Ayn Rand Trashes C.S. Lewis in Her Marginalia: He’s an “Abysmal Bastard”

rand-lewis2

Images via Wiki­me­dia Com­mons

The polit­i­cal inter­sec­tion of Ayn Ran­di­an lib­er­tar­i­ans and Evan­gel­i­cal con­ser­v­a­tives is a baf­fling phe­nom­e­non for most of us out­side the Amer­i­can right. It’s hard to rec­on­cile the athe­ist arch-cap­i­tal­ist and despis­er of social wel­fare with, for exam­ple, the Ser­mon on the Mount. But hey, mixed mar­riages often work out, right? Well, as for Rand her­self, one would hard­ly find her sym­pa­thet­ic to reli­gion or its expos­i­tors at any point in her career. Take her sound lash­ing of writer, schol­ar, and lay the­olo­gian C.S. Lewis, intel­lec­tu­al hero of Protes­tant Chris­tian­i­ty. (Wheaton Col­lege hous­es his per­son­al library, and there exists not only a C.S. Lewis Insti­tute, but also a C.S. Lewis Foun­da­tion.) Lewis’ The Abo­li­tion of Man (1943), while osten­si­bly a text on edu­ca­tion, also pur­ports, like Aquinas’ Sum­ma The­o­log­i­ca, to expound the prin­ci­ples of nat­ur­al law and objec­tive moral val­ue. Rand would have none of it.

LewisRand

Reli­gion jour­nal First Things brings us excerpts from the edit­ed col­lec­tion, Ayn Rand’s Mar­gin­a­lia: Her crit­i­cal com­ments on the writ­ings of over 20 authors. In it, Rand gloss­es Lewis’s Abo­li­tion of Man with sav­age feroc­i­ty, call­ing the author an “abysmal bas­tard,” “cheap, dri­v­el­ling non-enti­ty” [sic], and “abysmal scum!” The screen­shot above (Lewis left, Rand’s anno­ta­tions right) from the First Things’ blog post offers a typ­i­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tion of Rand’s tone through­out, and includes some par­tic­u­lar­ly elab­o­rate insults.

LewisRandII

The C.S. Lewis Foun­da­tion com­ments that Lewis “prob­a­bly would not have approved of the lev­el of ven­om, but he prob­a­bly would not have liked Rand’s phi­los­o­phy much either.” Anoth­er Chris­t­ian aca­d­e­m­ic has suc­cess­ful­ly squared an appre­ci­a­tion for both Rand and Lewis, but writes crit­i­cal­ly of Rand, who “seems to have inter­pret­ed Lewis’s book as a Lud­dite screed against sci­ence and tech­nol­o­gy,” part of her “ten­den­cy to car­i­ca­ture her oppo­nents.” Cer­tain­ly no one ever accused her of sub­tle­ty. “It’s pret­ty clear,” our pro­fes­sor con­tin­ues, “that when show­ing stu­dents how to engage in schol­ar­ly dis­course, Ayn Rand should not be the mod­el.” No, indeed, but how she would thrive on the Inter­net.

Read more at First Things, and down­load a PDF of the Rand-anno­tat­ed Lewis excerpts here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Free Audio: Down­load the Com­plete Chron­i­cles of Nar­nia by C.S. Lewis

The Only Known Record­ings of C.S. Lewis (1944–1948)

Watch Hand-Drawn Ani­ma­tions of 7 Sto­ries & Essays by C.S. Lewis

Flan­nery O’Connor: Friends Don’t Let Friends Read Ayn Rand (1960)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

5 Free Short Stories by Nadine Gordimer

By now, you know that Nadine Gordimer has died. She was 90 years old. Back in 1991, when she won the Nobel Prize, The New York Times made this announce­ment:

Nadine Gordimer, whose nov­els of South Africa por­tray the con­flicts and con­tra­dic­tions of a racist soci­ety, was named win­ner of the 1991 Nobel Prize in Lit­er­a­ture today as her coun­try final­ly begins to dis­man­tle the sys­tem her works have poignant­ly explored for more than 40 years.

In a brief cita­tion, the Swedish Acad­e­my, which con­fers the awards, referred to her as “Nadine Gordimer, who through her mag­nif­i­cent epic writ­ing has — in the words of Alfred Nobel — been of very great ben­e­fit to human­i­ty.”

The acad­e­my also added that “her con­tin­u­al involve­ment on behalf of lit­er­a­ture and free speech in a police state where cen­sor­ship and per­se­cu­tion of books and peo­ple exist have made her ‘the doyenne of South African let­ters.’ ”

Yes­ter­day, The New York­er com­ment­ed that, although she wrote 15 nov­els, it was “through her short fic­tion Gordimer made her pres­ence felt the most.” Gordimer pub­lished her very first short sto­ry, “Come Again Tomor­row,” in a Johan­nes­burg mag­a­zine in 1938, when she was just 15 years old. Thir­teen years lat­er, there came anoth­er first — the first of many sto­ries she pub­lished in The New York­er (“A Watch­er of the Dead”). Although many of Gordimer’s New York­er sto­ries remain locked up, avail­able only to the mag­a­zine’s sub­scribers, we’ve man­aged to dig up sev­er­al open ones. Above, you can watch Gordimer read her 1999 sto­ry called “Loot” while vis­it­ing Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty in 2005. The text has since been re-pub­lished on the Nobel Prize web site. Below, you can also lis­ten to author Tes­sa Hadley read “City Lovers,” first pub­lished in The New York­er in 1975. The sto­ry “focuss­es on a love affair between a white man and a ‘col­ored’ woman in Apartheid South Africa. It’s deeply polit­i­cal in its details—the man is a geol­o­gist at a min­ing com­pa­ny, the couple’s affair is ille­gal, and they cov­er it up by pre­tend­ing that she is his ser­vant. ”

Oth­er Gordimer sto­ries avail­able online include “The First Sense” and “A Ben­e­fi­cia­ry”, pub­lished respec­tive­ly in The New York­er in 2006 and 2007. “The Sec­ond Sense” came out in The Vir­ginia Quar­ter­ly, also in 2007. If you, dear Open Cul­ture read­ers, hap­pen to know of any oth­er Gordimer sto­ries pub­lished online, please let us know in the com­ments sec­tions below, and we’ll add them to the roundup.

Relat­ed Con­tent

1,000 Free Audio Books: Down­load Great Books for Free

Read 18 Short Sto­ries From Nobel Prize-Win­ning Writer Alice Munro Free Online

10 Free Sto­ries by George Saun­ders, Author of Tenth of Decem­ber

Neil Gaiman’s Free Short Sto­ries

30 Free Essays & Sto­ries by David Fos­ter Wal­lace on the Web

800 Free eBooks for iPad, Kin­dle & Oth­er Devices

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

Jimi Hendrix at Woodstock (1969)

What must it have been like to have been at Wood­stock? Like, real­ly have been there, not just watched the film or the 2009 movie about Wood­stock, not just have gone to any of the sev­er­al mil­lion mud­dy, drug­gy out­door fes­ti­vals that pro­lif­er­at­ed in Woodstock’s wake, but real­ly been there, man? I’ll nev­er know. The real expe­ri­ence of the 1960s can feel as for­ev­er irre­triev­able as that of the 1860s. But, wow, am I glad for the devel­op­ment of mov­ing pic­tures and live audio record­ing in that 100 years.

Not only can we see the throngs of hap­py hip­pies mak­ing their way across Max and Miri­am Yas­gur’s dairy farm in the ini­tial few min­utes above, but we do not have to smell them! Seri­ous­ly, the footage lead­ing up to Jimi Hendrix’s Wood­stock per­for­mance is fun, includ­ing a brief glimpse of Jer­ry Gar­cia hang­ing out with the peo­ple. But you’re here to see Jimi, so, if you can’t wait, skip to ahead. The crowd cer­tain­ly waited—waited three days for Hen­drix to close the fes­ti­val Sun­day night with his band Gyp­sy Sun & Rain­bows. Then they wait­ed some more, all night, in fact, until Hen­drix final­ly took the stage at 8:00 a.m. that Mon­day morn­ing, August 18, 1969. I imag­ine every­one who stayed would say it was well worth it. Part 2 of the video is here.

The per­for­mances, as you know, are leg­en­dar­i­ly blis­ter­ing and include Hendrix’s famous­ly scream­ing, feed­back-drenched “Star-Span­gled Ban­ner.” See it above like you nev­er could if you were knee-deep in mud and stand­ing behind a crowd of thou­sands in the sum­mer sun. Hear it above in audio from Inter­net Archive, who also have mp3 and ogg vor­bis ver­sions of each song for free down­load. And hear a radio doc­u­men­tary about that per­for­mance below. Enjoy!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

‘Elec­tric Church’: The Jimi Hen­drix Expe­ri­ence Live in Stock­holm, 1969

Jimi Hendrix’s Final Inter­view on Sep­tem­ber 11, 1970: Lis­ten to the Com­plete Audio

Jimi Hen­drix Unplugged: Two Rare Record­ings of Hen­drix Play­ing Acoustic Gui­tar

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Tour the World’s Street Art with Google Street Art

By far the most enjoy­able part of our recent fam­i­ly trip to Lon­don was the after­noon my young son and I spent in Shored­itch, grop­ing our way to No Brow, a comics shop I had noticed on an ear­ly morn­ing stroll with our host­ess. Our route was evi­dence that I had for­got­ten the coor­di­nates, the street name, the name of the shop… Even­tu­al­ly, I real­ized we were lost, and that is where the real fun began, as we retraced our steps using street art as bread crumbs.

Ah right, there’s  that rooftop mush­room instal­la­tion!

And there’s that Stik fig­ure

After a while, a FedEx man took pity on us, ruin­ing our fun by steer­ing us toward the prop­er address..

I’m not sure I could ever dupli­cate our trail, but I enjoy try­ing with Google Street Art. Arm­chair trav­el­ers can use it to project them­selves to the heart of ephemer­al, pos­si­bly ille­gal exhi­bi­tions all over the globe,.

Bogotá... Paris... New York’s leg­endary 5 Pointz, before the land­lord clutched and white­washed the entire thing in the dead of night. Each up close pho­to bears a high­ly infor­ma­tion­al cap­tion, much more than you’d find in the street itself. Think of it as an after-the-fact dig­i­tal muse­um. It’s appro­pri­ate, giv­en the ephemer­al nature of the work. An online pres­ence is its best shot at preser­va­tion.

Those of us with some­thing to con­tribute can add to the record with a user gallery or by tag­ging our pho­tos with #Stree­tArtist.

Enter Google Street Art here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Obey the Giant: Short Film Presents the True Sto­ry of Shep­ard Fairey’s First Act of Street Art

Banksy Cre­ates a Tiny Repli­ca of The Great Sphinx Of Giza In Queens

Big Bang Big Boom: Graf­fi­ti Stop-Motion Ani­ma­tion Cre­ative­ly Depicts the Evo­lu­tion of Life

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, home­school­er and the Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of The East Vil­lage Inky zine. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

Lost Kubrick: A Short Documentary on Stanley Kubrick’s Unfinished Films

Liv­ing, as many do, in Los Ange­les, and lov­ing, as many do, the films of Stan­ley Kubrick, I man­aged to attend last year’s acclaimed Kubrick exhib­it at the Los Ange­les Coun­ty Muse­um of Art more than once. The first time there, I mar­veled at all the arti­facts they’d col­lect­ed from the pro­duc­tion of my favorite Kubrick films, the ones I’ve seen sev­en, eight, nine times: Dr. StrangeloveBar­ry Lyn­don2001: A Space Odyssey, etc. But the sec­ond time, I focused on the rooms ded­i­cat­ed to the Kubrick films I’d nev­er seen — the ones, in fact, that nobody has ever seen.

Sev­er­al of his unfin­ished projects got far enough into pre-pro­duc­tion to leave behind a con­sid­er­able amount of intrigu­ing research mate­ri­als, script notes, shoot­ing sched­ules, design sketch­es, and screen tests. The sto­ry of each pro­jec­t’s ori­gin and demise reveals qual­i­ties of not just Kubrick­’s much-exam­ined work­ing meth­ods, but of his per­son­al­i­ty. “He was a man of such var­ied inter­ests that he was always busy,” says for­mer Warn­er Broth­ers exec­u­tive John Cal­ley in the short doc­u­men­tary above, Lost Kubrick. And if Kubrick had an inter­est, he instinc­tive­ly threw him­self into the mak­ing of a motion pic­ture to do with it.

“Napoleon was one of the abid­ing inter­ests of Stan­ley’s life,” says Antho­ny Frewin, Kubrick­’s assis­tant on 2001, “along with extrater­res­tri­al intel­li­gence, the Holo­caust, con­cen­tra­tion camps, Julius Cae­sar, Eng­lish place name ety­mol­o­gy, and three thou­sand oth­er things.” We’ve fea­tured Kubrick­’s Napoleon before, but Lost Kubrick also includes an exam­i­na­tion of The Aryan Papers, his aban­doned Hol­caust project from the 1990s. I do won­der how it would have com­pared to Schindler’s List, Steven Spiel­berg’s com­plet­ed Holo­caust project from the 1990s, which itself had an influ­ence on Kubrick­’s drop­ping The Aryan Papers. But Juras­sic Park, Spiel­berg’s dinosaur project from that same time, con­vinced Kubrick that spe­cial effects tech­nol­o­gy had come far enough for him to move for­ward on A.I., which he would lat­er hand over to Spiel­berg him­self. The younger direc­tor seems to have fall­en into the role of execu­tor of Kubrick­’s many ideas; just last year, he even announced plans to turn Kubrick­’s Napoleon script into a tele­vi­sion series. Per­son­al­ly, it makes me won­der less what Spiel­berg will do with the sto­ry of Napoleon than what Kubrick could have accom­plished in this age of the tele­vi­sion-series auteur.

Lost Kubrick will be added to our list, 285 Free Doc­u­men­taries Online, part of our larg­er col­lec­tion of 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More.

via Devour

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Napoleon: The Great­est Movie Stan­ley Kubrick Nev­er Made

Explore the Mas­sive Stan­ley Kubrick Exhib­it at the Los Ange­les Coun­ty Muse­um of Art

Stan­ley Kubrick’s Very First Films: Three Short Doc­u­men­taries

The Mak­ing of Stan­ley Kubrick’s A Clock­work Orange

Ter­ry Gilliam: The Dif­fer­ence Between Kubrick (Great Film­mak­er) and Spiel­berg (Less So)

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

What Did Jane Austen Really Look Like? New Wax Sculpture, Created by Forensic Specialists, Shows Us

Austenwaxwork

Last Wednes­day, the Jane Austen Cen­tre in Bath, Eng­land unveiled the wax sculp­ture above, which they say is the clos­est “any­one has come to the real Jane Austen in 200 years.” The fig­ure, The Guardian reports, is the cre­ation of foren­sic artist Melis­sa Dring, a “spe­cial­ist team using foren­sic tech­niques which draw on con­tem­po­rary eye-wit­ness accounts,” and Emmy-win­ning cos­tume design­er Andrea Galer.

Austen often intro­duced her char­ac­ters with broad descriptions—Emma Wood­house is “hand­some, clever, and rich,” Pride and Prej­u­dice’s Mr. Bin­g­ley sim­ply “a sin­gle man in pos­ses­sion of a good for­tune.” But her tal­ent con­sist­ed in under­min­ing such stock descrip­tions, and the soci­etal assump­tions they entail. Instead of types, she gave read­ers com­pli­cat­ed indi­vid­u­als squirm­ing uncom­fort­ably inside the bonds of pro­pri­ety and deco­rum. But what of Austen her­self? Read­ers ini­tial­ly knew noth­ing of the author, as her nov­els were first pub­lished anony­mous­ly.

Since her death in 1817, biog­ra­phers have told and retold her per­son­al his­to­ry, and she has become an almost cult-like fig­ure for fans of her work. Some of the author’s first biog­ra­phers were fam­i­ly mem­bers, includ­ing her nephew James Edward Austen-Leigh, who pub­lished A Mem­oir of Jane Austen in 1872 (above). In it, Austen-Leigh describes his aunt as “very attrac­tive”: “Her fig­ure was rather tall and slen­der, her step light and firm, and her whole appear­ance expres­sive of health and ani­ma­tion. In com­plex­ion she was a clear brunette with a rich colour; she had full round cheeks, with mouth and nose small and well-formed, bright hazel eyes, and brown hair form­ing nat­ur­al curls round her face.”

Based part­ly on that descrip­tion and oth­ers from niece Car­o­line, the wax fig­ure, Dring told the BBC, is “pret­ty much like her.” Austen “came from a large… fam­i­ly and they all seemed to share the long nose, the bright spark­ly eyes and curly brown hair. And these char­ac­ter­is­tics come through the gen­er­a­tions.” Dring used Austen’s sis­ter Cassandra’s famous por­trait as a start­ing point, but not­ed that the sketch “does make it look like she’s been suck­ing lemons […] We know from all accounts of her, she was very live­ly, very great fun to be with and a mis­chie­vous and wit­ty per­son.” All descrip­tions with which her devot­ed read­ers would doubt­less agree. See more pho­tos of the Austen wax sculp­ture here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Recipes of Icon­ic Authors: Jane Austen, Sylvia Plath, Roald Dahl, the Mar­quis de Sade & More

15-Year-Old Jane Austen Writes a Satir­i­cal His­to­ry Of Eng­land: Read the Hand­writ­ten Man­u­script Online (1791)

Jane Austen’s Fic­tion Man­u­scripts Online

Find nov­els by Jane Austen in our col­lec­tions: 1,000 Free Audio Books: Down­load Great Books for Free and 800 Free eBooks for iPad, Kin­dle & Oth­er Devices

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Slavoj Žižek Charged With Plagiarizing A White Nationalist Magazine Article

Slavoj_Žižek_2011

Any­one who does any sort of research-based writ­ing knows how easy it is for an occa­sion­al close approx­i­ma­tion of another’s prose to slip into a sum­ma­ry. Such instances rarely con­sti­tute pla­gia­rism, but they can occu­py an uncom­fort­able gray area. Recent alle­ga­tions against Sloven­ian the­o­rist Slavoj Žižek, how­ev­er, charge the whole­sale theft of entire pas­sages of text, almost ver­ba­tim. It’s an unusu­al sto­ry, not least because of the source mate­r­i­al Žižek alleged­ly lifted—an arti­cle in Amer­i­can Renais­sanceiden­ti­fied by the South­ern Pover­ty Law Cen­ter as a white suprema­cist pub­li­ca­tion.

As Crit­i­cal The­o­ry reports, the first hints of a pos­si­ble bor­row­ing came on July 8 from Steve Sail­er, writ­ing for the The Unz Review (an alter­na­tive out­let with its own some­times pecu­liar pre­oc­cu­pa­tions when it comes to race). Sail­er points to a por­tion of Žižek’s 2006 arti­cle “A Plea for a Return to Dif­férance (with a Minor Pro Domo Sua)” that is unchar­ac­ter­is­ti­cal­ly lucid and, well, un-Žižek-like. The text in ques­tion sum­ma­rizes Kevin MacDonald’s anti-Semit­ic evo­lu­tion­ary-psy­chol­o­gy book The Cul­ture of Cri­tique. The day after Sail­er’s obser­va­tion, blog­ger Deogol­wulf tracked down a review of the Mac­Don­ald book by Stan­ley Horn­beck in Amer­i­can Renais­sance and placed Žižek and Hornbeck’s prose side by side. Observe the sig­nif­i­cant sim­i­lar­i­ties and minor dif­fer­ences here.

In a July 11th arti­cle break­ing the sto­ry, Newsweek wrote that it had con­tact­ed Deogol­wulf and Sail­er for com­ment, but nei­ther respond­ed by the time of pub­li­ca­tion. How­ev­er, James Williams, senior man­ag­ing edi­tor for the jour­nal Crit­i­cal Inquiry, which pub­lished Žižek’s arti­cle, did, say­ing Žižek “absolute­ly” bor­rowed from Horn­beck. Had they known, said Williams, “we would have cer­tain­ly asked him to remove the ille­gal pas­sages.” Horn­beck also respond­ed, call­ing the bor­row­ing “con­temptible.”

Did Žižek know­ing­ly pla­gia­rize Amer­i­can Renais­sance (does Žižek even read Amer­i­can Renais­sance)? Accord­ing to Žižek him­self, the answer is no. In an email to Crit­i­cal The­o­ry, he writes that the close resem­blance between his arti­cle and Hornbeck’s review is the result of a sum­ma­ry of MacDonald’s work giv­en to him by an unnamed “friend.” Here’s more from Žižek’s email. (Note: he uses the word “résumé” here in the sense of “sum­ma­ry”):

With regard to the recent accu­sa­tions about my pla­gia­rism, here is what hap­pened. When I was writ­ing the text on Der­ri­da which con­tains the prob­lem­at­ic pas­sages, a friend told me about Kevin Macdonald’s the­o­ries, and I asked him to send me a brief resume. The friend send [sic] it to me, assur­ing me that I can use it freely since it mere­ly resumes another’s line of thought. Con­se­quent­ly, I did just that – and I sin­cere­ly apol­o­gize for not know­ing that my friend’s resume was large­ly bor­rowed from Stan­ley Hornbeck’s review of Macdonald’s book.

“The prob­lem­at­ic pas­sages,” Žižek con­tin­ues in his defense, “are pure­ly infor­ma­tive, a report on another’s the­o­ry for which I have no affin­i­ty what­so­ev­er.” He adds at the end, “I nonethe­less deeply regret the inci­dent.”

It is true that unlike, say, Sen­a­tor Rand Paul—who appar­ent­ly passed off almost whol­ly pla­gia­rized arti­cles as his own orig­i­nal work—Žižek does not take any cred­it for MacDonald’s ideas and sum­ma­rizes them only in an attempt to refute them. Nonethe­less, as Newsweek notes (in an unfor­tu­nate choice of words), for con­ser­v­a­tive crit­ics, Žižek is “a big scalp” and the mat­ter a very seri­ous one. Zizek’s “slop­py cita­tions,” writes Crit­i­cal The­o­ry, have come under fire before—notably in his feud with Noam Chom­sky, who caught Žižek mis­at­tribut­ing a racist quote to him. (Žižek “admit­ted the mis­take and apol­o­gized.”) This case seems much more severe for the length of the pas­sages lift­ed as well as Žižek’s fail­ure to check and cite his source. Charges of aca­d­e­m­ic pla­gia­rism fre­quent­ly go to press. But with such a pub­lic fig­ure (and film star) as the flam­boy­ant Marx­ist Žižek, and such inflam­ma­to­ry far right source mate­r­i­al, this par­tic­u­lar­ly regret­table incident—unintentional as it may be—makes for some par­tic­u­lar­ly sen­sa­tion­al­ist head­lines.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Slavoj Žižek Responds to Noam Chom­sky: ‘I Don’t Know a Guy Who Was So Often Empir­i­cal­ly Wrong’

Vice Meets Up with Super­star Com­mu­nist Cul­tur­al The­o­rist Slavoj Žižek

Slavoj Žižek’s Pervert’s Guide to Ide­ol­o­gy Decodes The Dark Knight and They Live

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Thomas Jefferson’s Handwritten Vanilla Ice Cream Recipe

jefferson ice cream

Anoth­er thing you can cred­it Thomas Jef­fer­son with — being the first known Amer­i­can to record an ice cream recipe. It’s one of 10 sur­viv­ing recipes writ­ten by the found­ing father.

Accord­ing to Monticello.org, ice cream began appear­ing “in French cook­books start­ing in the late 17th cen­tu­ry, and in Eng­lish-lan­guage cook­books in the ear­ly 18th cen­tu­ry.” And there “are accounts of ice cream being served in the Amer­i­can colonies as ear­ly as 1744.” Jef­fer­son like­ly tast­ed his fair share of the dessert while liv­ing in France (1784–1789), and it would con­tin­ue to be served at Mon­ti­cel­lo upon his return. By the first decade of the 19th cen­tu­ry, ice cream would become increas­ing­ly found in cook­books pub­lished through­out the U.S.

You can see the entire recipe for Jef­fer­son­’s vanil­la ice cream recipe here, and a read tran­script below.

2. bot­tles of good cream.
6. yolks of eggs.
1/2 lb. sug­ar

mix the yolks & sug­ar
put the cream on a fire in a casse­role, first putting in a stick of Vanil­la.
when near boil­ing take it off & pour it gen­tly into the mix­ture of eggs & sug­ar.
stir it well.
put it on the fire again stir­ring it thor­ough­ly with a spoon to pre­vent it’s stick­ing to the casse­role.
when near boil­ing take it off and strain it thro’ a tow­el.
put it in the Sabottiere[12]
then set it in ice an hour before it is to be served. put into the ice a hand­ful of salt.
put salt on the cov­er­lid of the Sabotiere & cov­er the whole with ice.
leave it still half a quar­ter of an hour.
then turn the Sabot­tiere in the ice 10 min­utes
open it to loosen with a spat­u­la the ice from the inner sides of the Sabotiere.
shut it & replace it in the ice
open it from time to time to detach the ice from the sides
when well tak­en (prise) stir it well with the Spat­u­la.
put it in moulds, justling it well down on the knee.
then put the mould into the same buck­et of ice.
leave it there to the moment of serv­ing it.
to with­draw it, immerse the mould in warm water, turn­ing it well till it will come out & turn it into a plate

via @Biblioklept

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Leo Tolstoy’s Fam­i­ly Recipe for Mac­a­roni and Cheese

Ernest Hemingway’s Sum­mer Camp­ing Recipes

David Lynch Teach­es You to Cook His Quinoa Recipe in a Weird, Sur­re­al­ist Video

MIT Teach­es You How to Speak Ital­ian & Cook Ital­ian Cui­sine All at Once (Free Online Course)

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast