Hear All Three of Jack Kerouac’s Spoken-World Albums: A Sublime Union of Beat Literature and 1950s Jazz

kerouac albums

Image by Tom Palum­bo, via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

At the epi­cen­ter of three explo­sive forces in 1950s America—the birth of Bebop, the spread of Bud­dhism through the coun­ter­cul­ture, and Beat rev­o­lu­tion­iz­ing of poet­ry and prose—sat Jack Ker­ouac, though I don’t pic­ture him ever sit­ting for very long. The rhythms that moved through him, through his verse and prose, are too flu­id to come to rest. At the end of his life he sat… and drank, a most­ly spent force.

But in his prime, Ker­ouac was always on the move, over high­ways on those leg­endary road trips, or his fin­gers fly­ing over the typewriter’s keys as he banged out the scroll man­u­script of On the Road in three fever­ish weeks (so he said). After the pub­li­ca­tion of On the Road, Ker­ouac “became a celebri­ty,” says Steve Allen in intro­duc­tion to the Beat writer on a 1959 appear­ance, “part­ly because he’d writ­ten a pow­er­ful and suc­cess­ful book, but part­ly because he seemed to be the embod­i­ment of this new gen­er­a­tion.”

After a lit­tle back-and-forth, Allen lets Ker­ouac do what he always did so well, whether on tele­vi­sion or on record—embody the rhythms of his writ­ing in his voice, his phras­ing always musi­cal, whether he read over jazz hot or cool or over med­i­ta­tive silence. He did a lot of both, record­ing with Allen and many oth­er jazzmen, and “exper­i­ment­ing with a home reel-to-reel sys­tem, tap­ing him­self to see whether his spon­ta­neous prose out­bursts had the musi­cal rhythms F. Scott Fitzger­ald con­sid­ered the hall­mark of all great writ­ing.” So writes his­to­ri­an David Brink­ley in the lin­er notes (remem­ber those?) to the com­pi­la­tion album Jack Ker­ouac Reads On the Road, a rare col­lec­tion of haunt­ing poet­ry read­ings, play­ful croon­ing, and exper­i­ments with voice and music. Brink­ley describes how Ker­ouac, the French Cana­di­an from Low­ell, Mass­a­chu­setts, devel­oped his “bop ear” by hang­ing out at Minton’s Play­house in Harlem in the 40s, watch­ing Thelo­nious Monk, Char­lie Park­er, and Dizzy Gille­spie invent what he called a “goofy new sound.”

The sound stayed with him, as he turned his immer­sion into Amer­i­can lit­er­ary and musi­cal coun­ter­cul­ture into On the Road, The Sub­ter­raneans, The Dhar­ma Bums, etc, and through­out all the writ­ing, there was the music of his read­ing, cap­tured on the albums Poet­ry for the Beat Gen­er­a­tion with Steve Allen, Blues and Haikus with Al Cohn and Zoot Sims—both in 1959—and, the fol­low­ing year, Read­ings by Jack Ker­ouac on the Beat Gen­er­a­tion. Kerouac’s read­ing style did not come only from his inter­nal­iza­tion of bebop rhythms, how­ev­er, but also from “the dis­cov­ery of the extra­or­di­nary spo­ken-word albums of poets Langston Hugh­es, Carl Sand­berg, and Dylan Thomas,” Brink­ley tells us. The writer became “con­vinced that prose should be read aloud in pub­lic, as it had been in Homer’s Greece and Shakespeare’s Eng­land.” The albums he record­ed and released in his life­time bear out this con­vic­tion and explore “the pos­si­bil­i­ties of com­bin­ing jazz and spon­ta­neous verse.”

These records became very dif­fi­cult to find for many years, but you can now pur­chase an omnibus CD at a rea­son­able price (vinyl will set you back a cou­ple hun­dred bucks). Alter­nate­ly, you can stream all three Ker­ouac albums free on Spo­ti­fy, above in chrono­log­i­cal order of release. If you don’t have Spo­ti­fy, you can eas­i­ly down­load the soft­ware here. And if you’d rather hear Ker­ouac’s read­ings on CD or on the orig­i­nal vinyl medi­um, that’s cool too. How­ev­er you expe­ri­ence these read­ings, you should, at some point, expe­ri­ence them. Like all the very best poet­ry, Ker­ouac’s work is most alive when read aloud, and most espe­cial­ly when read aloud by Ker­ouac him­self.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Down­load 55 Free Online Lit­er­a­ture Cours­es: From Dante and Mil­ton to Ker­ouac and Tolkien

Jack Kerouac’s 30 Beliefs and Tech­niques For Writ­ing Mod­ern Prose

Jack Ker­ouac Lists 9 Essen­tials for Writ­ing Spon­ta­neous Prose

The First Record­ing of Allen Gins­berg Read­ing “Howl” (1956)

Watch Langston Hugh­es Read Poet­ry from His First Col­lec­tion, The Weary Blues (1958)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

 

The Life & Times of Buckminster Fuller’s Geodesic Dome: A Documentary

In the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry, the vision­ary inven­tor Buck­min­ster Fuller start­ed look­ing for ways to improve human shel­ter by:

  • Apply­ing mod­ern tech­no­log­i­cal know-how to shel­ter con­struc­tion.
  • Mak­ing shel­ter more com­fort­able and effi­cient.
  • Mak­ing shel­ter more eco­nom­i­cal­ly avail­able to a greater num­ber of peo­ple.

And what he came up with (read more here) was the “geo­des­ic” dome.” This dome held appeal for two main rea­sons: 1.) its sur­face would be “omni­tri­an­gu­lat­ed,” mean­ing built out of small tri­an­gles, which would give the over­all struc­ture unpar­al­leled strength. And 2.) domes by their very nature enclose the great­est vol­ume for the least sur­face area, which makes them very effi­cient.

Fuller devel­oped the math­e­mat­ics for the geo­des­ic dome and helped make it an archi­tec­tur­al real­i­ty. You can find instances where these domes served as audi­to­ri­ums, weath­er obser­va­to­ries, and stor­age facil­i­ties in the US and Cana­da. And then above, you watch a doc­u­men­tary called A Nec­es­sary Ruin: The Sto­ry of Buck­min­ster Fuller and the Union Tank Car DomeShot by Evan Math­er in 2010, the doc­u­men­tary tells the sto­ry of the dome built in Baton Rouge, LA in 1958. At 384 feet in diam­e­ter, the Union Tank Car Dome was the world’s largest free-span struc­ture then in exis­tence. Math­er’s doc­u­men­tary includes ” inter­views with archi­tects, engi­neers, preser­va­tion­ists, media, and artists; ani­mat­ed sequences demon­strat­ing the oper­a­tion of the facil­i­ty; and hun­dreds of rare pho­tographs and video seg­ments tak­en dur­ing the dome’s con­struc­tion, decline, and demo­li­tion.” It was fund­ed by a grant from the Gra­ham Foun­da­tion for Advanced Stud­ies in the Fine Arts, and you can now find it our col­lec­tion of Free Doc­u­men­taries, a sub­set of our col­lec­tion, 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More.

Vis­it handcraftedfilms.com for more info on Math­er’s film and/or to pur­chase the DVD.

Relat­ed Con­tent

Every­thing I Know: 42 Hours of Buck­min­ster Fuller’s Vision­ary Lec­tures Free Online (1975)

Watch an Ani­mat­ed Buck­min­ster Fuller Tell Studs Terkel All About “the Geo­des­ic Life”

Bet­ter Liv­ing Through Buck­min­ster Fuller’s Utopi­an Designs: Revis­it the Dymax­ion Car, House, and Map

Bertrand Rus­sell & Buck­min­ster Fuller on Why We Should Work Less, and Live & Learn More

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

How Isaac Asimov Went from Star Trek Critic to Star Trek Fan & Advisor

asimov star trek

When we think of a sci­ence fic­tion, most of us doubt­less think of a Star Trek. Since the orig­i­nal series made its tele­vi­sion debut almost a half-cen­tu­ry ago, the spec­u­la­tive future it cre­at­ed has come to stand, in many minds, as the very mod­el of the sci­ence-fic­tion­al enter­prise (as it were). But the insti­tu­tion of Star Trek in all its forms — TV shows, movies, movies made out of TV shows, nov­els, video games, action fig­ures, and so on — still has its detrac­tors, and back at the very begin­ning it hard­ly looked like a sure suc­cess. Geek.com’s list of five things that near­ly killed off Star Trek includes a failed pilot, a near-fir­ing of Leonard Nimoy, and the words of no less a sci­ence-fic­tion titan than Isaac Asi­mov.

Star Trek,wrote its cre­ator Gene Rod­den­ber­ry in 1966, “almost did not get on the air because it refused to do juve­nile sci­ence fic­tion, because it refused to put a ‘Lassie’ aboard the space ship, and because it insist­ed on hir­ing Dick Math­e­son, Har­lan Elli­son, A.E. Van Vogt, Phil Farmer, and so on.” This came as part of a response to Asi­mov, who, in a TV Guide arti­cle enti­tled “What Are a Few Galax­ies Among Friends?,” crit­i­cized Star Trek for get­ting the sci­ence wrong. He cites, for exam­ple, a line about a gaseous cloud “one-half light year out­side the Galaxy,” which he likens to “say­ing a house is one-half yard out­side the Mis­sis­sip­pi Basin.”

Mea­sure­ment flubs aside, Star Trek, despite its can­cel­la­tion after three sea­sons, had become so big by the ear­ly 1970s that its fans had begun to put on whole con­ven­tions ded­i­cat­ed to the show. You can see in the clip above one such event in 1973, which pro­vides proof that even Asi­mov had turned fan. He speaks of his appre­ci­a­tion for the show three times dur­ing the video, now describ­ing Star Trek as the “san­est” and “most mean­ing­ful” pro­gram of its kind, one that “tack­led real social prob­lems,” was “not devot­ed entire­ly to adven­ture,” and had “ful­ly real­ized char­ac­ters” (cit­ing Mr. Spock as Exhib­it A). He may still have object­ed to the infa­mous split infini­tive “to bold­ly go” (once a nit­pick­er, always a nit­pick­er), but he still thought the show “real­ly pre­sent­ed the broth­er­hood of intel­li­gence.”

After Asi­mov wrote his ini­tial cri­tique in TV Guide, he and Gene Rod­den­ber­ry exchanged let­ters, and the two for­mi­da­ble sci-fi minds became friends and even col­lab­o­ra­tors there­after. A 1967 Time mag­a­zine pro­file described Asi­mov as “bat­ting out books on a new elec­tric type­writer, emerg­ing only occa­sion­al­ly to watch Star Trek (his favorite TV show),” and he went on to become an advi­sor to the show. A Let­ters of Note post on Rod­den­ber­ry and Asi­mov’s cor­re­spon­dence con­tains a 1967 exchange where­in they put their heads togeth­er to solve the prob­lem of how to give Cap­tain Kirk lines as good as the ones that nat­u­ral­ly go to a more unusu­al char­ac­ter like Spock. Since Asi­mov also con­tributed orig­i­nal ideas to the show, after hav­ing gone on record as a fan, I won­der: does that mean, in some sense, that Isaac Asi­mov wrote Star Trek fan fic­tion?

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Klin­gon for Eng­lish Speak­ers: Sign Up for a Free Course Com­ing Soon

Isaac Asi­mov Pre­dicts in 1964 What the World Will Look Like Today — in 2014

Free: Isaac Asimov’s Epic Foun­da­tion Tril­o­gy Dra­ma­tized in Clas­sic Audio

Isaac Asi­mov Explains the Ori­gins of Good Ideas & Cre­ativ­i­ty in Nev­er-Before-Pub­lished Essay

Isaac Asi­mov Explains His Three Laws of Robots

Isaac Asimov’s Favorite Sto­ry “The Last Ques­tion” Read by Isaac Asi­mov— and by Leonard Nimoy

Based in Seoul, Col­in Mar­shall writes and broad­casts on cities and cul­ture. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­maand the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future? Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

Steve Martin Writes a Hymn for Hymn-Deprived Atheists

To under­stand the two sides of Steve Martin’s per­form­ing tal­ents, check out his one and only hit sin­gle, 1978’s King Tut. On the A‑side was the nov­el­ty funk hit about the Egypt­ian boy king. On the B‑side, two deep cuts that showed off Martin’s for­mi­da­ble Americana/banjo chops: the tra­di­tion­al “Sal­ly Good­in” (cir­ca 1860, but exist­ing on record­ings since 1922), and “Hoe­down at Alice’s” an orig­i­nal writ­ten for his then stand-up man­ag­er Bill McEuen’s wife.

It’s not what you’d expect from the “Wild and Crazy Guy,” but Martin’s ban­jo had always been a part of his act. He taught him­self at 15 years old, play­ing along very slow­ly to Earl Scrug­gs records. He told an inter­view­er:

The rea­son I played it on stage is because my act was so crazy I thought it’s prob­a­bly good to show the audi­ence I can do some­thing that looks hard, because this act looks like I’m just mak­ing it up. I real­ly was­n’t. I worked very hard on it.

Which is a long way of say­ing: When Mar­tin record­ed an album of ban­jo favorites in 2009, The Crow, won a Gram­my with­out rely­ing on a sin­gle joke, then enlist­ed the help of the North Car­olin­ian Steep Canyon Rangers to go on a tour, it should not have real­ly been a sur­prise.

When he teamed up next with The Steep Canyon Rangers and record­ed Rare Bird Alert in 2011, Mar­tin start­ed to com­bine com­e­dy and music once again, and with this above nov­el­ty song, he gets to indulge in the beau­ti­ful har­mo­ny singing that blue­grass groups like The Stan­ley Broth­ers, The Lou­vin Broth­ers, and the Osbourne Broth­ers made so pop­u­lar in the mid-cen­tu­ry. (There wasn’t just ban­jo pickin’ on those LPs, you know.) The above appear­ance on Let­ter­man is a great ren­di­tion of a con­cert favorite, “Athe­ists Don’t Have No Songs.”

So in this month of argu­ments over the Star­bucks hol­i­day cup, let Mr. Mar­tin and group add a pal­lia­tive to any hurt athe­ist feel­ings. You guys rock.

P.S. Mar­tin got a chance to play with his hero on the same late-night pro­gram.

Relat­ed Con­tent

Steve Mar­tin Teach­es His First Online Course on Com­e­dy

Steve Mar­tin & Robin Williams Riff on Math, Physics, Ein­stein & Picas­so in a Heady Com­e­dy Rou­tine (2002)

Steve Mar­tin on the Leg­endary Blue­grass Musi­cian Earl Scrug­gs

Steve Mar­tin Releas­es Blue­grass Album/Animated Video

A Blue­grass Ver­sion of Metallica’s Heavy Met­al Hit, “Enter Sand­man”

Ted Mills is a free­lance writer on the arts who cur­rent­ly hosts the artist inter­view-based FunkZone Pod­cast. King Tut was the sec­ond 45 he ever bought as a kid. You can also fol­low him on Twit­ter at @tedmills, read his oth­er arts writ­ing at tedmills.com and/or watch his films here.

Watch a New Nina Simone Animation Based on an Interview Never Aired in the U.S. Before

Blank on Blank has worked their mag­ic again, this time ani­mat­ing a 1968 inter­view with the singer-song­writer and civ­il rights activist, Nina Simone. As always, Blank on Blank’s visu­al work is a treat. But what stands out for me here is the audio record­ing. Tak­en from a 1960s radio show host­ed by Lil­ian Ter­ry, the audio orig­i­nal­ly aired in Italy in the 1960s. And, until now, it has nev­er been heard in the Unit­ed States. Ter­ry is nowa­days work­ing on an audio­book project called Voic­es from the Jazz Dimen­sion that “chron­i­cles her remark­able col­lec­tion of inter­views with jazz leg­ends from Nina to Duke Elling­ton.” We can hard­ly wait for that project to take final shape. You can find more Blank on Blank ani­ma­tions, all of which revive vin­tage audio clips, in our archive.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Nina Simone Sings Her Break­through Song, ‘I Loves You Por­gy,’ in 1962

Free Archive of Audio Inter­views with Rock, Jazz & Folk Leg­ends Now on iTunes

Jazz on the Tube: An Archive of 2,000 Clas­sic Jazz Videos (and Much More)

 

 

15-Year-Old French Guitar Prodigy Flawlessly Rips Through Solos by Eddie Van Halen, David Gilmour, Yngwie Malmsteen & Steve Vai

I’ve been play­ing gui­tar off and on for most of my life, and I’d be the first to admit that I’m not the most spec­tac­u­lar musi­cian. I do it for joy and don’t sweat my musi­cal lim­i­ta­tions too much. This is a good thing; oth­er­wise I might find myself seething with mad envy—like F. Mur­ray Abraham’s Salieri—upon real­iz­ing that in 15 life­times I’d nev­er be as good as young French prodi­gy Tina S is at 15 years of age. Tina has sent gui­tar nerds every­where flee­ing to their bed­rooms, work­ing their fin­gers bloody in furi­ous efforts to match her speed and accu­ra­cy. Watch her flaw­less­ly rip through Yng­wie Malmsteen’s “Arpeg­gios from Hell” above, ye mighty shred­ders, and despair. See her destroy Steve Vai’s “Pagani­ni 5th Caprice (Cross­roads)” below, ye mon­sters of rock, and rend your den­im vests asun­der with grief.

The baroque speed met­al of Malm­steen and Vai aren’t real­ly my bag, but I have to say, there’s maybe a lit­tle Salieri voice cack­ling into the void in the back of my mind when I watch Tina’s videos. Maybe she’s a one-trick-pony, it tells me, play­ing arpeg­gios all day like a few hun­dred oth­er gui­tarists in the audi­tion line for a hun­dred met­al bands in a hun­dred cities a day—players who couldn’t slow down and play the blues if they were heav­i­ly med­icat­ed.

So says my inner Salieri. But no, there she is below, flaw­less­ly pulling off the “Com­fort­ably Numb” solo, her bends and slides so impec­ca­bly timed I could close my eyes and almost swear it’s David Gilmour. Sigh and alas.

But can she do Van Halen, you right­ly ask? Because, you know, any­one can play Malm­steen, Vai, and Gilmour, but Eddie Van Halen, c’mon…. Yet there she is below, with a sear­ing ren­di­tion of “Erup­tion,” a song gui­tarists who learn Van Halen often avoid for rea­sons that will like­ly become evi­dent when you see Tina play it. Is she too much tech­nique, too lit­tle soul, you say? Yeah, well, she’s 15, and bet­ter than most of us are at twice that age. Com­ments on her videos include the fol­low­ing: “I want to throw my gui­tar out the win­dow” and “This makes me want to kill myself.” In all seri­ous­ness, I hope any­one who gen­uine­ly feels this way seeks help. Also in all seri­ous­ness, don’t despair. Do what you do and enjoy it. And maybe after many long life­times you’ll be reborn as a Parisian gui­tar prodi­gy.

That Tina S has obvi­ous nat­ur­al abil­i­ty in no way means she hasn’t had to work hard for this lev­el of skill. On the con­trary, any­one this good gets there through end­less reg­u­lar prac­tice and the guid­ance of a tal­ent­ed teacher (in this case, French gui­tarist Renaud Louis-Ser­vais). Tina post­ed her first video in 2008 at the ten­der age of 8, play­ing a com­po­si­tion by gui­tarist Maria Lin­ne­mann. You can see her below hon­ing the clas­si­cal chops that she lat­er put to ludi­crous­ly fast use on a met­al trib­ute to Vival­di.

But does she do Mozart? Not so far on her Youtube chan­nel, where you’ll find more ear­ly acoustic per­for­mances, like “Let it Be” and “Hotel Cal­i­for­nia,” and more recent shred­fests like Jason Becker’s “Alti­tudes.” To learn just how Tina views her own musi­cian­ship and sees her future as a gui­tarist, read this inter­view with her on the Gui­tar Chan­nel. “I have not yet start­ed my career as a gui­tarist,” she dead­pans. Many would-be Salieris have already sworn to end theirs after watch­ing her videos.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Four­teen-Year-Old Girl’s Blis­ter­ing Heavy Met­al Per­for­mance of Vival­di

Great Vio­lin­ists Play­ing as Kids: Itzhak Perl­man, Anne-Sophie Mut­ter, & More

The Gui­tar Prodi­gy from Karachi

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Learn to Code with Harvard’s Popular Intro to Computer Science Course: The 2015 Edition

Briefly not­ed: This fall, Har­vard has been rolling out videos from the 2015 edi­tion of Com­put­er Sci­ence 50 (CS50), the uni­ver­si­ty’s intro­duc­to­ry cod­ing course designed for majors and non-majors alike. Taught by David Malan, a peren­ni­al­ly pop­u­lar pro­fes­sor (you’ll imme­di­ate­ly see why), the one-semes­ter course (taught most­ly in C) com­bines cours­es typ­i­cal­ly known else­where as “CS1” and “CS2.”

Even if you’re not a Har­vard stu­dent, you’re wel­come to fol­low CS50 online by head­ing over to the This is CS50 web­site, or this alter­na­tive site here. There you will find video lec­tures (stream them all above or access them indi­vid­u­al­ly here), prob­lem sets, quizzes, and oth­er use­ful course mate­ri­als. Once you’ve mas­tered the mate­r­i­al cov­ered in CS50, you can start branch­ing out into new areas of cod­ing by perus­ing our big col­lec­tion of Free Online Com­put­er Sci­ence Cours­es, a sub­set of our larg­er col­lec­tion, 1,700 Free Online Cours­es from Top Uni­ver­si­ties.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Immanuel Kant’s Life & Philosophy Introduced in a Short Monty Python-Style Animation

Philoso­pher Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) is per­haps best known for his sys­tem­at­ic philo­soph­i­cal ethics, con­ceived of as a post-reli­gious frame­work for sec­u­lar moral­i­ty. His pri­ma­ry eth­i­cal man­date, which he called the “cat­e­gor­i­cal imper­a­tive,” enables us—Alain de Bot­ton tells us in his short School of Life video above—to “shift our per­spec­tive, to get us to see our own behav­ior in less imme­di­ate­ly per­son­al terms.” It’s a philo­soph­i­cal ver­sion, de Bot­ton says, of the Gold­en Rule. “Act only accord­ing to that max­im,” Kant famous­ly wrote of the imper­a­tive in his Ground­work of the Meta­physics of Morals, “by which you can at the same time will that it should become a uni­ver­sal law.”

This guide to moral behav­ior seems on its face a sim­ple one. It asks us to imag­ine the con­se­quences of behav­ior should every­one act in the same way. How­ev­er, “almost every con­ceiv­able analy­sis of the Ground­work has been tried out over the past two cen­turies,” writes Har­vard pro­fes­sor Michael Rosen, “yet all have been found want­i­ng in some way or oth­er.” Friedrich Niet­zsche allud­ed to a seri­ous prob­lem with what Rosen calls Kant’s “rule-util­i­tar­i­an­ism.” How, Niet­zsche asks in On the Geneal­o­gy of Morals, are we to deter­mine whether an action will have good or bad con­se­quences unless we have “learned to sep­a­rate nec­es­sary events from chance events, to think in terms of cause and effect, to see dis­tant events as if they were present, to antic­i­pate them….”

Can we ever have that kind of fore­sight? Can we for­mu­late rules such that every­one who acts on them will pre­dict the same pos­i­tive or neg­a­tive out­comes in every sit­u­a­tion? The ques­tions did not seem to per­son­al­ly dis­turb Kant, who lived his life in a high­ly pre­dictable, rule-bound way—even, de Bot­ton tells us, when it came to struc­tur­ing his din­ner par­ties. But while the cat­e­gor­i­cal imper­a­tive has seemed unwork­ably abstract and too divorced from par­tic­u­lar cir­cum­stances and con­tin­gen­cies, an elab­o­ra­tion of the max­im has had much more appeal to con­tem­po­rary ethi­cists. We should also, Kant wrote, “act so as to treat peo­ple always as ends in them­selves, nev­er as mere means.” De Bot­ton pro­vides some help­ful con­text for why Kant felt the need to cre­ate these eth­i­cal prin­ci­ples.

Kant lived in a time when “the iden­ti­fy­ing fea­ture of his age was its grow­ing sec­u­lar­ism.” De Bot­ton con­tends that while Kant wel­comed the decline of tra­di­tion­al reli­gion, he also feared the con­se­quences; as “a pes­simist about human char­ac­ter,” Kant “believed that we are by nature intense­ly prone to cor­rup­tion.” His solu­tion was to “replace reli­gious author­i­ty with the author­i­ty of rea­son.” The project occu­pied all of Kant’s career, from his work on polit­i­cal phi­los­o­phy to that on aes­thet­ics in the Cri­tique of Pure Judg­ment. And though philoso­phers have for cen­turies had dif­fi­cul­ty mak­ing Kant’s ethics work, his dense, dif­fi­cult writ­ing has nev­er­the­less occu­pied a cen­tral place in West­ern thought. In his defense of the author­i­ty of rea­son, Kant pro­vid­ed us with one of the most com­pre­hen­sive means for under­stand­ing how exact­ly human rea­son works—and for rec­og­niz­ing its many lim­i­ta­tions.

To read Kan­t’s work for your­self, down­load free ver­sions of his major texts in a vari­ety of dig­i­tal for­mats from our archive of Free Phi­los­o­phy eBooks. Kant is no easy read, and it helps to have a guide. To learn how his work has been inter­pret­ed over the past two hun­dred years, and how he arrived at many of his con­clu­sions, con­sid­er tak­ing one of many online class­es on Kant we have list­ed in our archive of Free Phi­los­o­phy Cours­es.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Philoso­phers Drink­ing Cof­fee: The Exces­sive Habits of Kant, Voltaire & Kierkegaard

Man Shot in Fight Over Immanuel Kant’s Phi­los­o­phy in Rus­sia

Philoso­phers Drink­ing Cof­fee: The Exces­sive Habits of Kant, Voltaire & Kierkegaard

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.