawa Shogu­nate [Edo-era; approx­i­mate­ly 1603–1867] as an attempt to main­tain some degree of order [and peace for the Toku­gawa fam­i­ly]. The Sen­goku-era, on the oth­er hand, was quite the oppo­site — peo­ple had a lot of free­dom then.

[The word KUROSAWA — uses next is ambigu­ous; “shu­jin” can either mean man of the house (hus­band) or land­lord; below are two plau­si­ble trans­la­tions based on these two dif­fer­ent def­i­n­i­tions]

KUROSAWA — (first trans­la­tion): “This hus­band of mine…he’s no good.” If that’s what she thought, then she would’ve, you know… [walked out on him]…without so much as a sec­ond thought.

KUROSAWA — (sec­ond trans­la­tion): “Our landlord…he’s no good.” If that’s what they thought, then they would’ve, you know…[revolted]…without so much as a sec­ond thought.

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — And that’s the kind of envi­ron­ment that spawned peo­ple like Hideyoshi [1536–1598]. They’re free-thinkers. “You must be loy­al to your hus­band” — that was­n’t the case then. If he was­n’t wor­thy, then you could just aban­don him. That’s what it was like. I think it would be real­ly inter­est­ing if you could por­tray that.

MIYAZAKI — Hmm…

KUROSAWA — Shake­speare might be unique­ly British, but actually…Japan did have peo­ple like Mac­beth dur­ing that era. You’d be sur­prised how eas­i­ly you could make a Japan­ese sto­ry that par­al­lels some­thing out of Shake­speare. Yeah, why don’t you do a Japan­ese Shake­speare­an Jidai-geki? There are a lot of good sto­ries.

MIYAZAKI — [Pause, per­plexed laugh]

KUROSAWA — Yeah?

MIYAZAKI — Well, let’s start with what they ate…what they wore.

KUROSAWA — We do have records of those…like menus

MIYAZAKI — What about the Muro­machi-era [encom­pass­es the Sen­goku-era, also known as the Ashik­a­ga-era; 1333–1573]

KUROSAWA — Muro­machi is…a good peri­od.

MIYAZAKI — It gets a lit­tle fuzzy in the Nan­boku-cho [ear­ly years; 1336–1392]. That and the Tai­hei­ki [col­lec­tion of war tales]…everything becomes a big mess.

KUROSAWA — Yeah, it gets more dif­fi­cult the fur­ther back you go. If it’s the Tale of the Heike [Part of the Tai­hei­ki], then we have good records of those.

MIYAZAKI — The utter dev­as­ta­tion of Kyoto towards the end of the Heian-era [794‑1185], as depict­ed in the Hou­jou­ki [Tale of the Ten-Foot Square Hut] — earth­quakes, great fires, dead bod­ies everywhere…rushing back from Fukuhara [mod­ern day Kobe area] only to find your estate in com­plete ruins…

KUROSAWA — You mean Rashomon’s time peri­od. That’s inter­est­ing too.

MIYAZAKI — Watch­ing it as a kid, I remem­ber it being a real­ly scary movie! [Laughs]. For me, the movies that stay on my mind aren’t the uplift­ing ones, but rather the ones that depict the real­i­ties of sur­vival.

KUROSAWA — Aku­ta­gawa-san has a lot of nov­els [aside from Rashomon] that depict that time peri­od. Remem­ber that the Rashomon writ­ten by him is com­plete­ly dif­fer­ent from Yabu no Naka [from which the movie was orig­i­nal­ly adapt­ed] — remem­ber the old lady upstairs who’s steal­ing the hair from the corpse?

MIYAZAKI — Right, right.

MIYAZAKI — It seems as if movies these days don’t deal with as wide of a time frame as they used to.

KUROSAWA — Yes, and that’s because…well first of all, even if you want­ed to make a movie of that era, you’d have a lot of trou­ble find­ing a good film­ing loca­tion.

MIYAZAKI — That’s very true. Pow­er lines every­where! [Laughs].

KUROSAWA — Places like the Ikaru­ga no Miya Palace [7th cen­tu­ry] were built in the mid­dle of a cedar for­est. Those trees were huge [Ges­tures] and that’s why they could man­age to build such a wood­en struc­ture. Nowa­days, there’s not a sin­gle one left! That’s how much things have changed.

MIYAZAKI — [Nod­ding] Yes…yes.

KUROSAWA — For Maada­dayo (1993), we had access to many of the clothes from that era [1940s]…like suites. But if you and I try to wear them, they won’t fit at all; we’ve got­ten big­ger.

MIYAZAKI — Oh I see.

KUROSAWA — But if you look at the armor from the Bat­tle of Oke­haza­ma [1560], or some­thing, they’re notice­ably big­ger. Clothes from the Sen­goku-era are big.

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs] Are you say­ing that we got small­er dur­ing the Edo-era [1603–1867]?

KUROSAWA — [Nod] Our physique undoubt­ed­ly dete­ri­o­rat­ed dur­ing the 300 years under Toku­gawa. At first, I did­n’t think such a dras­tic change was rea­son­able, or even pos­si­ble. But when you look at the clothes from the ear­ly Showa-era [pre WWII] and com­pare it to those of today…in just 40 years, look at how much we’ve changed. They just don’t fit!

MIYAZAKI — [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — So we had to find fab­ric that matched the orig­i­nal and tai­lor new ones based on that. It was a big has­sle.

MIYAZAKI — When it comes to mak­ing a Jidai-geki, I just keep run­ning in circles…and nev­er actu­al­ly come close to real­iz­ing that goal. Peo­ple ask, “so what’s your next project?” to which I’ll respond, “Jidai-geki!” I’ve been say­ing that for the past 10 years! [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — In Sev­en Samu­rai, we were orig­i­nal­ly going to chron­i­cle the every­day life of a par­tic­u­lar samu­rai. And as you men­tioned earlier…he’ll wake up in the morn­ing, eat some­thing for break­fast, per­haps go to the Edo Castle…but what exact­ly would he do there, and what would he do for lunch? We don’t know any of the details. There’s no way we can write a script like that.

MIYAZAKI — Right…right.

KUROSAWA — It’s actu­al­ly eas­i­er to find ear­li­er writ­ten records than it is to find those of the Edo-era. We did a lot of research, and that’s when we came across an account of a vil­lage hir­ing samu­rais to become the only vil­lage spared from rebel attacks. “Hey, let’s do this.” And that’s how it start­ed. Of course, once we got to work on it, we just let our imag­i­na­tion run wild. Our pro­duc­er asked, “what about the title?” and I said, “well, it’s about sev­en samurai…hey, that’s per­fect!” “We’re going with this, no mat­ter what!”

MIYAZAKI — That’s true! Movies that don’t have a fit­ting title are no good. [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — That’s very true. Although… we had a lot of trou­ble nam­ing this one [Maada­dayo].

MIYAZAKI — Oh real­ly? [Laughs]

KUROSAWA — They were all too awk­ward sound­ing. Every day, I’d rack my brain over a title to the point where one day, I just blurt­ed out “Maada­dayo! [Not yet!]” My son said “hey, that works!” so we knew it was a keep­er.

[Shows clip from Maada­dayo]

[End chat]

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Aki­ra Kuro­sawa & Gabriel Gar­cía Márquez Talk About Film­mak­ing (and Nuclear Bombs) in Six Hour Inter­view

Aki­ra Kurosawa’s Advice to Aspir­ing Film­mak­ers: Write, Write, Write and Read

When Aki­ra Kuro­sawa Watched Solaris with Andrei Tarkovsky: I Was “Very Hap­py to Find Myself Liv­ing on Earth”

Watch Moe­bius and Miyaza­ki, Two of the Most Imag­i­na­tive Artists, in Con­ver­sa­tion (2004)

Watch Hayao Miyaza­ki Ani­mate the Final Shot of His Final Fea­ture Film, The Wind Ris­es

How to Make Instant Ramen Com­pli­ments of Japan­ese Ani­ma­tion Direc­tor Hayao Miyaza­ki

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Watch Wagner’s Ring Cycle: A Complete 15-Hour Performance Is Now Free Online Thanks to the BBC

The word “Wag­ner­ian” as a syn­onym for oper­at­ic bom­bast may have fall­en out of favor in recent years, as has the rep­u­ta­tion of Ger­man com­pos­er Richard Wag­n­er. He has been regard­ed as “the most repug­nant of musi­cal nation­al­ists,” writes David P. Gold­man at Tablet—a sen­ti­ment wide­ly shared giv­en Wagner’s per­ma­nent asso­ci­a­tion with Nazism. His music has long been banned in Israel, though “every so often a promi­nent musi­cian makes a point of sneak­ing Wag­n­er into a pub­lic con­cert.” And just as phi­los­o­phy depart­ments across the world have strug­gled with Mar­tin Heidegger’s Nazism, so the clas­si­cal music and opera worlds have wres­tled with Wag­n­er.

What’s odd, how­ev­er, in this case, is that Wag­n­er died in 1883. He tow­ered over 19th-cen­tu­ry Ger­man cul­ture, a con­tem­po­rary of Niet­zsche rather than Hitler, who claimed him after the composer’s death.

Yet those who know the sto­ry of Wag­n­er’s tur­bu­lent friend­ship with Niet­zsche know that the philoso­pher vio­lent­ly reject­ed his for­mer idol and father fig­ure in part because, as Robert Hol­ub argues, Niet­zsche “was unequiv­o­cal­ly antag­o­nis­tic toward what he under­stood as anti-Semi­tism and anti-Semi­tes.” Niet­zsche saw the writ­ing on the wall in views Wag­n­er expressed in essays like 1850’s “Judaism in Music.”

Wagner—musicologists and his­to­ri­ans would say—also saw the future, and helped design it through his unwit­ting posthu­mous influ­ence on Hitler. The com­poser’s famed the­o­ry and prac­tice of what he called Gesamtkunst­werk, the “total work of art,” antic­i­pate the mas­sive spec­ta­cles of 20th cen­tu­ry total­i­tar­i­an aes­thet­ics and the mytho­log­i­cal dimen­sions of 20th cen­tu­ry fas­cism. Wag­n­er called his work the “Music of the Future,” hap­pi­ly appro­pri­at­ing a term crit­ics used to deride his Roman­tic nation­al­ism. But Wagner’s cul­tur­al influ­ence is much, much broad­er than its most damn­ing asso­ci­a­tion, includ­ing his for­ma­tive influ­ence on Niet­zsche.

Wagner’s great­est achieve­ment, Der Ring des Nibelun­gen—referred to as the Ring Cycle—inspired J.R.R. Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings and scored the “Ride of the Valkyries” scene in Apoc­a­lypse Now. Loony Tunes’ “Kill the Wab­bit” spoofed the Ring Cycle, and became an entire generation’s “first, and often only expo­sure to opera,” as Ayun Hal­l­i­day not­ed here recent­ly. The Ring Cycle’s over­whelm­ing demon­stra­tion of the Gesamtkunst­werk is a thing to behold, and you can see it here per­formed in full, all four parts, “15 hours of epic opera” cour­tesy of BBC Arts and The Space. The film here, by Opera North, comes from live per­for­mances in Leeds in 2016. At the top, see Das Rhein­gold, below it Die Walküre, just above Siegfried, and below Göt­ter­däm­merung (“Twi­light of the Gods”).

So what should we make of Wagner’s music, giv­en its unavoid­able rela­tion­ship to wars of dom­i­na­tion (against even “Wab­bits”)? If we are to heed some of his crit­ics, we might think of him as a 19th cen­tu­ry Michael Bay. Mark Twain is rumored to have called Wagner’s music “bet­ter than it sounds”—though it turns out the quote actu­al­ly comes from humorist Edgar Wil­son. Twain did write that he enjoyed “the first act of every­thing Wag­n­er cre­at­ed,” but “after two acts I have gone away phys­i­cal­ly exhaust­ed.” Samuel Beck­ett, in a gem of a para­graph, called Wagner’s work “clouds on wheels.” But Wag­n­er is also incred­i­bly pow­er­ful and often sub­lime, and his music does inspire the kind of awe that Tolkien and Fran­cis Ford Cop­po­la drew on for their own awe-inspir­ing work.

< Appre­ci­at­ing Wag­n­er may indeed be an endurance exer­cise. His boom­ing tales of dwarfs and giants, gods and riv­er-maid­ens, heroes and, yes, Valkyries, can seem to rum­ble along sev­er­al miles above us. The exer­cise is not for the faint of heart. How­ev­er, the tech­nol­o­gy of stream­ing video can save us from Twain’s fate—you can return here, or to the BBC’s site—as many times as you like with­out hav­ing to take in the mas­sive Der Ring des Nibelun­gen all in one sit­ting. And as is always help­ful in opera of any length, you can peruse summaries—like this one—when you feel a bit lost in the clouds. Or, for a tru­ly sur­re­al con­densed Wag­ner­ian expe­ri­ence, watch the video above of “four and a half hours of opera in one minute.”

Relat­ed Con­tent:  

New Web Site, “The Opera Plat­form,” Lets You Watch La Travi­a­ta and Oth­er First-Class Operas Free Online

Stephen Fry Hosts “The Sci­ence of Opera,” a Dis­cus­sion of How Music Moves Us Phys­i­cal­ly to Tears

Kill the Wab­bit!: How the 1957 Bugs Bun­ny Car­toon, “What’s Opera, Doc?,” Inspired Today’s Opera Singers to First Get Into Opera

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Duet for French Horn and Chair

Pret­ty clever. Even more bet­ter is the com­ment left by one YouTube user, “I won­der if he’s first chair?” Ha!!

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Musi­cian Lugs a Cel­lo Up a Moun­tain, Then Plays Bach at 10,000 Feet, at the “Top of the World”

Down­load the Com­plete Organ Works of J.S. Bach for Free

The Genius of J.S. Bach’s “Crab Canon” Visu­al­ized on a Möbius Strip

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

A Handy, Detailed Map Shows the Hometowns of Characters in the Iliad

Click here to see a larg­er ver­sion of the map.

You’ve adjust­ed to the strange­ness of names like Ascala­phus and Phidip­pus. You’ve more or less fig­ured out who’s on which side in the ancient war between Greece and Troy. But as lit­er­ary epics will do—from the ancient Greeks and Indi­ans to the 19th cen­tu­ry Rus­sians—Homer’s Ili­ad also presents you with sev­er­al logis­ti­cal puz­zles you must either ignore or spend count­less hours try­ing to solve: you are giv­en the names of major and minor char­ac­ters’ home­towns, rang­ing all over the Adri­at­ic, Ion­ian, Cre­tan, and Aegean Seas. Doubt­less you have no idea where most of these places were.

Again and again, place names occur in rapid suc­ces­sion, and you’re told not only who hails from where, but who com­mands and con­quers which city. Just a smat­ter­ing of exam­ples from Book II (in Samuel But­ler’s trans­la­tion):

Ulysses led the brave Cephal­leni­ans, who held Itha­ca, Ner­i­tum with its forests, Cro­cylea, rugged Aegilips, Samos and Zacyn­thus, with the main­land also that was over against the islands. 

Thoas, son of Andrae­mon, com­mand­ed the Aeto­lians, who dwelt in Pleu­ron, Olenus, Pylene, Chal­cis by the sea, and rocky Caly­don, 

And those that held Pher­ae by the Boe­bean lake, with Boebe, Glaphyrae, and the pop­u­lous city of Iol­cus

“Huh,” you say, “Okay, Homer, I’ll take your word for it.” Ques­tions of his­toric­i­ty aside, we can at least say that the hun­dreds of cities and towns men­tioned in this cul­tur­al­ly for­ma­tive text did exist, or con­tin­ue to do so, though it’s debat­able, as Jason Kot­tke writes, whether “that lev­el of mobil­i­ty was accu­rate for the time [some­where in the 11th or 12th cen­tu­ry BC] or if Homer sim­ply pop­u­lat­ed his poem with folks from all over Greece as a way of mak­ing lis­ten­ers from many areas feel con­nect­ed to the sto­ry.”

In any case, you need not despair of ever mak­ing sense of Homer’s bewil­der­ing geo­graph­i­cal lists. The map above (click here to see it in a larg­er for­mat) hand­i­ly illus­trates the world of the Ili­ad, show­ing the places of ori­gins of a few dozen char­ac­ters, with Greeks in green and Tro­jans in yel­low. Kot­tke notes in an adden­dum to his post that “not every char­ac­ter is rep­re­sent­ed… (par­tic­u­lar­ly the women) and… some of the loca­tions and home­towns are incor­rect.” We would wel­come corrections—as would Wikipedia—if an enter­pris­ing clas­sics schol­ar has the time and ener­gy to devote to such an effort.

But for the lay read­er of Homer’s epic, the map more than suf­fices as help­ful visu­al con­text for a very com­pli­cat­ed nar­ra­tive. One defin­ing fea­ture of a war epic well-told, most crit­ics would say, is that the human dra­ma does not get lost in the scale and scope of the action. More than any oth­er form, the epic illus­trates what Tol­stoy described in War and Peace as the “his­tor­i­cal sense” that our con­flicts are “bound up with the whole course of his­to­ry and pre­or­dained from all eter­ni­ty.” But against this kind of deter­min­ism, the great poets par­tic­u­lar­ize, mak­ing their char­ac­ters seem not like props in a cos­mic dra­ma but like actu­al peo­ple from actu­al places on earth. See­ing the Ili­ad mapped above rein­forces our sense of the Greek epics as genuine—if fantastical—accounts of mean­ing­ful human action in the world.

You can find free ver­sions of the Ili­ad and the Odyssey in our col­lec­tion of Free eBooks and Free Audio Books.

via Kottke.org.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

An Inter­ac­tive Map of Odysseus’ 10-Year Jour­ney in Homer’s Odyssey

Greek Myth Comix Presents Homer’s Ili­ad & Odyssey Using Stick-Man Draw­ings

Hear Homer’s Ili­ad Read in the Orig­i­nal Ancient Greek

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

How Machiavelli Really Thought We Should Use Power: Two Animated Videos Provide an Introduction

Nice guys, so they say, fin­ish last. Many of us might instinc­tive­ly label such a world­view “Machi­avel­lian,” par­tial­ly for good rea­son and par­tial­ly not. It stands as a tes­ta­ment to the insights of the Renais­sance-era Flo­ren­tine polit­i­cal philoso­pher Nic­colò Machi­avel­li, expressed with great clar­i­ty and suc­cinct­ness in his books The Prince and the Dis­cours­es on Livy, not just that his name became an adjec­tive, but that it became one that remains in wide use near­ly 500 years after his death. But like oth­er such terms — “Kafkaesque” and “Orwellian” come to mind — its mod­ern usage tends to come detached from its name­sake writer’s orig­i­nal ideas.

So what did Machi­avel­li actu­al­ly have to say to human­i­ty? “Machi­avel­li’s Advice for Nice Guys,” a new ani­mat­ed video from Alain de Bot­ton’s School of Life, high­lights the core insight of his work: “that the wicked tend to win. And they do so because they have a huge advan­tage over the good: they are will­ing to act with the dark­est inge­nu­ity and cun­ning to fur­ther their cause. They are not held back by those rigid oppo­nents of change: prin­ci­ples.

They will be pre­pared to out­right lie, twist facts, threat­en or get vio­lent. They will also – when the sit­u­a­tion demands it – know how to seduc­tive­ly deceive, use charm and hon­eyed words, bedaz­zle and dis­tract. And in this way, they con­quer the world.”

This line of think­ing, put in such stark terms, can make Machi­avel­li seem like an off­putting­ly harsh (if quite intel­li­gent) char­ac­ter. But his writ­ing is more nuanced: he advo­cates not using flat-out lies and vio­lence to achieve one’s ends, but indeed to be nice — just “nev­er to be over­ly devot­ed to act­ing nice­ly,” an atti­tude he thought the West­’s pop­u­lar read­ings of the sto­ry of Jesus of Nazareth too often advo­cat­ed —  while always know­ing “how to bor­row – when need be – every sin­gle trick employed by the most cyn­i­cal, das­tard­ly, unscrupu­lous and nas­ti­est peo­ple who have ever lived.” Nice guys, in short, have no choice but to learn from their ene­mies.

You can learn more about the some­times har­row­ing expe­ri­ences that taught Machi­avel­li all this in the School of Life’s intro­duc­tion to his polit­i­cal the­o­ry just above. He reck­oned, more mem­o­rably than any oth­er, “the price of deal­ing with the world as it is, and not as we feel it should be. The world has con­tin­ued to love and hate Machi­avel­li in equal mea­sure for insist­ing on this uncom­fort­able truth.” Machi­avel­li, as Salman Rushdie put it in a clip we fea­tured a few years ago, lived in a time when Italy’s rul­ing fam­i­lies behaved “in the most ruth­less way, and he wrote this lit­tle trea­tise about not what he would like things to be like, but how pow­er actu­al­ly works, which he observed.” Rushdie calls the neg­a­tive asso­ci­a­tions with the philoso­pher’s name “a clas­sic case of shoot­ing the mes­sen­ger” — some­thing, alas, even the most good-inten­tioned ruler may find him­self forced to do once in a while.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Salman Rushdie: Machiavelli’s Bad Rap

Intro­duc­tion to Polit­i­cal Phi­los­o­phy: A Free Yale Course

Allan Bloom’s Lec­tures on Machi­avel­li (Boston Col­lege, 1983)

6 Polit­i­cal The­o­rists Intro­duced in Ani­mat­ed “School of Life” Videos: Marx, Smith, Rawls & More

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­ma, the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future?, and the Los Ange­les Review of Books’ Korea Blog. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Meet Jane Little: The Musician Who Played with the Same Orchestra for 71 Straight Years, a World Record

Last May, when Jane Lit­tle died at the age of 87, a world record came to an end.

Stand­ing only 4′11″ and weigh­ing only 98 pounds, Lit­tle began play­ing a dou­ble bass in the Atlanta Sym­pho­ny Orches­tra in 1945, at the age of 16. And she con­tin­ued play­ing that bass for the orches­tra for the next 71 years, giv­ing her the longest pro­fes­sion­al tenure with the same orches­tra. Fit­ting­ly, she died onstage, col­laps­ing dur­ing an encore per­for­mance of ‘There’s No Busi­ness Like Show Busi­ness.’

This week, The New York­er has a short pro­file on Jane Lit­tle and an accom­pa­ny­ing video, which you can watch above. It’s enti­tled “The Longest Short­est Dou­ble Bassist.”

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Neu­ro­science of Bass: New Study Explains Why Bass Instru­ments Are Fun­da­men­tal to Music

Hear Iso­lat­ed Tracks From Five Great Rock Bassists: McCart­ney, Sting, Dea­con, Jones & Lee

Musi­cians Play Bach on the Octo­bass, the Gar­gan­tu­an String Instru­ment Invent­ed in 1850

The Sto­ry of the Bass: New Video Gives Us 500 Years of Music His­to­ry in 8 Min­utes

100 Great Bass Riffs Played in One Epic Take: Cov­ers 60 Years of Rock, Jazz and R&B

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

A 10-Hour Playlist of Music Inspired by Robert Moog’s Iconic Synthesizer: Hear Electronic Works by Kraftwerk, Devo, Stevie Wonder, Rick Wakeman & More

It’s no secret that we love elec­tron­ic music here, espe­cial­ly that made with the ear­li­est instru­ments to hit con­cert stages and record­ing stu­dios. The most promi­nent of these two, respec­tive­ly, would be the Theremin and the Moog syn­the­siz­er, two devices invent­ed by engi­neers who were not them­selves musi­cians. Iron­i­cal­ly, these have remained two elec­tron­ic instru­ments with the most har­mo­nious­ly musi­cal voices—simulating the warmth and qua­v­ery vibra­to of the human voice while also lend­ing every­thing they touch an eerie, oth­er­world­ly air.

What often goes unre­marked is the close, near­ly direct influ­ence of one upon the oth­er, as David McNamee at The Guardian notes. Often thought of now as a nov­el­ty, the Theremin in its day received seri­ous treat­ment in the hands of clas­si­cal per­former Clara Rock­more, who inspired Robert Moog, then only 14 years old, to build his own ver­sion of Leo Theremin’s device in 1948. “God­fa­ther of elec­tron­ic music” Ray­mond Scott took Moog’s instru­ment and wired it “into a key­board-con­trolled con­trap­tion Scott called the Cla­vivox, which had a pro­found influ­ence on Moog.”

Moog con­tin­ued to build Theremins (a ver­sion of one went on tour with the Beach Boys to play “Good Vibra­tions”). But he is most famous for his syn­the­siz­ers. Ini­tial­ly, he had “no inter­est in repli­cat­ing exist­ing instru­ments. They were machines for cre­at­ing sound that sound­ed elec­tron­ic.” Moog first designed a cum­ber­some stu­dio-only appa­ra­tus, debut­ing in 1964, and his com­pa­ny’s “mas­sive, frag­ile and impos­si­ble to tune” mod­u­lar syn­the­siz­ers had lit­tle pop­u­lar appeal, or afford­abil­i­ty. “Few of Dr. Moog’s ear­ly cus­tomers,” McNamee points out, includ­ing “sound artists, chore­o­g­ra­phers, and stu­dios” were “inter­est­ed in play­ing con­ven­tion­al melody on the instru­ments.”

This makes all the more impres­sive the achieve­ments of Wendy Car­los, who showed the Moog’s capa­bil­i­ty for dynam­ic range and musi­cal pre­ci­sion with her huge­ly pop­u­lar adap­ta­tions of Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven on the Moog syn­the­siz­er in 1968 and sub­se­quent years. But by 1970, the Min­i­moog, the inventor’s first portable key­board, had made ana­log syn­the­siz­ers acces­si­ble to musi­cians worldwide—even though lat­er con­sumer-grade instru­ments retained some of the odd prop­er­ties of the orig­i­nal, like the “shon­ky” pitch con­trol that sends Moogs qua­ver­ing off key. (In its ear­li­est incar­na­tions, “mak­ing the things stay in tune seemed a low pri­or­i­ty.”)

There’s no over­state­ment in say­ing that the Moog’s move out of the hands of elite engi­neers and onto the stage and rock stu­dio changed music his­to­ry for­ev­er in the 70s and 80s. Com­pre­hen­sive accounts of the Moog rev­o­lu­tion fill books and fea­ture-length doc­u­men­taries. The most direct expe­ri­ence comes from the music itself, of course, and to that end, The Guardian com­piled the playlist above of “Moog heroes”—featuring reli­able elec­tro-stars like Gary Numan, Kraftwerk, Tan­ger­ine Dream, Rick Wake­man, and Her­bie Han­cock, as well as more eso­teric Moog com­posers like Ital­ian hor­ror-film mas­ters Gob­lin. Gior­gio Morodor’s Moog grooves with Don­na Sum­mer are promi­nent, as are more recent dance hits from Depeche Mode, Franz Fer­di­nand, and LCD Soundsys­tem. Sur­pris­es come in the form of lit­tle heard tunes from clas­sic rock artists, like Neil Young’s “Com­put­er Age” (fur­ther up).

We’ll all find bones to pick with this list. Astute music nerds will notice right away that not all of these songs fea­ture Moog syn­the­siz­ers, and at least one, the Rolling Stones’ “2000 Light Years from Home,” actu­al­ly uses an instru­ment that pre­dates Moogs, the Mel­lotron. One might then rea­son­ably refer to the playlist as in some degree “Moog-inspired.” Miss­ing here are essen­tial con­tri­bu­tions from Bob Mar­ley and the Wail­ers and the recent­ly-depart­ed Bernie Wor­rell of Par­lia­ment-Funkadel­ic, from the eter­nal grooves of African pio­neers like William Ony­bear (top), and arguably, from Sui­cide and elec­tro-psych rock­ers Sil­ver Apples (who built their own syn­the­siz­er). These and oth­er per­haps cru­cial omis­sions aside, The Guardian’s “Moog heroes” playlist more than makes its case for the his­tor­i­cal sig­nif­i­cance and utter­ly dis­tinc­tive char­ac­ter of the Moog and its imi­ta­tors and musi­cal chil­dren.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How the Moog Syn­the­siz­er Changed the Sound of Music

Watch Her­bie Han­cock Rock Out on an Ear­ly Syn­the­siz­er on Sesame Street (1983)

Dis­cov­er­ing Elec­tron­ic Music: 1983 Doc­u­men­tary Offers a Fun & Edu­ca­tion­al Intro­duc­tion to Elec­tron­ic Music

The Scores That Elec­tron­ic Music Pio­neer Wendy Car­los Com­posed for Stan­ley Kubrick’s A Clock­work Orange and The Shin­ing

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

5,000-Year-Old Chinese Beer Recipe Gets Recreated by Stanford Students

A cou­ple of years back, we intro­duced you to what was con­sid­ered the old­est known beer recipe–an Ancient Sumer­ian recipe dat­ing back to 1800 BC. It turns out, how­ev­er, that the Chi­nese had the Sume­ri­ans beat.

Above, you can watch Stan­ford stu­dents recre­ate a 5,000-year-old beer recipe which Pro­fes­sor Li Liu revealed to the world last spring. Accord­ing to Stan­ford News, Liu and a team of researchers recent­ly found the recipe while “study­ing the residue on the inner walls of pot­tery ves­sels found in an exca­vat­ed site in north­east Chi­na.” As part of the course Archae­ol­o­gy of Food: Pro­duc­tion, Con­sump­tion and Rit­u­al, Pro­fes­sor Liu’s stu­dents recre­at­ed the dis­cov­ered con­coc­tion, fol­low­ing this gen­er­al process:

The stu­dents first cov­ered their grain with water and let it sprout, in a process called malt­ing. After the grain sprout­ed, the stu­dents crushed the seeds and put them in water again. The con­tain­er with the mix­ture was then placed in the oven and heat­ed to 65 degrees Cel­sius (149 F) for an hour, in a process called mash­ing. After­ward, the stu­dents sealed the con­tain­er with plas­tic and let it stand at room tem­per­a­ture for about a week to fer­ment.

You can dig up infor­ma­tion on the Chi­nese beer recipe by look­ing at the Pro­ceed­ings of the Nation­al Acad­e­my of Sci­ences of the Unit­ed States of Amer­i­ca.

via Stan­ford News

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent

Dis­cov­er the Old­est Beer Recipe in His­to­ry From Ancient Sume­ria, 1800 B.C.

Watch “Beer,” a Mind-Warp­ing Ani­ma­tion of Charles Bukowski’s 1971 Poem Hon­or­ing His Favorite Drink

The Physics of Guin­ness Beer Demys­ti­fied

MIT Teach­es You How to Speak Ital­ian & Cook Ital­ian Food All at Once (Free Online Course)

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast