A Playlist of Music Scientifically-Proven to Increase Cows’ Milk Production: REM, Lou Reed & More

cow-music-milking

Image by Daniel Schwen via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

Let’s test our agri­cul­ture math skills with a lit­tle dairy indus­try sto­ry prob­lem:

If an 8‑ounce glass of whole milk pro­vides 149 calo­ries, 8 grams of pro­tein, 276 mil­ligrams of cal­ci­um, 8 grams of fat, 4.5 grams of sat­u­rat­ed fat and 24 mil­ligrams of cho­les­terol, and a cup of two-per­cent milk has 120 calo­ries, 5 grams of fat, 3 grams of sat­u­rat­ed fat and 20 mil­ligrams of cho­les­terol, what kind of music will result in an over­all milk pro­duc­tion increase of 3%?

Accord­ing to a study at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Leices­ter School of Psy­chol­o­gy, the answer is slow jams and easy lis­ten­ing.

Huh. Based on the con­cert tees of the boys I grew up around in Indi­ana, I would have guessed Rush or Guns N’ Ros­es. (Maybe there was some Bar­ry Manilow going on behind closed barn doors?)

Actu­al­ly, research shows that bovine musi­cal pref­er­ence, like that of aer­o­bics instruc­tors, hinges less on any spe­cif­ic artist than on beats per minute.

…I hope they did­n’t spend too much on this study. Upon reflec­tion, isn’t it just com­mon sense that noise-sen­si­tive herd ani­mals attached to machines via their udders would choose a mel­low groove over death met­al or psy­chobil­ly?

(Poor Bana­nara­ma. It must’ve stung when the Uni­ver­si­ty of Leices­ter’s team told the world that 1,000 Hol­stein Friesian cat­tle liked lis­ten­ing to noth­ing at all bet­ter than their 1986 Bill­board Hot 100 #1 hit, “Venus.”)

To para­phrase anoth­er 80’s fave, I know what cows like, thanks to a pan­el of five Hol­steins who got to pick the win­ner of the British Colum­bia Dairy Asso­ci­a­tion’s 2012 “Music Makes More Milk” con­test. Brace your­self:

Did any­one else just imag­ine a thou­sand cows with phones to their ears, chew­ing their cuds and swish­ing their tails, con­tent to remain on hold indef­i­nite­ly?

Should the above tune ever grow old (doubt­ful) there’s always Shake­speare. Accord­ing to NPR, a the­atri­cal read­ing of “The Mer­ry Wives of Wind­sor” proved pop­u­lar, milk-wise, with an audi­ence of UK cows. And Mod­ern Farmer has hon­ored Lou Reed by includ­ing one of his com­po­si­tions (no, not “Met­al Machine Music, Part 1”) in their recent Playlist To Milk By:

Every­body Hurts,” REM

What a Dif­fer­ence A Day Makes,” Aretha Franklin

Bridge Over Trou­bled Water,” Simon & Gar­funkel

Moon Riv­er,” Dan­ny Williams

Orinoco Flow,” Celtic Woman

Per­fect Day,” Lou Reed (The Lit­tle Willie’s Lou Reed cow-tip­ping song aside, can you pic­ture him milk­ing one?)

via Grist

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Jazz for Cows

Sir Patrick Stew­art Demon­strates How Cows Moo in Dif­fer­ent Eng­lish Accents

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, zine pub­lish­er, and recent con­vert to almond milk. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

The Chemistry of Sriracha & What Sets Your Mouth Aflame

If you head over to the Huy Fong Foods web site, they’ll tell you that Sriracha, their ever-pop­u­lar Thai condi­ment, is “made from sun ripen chilies which are ground into a smooth paste along with gar­lic and pack­aged in a con­ve­nient squeeze bot­tle.” It’s the chilies that make your mouth burn when you pour that Sriracha onto your eggs or burg­ers, or in your soup and, yes, cock­tails. But if you want to get sci­en­tif­ic about things, it’s actu­al­ly the cap­saicin and dihy­dro­cap­saicin — the two com­pounds inside the hot pep­pers — that set your mouth aflame.  All of this, and more, gets cov­ered by this new video, The Chem­istry of Sriracha, from the Amer­i­can Chem­i­cal Soci­ety. It’s part of their video series, Reac­tions, that exam­ines the chem­istry of every­day things.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Free Online Chem­istry Cours­es

The Fas­ci­nat­ing Sci­ence of Snow

“The Peri­od­ic Table Table” — All The Ele­ments in Hand-Carved Wood

The Ele­ments: Tom Lehrer Recites Chem­i­cal Ele­ments to the Tune of Gilbert & Sul­li­van

Alice Herz-Sommer, the Oldest Holocaust Survivor (Thanks to the Power of Music), Dies at 110

On Sun­day, 23 Feb­ru­ary 2014, Alice Herz-Som­mer, thought to be the old­est Holo­caust sur­vivor, died in Lon­don. She has been an inspi­ra­tion to many peo­ple as the sto­ry of her life is shown in the Oscar-nom­i­nat­ed doc­u­men­tary called “The Lady in Num­ber 6″ (the video above is the offi­cial trail­er).

Alice was born in Prague – then part of the Aus­tro-Hun­gar­i­an Empire – in 1903. She start­ed play­ing the piano as a child and took lessons with Con­rad Ansorge, a stu­dent of Liszt. At 16, she attend­ed the mas­ter class at Prague’s pres­ti­gious Ger­man musi­cal acad­e­my. Lat­er, Alice became a respect­ed con­cert pianist in Prague. Through her fam­i­ly, she also knew Franz Kaf­ka. All of this changed when the Nazis occu­pied Czecho­slo­va­kia in March 1939. Along with oth­er Jews liv­ing in Prague, Alice was ini­tial­ly forced to live in Prague’s ghet­to before being deport­ed to the There­sien­stadt con­cen­tra­tion camp in 1943, along with her five-year-old son Raphael. Even­tu­al­ly her whole fam­i­ly, includ­ing her hus­band, cel­list Leopold Som­mer, and her moth­er, was sent to Auschwitz, Tre­blin­ka and Dachau, where they were killed.

Alice and her son sur­vived There­sien­stadt because the Nazis used this par­tic­u­lar con­cen­tra­tion camp to show the world how “well” the inmates were treat­ed. A pro­pa­gan­da film by the Nazis was shot and a del­e­ga­tion from the Dan­ish and Inter­na­tion­al Red Cross was shown around in 1943. To boost morale, Alice and many oth­er impris­oned musi­cians reg­u­lar­ly per­formed for the inmates. Despite the unimag­in­able liv­ing con­di­tions, Alice and her son sur­vived. They moved to Israel after the war, where she taught music. In 1986, she moved to Lon­don. Her son died in 2001 (obit­u­ary here).

The way Alice dealt with those hor­ri­ble times is par­tic­u­lar­ly inspir­ing. She says about the role of music: “I felt that this is the only thing which helps me to have hope … it’s a sort of reli­gion actu­al­ly. Music is … is God. In dif­fi­cult times you feel it, espe­cial­ly when you are suf­fer­ing.” When asked by Ger­man jour­nal­ists if she hat­ed Ger­mans, she replied: “I nev­er hate, and I will nev­er hate. Hatred brings only hatred.”

Extra mate­r­i­al:

By pro­fes­sion, Matthias Rasch­er teach­es Eng­lish and His­to­ry at a High School in north­ern Bavaria, Ger­many. In his free time he scours the web for good links and posts the best finds on Twit­ter.

 

Edgar Allan Poe Offers Interior Design Advice and Blasts American Aristocrats in “The Philosophy of Furniture” (1840)

edgar-allan-poe-brooklyn

Edgar Allan Poe isn’t read much as an essay­ist, which is too bad. His essays reveal a quick and iron­ic cast of mind where his dark poet­ry and sto­ries often mark him as a sin­gle-mind­ed hyper­sen­si­tive, “like a peony just past bloom.” Where Poe the poet can be lugubri­ous, Poe the essay­ist is brisk, inci­sive, and, well… kin­da cat­ty. Take the fol­low­ing apho­ris­tic wit­ti­cisms from his 1846 “A Few Words on Eti­quette”:

Nev­er use the term gen­teel — it is only to be found in the mouths of those who have it nowhere else.

Green spec­ta­cles are an abom­i­na­tion, fit­ted only for stu­dents of divin­i­ty.

Almost every defect of face may be con­cealed by a judi­cious use and arrange­ment of hair.

Are these casu­al bon mots or seri­ous pre­scrip­tions? Why not both? An edi­tor at the Edgar Allan Poe Soci­ety of Bal­ti­more notes that the eti­quette essay “bears much the same humor­ous tone and mix­ture of gen­uine and satir­i­cal com­men­tary as Poe’s essay ‘The Phi­los­o­phy of Fur­ni­ture’ from 6 years ear­li­er.” Indeed, in that ear­li­er crit­i­cal work on inte­ri­or design, Poe makes con­fi­dent judg­ments, leaps from point to point with delight­ful­ly spe­cif­ic exam­ples, and employs a mix of lev­i­ty and grav­i­ty.

Poe begins “The Phi­los­o­phy of Fur­ni­ture” with “a some­what Colerid­e­gy asser­tion” from Hegel then launch­es into a piti­less cri­tique of var­i­ous nation­al styles. His last point—“The Yan­kees alone are preposterous”—is the basis for what fol­lows, a dis­qui­si­tion on the sad state of Amer­i­can inte­ri­or design, brought about by “an aris­toc­ra­cy of dol­lars” in which “the dis­play of wealth” takes the place of her­aldry. His cri­tique recalls (and per­haps alludes to) Eng­lish poet Alexan­der Pope’s “Epis­tle to Burling­ton,” whose satir­i­cal tar­get makes such a taste­less mess of his vil­la that his neigh­bors cry out “What sums are thrown away!”

In Poe’s case, the offend­ing estate is “what is termed in the Unit­ed States, a well-fur­nished apart­ment.” He decries the inju­di­cious use of cur­tains, the poor dis­play of car­pets (“the soul of the apart­ment”), and the prob­lem “of gas and of glass.” Poe deli­cious­ly details the dec­o­rat­ing habits of a par­venu Amer­i­can aris­toc­ra­cy, whose defects are dis­cern­able by even the “ver­i­est bump­kin.” But he offers more than snark. “Like any good crit­ic,” writes The Smith­son­ian, “Poe doesn’t just con­demn, he offers solu­tions.” In the final, lengthy para­graph of “The Phi­los­o­phy of Fur­ni­ture,” Poe turns his tal­ent for vivid descrip­tion to a por­trait of his per­fect boudoir. Above, you can see a 1959 recre­ation of Poe’s “small and not, osten­ta­tious cham­ber with whose dec­o­ra­tions no fault can be found.” But this may be redun­dant. Poe fur­nish­es us with suf­fi­cient fine detail that we can bet­ter cre­ate his ide­al room in our  imag­i­na­tion. See the excerpts below, and read Poe’s com­plete essay here.

The pro­pri­etor lies asleep on a sofa — the weath­er is cool — the time is near mid­night: I will make a sketch of the room ere he awakes. It is oblong — some thir­ty feet in length and twen­ty-five in breadth — a shape afford­ing the best (ordi­nary) oppor­tu­ni­ties for the adjust­ment of fur­ni­ture. It has but one door — by no means a wide one — which is at one end of the par­al­lel­o­gram, and but two win­dows, which are at the oth­er. These lat­ter are large, reach­ing down to the floor — have deep recess­es — and open on an Ital­ian veran­da. Their panes are of a crim­son-tint­ed glass, set in rose-wood fram­ings, more mas­sive than usu­al. They are cur­tained with­in the recess, by a thick sil­ver tis­sue adapt­ed to the shape of the win­dow, and hang­ing loose­ly in small vol­umes. With­out the recess are cur­tains of an exceed­ing­ly rich crim­son silk, fringed with a deep net­work of gold, and lined with sil­ver tis­sue, which is the mate­r­i­al of the exte­ri­or blind. There are no cor­nices; but the folds of the whole fab­ric (which are sharp rather than mas­sive, and have an airy appear­ance), issue from beneath a broad entab­la­ture of rich gilt-work, which encir­cles the room at the junc­tion of the ceil­ing and walls […]

The car­pet — of Sax­ony mate­r­i­al — is quite half an inch thick, and is of the same crim­son ground, relieved sim­ply by the appear­ance of a gold cord (like that fes­toon­ing the cur­tains) slight­ly relieved above the sur­face of the ground, and thrown upon it in such a man­ner as to form a suc­ces­sion of short irreg­u­lar curves — one occa­sion­al­ly over­lay­ing the oth­er. The walls are pre­pared with a glossy paper of a sil­ver gray tint, spot­ted with small Arabesque devices of a fainter hue of the preva­lent crim­son. Many paint­ings relieve the expanse of paper. These are chiefly land­scapes of an imag­i­na­tive cast — such as the fairy grot­toes of Stan­field, or the lake of the Dis­mal Swamp of Chap­man. There are, nev­er­the­less, three or four female heads, of an ethe­re­al beau­ty — por­traits in the man­ner of Sul­ly. The tone of each pic­ture is warm, but dark […]

Two large low sofas of rose­wood and crim­son silk, gold-flow­ered, form the only seats, with the excep­tion of two light con­ver­sa­tion chairs, also of rose-wood. There is a pianoforte (rose-wood, also), with­out cov­er, and thrown open. An octag­o­nal table, formed alto­geth­er of the rich­est gold-thread­ed mar­ble, is placed near one of the sofas. This is also with­out cov­er — the drap­ery of the cur­tains has been thought suf­fi­cient.. Four large and gor­geous Sevres vas­es, in which bloom a pro­fu­sion of sweet and vivid flow­ers, occu­py the slight­ly round­ed angles of the room. A tall can­de­labrum, bear­ing a small antique lamp with high­ly per­fumed oil, is stand­ing near the head of my sleep­ing friend. Some light and grace­ful hang­ing shelves, with gold­en edges and crim­son silk cords with gold tas­sels, sus­tain two or three hun­dred mag­nif­i­cent­ly bound books. Beyond these things, there is no fur­ni­ture, if we except an Argand lamp, with a plain crim­son-tint­ed ground glass shade, which depends from the lofty vault­ed ceil­ing by a sin­gle slen­der gold chain, and throws a tran­quil but mag­i­cal radi­ance over all.

Again, the Edgar Allan Poe Soci­ety edi­tor help­ful­ly notes that “Poe, in this arti­cle, has adopt­ed an inten­tion­al­ly humor­ous tone.” Should we take this seri­ous­ly or treat is as Poe-ean satire? Why not both?

Works by Poe can be found in our col­lec­tions of Free Audio Books and Free eBooks.

via Smithsonian.com

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Edgar Allan Poe Dig­i­tal Col­lec­tion

Edgar Allan Poe’s “The Raven,” Read by Christo­pher Walken, Vin­cent Price, and Christo­pher Lee

Edgar Allan Poe & The Ani­mat­ed Tell-Tale Heart

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Watch a Witty, Gritty, Hardboiled Retelling of the Famous Aaron Burr-Alexander Hamilton Duel

Imag­ine Vice Pres­i­dent Joe Biden being on the receiv­ing end of a vocif­er­ous attack in the press by for­mer Sec­re­tary of the Trea­sury, Tim Gei­th­n­er. Now, pic­ture Biden demand­ing sat­is­fac­tion, and tak­ing the morn­ing off from his vice pres­i­den­tial duties to set­tle things man-to-man, and Gei­th­n­er wind­ing up in a coma. As unbe­liev­able as this episode may seem today, this kind of affair played out some 200 years ago on a much grander scale when Vice Pres­i­dent Aaron Burr fatal­ly shot Alexan­der Hamil­ton dur­ing a duel. The Burr-Hamil­ton con­fronta­tion remains an infa­mous black mark on Amer­i­can pol­i­tics. Burr, serv­ing as VP in Thomas Jefferson’s admin­is­tra­tion, is wide­ly seen as a vil­lain for mur­der­ing Hamil­ton. Hamil­ton, for his part, is beloved as one of the Found­ing Fathers and a vocal cham­pi­on of the U.S. Con­sti­tu­tion. For our non-Amer­i­can read­ers, this adu­la­tion trans­lates to his face now grac­ing the $10 bill.

But were things real­ly so sim­ple? Dana O’Keefe, the film­mak­er behind Aaron Burr, Part 2, answers with a resound­ing no. “His­to­ry is a con­test, not unlike a duel. I end­ed his life. But he ruined mine. I won the duel, but I lost my place in his­to­ry,” Burr declares in the open­ing mono­logue of O’Keefe’s 8‑minute short, and it is pre­cise­ly Burr’s place in his­to­ry that the film seeks to address. In O’Keefe’s mod­ern retelling, Burr emerges as an unfair­ly maligned fig­ure, whose brav­ery in bat­tle has been over­shad­owed by the incom­pe­tence of supe­ri­ors such as Gen­er­als George Wash­ing­ton and Richard Mont­gomery. It’s effec­tive. Mix­ing archival footage of orig­i­nal doc­u­ments with re-enact­ments and present day shots, O’Keefe cre­ates a grit­ty, some­times wit­ty, hard­boiled feel to Bur­r’s sto­ry, and view­ers begin to sym­pa­thize with the dis­par­aged fig­ure. To the sounds of tracks like Dr. Dre’s “The Next Episode” and some cre­ative use of iPhones, O’Keefe dis­pels the idea that Burr shot Hamil­ton first. Rather, Burr is the hon­or­able par­ty, and Hamil­ton is the scoundrel. It’s well worth a watch.

via The Atlantic

Ilia Blin­d­er­man is a Mon­tre­al-based cul­ture and sci­ence writer. Fol­low him at @iliablinderman, or read more of his writ­ing at the Huff­in­g­ton Post.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Drunk His­to­ry: An Intox­i­cat­ed Look at the Famous Alexan­der Hamil­ton – Aaron Burr Duel

Alexan­der Hamil­ton: Hip-Hop Hero at the White House Poet­ry Evening

Free Online His­to­ry Cours­es

Watch Boy and Bicycle: Ridley Scott’s Very First Film (1965)

AlienBlade Run­nerGlad­i­a­torPrometheus, the Apple Mac­in­tosh 1984 Super Bowl ad, the upcom­ing Bib­li­cal­ly-based (and Bib­li­cal­ly-sized) Exo­dus: if you want a thor­ough­ly through-and-through vision, exe­cut­ed at full scale and tint­ed with more than a touch of dystopi­an grim­ness, you go to Rid­ley Scott. But no direc­tor com­mences his career mak­ing pic­tures like these; most of them have to begin in hum­bler places, pulling togeth­er what­ev­er grant mon­ey, film-school resources, and help­ful acquain­tances they can to real­ize, and in the process often com­pro­mise, their long-incu­bat­ed cin­e­mat­ic dreams. So it went with Scott him­self, who made the short film above, 1965’s Boy and Bicy­cle, while a stu­dent at Lon­don’s Roy­al Col­lege of Art. But even this com­par­a­tive­ly tiny project, with its rich 16-mil­lime­ter images, adept cam­era move­ment, and utter­ly hope­less set­ting, shows signs of what sort of film­mak­er the twen­tysome­thing Scott would become a decade or two lat­er.

Though he received his pho­to­graph­ic edu­ca­tion in Lon­don, Scott took his cam­era out for the Boy and Bicy­cle shoot to West Hartle­pool, where he’d attend­ed art school sev­er­al years ear­li­er. That bit of the soon-to-be-dein­dus­tri­al­ized north of Eng­land pro­vid­ed, espe­cial­ly in the British Steel North Works cool­ing tow­er and blast fur­nace, just the sort of back­ground we’d expect to see in the mature direc­tor’s work. And through this bleak land­scape (which reminds me of noth­ing so much as the inhos­pitable Osa­ka he would por­tray more than twen­ty years lat­er in Black Rain) we have the tit­u­lar boy on the tit­u­lar bicy­cle, played by — clas­sic first-time film­mak­er’s strat­e­gy — the direc­tor’s younger broth­er. In this case, that broth­er would grow up to become Tony Scott, a cel­e­brat­ed if aes­thet­i­cal­ly polar­iz­ing direc­tor (Top GunTrue RomanceDomi­no) in his own right. Not one to waste a res­o­nant image, Rid­ley Scott would a decade lat­er revis­it Boy and Bicy­cle in the beloved adver­tise­ment for Hov­is bread just above.

Oth­er ear­ly short films by great direc­tors can be found below, and in our col­lec­tion of 635 Free Movies Online.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Mar­tin Scorsese’s Very First Films: Three Imag­i­na­tive Short Works

Stan­ley Kubrick’s Very First Films: Three Short Doc­u­men­taries

Andrei Tarkovsky’s Very First Films: Three Stu­dent Films, 1956–1960

The Hearts of Age: Orson Welles’ Sur­re­al­ist First Film (1934)

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, Asia, film, lit­er­a­ture, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on his brand new Face­book page.

Enjoy a Bluegrass Performance of Elton John’s 1972 Hit, “Rocket Man”

Last fall, our read­ers loved watch­ing Iron Horse, a blue­grass band from Alaba­ma, per­form­ing a most unusu­al ver­sion of Metal­li­ca’s “Enter Sand­man.” The band’s take on Metal­li­ca’s anthem was orig­i­nal­ly record­ed on the 2003 album, Fade to Blue­grass: Trib­ute to Metal­li­ca, where Iron Horse — with Tony Robert­son on man­dolin, Vance Hen­ry on gui­tar, Ricky Rogers on bass, and Antho­ny Richard­son on ban­jo — played Metal­li­ca hits in blue­grass fash­ion — “or at least as blue­grass as it’s pos­si­ble for Metal­li­ca songs to be.”

This Jan­u­ary, the quar­tet released a new video, this time cov­er­ing “Rock­et Man.” Sung by Elton John in ’72, writ­ten by Bernie Taupin, and inspired by a Ray Brad­bury sto­ry, Rock­et Man has been covered/performed by Cold­play, Kate BushMy Morn­ing Jack­et and many oth­ers. But, if you have a score­card, you’ll almost cer­tain­ly give Iron Horse top marks for cre­ativ­i­ty and orig­i­nal­i­ty. Hope you enjoy.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

A Blue­grass Ver­sion of Metallica’s Heavy Met­al Hit, “Enter Sand­man”

Robert Plant and Ali­son Krauss Sing Coun­try Ver­sions of Zeppelin’s “Black Dog” & “When the Lev­ee Breaks”

Pak­istani Musi­cians Play Amaz­ing Ver­sion of Dave Brubeck’s Jazz Clas­sic, “Take Five”

 

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

Crime Jazz: How Miles Davis, Count Basie & Duke Ellington Created Soundtracks for Noir Films & TV

When we think of film noir, we tend to think of a mood best set by a look: shad­ow and light (most­ly shad­ow), grim but visu­al­ly rich weath­er, near-depop­u­lat­ed urban streets. You’ll see plen­ty of that pulled off at the height of the craft in the movies that make up “noir­chae­ol­o­gist” Eddie Muller’s list of 25 noir pic­tures that will endure, which we fea­tured last week. But what will you hear? Though no one com­po­si­tion­al style dom­i­nat­ed the sound­tracks of films noirs, you’ll cer­tain­ly hear more than a few sol­id pieces of crime jazz. Xeni Jardin at Boing Boing, writ­ing about Rhi­no’s epony­mous com­pi­la­tion album, defines this musi­cal genre as “jazzy theme music from 1950s TV shows and movies in which very bad peo­ple do very bad things.” She links to PopCult’s col­lec­tion of clas­sic crime jazz sound­track album cov­ers, from The Third Man to Cha­rade (the best Hitch­cock film, of course, that Hitch­cock nev­er made), to The Man With the Gold­en Arm, all as evoca­tive as the music itself.

“Pre­vi­ous­ly, movie music meant sweep­ing orches­tral themes or tra­di­tion­al Broad­way-style musi­cals,” says PopCult. “But with the grow­ing pop­u­lar­i­ty of bebop and hard bop as the sound of urban cool, stu­dios began latch­ing onto the now beat as a way to make their movies seem grit­ty or ‘street.’ ”

At Jazz.com, Alan Kurtz writes about the spread of crime jazz from straight-up film noir to all sorts of pro­duc­tions hav­ing to do with life out­side the law: “In movies and TV, jazz accom­pa­nied the entire sor­did range of police-blot­ter behav­ior, from gam­bling, pros­ti­tu­tion and drug addic­tion to theft, assault, mur­der and cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment.” Get your­self in the spir­it of all those mid­cen­tu­ry degen­era­cies and more with the tracks fea­tured here, all of which will take you straight to an ear­li­er kind of mean street: the theme from The M Squad, “two min­utes of may­hem by Count Basie and his mob of heav­ies”; Miles Davis’ “Au Bar du Petit Bac,” impro­vised by Davis and his Parisian band against Louis Malle’s Ele­va­tor to the Gal­lows; and Ray Antho­ny’s “Peter Gunn Theme,” a “quick­ie cov­er” that “beat Hen­ry Mancini’s orig­i­nal to the punch.”

And final­ly we have Duke Elling­ton’s score for Anato­my of a Mur­der, direct­ed by Otto Pre­minger in 1959.

via Boing Boing

Relat­ed Con­tent:

30 Free Noir Films

1959: The Year that Changed Jazz

The Nazis’ 10 Con­trol-Freak Rules for Jazz Per­form­ers: A Strange List from World War II

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, Asia, film, lit­er­a­ture, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on his brand new Face­book page.

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.