You might think that a movie about inforÂmaÂtion from 1953 couldn’t posÂsiÂbly be relÂeÂvant in the age of iPhone apps and the InterÂnet but you’d be wrong. A ComÂmuÂniÂcaÂtions Primer, directÂed by that powÂer couÂple of design Charles and Ray Eames, might refer to some hopeÂlessÂly quaint techÂnolÂoÂgy – comÂputÂer punch cards, for instance – but the underÂlyÂing ideas are as curÂrent as anyÂthing you’re likeÂly to see at a TED talk. You can watch it above.
In fact, the film made for IBM was the result of the first ever mulÂti-media preÂsenÂtaÂtions that Charles Eames develÂoped for the UniÂverÂsiÂty of GeorÂgia and UCLA. Using slides, music, narÂraÂtion and film, Eames broke down some eleÂmenÂtal aspects of comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtions for the audiÂence. CenÂtral to the film is an input/output diaÂgram that was laid out by Claude ShanÂnon, the father of inforÂmaÂtion theÂoÂry, in his 1949 book, The MathÂeÂmatÂiÂcal TheÂoÂry of ComÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion. As the perÂhaps overÂly soothÂing narÂraÂtor intones, any mesÂsage is transÂmitÂted by a sigÂnal through a chanÂnel to its receivÂer. While in the chanÂnel, the sigÂnal is altered and degradÂed by noise. The key to effecÂtive comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion is to reduce “noise” (conÂstrued broadÂly) that interÂferes with the mesÂsage and to genÂerÂalÂly simÂpliÂfy things.
The issue of sigÂnal vs noise is probÂaÂbly more relÂeÂvant now in this age of perÂpetÂuÂal disÂtracÂtion than it was durÂing the EisenÂhowÂer adminÂisÂtraÂtion. Every email, text mesÂsage or BuzÂzfeed artiÂcle seen indiÂvidÂuÂalÂly is clearÂly a sigÂnal. Yet for someÂone tryÂing to work, say on an artiÂcle about a short film by Charles and Ray Eames, they are defÂiÂniteÂly noise.
The Eames use the terms “sigÂnal,” “noise,” and “comÂmuÂniÂcaÂtion” quite broadÂly. Not only do they use these terms to describe, say, a radio broadÂcast or a mesÂsage being relayed by Morse code but also the creÂation of archiÂtecÂture, design and even visuÂal art.
The source of a paintÂing is the mind and expeÂriÂence of the painter. MesÂsage? His conÂcept of a parÂticÂuÂlar paintÂing. TransÂmitÂter? His talÂent and techÂnique. SigÂnal? The paintÂing itself. ReceivÂer? All the eyes and nerÂvous sysÂtems and preÂviÂous conÂdiÂtionÂing of those who see the paintÂing. DesÂtiÂnaÂtion? Their minds, their emoÂtions, their expeÂriÂence. Now in this case, the noise that tends to disÂrupt the sigÂnal can take many forms. It can be the qualÂiÂty of the light. The colÂor of the light. The prejÂuÂdices of the viewÂer. The idioÂsynÂcrasies of the painter.
Of course, a paintÂing — or a poem, or a film by Andrei Tarkovsky — is a difÂferÂent kind of sigÂnal than an email. It’s mesÂsage is mulÂtiÂlayÂered and mulÂtiÂvaÂlent. And while a genÂerÂaÂtion of culÂturÂal theÂoÂrists would no doubt chafe at Eames’s reducÂtive, ModÂernist view of art, it is still interÂestÂing to think of a paintÂing in the same manÂner as smoke sigÂnals.
The film’s narÂraÂtor conÂtinÂues:
But besides noise, there are othÂer facÂtors that can keep inforÂmaÂtion from reachÂing its desÂtiÂnaÂtion in tact. The backÂground and conÂdiÂtionÂing of the receivÂing appaÂraÂtus may so difÂfer from that of the transÂmitÂter that it may be imposÂsiÂble for the receivÂer to pick up the sigÂnal withÂout disÂtorÂtion.
That’s about as good a descripÂtion of cable new punÂdits as I’ve ever seen.
A ComÂmuÂniÂcaÂtions Primer will be added to our colÂlecÂtion, 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great ClasÂsics, Indies, Noir, WestÂerns, DocÂuÂmenÂtaries & More.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Charles and Ray Eames’ PowÂers of Ten: The ClasÂsic Film Re-ImagÂined By 40 Artists
Jonathan Crow is a Los AngeÂles-based writer and filmÂmakÂer whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The HolÂlyÂwood Reporter, and othÂer pubÂliÂcaÂtions. You can folÂlow him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog VeepÂtoÂpus, feaÂturÂing lots of picÂtures of vice presÂiÂdents with octoÂpusÂes on their heads. The VeepÂtoÂpus store is here.