Terry Gilliam’s Lost Animations from Monty Python and the Holy Grail Are Now Online

This year marks the 40th anniver­sary of Mon­ty Python and the Holy Grail and as the group has always been upfront about shame­less­ly milk­ing their fans for cash, there’s a new ver­sion of the Blu-Ray out, and a new print tour­ing the world. John Cleese and Eric Idle are cur­rent­ly also on an Amer­i­can tour, shar­ing the stage as a duo for the first time. Michael Palin has a book tour for the third vol­ume of his diaries. Ter­ry Jones is still work­ing on movies and plug­ging char­i­ties on his Twit­ter stream. Ter­ry Gilliam has an auto­bi­og­ra­phy com­ing out this month. And Gra­ham Chap­man, despite his beau­ti­ful plumage, is still dead.

How­ev­er, the Pythons are giv­ing a few things away and one of them is the above com­pi­la­tion of unused ani­ma­tions by Gilliam from the Holy Grail. They can be found on the new Blu-Ray, but the group’s offi­cial Youtube chan­nel is shar­ing them-—first with Gilliam’s com­men­tary, then with sound effects—for free.

These ani­ma­tions are links between the skits that make up Holy Grail, and include drag­ons, giants, and a very large snail. Gilliam took a lot of the illus­tra­tions that he didn’t do him­self from a book on illu­mi­nat­ed man­u­scripts, and, see­ing them all togeth­er in one go, one can imag­ine an alter­na­tive uni­verse where the ani­ma­tor makes an entire movie this way. (On the com­men­tary track, he half-jok­ing­ly describes him­self as “the man who could have gone on to become a great ani­ma­tor but was forced into live action film.”)

As per Python, a lot of the com­men­tary track berates the view­er for throw­ing mon­ey away on a redun­dant ver­sion of what the con­sumer prob­a­bly owns, and how Gilliam isn’t get­ting paid enough to do this. (Cue some coinage sound effects and Gilliam gets back on mic.)

If this kind of archiv­ing is going on, it would be inter­est­ing to know the sta­tus of Gilliam’s oth­er ani­ma­tions for both Python and the var­i­ous shows he did in the years run­ning up to it. There are indeed some inter­est­ing ear­ly works out there that need a facelift.

As for Gilliam and the Holy Grail, he says he doesn’t watch it:

I’m glad it makes a lot of mon­ey and keeps me in the style I’ve grown accus­tomed to. But watch it again? Why? We’ve got lives to lead.

via Digg

Relat­ed con­tent:

Ter­ry Gilliam Reveals the Secrets of Mon­ty Python Ani­ma­tions: A 1974 How-To Guide

Mon­ty Python and the Holy Grail Re-Imag­ined as an Epic, Main­stream Hol­ly­wood Film

Watch Ter­ry Gilliam’s Ani­mat­ed Short, The Christ­mas Card (1968)

John Cleese’s Eulo­gy for Gra­ham Chap­man: ‘Good Rid­dance, the Free-Load­ing Bas­tard, I Hope He Fries’

Ted Mills is a free­lance writer on the arts who cur­rent­ly hosts the FunkZone Pod­cast. You can also fol­low him on Twit­ter at @tedmills, read his oth­er arts writ­ing at tedmills.com and/or watch his films here.

William Faulkner Draws Maps of Yoknapatawpha County, the Fictional Home of His Great Novels

faulkner-Portable map

If you’ve ever had dif­fi­cul­ty pro­nounc­ing the word Yok­na­p­ataw­pha—the fic­tion­al Mis­sis­sip­pi coun­ty where William Faulkn­er set his best-known fiction—you can take instruc­tion from the author him­self. Dur­ing his time as writer-in-res­i­dence at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Vir­ginia, Faulkn­er gave stu­dents a brief les­son on his pro­nun­ci­a­tion of the Chick­a­saw-derived word, which, as he says, sounds like it’s spelled.

If you’ve ever had dif­fi­cul­ty get­ting around in Yoknapatawpha—getting the lay of the land, as it were—Faulkner has stepped in again to help his read­ers. He drew sev­er­al maps of vary­ing lev­els of detail that show Yok­na­p­ataw­pha, its coun­ty seat of Jef­fer­son in the cen­ter, and var­i­ous key char­ac­ters’ plan­ta­tions, cross­roads, camps, stores, hous­es, etc. from the fif­teen nov­els and sto­ry cycles set in the author’s native Mis­sis­sip­pi.

Per­haps the most repro­duced of Faulkner’s maps, above, comes from 1946’s The Portable Faulkn­er and was drawn by the author at the request of edi­tor Mal­colm Cow­ley. We see named on the map the loca­tions of set­tings in The Unvan­quished, Sanc­tu­ary, The Sound and the Fury, The Ham­let, Go Down, Moses, Light in August, and the sto­ries “A Rose for Emi­ly” and “Old Man,” among oth­ers. This map, dat­ed 1945, had an impor­tant pre­de­ces­sor, how­ev­er: the map below, the final page in Faulkner’s epic tragedy Absa­lom, Absa­lom! Most read­ers of that nov­el, myself includ­ed, have thought of Quentin Compson’s deeply con­flict­ed, repeat­ed asser­tions that he doesn’t hate the South as the novel’s con­clu­sion. It’s a pas­sion­ate speech as mem­o­rable, and as final, as Mol­ly Bloom’s silent “Yes” at the end of Joyce’s Ulysses. Not so, writes Faulkn­er schol­ar Robert Ham­blin, the nov­el actu­al­ly ends after Quentin, and after the appen­dix’s chronol­o­gy and geneal­o­gy; the nov­el tru­ly ends with the map.

What Ham­blin wants us to acknowl­edge is that the map cre­ates more ambi­gu­i­ty than it resolves. The map, he says “is more than a graph­ic rep­re­sen­ta­tion of an actu­al place”—or in this case, a fic­tion­al place based on an actu­al place—“it is simul­ta­ne­ous­ly a metaphor.” While it fur­ther attempts to sit­u­ate the nov­el in his­to­ry, giv­ing Yok­na­p­ataw­pha the tan­gi­bil­i­ty of Thomas Hardy’s fic­tion­al Wes­sex or Sher­wood Anderson’s Wines­burg, Ohio, the map also ele­vates the coun­ty to a myth­ic dimen­sion, like “Bullfinch’s maps depict­ing the set­tings of the Greek and Roman myths and the wan­der­ings of Ulysses, Sir Thomas More’s map of Utopia, Jonathan Swift’s maps of the trav­els of Lemuel Gul­liv­er.”

faulkner-Absalom map

The Portable Faulkn­er map at the top of the post appears “in a style unlike Faulkner’s” and was “much reduced for pub­li­ca­tion in first and sub­se­quent print­ings,” A Com­pan­ion to William Faulkn­er tells us. The Absa­lom map, on the oth­er hand, appeared in a first, lim­it­ed-edi­tion of the nov­el in 1936, hand-drawn and let­tered in red and black ink, a col­or-cod­ing fea­ture com­mon to “Faulkner’s many hand-made books.” Click the image, then click it again to zoom in and read the details. You’ll notice a num­ber of odd things. For one, Faulkn­er gives equal atten­tion to nam­ing loca­tions and describ­ing events that occurred in oth­er Yok­na­p­ataw­pha nov­els, main­ly mur­ders, deaths, and var­i­ous crimes and hard­ships. For anoth­er, his neat cap­i­tal let­ter­ing repro­duces the let­ter “N” back­wards sev­er­al times, but just as many times he writes it nor­mal­ly, occa­sion­al­ly doing both in the same word or name—a styl­is­tic quirk that is not repro­duced in The Portable Faulkn­er map.

Final­ly, in con­trast to the map at the top, which Faulkn­er gives his name to as one who “sur­veyed & mapped” the ter­ri­to­ry,” in the Absa­lom map, he lists himself—beneath the town and coun­ty names, square mileage, and pop­u­la­tion count by race—as “sole own­er & pro­pri­etor.” Against Alfred Korzybski’s famous dic­tum, Tok­izane Sanae insists that at least when it comes to lit­er­ary maps, “Map is Ter­ri­to­ry… proof of new­ly con­quered own­er­ship of a land”—the ter­ri­to­ry of a deed. Suit­ably, Faulkn­er ends a nov­el obsessed with own­er­ship and prop­er­ty with a state­ment of own­er­ship and property—over his entire fic­tion­al uni­verse. In an iron­ic exag­ger­a­tion of the pow­er of sur­vey­ors, car­tog­ra­phers, archi­tects, and their landown­ing employ­ers, the map “spa­tial­izes and visu­al­izes the con­cept of a myth­i­cal soil and the pow­er of this God.” In that sense, it forces us to view all of the Mis­sis­sip­pi nov­els not as his­tor­i­cal fic­tion, but as episodes in a great reli­gious mythol­o­gy, with the same depth and res­o­nance as ancient scrip­ture or polit­i­cal alle­go­ry.

sancmap

If we wish to see Faulkner’s map this way—a zoom out into an aer­i­al shot at the end of an epic picture—then we’re unlike­ly to find it of much use as a guide to the plain-faced logis­tics of his fic­tion. It’s unclear to me that Faulkn­er intend­ed it that way, as much as it’s unclear that Ezra Pound and T.S. Eliot’s foot­notes to The Waste Land serve any pur­pose except to dis­tract and con­fuse read­ers. But of course read­ers have been using those foot­notes, and Faulkner’s map, as guide­lines to their respec­tive texts for decades any­way, not­ing incon­sis­ten­cies and find­ing mean­ing­ful cor­re­spon­dences where they can. One inter­est­ing exam­ple of such a use of Faulkner’s map­mak­ing comes to us from the site of a com­pre­hen­sive Uni­ver­si­ty of Vir­ginia Faulkn­er course that cov­ers a bulk of the Yok­na­p­ataw­pha books. The project, “Map­ping Faulkn­er,” begins with a con­sid­er­ably spars­er Yok­na­p­ataw­pha map, one prob­a­bly made “late in his life” and which “seems unfin­ished,” lack­ing most of the place names and descrip­tions, and cer­tain­ly the assertive sig­na­ture. With over­laid blue let­ter­ing, the site does what the Absa­lom map does not—gives each nov­el, or 9 of them any­way, its own map, with dis­crete bound­aries between events, char­ac­ters, and time peri­ods.

If Faulkn­er want­ed us to see the books as man­i­fes­ta­tions of a sin­gu­lar con­scious­ness, all radi­at­ing from a sin­gle source of wis­dom, this project iso­lates each nov­el, and its themes. In the map of Sanc­tu­ary, above, only loca­tions from that nov­el appear. On the page itself, a click on the cir­cu­lar mark­ings under each locale brings up a win­dow with anno­ta­tions and page ref­er­ences. The appa­ra­tus might at first appear to be a use­ful guide through the noto­ri­ous­ly dif­fi­cult nov­els, pro­vid­ed Faulkn­er meant the loca­tions to actu­al­ly cor­re­spond to the text in this way. But what are we to do with this visu­al infor­ma­tion? Lack­ing any leg­end, we can’t use the map to judge scale and dis­tance. And by remov­ing all of the oth­er events occur­ring in the vicin­i­ty in the span of around a hun­dred years or so, the maps denude the nov­els of their greater con­text, the pur­pose to which their “own­er & pro­pri­etor” devot­ed them at the end of Absa­lom, Absa­lom! Faulkner’s maps, as works of art in their own right, extend “the trag­ic view of life and his­to­ry that the Sut­pen nar­ra­tive has already con­veyed” in Absa­lom, Absa­lom!, writes Ham­blin: “Through the hand­writ­ten entries that Faulkn­er made,” in that map, the most com­plete drawn in the author’s own hand, “the land­scape of Yok­na­p­ataw­pha is pre­sent­ed pri­mar­i­ly as a set­ting for grief, vil­lainy, and death.”

View more maps by Faulkn­er here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Art of William Faulkn­er: Draw­ings from 1916–1925

Rev­el in The William Faulkn­er Audio Archive on the Author’s 118th Birth­day

William Faulkn­er Resigns From His Post Office Job With a Spec­tac­u­lar Let­ter (1924)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Postage Stamps from Bhutan That Double as Playable Vinyl Records

Bhutan_record_stamps

The tiny, Himalayan king­dom of Bhutan has a unique nation­al aspi­ra­tion that sets it apart from its neigh­bors, Chi­na and India. (And cer­tain­ly the Unit­ed States too.) Rather than increas­ing its gross nation­al prod­uct, Bhutan has instead made it a goal to increase the Gross Nation­al Hap­pi­ness of its cit­i­zens. There’s wealth in health, not just mon­ey, the Bhutanese have argued. And since the 197os, the coun­try has tak­en a holis­tic approach to devel­op­ment, try­ing to increase the spir­i­tu­al, phys­i­cal, and envi­ron­men­tal health of its peo­ple. And guess what? The strat­e­gy is pay­ing off. A 2006 glob­al sur­vey con­duct­ed by Busi­ness Week found that Bhutan is the hap­pi­est coun­try in Asia and the eighth-hap­pi­est coun­try in the world.

It’s per­haps only a nation devot­ed to hap­pi­ness that could throw its sup­port behind this — postage stamps that dou­ble as playable vinyl records. Cre­at­ed by an Amer­i­can entre­pre­neur Burt Todd in the ear­ly 70s, at the request of the Bhutanese roy­al fam­i­ly, the “talk­ing stamps” shown above could be stuck on a let­ter and then lat­er played on a turntable. Accord­ing to Tod­d’s 2006 obit­u­ary in The New York Times, one stamp “played the Bhutanese nation­al anthem,” and anoth­er deliv­ered “a very con­cise his­to­ry of Bhutan.” Thanks to WFMU, our favorite inde­pen­dent free form radio sta­tion, you can hear clips of talk­ing stamps above and below. Don’t you feel hap­pi­er already?

via The Reply All Pod­cast

Fol­low Open Cul­ture on Face­book and Twit­ter and share intel­li­gent media with your friends. Or bet­ter yet, sign up for our dai­ly email and get a dai­ly dose of Open Cul­ture in your inbox. And if you want to make sure that our posts def­i­nite­ly appear in your Face­book news­feed, just fol­low these sim­ple steps.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How to Clean Your Vinyl Records with Wood Glue

Sovi­et Hip­sters Boot­legged West­ern Pop Music on Dis­card­ed X‑Rays: Hear Orig­i­nal Audio Sam­ples

How Vinyl Records Are Made: A Primer from 1956

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 2 ) |

Watch Dismaland — The Official Unofficial Film, A Cinematic Journey Through Banksy’s Apocalyptic Theme Park

After a frus­trat­ing day spent deal­ing with a tena­cious ghost in my two-year-old lap­top, I’d much rather vis­it the drea­ry bemuse­ment park, Dis­ma­land, than that soul­less, slick-sur­faced “genius” bar. It just feels more real, some­how.

Sad­ly for those of us in gloomy, defeatist moods, Dis­ma­land, the artist Banksy’s high con­cept, mul­ti­ple acre instal­la­tion, was nev­er intend­ed to be a per­ma­nent fix­ture. It went the way of Cinderella’s coach ear­li­er this fall, but not before pho­tog­ra­ph­er Jamie Bright­more man­aged to squeeze in amongst the great throngs of British curios­i­ty seek­ers, cam­era in hand.

The weath­er was drea­ry for his three vis­its, and a secu­ri­ty guard denud­ed him of his tri­pod, but he still man­aged to cap­ture the dystopi­an scene on behalf of arm­chair trav­el­ers every­where. A cat­a­logue of hor­rors awaits you above in Dis­ma­land: The Offi­cial Unof­fi­cial Film. He also paid close atten­tion to the sound design of the apoc­a­lyp­tic get­away, under­stand­ing the audio com­po­nent to such grim exhibits as Relent­less Paparazzi and the hor­ri­fy­ing mer­ry-wheel, Cor­po­rate Scan­dal.

The artist, a true Dis­ma­teer, shares more about his time at the least hap­py place on earth here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Banksy Cre­ates a Tiny Repli­ca of The Great Sphinx Of Giza In Queens

Pat­ti Smith Presents Top Web­by Award to Banksy; He Accepts with Self-Mock­ing Video

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, illus­tra­tor, and Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of the East Vil­lage Inky zine. Her play, Fawn­book, opens in New York City lat­er this fall. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

A Young Hunter S. Thompson Appears on the Classic TV Game Show, To Tell the Truth (1967)

Once upon a time, avant-garde com­posers, sur­re­al­ist painters, and Gonzo jour­nal­ists made guest appear­ances on the most main­stream Amer­i­can game shows. It does­n’t hap­pen much any­more.

We’ve shown you John Cage per­form on I’ve Got a Secret in 1960; Sal­vador Dalí do his Dalí schtick on What’s My Line in 1952; and a young Frank Zap­pa turn a bicy­cle into a musi­cal instru­ment on The Steve Allen Show in ’63. Now we can add to the list a young Hunter S. Thomp­son mak­ing an appear­ance on To Tell the Truth, one of the longest-run­ning TV game shows in Amer­i­can his­to­ry. The episode (above) aired on Feb­ru­ary 20, 1967, the year after Thomp­son pub­lished his first major book of jour­nal­ism, Hel­l’s Angels: The Strange and Ter­ri­ble Saga of the Out­law Motor­cy­cle Gangs. (See him get con­front­ed by the Angels here.)

If you’re not famil­iar with the show, To Tell the Truth works like this:

The show fea­tures a pan­el of four celebri­ties whose object is the cor­rect iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of a described con­tes­tant who has an unusu­al occu­pa­tion or expe­ri­ence. This cen­tral char­ac­ter is accom­pa­nied by two impos­tors who pre­tend to be the cen­tral char­ac­ter; togeth­er, the three per­sons are said to belong to a “team of chal­lengers.” The celebri­ty pan­elists ques­tion the three con­tes­tants; the impos­tors are allowed to lie but the cen­tral char­ac­ter is sworn “to tell the truth”. After ques­tion­ing, the pan­el attempts to iden­ti­fy which of the three chal­lengers is telling the truth and is thus the cen­tral char­ac­ter.

Giv­en the whole premise of the show, Thomp­son, only 30 years old, was still an unrec­og­niz­able face on Amer­i­ca’s cul­tur­al scene. But, with the pub­li­ca­tion of Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas just around the cor­ner, all of that was about to change.

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

via @WFMU

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Hunter S. Thomp­son Gets Con­front­ed by The Hell’s Angels

Read 18 Lost Sto­ries From Hunter S. Thompson’s For­got­ten Stint As a For­eign Cor­re­spon­dent

Hunter S. Thomp­son, Exis­ten­tial­ist Life Coach, Gives Tips for Find­ing Mean­ing in Life

Read 10 Free Arti­cles by Hunter S. Thomp­son That Span His Gonzo Jour­nal­ist Career (1965–2005)

Hunter S. Thomp­son Inter­views Kei­th Richards

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Maurice Sendak Illustrates Tolstoy in 1963 (with a Little Help from His Editor)

sendak_tolstoy5

Even those of us who know noth­ing else of Mau­rice Sendak’s work know Where the Wild Things Are, almost always because we read and found our­selves cap­ti­vat­ed by it in our own child­hoods — if, of course, our child­hoods hap­pened in 1963 or lat­er. Though that year saw the pub­li­ca­tion of that best-known of Sendak’s many works as an illus­tra­tor and writer — and indeed, quite pos­si­bly the best-known chil­dren’s book of the twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry, illus­trat­ed or writ­ten by any­one — the world got some­thing else intrigu­ing from Sendak at the same time: an illus­trat­ed edi­tion of Leo Tol­stoy’s 1852 auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal nov­el Nikolenka’s Child­hood.

sendak_tolstoy1

At Brain­pick­ings, Maria Popo­va writes of the strug­gle Sendak, then a young and inse­cure artist at the begin­ning of his career, endured to com­plete this less­er-known project: “His youth­ful inse­cu­ri­ty, how­ev­er, presents a beau­ti­ful par­al­lel to the com­ing-of-age themes Tol­stoy explores. The illus­tra­tions, pre­sent­ed here from a sur­viv­ing copy of the 1963 gem, are as ten­der and soul­ful as young Sendak’s spir­it.” Here we’ve select­ed a few of the images that Popo­va gath­ered from this out-of-print book; to see more, do have a look at her orig­i­nal post.

sendak_tolstoy15

Lat­er in life Sendak explained his anx­i­ety about accom­pa­ny­ing the words of the man who wrote War and Peace: “You can’t illus­trate Tol­stoy. You’re com­pet­ing with the great­est illus­tra­tor in the world. Pic­tures bring him down and just limp along.” At Let­ters of Note, you can read the words of encour­age­ment writ­ten to the young Sendak by his edi­tor Ursu­la Nord­strom, who acknowl­edged that, “sure, Tol­stoy and Melville have a lot of fur­ni­ture in their books and they also know a lot of facts, but that isn’t the only sort of genius, you know that. Yes, Tol­stoy is won­der­ful (his pub­lish­er asked me for a quote) but you can express as much emo­tion and ‘cohe­sion and pur­pose’ in some of your draw­ings as there is in War and Peace. I mean that.”

sendak_tolstoy12

Again, find more of Sendak’s illus­tra­tions of Tol­stoy’s Nikolenka’s Child­hood at Brain­Pick­ings. Used copies can be found on Abe­Books.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Mau­rice Sendak Sent Beau­ti­ful­ly Illus­trat­ed Let­ters to Fans — So Beau­ti­ful a Kid Ate One

Mau­rice Sendak’s Bawdy Illus­tra­tions For Her­man Melville’s Pierre: or, The Ambi­gu­i­ties

The Only Draw­ing from Mau­rice Sendak’s Short-Lived Attempt to Illus­trate The Hob­bit

Mau­rice Sendak’s Emo­tion­al Last Inter­view with NPR’s Ter­ry Gross, Ani­mat­ed by Christoph Nie­mann

An Ani­mat­ed Christ­mas Fable by Mau­rice Sendak (1977)

Col­in Mar­shall writes else­where on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer, the video series The City in Cin­e­maand the crowd­fund­ed jour­nal­ism project Where Is the City of the Future? Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

How to Sing Two Notes At Once (aka Polyphonic Overtone Singing): Lessons from Singer Anna-Maria Hefele

Last year we drew your atten­tion to the video above from Munich-based singer Anna-Maria Hefele in which she gives us a stun­ning demon­stra­tion of poly­phon­ic over­tone singing. It’s a tech­nique com­mon to Tuva, Inu­it, and Xhosa cul­tures but large­ly unfa­mil­iar to us in West­ern music.

Many read­ers point­ed out that Hefele’s fine exam­ple of her tech­nique did not in fact show us how to do it, only that it could be done in a vari­ety of dif­fer­ent, all equal­ly impres­sive, ways. Well, today, we bring you a series of lessons Hefele has post­ed as a response to her first video’s pop­u­lar­i­ty. In each of these videos, she offers detailed instruc­tions on how to har­ness the pow­er of your voice to sing two notes at once.

Before begin­ning Hefele’s course, you may wish to get a more the­o­ret­i­cal overview of how poly­phon­ic singing works. For that pur­pose, the video above gives us a visu­al rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the over­tones in Hefele’s voice. As she demon­strates via spec­tro­gram, her nor­mal singing voice con­tains sev­er­al tones at once already, which we typ­i­cal­ly hear as only one note. Sim­i­lar­ly, eth­no­mu­si­col­o­gist and stu­dent of throat singing Mark van Ton­geren explains at Smith­son­ian Folk­ways, “every­one con­tin­u­ous­ly when you’re speak­ing [or singing] pro­duces a whole spec­trum of sound.” The throat singing method involves alter­ing the voice to enhance over­tones. Hefele uses some slight­ly dif­fer­ent tech­niques to “fil­ter,” as she puts it, spe­cif­ic tones in her voice.

The first intro­duc­tion to the over­tone fil­ter­ing tech­nique comes to us in Les­son 1 above. Hefele demon­strates how to move from tone to tone by grad­u­al­ly tran­si­tion­ing to dif­fer­ent vow­el sounds. She also teas­es the sec­ond and third lessons, below, which show how to ampli­fy spe­cif­ic tones once you have iso­lat­ed them. Hefele is a per­son­able and engag­ing instructor—she would, I imag­ine, make an excel­lent lan­guage teacher as well—and her cheeky pre­sen­ta­tion takes us into the show­er with her in Les­son 2, the best place, unsur­pris­ing­ly, to prac­tice your poly­phon­ic over­tone singing. And to hear how Hefele uses her vocal tech­niques in beau­ti­ful­ly haunt­ing, almost oth­er­world­ly music, make sure to watch this solo per­for­mance from 2012 or hear this Hilde­gard von Bin­gen choral com­po­si­tion adapt­ed to Hefele’s poly­phon­ic solo voice.

H/T Natal­ie in the UK

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Watch Stephen Sond­heim Teach a Kid How to Sing “Send In the Clowns”

Bri­an Eno Lists the Ben­e­fits of Singing: A Long Life, Increased Intel­li­gence, and a Sound Civ­i­liza­tion

Dutch­man Mas­ters the Art of Singing Led Zeppelin’s “Stair­way to Heav­en” Back­wards

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

In 1704, Isaac Newton Predicts the World Will End in 2060

Newton Letter

We have become quite used to pro­nounce­ments of doom, from sci­en­tists pre­dict­ing the sixth mass extinc­tion due to the mea­sur­able effects of cli­mate change, and from reli­gion­ists declar­ing the apoc­a­lypse due to a sur­feit of sin. It’s almost impos­si­ble to imag­ine these two groups of peo­ple agree­ing on any­thing oth­er than the omi­nous por­tent of their respec­tive mes­sages. But in the ear­ly days of the sci­en­tif­ic revolution—the days of Shake­speare con­tem­po­rary Fran­cis Bacon, and lat­er 17th cen­tu­ry Descartes—it was not at all unusu­al to find both kinds of rea­son­ing, or unrea­son­ing, in the same per­son, along with beliefs in mag­ic, div­ina­tion, astrol­o­gy, etc.

Yet even in this mael­strom of het­ero­dox thought and prac­tices, Sir Isaac New­ton stood out as a par­tic­u­lar­ly odd co-exis­tence of eso­teric bib­li­cal prophe­cy, occult beliefs, and a rigid, for­mal math­e­mat­ics that not only adhered to the induc­tive sci­en­tif­ic method, but also expand­ed its poten­tial by apply­ing gen­er­al axioms to spe­cif­ic cas­es. Yet many of Newton’s gen­er­al prin­ci­ples would seem total­ly inim­i­cal to the nat­u­ral­ism of most physi­cists today. As he was for­mu­lat­ing the prin­ci­ples of grav­i­ty and three laws of motion, for exam­ple, New­ton also sought the leg­endary Philosopher’s Stone and attempt­ed to turn met­al to gold. More­over, the devout­ly reli­gious New­ton wrote the­o­log­i­cal trea­tis­es inter­pret­ing Bib­li­cal prophe­cies and pre­dict­ing the end of the world. The date he arrived at? 2060.

NewtonPapers1AP_468x603

New­ton seems, writes sci­ence blog Anoth­er Pale Blue Dot, “as con­fi­dent of his pre­dic­tions in this realm as he was in the ratio­nal world of sci­ence.” In a 1704 let­ter exhib­it­ed at Jerusalem’s Hebrew Uni­ver­si­ty, above, New­ton describes his “rec­coning”:

So then the time times & half a time are 42 months or 1260 days or three years & an half, rec­coning twelve months to a yeare & 30 days to a month as was done in the Cal­en­dar of the prim­i­tive year. And the days of short lived Beasts being put for the years of lived [sic] king­doms, the peri­od of 1260 days, if dat­ed from the com­plete con­quest of the three kings A.C. 800, will end A.C. 2060. It may end lat­er, but I see no rea­son for its end­ing soon­er.

New­ton fur­ther demon­strates his con­fi­dence in the next sen­tence, writ­ing that his intent, “though not to assert” an answer, should in any event “put a stop the rash con­jec­tures of fan­ci­full men who are fre­quent­ly pre­dict­ing the time of the end.” Indeed. So how did he arrive at this num­ber? New­ton applied a rig­or­ous method, that is to be sure.

If you have the patience for exhaus­tive descrip­tion of how he worked out his pre­dic­tion using the Book of Daniel, you may read one here by his­to­ri­an of sci­ence Stephen Sno­be­len, who also points out how wide­spread the inter­est in Newton’s odd beliefs has become, reach­ing across every con­ti­nent, though schol­ars have known about this side of the Enlight­en­ment giant for a long time.

For a sense of the exact­ing, yet com­plete­ly bizarre fla­vor of Newton’s prophet­ic cal­cu­la­tions, see anoth­er New­ton let­ter at the of the post, tran­scribed below.

Prop. 1. The 2300 prophet­ick days did not com­mence before the rise of the lit­tle horn of the He Goat.

2 Those day [sic] did not com­mence a[f]ter the destruc­tion of Jerusalem & ye Tem­ple by the Romans A.[D.] 70.

3 The time times & half a time did not com­mence before the year 800 in wch the Popes suprema­cy com­menced

4 They did not com­mence after the re[ig]ne of Gre­go­ry the 7th. 1084

5 The 1290 days did not com­mence b[e]fore the year 842.

6 They did not com­mence after the reigne of Pope Greg. 7th. 1084

7 The dif­f­ence [sic] between the 1290 & 1335 days are a parts of the sev­en weeks.

There­fore the 2300 years do not end before ye year 2132 nor after 2370.

The time times & half time do n[o]t end before 2060 nor after [2344]

The 1290 days do not begin [this should read: end] before 2090 [New­ton might mean: 2132] nor after 1374 [sic; New­ton prob­a­bly means 2374]

The edi­to­r­i­al inser­tions are Pro­fes­sor Snobelen’s, who thinks the let­ter dates “from after 1705,” and that “the shaky hand­writ­ing sug­gests a date of com­po­si­tion late in Newton’s life.” What­ev­er the exact date, we see him much less cer­tain here; New­ton push­es around some oth­er dates—2344, 2090 (or 2132), 2374. All of them seem arbi­trary, but “giv­en the nice round­ness of the num­ber,” writes Moth­er­board, “and the fact that it appears in more than one let­ter,” 2060 has become his most mem­o­rable dat­ing for the apoc­a­lypse.

It’s impor­tant to note that New­ton didn’t believe the world would “end” in the sense of cease to exist or burn up in holy flames. His end times phi­los­o­phy resem­bles that of a sur­pris­ing num­ber of cur­rent day evan­gel­i­cals: Christ would return and reign for a mil­len­ni­um, the Jew­ish dias­po­ra would return to Israel and would, he wrote, set up “a flour­ish­ing and ever­last­ing King­dom.” We hear such state­ments often from tel­e­van­ge­lists, school boards, gov­er­nors, and pres­i­den­tial can­di­dates.

As many peo­ple have argued, despite Newton’s con­cep­tion of his sci­en­tif­ic work as a bul­wark against oth­er the­olo­gies, it ulti­mate­ly became a foun­da­tion for Deism and Nat­u­ral­ism, and has allowed sci­en­tists to make accu­rate pre­dic­tions for hun­dreds of years. 20th cen­tu­ry physics may have shown us a much more rad­i­cal­ly unsta­ble uni­verse than New­ton ever imag­ined, but his the­o­ries are, as Isaac Asi­mov would put it, “not so much wrong as incom­plete,” and still essen­tial to our under­stand­ing of cer­tain fun­da­men­tal phe­nom­e­na. But as fas­ci­nat­ing and curi­ous as Newton’s oth­er inter­ests may be, there’s no more rea­son to cred­it his prophet­ic cal­cu­la­tions than those of the Mil­lerites, Harold Camp­ing, or any oth­er apoc­a­lyp­tic dooms­day sect.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Stag­ger­ing Genius of Isaac New­ton

Isaac New­ton Cre­ates a List of His 57 Sins (Cir­ca 1662)

Sir Isaac Newton’s Papers & Anno­tat­ed Prin­cip­ia Go Dig­i­tal

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.