Next month, David Gilmour will release his first solo album since 2006 and launch his first tour since ’08. But right now, in the dead of August, you can watch a new aniÂmatÂed video for his upcomÂing track, “RatÂtle That Lock.”
Kevin Smith’s 1994 debut Clerks did much to define the low-budÂget, high-proÂfile “Indiewood” boom of that era. But set a trend on AmerÂiÂca’s culÂturÂal fringe, and it nevÂer takes long for the mainÂstream to come callÂing. In this case, the mainÂstream wantÂed to cash in on a Clerks teleÂviÂsion sitÂcom, the only proÂduced episode of which spent the past couÂple decades lanÂguishÂing in the vast graveÂyard of pilots no netÂwork would pick up before its redisÂcovÂery just this year. You can watch it in all its sanÂiÂtized gloÂry just above.
Even though those of us who grew up on the mid-1990s teleÂviÂsuÂal landÂscape won’t recÂogÂnize the nevÂer-aired Clerks itself, we’ll recÂogÂnize its senÂsiÂbilÂiÂty right away. “It gives me bad flashÂbacks to the pre-web monoÂculÂture,” writes one comÂmenter on the MetafilÂter thread about the show — a monoÂculÂture built, at that time, upon one-linÂers and their corÂreÂspondÂing laugh tracks, flopÂpy hair and bagÂgy clothes. IronÂiÂcalÂly, it was that very same domÂiÂnant glossy blandÂness that made Clerks, the movie, feel so fresh when it first made its way from fesÂtiÂval to theÂatriÂcal release.
Still, this failed TV adapÂtaÂtion does retain a few eleÂments of its source mateÂrÂiÂal: the conÂveÂnience-store setÂting (though here called Rose MarÂket rather than Quick Stop), the main charÂacÂters named Dante and RanÂdal. But the resemÂblance more or less stops there. “Gone are the movie’s iconÂic drug dealÂers Jay and Silent Bob,” writes the A.V. Club’s ChristoÂpher CurÂley, “replaced by backÂup charÂacÂters includÂing an ice cream servÂer and a tanÂning salon ditz. Some of the beats of the film are still there, like RanÂdal harassÂing his video store cusÂtomers, but nothÂing lands or even remoteÂly coheres.”
Kevin Smith made Clerks with $27,575. Clerks the sitÂcom pilot, made entireÂly withÂout Smith’s involveÂment, cerÂtainÂly cost much more — monÂey that bought zero culÂturÂal impact, espeÂcialÂly by comÂparÂiÂson to the film that inspired it. The Indiewood moveÂment showed us how much untapped vitalÂiÂty AmerÂiÂcan cinÂeÂma still had; almost everyÂthing on teleÂviÂsion looked like lifeÂless proÂducÂtions-by-comÂmitÂtee by comÂparÂiÂson. But now that Clerks has passed its twenÂtiÂeth anniverÂsary, the tables have turned, and we look to teleÂviÂsion for the raw, real stoÂries HolÂlyÂwood doesÂn’t tell. The traÂvails of a couÂple of young sex- and Star Wars-obsessed dead-enders in grim subÂurÂban New JerÂsey, shot in black-and-white 16-milÂlimeÂter film — would CBS care to hear more?
It may be true that specÂuÂlaÂtion about an author’s perÂsonÂal hisÂtoÂry can prove not espeÂcialÂly illuÂmiÂnatÂing to readÂing their books. We genÂerÂalÂly think it best to read a litÂerÂary work on its own terms. But in cerÂtain casÂes, as in the well-worn case of Ernest HemÂingÂway, the parÂalÂlels between life and work are imposÂsiÂble to ignore or to pass over withÂout comÂment, and, for many critÂics, this goes parÂticÂuÂlarÂly for disÂcusÂsions about HemÂingÂway’s genÂder and sexÂuÂalÂiÂty. Even HemÂingÂway’s conÂtemÂpoÂraries had their comÂmenÂtary. ZelÂda FitzgerÂald supÂposÂedÂly remarked that no one could be as masÂcuÂline as HemÂingÂway, for examÂple, and VirÂginia Woolf referred to him as “self conÂsciousÂly virÂile.” Themes of homoÂsexÂuÂalÂiÂty and genÂder anxÂiÂety crop up in HemÂingÂway’s ficÂtion, and more promiÂnentÂly in unpubÂlished work unearthed in the 1980s.
For critÂics like Debra ModÂdelÂmog, author of ReadÂing Desire: In PurÂsuit if Ernest HemÂingÂway, the bioÂgraphÂiÂcal interÂest begins with the hyper-macho modÂernist’s earÂly childÂhood, durÂing which his mothÂer Grace raised him and his oldÂer sisÂter MarÂcelline as twin girls, dressÂing them alike “in fanÂcy dressÂes and flowÂered hats.” This apparÂentÂly hapÂpened over a periÂod of sevÂerÂal years, until HemÂingÂway was at least five years old, and Grace even held MarÂcelline back a year so that the two could attend the same grade. Though one of HemÂingÂway’s younger sisÂters, SunÂny, has “denied that the twinÂning ever took place” the eviÂdence seems to show otherwise—in MarÂcelline’s remÂiÂnisces and in phoÂtoÂgraph after phoÂtoÂgraph of young Ernest and MarÂcelline dressed exactÂly alike and havÂing tea parÂties, ridÂing in wagÂons, and holdÂing bouÂquets. You can see them in 1901, in bonÂnets above and flowÂered hats below.
At the top of the post, see HemÂingÂway in a girlÂish hairÂcut idenÂtiÂcal to his sisÂter’s, and below, see two phoÂtographs of him in a wide-shoulÂdered dress. At the JFK Library webÂsite (click here and scroll to botÂtom), you can now view many more of these phoÂtographs from HemÂingÂway’s first few years on up to the age of 18. The digÂiÂtized colÂlecÂtion of six childÂhood scrapÂbooks, the library writes, were “colÂlectÂed by Ernest HemÂingÂway himÂself and donatÂed to the John F. Kennedy Library by his widÂow, Mary HemÂingÂway.” Many of the childÂhood phoÂtographs are fasÂciÂnatÂing for varÂiÂous reaÂsons, though the “twinÂning” phoÂtographs have proÂvoked the most interÂest and conÂtributed to already rich theÂoÂries of HemÂingÂway’s idenÂtiÂty as a perÂson and an artist.
Looked at in the conÂtext of the time, these phoÂtographs don’t seem all that odd. As anyÂone who has flipped through famÂiÂly albums from the turn of the cenÂtuÂry (should they have them) will have noticed, litÂtle boys were rouÂtineÂly dressed in ambiguÂousÂly girlÂish attire, their long hair often styled and curled. The fashÂion derived partÂly from a hugeÂly popÂuÂlar charÂacÂter in chilÂdren’s ficÂtion named “LitÂtle Lord Fauntleroy,” the HarÂry PotÂter of his day, who had a rags-to-richÂes stoÂry that capÂtiÂvatÂed AmerÂiÂcan readÂers espeÂcialÂly. The charÂacÂter has been the subÂject of film adapÂtaÂtions even as late as 1980, in which he was played by a young Ricky SchroedÂer. Fauntleroy had some influÂence on Grace HemÂingÂway. (See HemÂingÂway in a Lord Fauntleroy suit, with footÂball, in a 1909 phoÂtoÂgraph below.)
Fauntleroy and othÂer simÂiÂlar charÂacÂters’ modÂel of “genÂteel manÂhood” gained wideÂspread curÂrenÂcy. Frances HodgÂson BurÂnetÂt’s VicÂtoÂriÂan novÂels feaÂturÂing this charÂacÂter came at a time when childÂhood was viewed through a much difÂferÂent lens than it is today. (As we’ve seen in the phoÂtogÂraÂphy of Lewis CarÂroll and many othÂer artists of the time in which chilÂdren appear as props and dolls, someÂtimes in strangeÂly sugÂgesÂtive or androgÂyÂnous posÂes that would not have seemed espeÂcialÂly pruriÂent or genÂder-bendÂing to their origÂiÂnal viewÂers.) The trend conÂtinÂued into the earÂly twenÂtiÂeth cenÂtuÂry. NonetheÂless, despite less rigid childÂhood genÂder norms, as HemÂingÂway biogÂraÂphÂer KenÂneth Schuyler Lynn writes, Grace HemÂingÂway’s “elabÂoÂrate preÂtense that litÂtle Ernest and his sisÂter were twins of the same sex” was very unusuÂal. CritÂics like ModÂdelÂmog and Mark Spilka have argued conÂvincÂingÂly that HemÂingÂway “rebelled against that idenÂtiÂty,” a rebelÂlion that “lastÂed a lifeÂtime.”
Artist Maria A. ArisÂtiÂdou’s mediÂum is cofÂfee, and lateÂly, she’s been garÂnerÂing a lot of attenÂtion for java-based porÂtraits of such culÂturÂal lumiÂnarÂies as EinÂstein, Darth VadÂer and The BeaÂtÂles.
The proÂlifÂic and highÂly-cafÂfeinatÂed artist found her niche when an acciÂdenÂtal spill gave rise to a someÂwhat sullen facÂsimÂiÂle of Vermeer’s Girl with a Pearl EarÂring.
She has since applied her espresÂso blends toward the Mona Lisa and one of Baroque era painter Juan de ArelÂlano’s floÂral still lifes, but for the most part, she draws her subÂjects from the realm of pop culÂture.
Scroll backÂwards to the mid-1800s and you’ll find author—and giftÂed draftsÂman—VicÂtor Hugo experÂiÂmentÂing with the stuff. Nor was his promisÂcuÂous nib a stranger to the artisÂtic posÂsiÂbilÂiÂties of soot, coal dust, and blood.
AnyÂone with a FaceÂbook or TwitÂter account last week couldÂn’t avoid hearÂing about WalÂter James Palmer, the MinÂnesoÂta denÂtist who allegedÂly went troÂphy huntÂing in ZimÂbabÂwe and killed Cecil the Lion, a local favorite who had been illeÂgalÂly lured away from a proÂtectÂed wildlife preÂserve. I won’t say anyÂthing more about it, othÂer than that you can sign a petiÂtion to get Palmer extraÂditÂed to ZimÂbabÂwe and let him defend his actions to local authorÂiÂties.
MeanÂwhile, back in New York City, two artists Travis Threlkel and Louie PsiÂhoyos were getÂting ready to turn The Empire State buildÂing into a Noah’s Ark of EndanÂgered AniÂmals. And that’s exactÂly what hapÂpened on SatÂurÂday night. PlacÂing “40 stacked, 20,000-lumen proÂjecÂtors on the roof of a nearÂby buildÂing,” Threlkel and PsiÂhoyos proÂjectÂed an array of endanÂgered aniÂmals “onto a space 375 feet tall and 186 feet wide covÂerÂing 33 floors,” reports The New York Times. You can see phoÂtos of the aniÂmals over at the RacÂing ExtincÂtion TwitÂter stream. TouchÂingÂly, there was an homage to Cecil the Lion. A video from the Times appears above; anothÂer from The New YorkÂer below.
To learn more about how Project MapÂping works, and to see othÂer examÂples of Threlkel’s work, see the videos on this page.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.