One of the great polyÂmaths of the 19th cenÂtuÂry, Lewis CarÂroll (pen name of Charles Lutwidge DodgÂson) —mathÂeÂmatiÂcian, logiÂcian, author, poet, AngliÂcan cleric—took to the new mediÂum of phoÂtogÂraÂphy with the same alacrity he applied to all of his purÂsuits. Though he may be described as a hobÂbyÂist in the sense that he nevÂer purÂsued the art proÂfesÂsionÂalÂly, he nonetheÂless “became a masÂter of the mediÂum, boastÂing a portÂfoÂlio of roughÂly 3,000 images and his very own stuÂdio.”
So says a recent artiÂcle by GanÂnon BurÂgett on Carroll’s “24-year career as a phoÂtogÂraÂphÂer,” durÂing which he made a numÂber of porÂtraits, includÂing one of then-poet lauÂreÂate of EngÂland Alfred, Lord TenÂnyson. His subÂjects also includÂed “landÂscapes, dolls, dogs, statÂues, paintÂings, trees and even skeleÂtons.”
CarÂroll excelled at a develÂopÂing method called the wet colÂloÂdiÂon process, which replaced the daguerreoÂtype as the priÂmaÂry means of phoÂtoÂgraphÂic image-makÂing. This process seems to have been someÂthing like paintÂing in oils, requirÂing a great deal of dexÂterÂiÂty and chemÂiÂcal know-how, and simÂiÂlarÂly subÂject to decay when done impropÂerÂly. CarÂroll parÂticÂuÂlarÂly valÂued this method for its difÂfiÂculÂty (he described it in detail in some lines added to a poem called “Hiawatha’s PhoÂtographÂing”)—so much so that once a dry develÂopÂing process came into being, he abanÂdoned the mediÂum altoÂgethÂer, comÂplainÂing that it became so easy anyÂone could do it. Carroll’s obsesÂsive focus on process mirÂrored an obsesÂsion with his favorite phoÂtoÂgraphÂic subÂjects, young chilÂdren, includÂing Tennyson’s son HalÂlam (above). Most famousÂly, CarÂroll obsesÂsiveÂly phoÂtographed the young Alice LidÂdell (top and below as “The Queen of May”), daughÂter of famÂiÂly friend HenÂry George LidÂdell and inspiÂraÂtion for Carroll’s most famous ficÂtionÂal charÂacÂter.
Many of Carroll’s phoÂtographs of Alice and othÂer chilÂdren can seem downÂright pruriÂent to our eyes. As Carroll’s biogÂraÂphÂer JenÂny Woolf writes in a 2010 essay for the SmithÂsonÂian, “of the approxÂiÂmateÂly 3,000 phoÂtographs DodgÂson made in his life, just over half are of children—30 of whom are depictÂed nude or semi-nude.”
Some of his portraits—even those in which the modÂel is clothed—might shock 2010 senÂsiÂbilÂiÂties, but by VicÂtoÂriÂan stanÂdards they were… well, rather conÂvenÂtionÂal. PhoÂtographs of nude chilÂdren someÂtimes appeared on postÂcards or birthÂday cards, and nude portraits—skillfully done—were praised as art studÂies […]. VicÂtoÂriÂans saw childÂhood as a state of grace; even nude phoÂtographs of chilÂdren were conÂsidÂered picÂtures of innoÂcence itself.
Woolf admits that Carroll’s interÂest, as scholÂars have specÂuÂlatÂed for decades, may have been less than innoÂcent, promptÂing Vladimir Nabokov to proÂpose “a pathetÂic affinÂiÂty” between CarÂroll and the narÂraÂtor of LoliÂta. The eviÂdence for Carroll’s posÂsiÂble pedophilÂia is highÂly sugÂgesÂtive but hardÂly conÂcluÂsive. BurÂgett sumÂmaÂrizes the claims as only specÂuÂlaÂtive at best: “The entire conÂtroÂverÂsy is an almost cenÂtuÂry-long debate, and one that doesn’t seem to be makÂing any major progress in either direcÂtion.” In a Slate review of Woolf’s Lewis CarÂroll biogÂraÂphy, Seth Lerer also acknowlÂedges the conÂtroÂverÂsy, but reads the phoÂtographs of Alice, her sisÂters, and friends as repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtive of largÂer trends, as “brilÂliant tesÂtiÂmonies to the taste, the senÂtiÂment, and perÂhaps the sexÂuÂalÂiÂty of mid-VicÂtoÂriÂan EngÂland.”
A great part of this VicÂtoÂriÂan senÂsiÂbilÂiÂty conÂsists of the “recogÂniÂtion that all life involves role-playÂing,” hence the recurÂring phoÂtos of the girls in dress-up—as figÂures from myth and litÂerÂaÂture and exotÂic OriÂenÂtalÂist charÂacÂters, such as the phoÂto above of Alice and her sisÂter LoriÂna as “ChiÂnaÂmen.” “These are the tableaux of VicÂtoÂriÂan meloÂdraÂma,” writes Lerer, “images on stage-sets of the imagÂiÂnaÂtion.” We see anothÂer of Carroll’s favorite phoÂtoÂgraphÂic subÂjects, AlexanÂdra “Xie” Kitchin, daughÂter of a colÂleague, also givÂen the OriÂenÂtalÂist treatÂment below, posed as an off-duty tea merÂchant.
Carroll’s careÂfulÂly staged child phoÂtographs are very much like those of othÂer phoÂtogÂraÂphers of the periÂod like Mary CowÂden Clarke and Julia MarÂgaret Cameron, who also phoÂtographed Alice LidÂdell, even into her adultÂhood. Cameron’s phoÂtographs also includÂed child nudes, to a simÂiÂlar effect as Carroll’s—the depicÂtion of a “state of grace” in which chilÂdren appear as nymphs, “gypÂsies” or othÂer such types supÂposÂedÂly belongÂing to Edenic worlds untouched by adult cares. GivÂen the conÂtext Woolf, Lerer and othÂers proÂvide, it’s reaÂsonÂable to view Carroll’s child phoÂtogÂraÂphy as conÂsisÂtent with the tastes of the day. (Though no one sugÂgests this as an aliÂbi for CarÂrolÂl’s posÂsiÂbly trouÂbling proÂclivÂiÂties.)
As it stands, the phoÂtographs of Alice and othÂer chilÂdren open a fasÂciÂnatÂing, if someÂtimes disÂcomÂfitÂing, winÂdow on an age that viewed childÂhood very difÂferÂentÂly than our own. They also give us a view of Carroll’s strange inner world, one not unlike the unsetÂtling fanÂtaÂsy realm of 20th cenÂtuÂry folk artist HenÂry DargÂer. Unlike DargÂer, Carroll’s work brought him wideÂspread fame in his lifeÂtime, but like that recluÂsive figÂure, the author of Alice’s AdvenÂtures in WonÂderÂland and Through the LookÂing Glass was a shy, introÂspecÂtive man whose imagÂiÂnaÂtive landÂscape posÂsessed a logÂic all its own, charged with magÂic, threat, and longÂing for lost childÂhood innoÂcence.
See a galÂleries of Carroll’s phoÂtographs of Alice and othÂer chilÂdren here and here, and see this site for more genÂerÂal info on Carroll’s phoÂtogÂraÂphy.
RelatÂed ConÂtent:
Free Audio: Alice In WonÂderÂland Read by Cory DocÂtorow
Josh Jones is a writer and musiÂcian based in Durham, NC. FolÂlow him at @jdmagness.