Charles Bukowski Rails Against 9‑to‑5 Jobs in a Brutally Honest Letter (1986)

Charles_Bukowski_smoking

Charles Bukows­ki—or “Hank” to his friends—assiduously cul­ti­vat­ed a lit­er­ary per­sona as a peren­ni­al drunk­en dead­beat. He most­ly lived it too, but for a few odd jobs and a peri­od of time, just over a decade, that he spent work­ing for the Unit­ed States Post Office, begin­ning in the ear­ly fifties as a fill-in let­ter car­ri­er, then lat­er for over a decade as a fil­ing clerk. He found the work mind-numb­ing, soul-crush­ing, and any num­ber of oth­er adjec­tives one uses to describe repet­i­tive and deeply unful­fill­ing labor. Actu­al­ly, one needn’t sup­ply a description—Bukowski has splen­did­ly done so for us, both in his fic­tion and in the epis­tle below unearthed by Let­ters of Note.

In Bukowski’s first nov­el Post Office (1971), the writer of lowlife com­e­dy and pathos builds in plen­ty of wish-ful­fill­ment for his lit­er­ary alter ego Hen­ry Chi­nas­ki. Kyle Ryan at The Onion’s A.V. Club sums it up suc­cinct­ly: “In Bukowski’s world, Chi­nas­ki is prac­ti­cal­ly irre­sistible to women, despite his alco­holism, misog­y­ny, and gen­er­al crank­i­ness.” In real­i­ty, to say that Bukows­ki found lit­tle solace in his work would be a gross under­state­ment. But unlike most of his equal­ly mis­er­able co-work­ers, Bukows­ki got to retire ear­ly, at age 49, when, in 1969, Black Spar­row Press pub­lish­er John Mar­tin offered him $100 a month for life on the con­di­tion that he quit his job and write full time.

Need­less to say, he was thrilled, so much so that he penned the let­ter below fif­teen years lat­er, express­ing his grat­i­tude to Mar­tin and describ­ing, with char­ac­ter­is­tic bru­tal hon­esty, the life of the aver­age wage slave. And though com­par­isons to slav­ery usu­al­ly come as close to the lev­el of absurd exag­ger­a­tion as com­par­isons to Nazism, Bukowski’s por­trait of the 9 to 5 life makes a very con­vinc­ing case for what we might call the the­sis of his let­ter: “Slav­ery was nev­er abol­ished, it was only extend­ed to include all the col­ors.”

After read­ing his let­ter below, you may feel a great deal more sym­pa­thy, if you did not already, with Bukowski’s life choic­es. You may find your­self, in fact, re-eval­u­at­ing your own.

8–12-86

Hel­lo John:

Thanks for the good let­ter. I don’t think it hurts, some­times, to remem­ber where you came from. You know the places where I came from. Even the peo­ple who try to write about that or make films about it, they don’t get it right. They call it “9 to 5.” It’s nev­er 9 to 5, there’s no free lunch break at those places, in fact, at many of them in order to keep your job you don’t take lunch. Then there’s OVERTIME and the books nev­er seem to get the over­time right and if you com­plain about that, there’s anoth­er suck­er to take your place.

You know my old say­ing, “Slav­ery was nev­er abol­ished, it was only extend­ed to include all the col­ors.”

And what hurts is the steadi­ly dimin­ish­ing human­i­ty of those fight­ing to hold jobs they don’t want but fear the alter­na­tive worse. Peo­ple sim­ply emp­ty out. They are bod­ies with fear­ful and obe­di­ent minds. The col­or leaves the eye. The voice becomes ugly. And the body. The hair. The fin­ger­nails. The shoes. Every­thing does.

As a young man I could not believe that peo­ple could give their lives over to those con­di­tions. As an old man, I still can’t believe it. What do they do it for? Sex? TV? An auto­mo­bile on month­ly pay­ments? Or chil­dren? Chil­dren who are just going to do the same things that they did?

Ear­ly on, when I was quite young and going from job to job I was fool­ish enough to some­times speak to my fel­low work­ers: “Hey, the boss can come in here at any moment and lay all of us off, just like that, don’t you real­ize that?”

They would just look at me. I was pos­ing some­thing that they did­n’t want to enter their minds.

Now in indus­try, there are vast lay­offs (steel mills dead, tech­ni­cal changes in oth­er fac­tors of the work place). They are layed off by the hun­dreds of thou­sands and their faces are stunned:

“I put in 35 years…”

“It ain’t right…”

“I don’t know what to do…”

They nev­er pay the slaves enough so they can get free, just enough so they can stay alive and come back to work. I could see all this. Why could­n’t they? I fig­ured the park bench was just as good or being a barfly was just as good. Why not get there first before they put me there? Why wait?

I just wrote in dis­gust against it all, it was a relief to get the shit out of my sys­tem. And now that I’m here, a so-called pro­fes­sion­al writer, after giv­ing the first 50 years away, I’ve found out that there are oth­er dis­gusts beyond the sys­tem.

I remem­ber once, work­ing as a pack­er in this light­ing fix­ture com­pa­ny, one of the pack­ers sud­den­ly said: “I’ll nev­er be free!”

One of the boss­es was walk­ing by (his name was Mor­rie) and he let out this deli­cious cack­le of a laugh, enjoy­ing the fact that this fel­low was trapped for life.

So, the luck I final­ly had in get­ting out of those places, no mat­ter how long it took, has giv­en me a kind of joy, the jol­ly joy of the mir­a­cle. I now write from an old mind and an old body, long beyond the time when most men would ever think of con­tin­u­ing such a thing, but since I start­ed so late I owe it to myself to con­tin­ue, and when the words begin to fal­ter and I must be helped up stair­ways and I can no longer tell a blue­bird from a paper­clip, I still feel that some­thing in me is going to remem­ber (no mat­ter how far I’m gone) how I’ve come through the mur­der and the mess and the moil, to at least a gen­er­ous way to die.

To not to have entire­ly wast­ed one’s life seems to be a wor­thy accom­plish­ment, if only for myself.

yr boy,

Hank

via Fla­vor­wire

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Charles Bukows­ki: Depres­sion and Three Days in Bed Can Restore Your Cre­ative Juices (NSFW)

“Don’t Try”: Charles Bukowski’s Con­cise Phi­los­o­phy of Art and Life

The Last (Faxed) Poem of Charles Bukows­ki

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Great Opening Lines of Fiction on Old School IBM Punch Cards

Call me Ishmael 2Look­ing to kill some time dur­ing the dog days of sum­mer? Here’s one option that John Ptak came up with. On his intrigu­ing blog, The His­to­ry of Ideas, he writes: “Isn’t this great?  I bumped into a won­der­ful site called kloth.net that pro­vides a free-to-all and unre­strict­ed use of their punch card emu­la­tor. It was found while look­ing for dat­ing ideas for an IBM 5081 card that I have that has pro­gram­ming infor­ma­tion for the BINAC com­put­er (ca. late 1940’s), and kloth.net had info on the his­to­ry of IBM cards as well as the emulator–plus oth­er stuff. Com­plete­ly dis­tract­ed from the BINAC quest, I cre­at­ed some cards using some great first lines of lit­er­a­ture.  You can play too!”  I cre­at­ed two of my own, using The Amer­i­can Book Review’s list of 100 great open­ing lines.

I am an invisible man 2

What exact­ly is a punch card, our younger read­ers might right­ly ask? An IBM web site tells us:

Per­haps the ear­li­est icon of the Infor­ma­tion Age was a sim­ple punched card pro­duced by IBM, com­mon­ly known as the “IBM card.” Mea­sur­ing just 7- 3/8 inch­es by 3- 1/4 inch­es, the piece of smooth stock paper was unas­sum­ing, to be sure. But tak­en col­lec­tive­ly, the IBM card [like the flop­py disks that came lat­er] held near­ly all of the world’s known infor­ma­tion for just under half a century—an impres­sive feat even by today’s mea­sures. It rose to pop­u­lar­i­ty dur­ing the Great Depres­sion and quick­ly became a ubiq­ui­tous install­ment in the worlds of data pro­cess­ing and pop­u­lar cul­ture. What’s more, the punched card [see exam­ples from Colum­bia Uni­ver­si­ty here] pro­vid­ed such a sig­nif­i­cant prof­it stream that it was instru­men­tal to IBM’s rapid growth in the mid-twen­ti­eth cen­tu­ry.

Now punch away.…

via The Paris Review

Relat­ed Con­tent:

“They Were There” — Errol Mor­ris Final­ly Directs a Film for IBM

The First Piz­za Ordered by Com­put­er, 1974

Great Moments in Com­put­er His­to­ry: Dou­glas Engel­bart Presents “The Moth­er of All Demos” (1968)

A Short His­to­ry of Roman­ian Com­put­ing: From 1961 to 1989

Free Online Com­put­er Sci­ence Cours­es

Down­load 55 Free Online Lit­er­a­ture Cours­es: From Dante and Mil­ton to Ker­ouac and Tolkien

 

 

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Hunter S. Thompson’s Conspiratorial 9/11 Interview: “The Public Version of the News is Never Really What Happened”

Hav­ing read almost every­thing the pro­lif­ic Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas author Hunter S. Thomp­son ever wrote, I don’t know if I would call him para­noid, per se. Nor do I know if I would call him not para­noid. He cer­tain­ly trust­ed no enti­ty with pow­er, espe­cial­ly not gov­ern­ments, and real­ly espe­cial­ly not the Unit­ed States gov­ern­ment. So by the time Sep­tem­ber 11, 2001 came around, he had lit­tle good­will to spare for any of the major play­ers involved in its after­math. “The tow­ers are gone now, reduced to bloody rub­ble, along with all hopes for Peace in Our Time, in the Unit­ed States or any oth­er coun­try,” he wrote in his Sep­tem­ber 12 ESPN col­umn. “Make no mis­take about it: We are At War now — with some­body — and we will stay At War with that mys­te­ri­ous Ene­my for the rest of our lives. It will be a Reli­gious War, a sort of Chris­t­ian Jihad, fueled by reli­gious hatred and led by mer­ci­less fanat­ics on both sides.”

A year lat­er, Aus­trali­a’s ABC Radio Nation­al got Thomp­son’s assess­ment of the sit­u­a­tion. Host Mick O’Re­gan opens the now famous inter­view above by ask­ing how he thought the U.S. media had per­formed in the new post‑9/11 real­i­ty. “ ‘Shame­ful­ly’ is a word that comes to mind,” responds Thomp­son. “Amer­i­can jour­nal­ism I think has been cowed and intim­i­dat­ed by the mas­sive flag-suck­ing, this patri­ot­ic orgy that the White House keeps whip­ping up. You know if you crit­i­cise the Pres­i­dent it’s unpa­tri­ot­ic and there’s some­thing wrong with you, you may be a ter­ror­ist.” And does he think 9/11 “worked in favor of the Bush Admin­is­tra­tion?” For Thomp­son’s full answer, blog­ger Scratch­ing­dog tracked down the orig­i­nal record­ing of the inter­view, not the edit­ed ver­sion actu­al­ly aired on ABC, and heard this:

Oh, absolute­ly. Absolute­ly. And I have spent enough time on the inside of, well, in the White House and you know, cam­paigns and I’ve known enough peo­ple who do these things, think this way, to know that the pub­lic ver­sion of the news or what­ev­er event, is nev­er real­ly what hap­pened. And these peo­ple I think are will­ing to take that even fur­ther, so I don’t assume that I know the truth of what went on that day, and yeah, just look­ing around and look­ing for who had the motive, who had the oppor­tu­ni­ty, who had the equip­ment, who had the will. Yeah, these peo­ple were loot­ing the trea­sury and they knew the econ­o­my was going into a spi­ral down­ward.

9/11 con­spir­a­cy the­o­rists have made much of this response and oth­er Thomp­son­ian analy­sis found in the unedit­ed inter­view, going so far as to sug­gest that maybe — just maybe — the writer died three years lat­er of some­thing oth­er than sui­cide. Giv­en Thomp­son’s com­pul­sion to speak truth to pow­er, and some­times to wave firearms around in front of it, any fan of his work can’t help but harsh­ly scru­ti­nize, and often pre-emp­tive­ly dis­miss, any and all “offi­cial sto­ries” they hap­pen to hear. We’ll nev­er know whether Thomp­son would have approved of the “9/11 Truth” move­ment in the forms it has tak­en today, but they do share his spir­it of cre­ative dis­trust. And per­haps a touch of para­noia gave his writ­ing its dis­tinc­tive verve. Nobody moves into what they unfail­ing­ly describe as a “for­ti­fied com­pound,” after all, with­out at least a lit­tle bit of it.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Read 11 Free Arti­cles by Hunter S. Thomp­son That Span His Gonzo Jour­nal­ist Career (1965–2005)

Hunter S. Thompson’s Har­row­ing, Chem­i­cal-Filled Dai­ly Rou­tine

Hunter S. Thomp­son Calls Tech Sup­port, Unleash­es a Tirade Full of Fear and Loathing (NSFW)

Noam Chom­sky Schools 9/11 Truther; Explains the Sci­ence of Mak­ing Cred­i­ble Claims

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

The Ramones, a New Punk Band, Play One of Their Very First Shows at CBGB (1974)

“Ramones Reunion Near­ly Com­plete,” announced The Onion just about ten years ago, after the death of the band’s gui­tarist John­ny Ramone. His band­mates Joey and Dee Dee Ramone had each tak­en their leave of this mor­tal coil a few years before, and now, with the pass­ing of drum­mer Tom­my Ramone, all the group’s orig­i­nal mem­bers have gone to that big CBGB in the sky. In the video above, you can see the Ramones play­ing at the small CBGB down here on Earth — way down here on Earth, giv­en the set­ting of down­town Man­hat­tan in 1974. That year alone, after the rev­e­la­tion they brought about after first tak­ing the stage in their bangs, ripped jeans, and black leather jack­ets on August 16, they played the now-his­toric rock club no few­er than 74 times. Show length aver­aged about sev­en­teen min­utes, which means this video, at just sev­en min­utes, includes quite a few songs. The setlist includes “Now I Wan­na Sniff Some Glue,” “I Don’t Wan­na Go Down to the Base­ment,” and “Judy Is a Punk.”

This per­for­mance hap­pened on Sep­tem­ber 15, 1974, six months after their debut at Per­for­mance Stu­dios in March of that year. They would­n’t sign a record­ing con­tract until late the next year, but they would do it because the wife of Sire Records co-founder Sey­mour Stein saw them at CBGB. Though the Ramones always prid­ed them­selves on the raw­ness of their sound, this show catch­es them at a moment when, though they’d already armed them­selves with looks and the atti­tude that made them instant icons, they still had to feel their way through exact­ly what this “punk rock” thing would turn into. You can see their music tak­ing an even clear­er, more dis­tilled form in the 1977 CBGB set we fea­tured last year. They may have lived fast, the Ramones, but they played even faster. Could they have done it with­out the bor­der­line-unpun­k­like skill of their drum­mer?

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Ramones in Their Hey­day, Filmed “Live at CBGB,” 1977

The Ramones Play a New Year’s Eve Con­cert in Lon­don, 1977

CBGB’s: The Roots of Punk Lets You Watch Vin­tage Footage from the Hey­day of NYC’s Great Music Scene

Watch the Sex Pis­tols’ Very Last Con­cert (San Fran­cis­co, 1978)

Rare Live Footage Doc­u­ments The Clash From Their Raw Debut to the Career-Defin­ing Lon­don Call­ing

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

5 Wonderfully Long Literary Sentences by Samuel Beckett, Virginia Woolf, F. Scott Fitzgerald & Other Masters of the Run-On

TheFaulknerPortable

Despite its occa­sion­al use in spo­ken mono­logue, the Very Long Lit­er­ary Sen­tence prop­er­ly exists in the mind (hence “stream-of-con­scious­ness”), since the most wordy of lit­er­ary exha­la­tions would exhaust the lungs’ capac­i­ty. Mol­ly Bloom’s 36-page, two-sen­tence run-on solil­o­quy at the close of Joyce’s Ulysses takes place entire­ly in her thoughts. Faulkner’s longest sentence—smack in the mid­dle of Absa­lom, Absa­lom! —unspools in Quentin Compson’s tor­tured, silent rumi­na­tions. Accord­ing to a 1983 Guin­ness Book of Records, this mon­ster once qual­i­fied as literature’s longest at 1,288 words, but that record has long been sur­passed, in Eng­lish at least, by Jonathan Coe’s The Rotter’s Club, which ends with a 33-page-long, 13,955 word sen­tence. Czech and Pol­ish nov­el­ists have writ­ten book-length sen­tences since the six­ties, and French writer Math­ias Énard puts them all to shame with a one-sen­tence nov­el 517 pages long, though its sta­tus is “com­pro­mised by 23 chap­ter breaks that alle­vi­ate eye strain,” writes Ed Park in the New York Times. Like Faulkner’s glo­ri­ous run-ons, Jacob Sil­ver­man describes Énard’s one-sen­tence Zone as trans­mut­ing “the hor­rif­ic into some­thing sub­lime.”

Are these lit­er­ary stunts kin to Philippe Petit’s high­wire chal­lenges—under­tak­en for the thrill and just to show they can be done? Park sees the “The Very Long Sen­tence” in more philo­soph­i­cal terms, as “a futile hedge against sep­a­ra­tion, an unwill­ing­ness to part from loved ones, the world, life itself.” Per­haps this is why the very long sen­tence seems most expres­sive of life at its fullest and most expan­sive. Below, we bring you five long lit­er­ary sen­tences culled from var­i­ous sources on the sub­ject. These are, of course, not the “5 longest,” nor the “5 best,” nor any oth­er superla­tive. They are sim­ply five fine exam­ples of The Very Long Sen­tence in lit­er­a­ture. Enjoy read­ing and re-read­ing them, and please leave your favorite Very Long Sen­tence in the com­ments.

At The New York­er’s “Book Club,” Jon Michaud points us toward this long sen­tence, from Samuel Beckett’s Watt. We find the title char­ac­ter, “an obses­sive­ly ratio­nal ser­vant,” attempt­ing to “see a pat­tern in how his mas­ter, Mr. Knott, rearranges the fur­ni­ture.”

Thus it was not rare to find, on the Sun­day, the tall­boy on its feet by the fire, and the dress­ing table on its head by the bed, and the night-stool on its face by the door, and the was­hand-stand on its back by the win­dow; and, on the Mon­day, the tall­boy on its back by the bed, and the dress­ing table on its face by the door, and the night-stool on its back by the win­dow and the was­hand-stand on its feet by the fire; and on the Tues­day…

Here, writes Michaud, the long sen­tence con­veys “a des­per­ate attempt to nail down all the pos­si­bil­i­ties in a giv­en sit­u­a­tion, to keep the world under con­trol by enu­mer­at­ing it.”

The next exam­ple, from Poyn­ter, achieves a very dif­fer­ent effect. Instead of list­ing con­crete objects, the sen­tence below from F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gats­by opens up into a series of abstract phras­es.

Its van­ished trees, the trees that had made way for Gatsby’s house, had once pan­dered in whis­pers to the last and great­est of all human dreams; for a tran­si­to­ry enchant­ed moment man must have held his breath in the pres­ence of this con­ti­nent, com­pelled into an aes­thet­ic con­tem­pla­tion he nei­ther under­stood nor desired, face to face for the last time in his­to­ry with some­thing com­men­su­rate to his capac­i­ty for won­der.

Cho­sen by The Amer­i­can Schol­ar edi­tors as one of the “ten best sen­tences,” the pas­sage, writes Roy Peter Clark, achieves quite a feat: “Long sen­tences don’t usu­al­ly hold togeth­er under the weight of abstrac­tions, but this one sets a clear path to the most impor­tant phrase, plant­ed firm­ly at the end, ‘his capac­i­ty for won­der.’”

Jane Wong at Tin House’s blog “The Open Bar” quotes the hyp­not­ic sen­tence below from Jamaica Kincaid’s “The Let­ter from Home.”

I milked the cows, I churned the but­ter, I stored the cheese, I baked the bread, I brewed the tea, I washed the clothes, I dressed the chil­dren; the cat meowed, the dog barked, the horse neighed, the mouse squeaked, the fly buzzed, the gold­fish liv­ing in a bowl stretched its jaws; the door banged shut, the stairs creaked, the fridge hummed, the cur­tains bil­lowed up, the pot boiled, the gas hissed through the stove, the tree branch­es heavy with snow crashed against the roof; my heart beat loud­ly thud! thud!, tiny beads of water grew folds, I shed my skin…

Kincaid’s sen­tences, Wong writes, “have the abil­i­ty to simul­ta­ne­ous­ly sus­pend and pro­pel the read­er. We trust her semi-colons and fol­low until we are sur­prised to find the peri­od. We stand on that rock of a period—with water all around us, and ask: how did we get here?”

The blog Paper­back Writer brings us the “puz­zle” below from noto­ri­ous long-sen­tence-writer Vir­ginia Woolf’s essay “On Being Ill”:

Con­sid­er­ing how com­mon ill­ness is, how tremen­dous the spir­i­tu­al change that it brings, how aston­ish­ing, when the lights of health go down, the undis­cov­ered coun­tries that are then dis­closed, what wastes and deserts of the soul a slight attack of influen­za brings to view, what precipices and lawns sprin­kled with bright flow­ers a lit­tle rise of tem­per­a­ture reveals, what ancient and obdu­rate oaks are uproot­ed in us by the act of sick­ness, how we go down into the pit of death and feel the water of anni­hi­la­tion close above our heads and wake think­ing to find our­selves in the pres­ence of the angels and harpers when we have a tooth out and come to the sur­face in the dentist’s arm-chair and con­fuse his “Rinse the Mouth —- rinse the mouth” with the greet­ing of the Deity stoop­ing from the floor of Heav­en to wel­come us – when we think of this, as we are fre­quent­ly forced to think of it, it becomes strange indeed that ill­ness has not tak­en its place with love and bat­tle and jeal­ousy among the prime themes of lit­er­a­ture.

Blog­ger Rebec­ca quotes Woolf as a chal­lenge to her read­ers to become bet­ter writ­ers. “This sen­tence is not some­thing to be feared,” she writes, “it is some­thing to be embraced.”

Final­ly, from The Barnes & Noble Book Blog, we have the very Mol­ly Bloom-like sen­tence below from John Updike’s Rab­bit, Run:

But then they were mar­ried (she felt awful about being preg­nant before but Har­ry had been talk­ing about mar­riage for a while and any­way laughed when she told him in ear­ly Feb­ru­ary about miss­ing her peri­od and said Great she was ter­ri­bly fright­ened and he said Great and lift­ed her put his arms around under her bot­tom and lift­ed her like you would a child he could be so won­der­ful when you didn’t expect it in a way it seemed impor­tant that you didn’t expect it there was so much nice in him she couldn’t explain to any­body she had been so fright­ened about being preg­nant and he made her be proud) they were mar­ried after her miss­ing her sec­ond peri­od in March and she was still lit­tle clum­sy dark-com­plect­ed Jan­ice Springer and her hus­band was a con­ceit­ed lunk who wasn’t good for any­thing in the world Dad­dy said and the feel­ing of being alone would melt a lit­tle with a lit­tle drink.

Sen­tences like these, writes Barnes & Noble blog­ger Han­na McGrath, “demand some­thing from the read­er: patience.” That may be so, but they reward that patience with delight for those who love lan­guage too rich for the pinched lim­i­ta­tions of worka­day gram­mar and syn­tax.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Open­ing Sen­tences From Great Nov­els, Dia­grammed: Loli­ta, 1984 & More

Lists of the Best Sen­tences — Open­ing, Clos­ing, and Oth­er­wise — in Eng­lish-Lan­guage Nov­els

Cor­mac McCarthy’s Three Punc­tu­a­tion Rules, and How They All Go Back to James Joyce

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

James Franco’s Short Student Film Features Michael Shannon Playing a Necrophile (NSFW)

It’s entire­ly pos­si­ble that James Fran­co has a dop­pel­ganger. Or maybe access to some alien space/time bend­ing tech­nol­o­gy. Oth­er­wise, I real­ly can’t fig­ure out how Fran­co man­ages to do all the things he does. On top of star­ring in movies like Milk, Spring Break­ers and Pineap­ple Express and get­ting nom­i­nat­ed for an Acad­e­my Award for 127 Hours, Fran­co is also a pub­lished nov­el­ist and poet, an artist and, as an odd per­for­mance art rou­tine, a guest on Gen­er­al Hos­pi­tal. He received an MFA in writ­ing from Colum­bia, and is cur­rent­ly a PhD stu­dent in Eng­lish at Yale.

And, of course, he’s a film direc­tor. His first fea­ture was an adap­ta­tion of William Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying and his sec­ond direc­to­r­i­al effort, which comes out next month, is based on Cor­mac McCarthy’s nov­el Child of God. Clear­ly, Fran­co is not inter­est­ed in mak­ing light-heart­ed fam­i­ly fare. Yet per­haps his dark­est, most dis­turb­ing movie is Her­bert White, a short he did while a film stu­dent at NYU. (Oh yeah, he went there too.) You can watch it above. Warn­ing: while not graph­ic, it prob­a­bly is NSFW.

Based on a poem by Frank Bidart, Her­bert White is a glimpse into the life of a ded­i­cat­ed fam­i­ly man and secret necrophile. The film stars Oscar-nom­i­nat­ed actor Michael Shan­non, and Fran­co lets him do what he does best – look pen­sive, haunt­ed and like he’s on the brink of com­mit­ting an unspeak­able act. If you’ve seen his pow­er­house per­for­mance in Jeff Nichol’s Take Shel­ter, you know what I mean. The movie is shot in an under­stat­ed, ellip­ti­cal sort of way that slow­ly gets under your skin. This is par­tic­u­lar­ly the case in the film’s cli­mat­ic scene, shot in one sin­gle take, where Shan­non cir­cles his intend­ed vic­tim while he argues with him­self over whether or not to suc­cumb to his dark urges. It is deeply unnerv­ing.

In an inter­view with Vice — he finds the time to be a reg­u­lar cor­re­spon­dent for that uber-cool pub­li­ca­tion too, by the way – he talks about that scene.

I thought Herbert’s strug­gle with him­self would be best cap­tured if we didn’t cut away from him. The rac­ing around the block along with Michael’s screech­es and curs­es (ad-libbed) adds to the depic­tion of the inner strug­gle. We shot it three times, rac­ing around the block. I was in the back with my DP. We were both pinch­ing each oth­er because the scene was so intense.

Fran­co was so moved by the expe­ri­ence of direct­ing the movie that he pub­lished a book of poems about the expe­ri­ence (of course) called Direct­ing Her­bert White. You can watch him read some of those poems below.

You can find Her­bert White added to our col­lec­tion, 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More.

via NoFilm­School

Relat­ed Con­tent:

James Fran­co Reads a Dream­i­ly Ani­mat­ed Ver­sion of Allen Ginsberg’s Epic Poem ‘Howl’

James Fran­co Reads Short Sto­ry in Bed for The Paris Review

Lis­ten to James Fran­co Read from Jack Kerouac’s Influ­en­tial Beat Nov­el, On the Road

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrow.

 

Watch The Hire: 8 Short Films Shot for BMW by John Woo, Ang Lee & Other Popular Filmmakers (2002)

If there’s ever a Mad Men: The Next Gen­er­a­tion, count on a 40-ish Sal­ly Drap­er to psych a con­fer­ence room full of BMW execs out of the tried-and-true for­mu­la for lux­u­ry auto­mo­bile ads in favor of a ground­break­ing, night­mar­ish, pre-YouTube web series.

As fic­tion­al sce­nar­ios go, it’s about as like­ly as hav­ing the Hard­est Work­ing Man in Show Busi­ness James Brown place a win­ner-take-all bet with the dev­il (Gary Old­man) that his dri­ver Clive Owen can out-drag peren­ni­al movie bad guy Dan­ny Tre­jo. (In oth­er words, very like­ly.)

The prize?

Anoth­er 50 years of hip-shak­ing, leg-split­ting soul for the God­fa­ther of.

Can’t wait for the soon-to-be released James Brown biopic to find out who wins?

Check out “Beat the Dev­il,” above, the final install­ment of BMW Films’ 8‑episode series, The Hire. One of the new mil­len­ni­um’s ear­li­est exam­ples of brand­ed con­tent, each fre­net­ic seg­ment found Owen’s name­less dri­ver going up against a ros­ter of big name guest stars, includ­ing Don Chea­dle, Mick­ey Rourke, Mar­i­lyn Man­son, and an uncred­it­ed, pee-soaked Madon­na. (You heard me.)

Brown’s episode, direct­ed by the late Tony Scott, quick­ly ven­tures into David Lynch ter­ri­to­ry. Old­man’s Prince of Dark­ness gets laughs with a prop flu­o­res­cent tube and striped sus­pender tights, but the scene’s not with­out men­ace. (Recall Dean Stock­well lip-synch­ing Can­dy Col­ored Clown in Blue Vel­vet…)

The dia­logue calls to mind Jim Jar­musch’s blunt snap.

Dev­il: Stick your face in the hole!

James Brown: My face?

Dev­il: Stick it in the hole!

James Brown: My face?

Dev­il: Face in the hole!

James Brown: My face?

Dev­il: Face in the- oh, shit!”

Else­where, Brown’s line deliv­ery gets a boost from same-lan­guage sub­ti­tles, with­out which one could eas­i­ly mis­hear his con­cerns about aging as an unex­pect­ed, late-in-life racial iden­ti­fi­ca­tion switch. (Say it loud, I’m Asian and proud?)

If the clip above leaves you hun­gry for more, the com­plete BMW series, fea­tur­ing the testos­terone-rich work of such high octane direc­tors as John Franken­heimer, Guy Ritchie, and John Woo is avail­able on the playlist below. 

You can find The Hire added to our col­lec­tion, 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Rid­ley Scott Talks About Mak­ing Apple’s Land­mark “1984″ Com­mer­cial, Aired 30 Years Ago on Super Bowl Sun­day

David Lynch’s Per­fume Ads Based on the Works of Hem­ing­way, F. Scott Fitzger­ald & D.H. Lawrence

The Coen Broth­ers Make a TV Com­mer­cial — Ridi­cul­ing “Clean Coal”

Ayun Hal­l­i­day is an author, home­school­er and the Chief Pri­ma­tol­o­gist of The East Vil­lage Inky zine. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

“Weird Al” Yankovic Releases “Word Crimes,” a Grammar Nerd Parody of “Blurred Lines”

When “Weird Al” Yankovic is in the zone, he can spin a par­o­dy that is bet­ter than the orig­i­nal. He took R. Kelly’s pre­pos­ter­ous pop soap opera “Trapped in the Clos­et” and turned it into “Trapped in the Dri­ve Thru,” one of the best por­traits of every­day sub­ur­ban ennui I’ve ever come across. His hilar­i­ous tune “White and Nerdy” got twice as much traf­fic on YouTube than the song he spoofed, “Ridin’” by Chamil­lionar­ie. And off of his lat­est (and pos­si­bly last) album, Manda­to­ry Fun, Yankovic takes Robin Thicke’s bizarre but catchy ode to date rapeBlurred Lines” and flips it into “Word Crimes,” a dit­ty that is bound to delight gram­mar pedants every­where. Watch it above.

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrow.

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.