Declassified CIA Document Reveals That Ben Franklin (and His Big Ego) Put U.S. National Security at Risk

ben franklin

Ben­jamin Franklin might have been a bril­liant author, pub­lish­er, sci­en­tist, inven­tor and states­man, but he was pret­ty lousy at keep­ing state secrets. That’s the find­ing from a recent­ly declas­si­fied CIA analy­sis of Franklin’s crit­i­cal­ly impor­tant diplo­mat­ic mis­sion to France dur­ing the Rev­o­lu­tion­ary War.

In Sep­tem­ber 1776, Franklin was dis­patched to Paris to enlist France’s sup­port for the Amer­i­can Rev­o­lu­tion. At the time, France was still smart­ing from los­ing the Sev­en Years’ War to Britain and was eager to do any­thing that could reduce its rival’s pow­er and pres­tige. Franklin’s Com­mis­sion ran all kinds of clan­des­tine oper­a­tions with tac­it French aid, includ­ing procur­ing weapons, sup­plies and mon­ey for the Amer­i­can Army; sab­o­tag­ing the Portsmouth Roy­al Navy Dock­yard; and nego­ti­at­ing a secret treaty between Amer­i­ca and France.

And accord­ing the CIA’s in-house pub­li­ca­tion, Stud­ies in Intel­li­gence, the British knew just about every­thing that was going on. “The British had a com­plete pic­ture of Amer­i­can-French activ­i­ties sup­port­ing the war in Amer­i­ca and of Amer­i­can inten­tions regard­ing an alliance with France. The British used this intel­li­gence effec­tive­ly against the Amer­i­can cause.”

Some of the prob­lems with the Com­mis­sion seem head-slap­ping­ly obvi­ous. “There was no real phys­i­cal secu­ri­ty at the Com­mis­sion itself. The pub­lic had access to the man­sion, doc­u­ments and papers were spread out all over the office, and pri­vate dis­cus­sions were held in pub­lic areas.”

One of Franklin’s fel­low com­mis­sion­ers, Arthur Lee, was out­raged over this lack of secu­ri­ty.

[Lee] wrote that a French offi­cial “had com­plained that every­thing we did was known to the Eng­lish ambas­sador, who was always plagu­ing him with the details. No one will be sur­prised at this who knows that we have no time or place appro­pri­ate to our con­sul­ta­tion, but that ser­vants, strangers, and every­one else was at lib­er­ty to enter and did con­stant­ly enter the room while we were talk­ing about pub­lic busi­ness and that the papers relat­ing to it lay open in rooms of com­mon and con­tin­u­al resort.

Not sur­pris­ing­ly, the Amer­i­can mis­sion was rid­dled with British spies; chief among them was Franklin’s long-time friend Edward Ban­croft, who, as the Commission’s sec­re­tary, had com­plete access to all of its papers. He was report­ed­ly paid a prince­ly sum of 1000 pounds a year by the British Empire to play the part of an Enlight­en­ment-era James Bond.

Lee sus­pect­ed Ban­croft of being a spy, but Franklin dis­missed his con­cerns large­ly because he great­ly dis­liked Lee. “[Franklin’s] atti­tude … is all too famil­iar among pol­i­cy­mak­ers and states­men,” writes the CIA. “His ego may have over­whelmed his com­mon sense.”

In the end, the ana­lyst lays the blame on these cat­a­stroph­ic laps­es in intel­li­gence on that inflat­ed ego.

“By the time [Franklin] arrived in Paris in late 1776, he was elder­ly and had lit­tle inter­est in the admin­is­tra­tive aspects of the Com­mis­sion. Franklin was wide­ly rec­og­nized as a states­man, sci­en­tist, and intel­lec­tu­al. While high­ly respect­ed, he was also vain, obsti­nate, and jeal­ous of his pre­rog­a­tives and rep­u­ta­tion. … The Com­mis­sion was “under pro­tec­tion” of the French Gov­ern­ment, and Franklin may have under­es­ti­mat­ed British capa­bil­i­ties to oper­ate in a third coun­try. In any event, he did noth­ing to cre­ate a secu­ri­ty con­scious­ness at the Com­mis­sion.”

The por­trait that the CIA paints is indeed a grim one that in dif­fer­ent cir­cum­stances could have lost the war. Thank­ful­ly, Britain proved whol­ly unable to use this wealth of infor­ma­tion to turn the tide of the war. As the CIA wry­ly notes: “Per­haps the great­est irony in the whole sto­ry of the pen­e­tra­tion of the Amer­i­can Com­mis­sion is that, while British intel­li­gence activ­i­ties were high­ly suc­cess­ful, British pol­i­cy was a total fail­ure.”

Via io9

Relat­ed Con­tent:

FBI’s “Vault” Web Site Reveals Declas­si­fied Files on Hem­ing­way, Ein­stein, Mar­i­lyn & Oth­er Icons

Albert Camus Writes a Friend­ly Let­ter to Jean-Paul Sartre Before Their Per­son­al and Philo­soph­i­cal Rift

How the CIA Secret­ly Fund­ed Abstract Expres­sion­ism Dur­ing the Cold War

Jonathan Crow is a Los Ange­les-based writer and film­mak­er whose work has appeared in Yahoo!, The Hol­ly­wood Reporter, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions. You can fol­low him at @jonccrow. And check out his blog Veep­to­pus, fea­tur­ing  vice pres­i­dents with octo­pus­es on their heads.  The Veep­to­pus store is here.

Musician Shows How to Sing Two Notes at Once in Mesmerizing Video

Anna-Maria Hefele, a musi­cian based in Munich, has an unusu­al tal­ent. She can sing two notes at once. In the music world, it’s known as poly­phon­ic over­tone singing, and it’s believed that the prac­tice orig­i­nat­ed and still endures in Mon­go­lia. Above, Hefele offers a pret­ty cap­ti­vat­ing five-minute dis­play of her tech­nique. On her YouTube chan­nel, you can also find a series of lessons (sev­en so far) where Ann-Maria teach­es you the basics of poly­phon­ic over­tone singing here. Find the lessons here. Enjoy!

via io9

Sign up for our dai­ly email and, once a day, we’ll bun­dle all of our dai­ly posts and drop them in your inbox, in an easy-to-read for­mat. You don’t have to come to us; we’ll come to you!

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 6 ) |

9 New Episodes of David Lynch’s Twin Peaks to Air in 2016

David Lynch just announced on Twit­ter this morn­ing, “Dear Twit­ter Friends… it is hap­pen­ing again.

He’s refer­ring to the revival of his ear­ly 1990s cult clas­sic show, Twin Peaks, on Show­time in 2016.

Show­time’s Youtube Chan­nel adds this detail:

The ground­break­ing tele­vi­sion phe­nom­e­non, Gold­en Globe® and Peabody Award-win­ner TWIN PEAKS will return as a new lim­it­ed series on SHOWTIME in 2016. Series cre­ators and exec­u­tive pro­duc­ers David Lynch and Mark Frost will write and pro­duce all nine episodes of the lim­it­ed series, and Lynch will direct every episode. Set in the present day, TWIN PEAKS will con­tin­ue the lore of the orig­i­nal series, pro­vid­ing long-await­ed answers and a sat­is­fy­ing con­clu­sion for the series’ pas­sion­ate fan base.

Accord­ing to the fan site Wel­come­toTwin­Peaks, David Lynch and Mark Frost are “try­ing to bring back as much of the orig­i­nal cast as pos­si­ble, with Kyle MacLach­lan def­i­nite­ly on board repris­ing his role as Spe­cial Agent Dale Coop­er. Com­pos­er Ange­lo Badala­men­ti and Emmy Award-win­ning edi­tor Duwayne Dun­ham will like­ly be involved as well.” You can rest assured that Wel­come­toTwin­Peaks will keep you post­ed on new details as they come to light.

In the mean­time, the orig­i­nal Twin Peaks series was re-issued on blu-ray this sum­mer. And US-based view­ers can watch the orig­i­nal series for free on Hulu.

via Bib­liok­lept

Fol­low us on Face­bookTwit­ter and Google Plus and share intel­li­gent media with your friends. Or bet­ter yet, sign up for our dai­ly email and get a dai­ly dose of Open Cul­ture in your inbox.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

David Lynch Presents the His­to­ry of Sur­re­al­ist Film (1987)

David Lynch Explains How Med­i­ta­tion Enhances Our Cre­ativ­i­ty

David Lynch Teach­es You to Cook His Quinoa Recipe in a Weird, Sur­re­al­ist Video

Dum­b­land, David Lynch’s Twist­ed Ani­mat­ed Series (NSFW)

Hear the Nazi’s Bizzaro Propaganda Jazz Band, “Charlie and His Orchestra” (1940–1943)

As you might expect from a vicious polit­i­cal move­ment front­ed by a frus­trat­ed illus­tra­tor, the Nazi par­ty had a com­pli­cat­ed­ly dis­dain­ful yet aspi­ra­tional — and need­less to say, unceas­ing­ly fas­ci­nat­ing — rela­tion­ship with art. We pre­vi­ous­ly fea­tured their philis­tine grudge against mod­ernism that led to the “Degen­er­ate Art Exhi­bi­tion” of 1937, their mega-bud­get pro­pa­gan­da film on the Titan­ic dis­as­ter that turned into a dis­as­ter itself, and their con­trol-freak list of rules for dance orches­tras. The Nazis, as you might expect, did­n’t much care for jazz, or at least saw some polit­i­cal cap­i­tal in open­ly denounc­ing it. Yet it seems they also saw some in embrac­ing it, turn­ing the quin­tes­sen­tial­ly free art form toward, as always, their own pro­pa­gan­dis­tic pur­pos­es. What if they could come up with their own pop­u­lar jazz band and, using long-dis­tance short- and medi­um-wave broad­cast sig­nals, turn the Allies’ own music against them? Enter, in 1940, Char­lie and His Orches­tra. Anoth­er Joseph Goebbels cre­ation.

“The idea behind the Nazis’ Char­lie cam­paign,” writes the Wall Street Jour­nal’s Will Fried­wald, “was that they could under­mine Allied morale through musi­cal pro­pa­gan­da, with a spe­cial­ly devised orches­tra broad­cast­ing mes­sages in Eng­lish to British and Amer­i­can troops.” The groups’ fea­tured singer, “Char­lie” him­self (real name: Karl Schwedler), would sing not just “irre­sistible” jazz stan­dards but ver­sions with anti-British, ‑Amer­i­can, and ‑Semit­ic lyrics. You can hear much of their cat­a­log in the clips here, includ­ing what Fried­wald cites as their “weird­est record­ings”: “Irv­ing Berlin’s ‘Slum­ming on Park Avenue,’ in which Schwedler, por­tray­ing a British pilot with a mock-Eng­lish accent, sings ‘Let’s go bomb­ing!’ ” and “So You Left Me for the Leader of a Swing Band” refash­ioned as “So You Left Me for the Leader of the Sovi­ets.” Ulti­mate­ly, not only did the out­side world prove to have bet­ter taste than the Nazis, their own fight­ers did too: “Not only did the Char­lie project fail to con­vert any Allies to the oth­er side, but even Ger­many’s own troops could­n’t bring them­selves to take Nazi swing seri­ous­ly.” It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that swing, I sup­pose — and Char­lie and his Orches­tra def­i­nite­ly did­n’t have it. More audio sam­ples can be heard over at WFMU.

via WSJ

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Nazis’ 10 Con­trol-Freak Rules for Jazz Per­form­ers: A Strange List from World War II

The Nazi’s Philis­tine Grudge Against Abstract Art and The “Degen­er­ate Art Exhi­bi­tion” of 1937

Titan­ic: The Nazis Cre­ate a Mega-Bud­get Pro­pa­gan­da Film About the Ill-Fat­ed Ship … and Then Banned It (1943)

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

In Her Final Speech, Ayn Rand Denounces Ronald Reagan, the Moral Majority & Anti-Choicers (1981)

When the Repub­li­can par­ty strug­gles to deter­mine its future direc­tion, it often looks back to its intel­lec­tu­al and polit­i­cal lead­ers of decades past. And while we often hear about nov­el ways to think of those fig­ures, we rarely hear much about what they thought of each oth­er. Such inquiries can show us the his­tor­i­cal fault lines vis­i­ble in cur­rent debates between lib­er­tar­i­an, small-gov­ern­ment types and so-called “val­ues vot­ers,” con­flicts that reach back at least to Bar­ry Gold­wa­ter, who had no sym­pa­thy for the reli­gious right in his hey­day. Even in his old age, the con­ser­v­a­tive sen­a­tor from Ari­zona was, for exam­ple, “pret­ty secure in feel­ing that dis­crim­i­nat­ing against gays is con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly wrong.” In a 1994 inter­view, Gold­wa­ter resist­ed what he called the “rad­i­cal right […] fel­lows like Pat Robert­son and oth­ers who are try­ing to take the Repub­li­can Par­ty away from the Repub­li­can Par­ty, and make a reli­gious orga­ni­za­tion out of it.” “If that ever hap­pens,” Gold­wa­ter said, “kiss pol­i­tics good­bye.”

Thir­teen years ear­li­er, in 1981, anoth­er fig­ure much-revered on the polit­i­cal right felt sim­i­lar­ly about the rise of the “moral major­i­ty” after the elec­tion of Ronald Rea­gan. Asked what she thought of Rea­gan, Ayn Rand replied, “I don’t think of him. And the more I see, the less I think of him.” For Rand, “the appalling part of his admin­is­tra­tion was his con­nec­tion with the so-called ‘Moral Major­i­ty’ and sundry oth­er TV reli­gion­ists, who are strug­gling, appar­ent­ly with his approval, to take us back to the Mid­dle Ages via the uncon­sti­tu­tion­al union of reli­gion and pol­i­tics.” Rand’s pri­ma­ry con­cern, it seems, is that this “uncon­sti­tu­tion­al union” rep­re­sent­ed a “threat to cap­i­tal­ism.” While she admired Reagan’s appeal to an “inspi­ra­tional ele­ment” in Amer­i­can pol­i­tics, “he will not find it,” remarked Rand, “in the God, fam­i­ly, tra­di­tion swamp.” Instead, she pro­claims, we should be inspired by “the most typ­i­cal Amer­i­can group… the busi­ness­men.”

Rand made these remarks in her last pub­lic lec­ture, deliv­ered in 1981 at the Nation­al Com­mit­tee for Mon­e­tary Reform con­fer­ence in New Orleans. You can see excerpts at the top of the post and the full speech above. She clar­i­fies her posi­tion on the moral major­i­ty in the sec­ond clip in the top video, claim­ing that the lob­by­ing groups and vot­ing blocks of the reli­gious right were seek­ing to impose their “reli­gious ideas on oth­er peo­ple by force.” Rand also sup­port­ed abor­tion rights, stat­ing unequiv­o­cal­ly that a politi­cian who oppos­es the right to an abor­tion is “not a defend­er of rights and not a defend­er of cap­i­tal­ism.” It’s not entire­ly clear how Rand saw reli­gious leg­is­la­tion as a threat to cap­i­tal­ism, but there can be no doubt that she did. And though—as NPR polit­i­cal blog­ger Frank James writes—many peo­ple think that a good deal of “cher­ryp­ick­ing of her ideas has to be done to claim her as a mod­ern con­ser­v­a­tive hero,” there are also obvi­ous­ly plen­ty of reli­gious con­ser­v­a­tives who can admire Rand with­out deny­ing or excus­ing her hos­til­i­ty to their faith. Yet, as the applause she received for her force­ful rejec­tion of the reli­gious right sug­gests, there may have been—at least in 1981—no small num­ber of con­ser­v­a­tives who agreed with her.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

A Free Car­toon Biog­ra­phy of Ayn Rand: Her Life & Thought

Ayn Rand Trash­es C.S. Lewis in Her Mar­gin­a­lia: He’s an “Abysmal Bas­tard”

Ayn Rand Adamant­ly Defends Her Athe­ism on The Phil Don­ahue Show (Cir­ca 1979)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness.

The 430 Books in Marilyn Monroe’s Library: How Many Have You Read?

marilyn reading

If you’re a read­er and user of social media, you’ve like­ly test­ed your life­time read­ing list against the BBC Book Quiz.

Or per­haps you’ve allowed your worth as a read­er to be deter­mined by the num­ber of Pulitzer Prize win­ners you’ve made it through.

The Nation­al Endow­ment for the Arts’ Big Read, any­one?

The 142 Books that Every Stu­dent of Eng­lish Lit­er­a­ture Should Read?

The 50 Best Dystopi­an Nov­els?

Being young is no excuse! Not when the Amer­i­can Library Asso­ci­a­tion pub­lish­es an annu­al list of Out­stand­ing Books for the Col­lege Bound and Life­long Learn­ers.

So… how’d you do? Or should I say how’d you do in com­par­i­son to Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe? The online Mon­roe fan club Ever­last­ing Star used pho­tographs, inter­views, and a Christie’s auc­tion cat­a­logue to come up with a list of more than 400 books in her pos­ses­sion.

Did she read them all? I don’t know. Have you read every sin­gle title on your shelves? (There’s a Japan­ese word for those books. It’s Tsun­doku.)

Fem­i­nist biog­ra­ph­er Oline Eaton has a great rant on her Find­ing Jack­ie blog about the phrase “Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe read­ing,” and the 5,610,000 search engine results it yields when typed into Google:

There is, with­in Monroe’s image, a deeply root­ed assump­tion that she was an idiot, a vul­ner­a­ble and kind and lov­ing and ter­ri­bly sweet idiot, but an idiot nonethe­less. That is the assump­tion in which ‘Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe read­ing’ is entan­gled.

The pow­er of the phrase Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe read­ing’ lies in its appli­ca­tion to Mon­roe and in our assump­tion that she wouldn’t know how.

Would that every­one search­ing that phrase did so in the belief that her pas­sion for the print­ed word rivaled their own. Imag­ine legions of geeks lov­ing her for her brain, bypass­ing Sam Shaw’s icon­ic sub­way grate pho­to in favor of home print­ed pin ups depict­ing her with book in hand.

Com­mem­o­ra­tive postage stamps are nice, but per­haps a more fit­ting trib­ute would be an ALA poster. Like Eaton, when I look at that image of Mar­i­lyn hunched over James Joyce’s Ulysses (or kick­ing back read­ing Walt Whit­man’s Leaves of Grass), I don’t see some­one try­ing to pass her­self off as some­thing she’s not. I see a high school dropout caught in the act of edu­cat­ing her­self. If I saw it taped to a library shelf embla­zoned with the word “READ,” I might just sum­mon the resolve to take a stab at Ulysses myself. (I know how it ends, but that’s about it.)

See below, dear read­ers. Apolo­gies that we’re not set up to keep track of your score for you, but please let us know in the com­ments sec­tion if you’d hearti­ly sec­ond any of Mar­i­lyn’s titles, par­tic­u­lar­ly those that are less­er known or have fad­ed from the pub­lic view.

Mar­i­lyn Monroe’s Read­ing Chal­lenge

(Thanks to Book Tryst for com­pil­ing Ever­last­ing Star’s find­ings)

1) Let’s Make Love by Matthew Andrews (nov­el­iza­tion of the movie)

2) How To Trav­el Incog­ni­to by Lud­wig Bemel­mans

3) To The One I Love Best by Lud­wig Bemel­mans

4) Thurber Coun­try by James Thurber

5) The Fall by Albert Camus

6) Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe by George Car­pozi

7) Camille by Alexan­der Dumas

8) Invis­i­ble Man by Ralph Elli­son

9) The Boston Cook­ing-School Cook Book by Fan­nie Mer­ritt-Farmer

10) The Great Gats­by by F Scott Fitzger­ald

11) From Rus­sia With Love by Ian Flem­ing

12) The Art Of Lov­ing by Erich Fromm

13) The Prophet by Kahlil Gilbran

14) Ulysses by James Joyce

15) Stoned Like A Stat­ue: A Com­plete Sur­vey Of Drink­ing Clich­es, Prim­i­tive, Clas­si­cal & Mod­ern by Howard Kan­del & Don Safran, with an intro by Dean Mar­tin (a man who knew how to drink!)

16) The Last Temp­ta­tion Of Christ by Nikos Kazantza­kis

17) On The Road by Jack Ker­ouac

18) Select­ed Poems by DH Lawrence

19 and 20) Sons And Lovers by DH Lawrence (2 edi­tions)

21) The Portable DH Lawrence (more…)

Free Download of The History Manifesto: Historians New Call for Big-Picture Thinking

history manifesto

Briefly not­ed…

Cam­bridge Uni­ver­si­ty Press has just pub­lished a new book called The His­to­ry Man­i­festo by Jo Gul­di (Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor, Brown Uni­ver­si­ty) and David Armitage (Chair of Har­vard’s His­to­ry Depart­ment). In a nut­shell, the book argues that his­to­ri­ans have lost their pub­lic rel­e­vance by writ­ing his­to­ries of the “short term” — essen­tial­ly “micro-scale” his­to­ries — when they could be writ­ing big­ger, deep­er his­to­ries, cov­er­ing longer peri­ods of time, that help read­ers put our world into per­spec­tive. What Gul­di and Armitage are call­ing for is a return to long, mean­ing­ful nar­ra­tives and big-pic­ture think­ing — the kind of think­ing that could per­haps pull the his­tor­i­cal pro­fes­sion out of cri­sis. As some­one who got his PhD in His­to­ry dur­ing the “micro-scale” era, all I can say is — amen to that.

Print edi­tions of The His­to­ry Man­i­festo will come out in Novem­ber. But you can already read the entire work online in both html and PDF for­mats. The book has been released under a Cre­ative Com­mons license.

H/T @NathanVM

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Down­load 78 Free Online His­to­ry Cours­es: From Ancient Greece to The Mod­ern World

800 Free eBooks for iPad, Kin­dle & Oth­er Devices

“The Civ­il War and Recon­struc­tion,” a New MOOC by Pulitzer-Prize Win­ning His­to­ri­an Eric Fon­er

Down­load the “Great Amer­i­can Com­ic Sci Fi Nov­el,” Bud­dy Hol­ly is Alive and Well on Ganymede 

Har­vard’s David Dam­rosch Presents “Intro­duc­tion to World Lit­er­a­ture” (Free Course)

Download the “Great American Comic Sci Fi Novel,” Buddy Holly is Alive and Well on Ganymede

fre buddy holly is alive and well

Back in 1991, Bradley Den­ton pub­lished Bud­dy Hol­ly is Alive and Well on Ganymede. The next year, it won the John W. Camp­bell Memo­r­i­al Award for Best Sci­ence Fic­tion Nov­el.

Writes Cory Doc­torow on Boing­Bo­ingBud­dy Hol­ly is Alive and Well on Ganymede “is the great Amer­i­can com­ic sci­ence fic­tion nov­el, a book about the quest to exhume Bud­dy Hol­ly’s corpse from Lub­bock, TX to prove that he can’t pos­si­bly be broad­cast­ing an all-pow­er­ful jam­ming sig­nal from a her­met­i­cal­ly sealed bub­ble on a dis­tant, air­less moon.”

Tak­ing advan­tage of new inno­va­tions (new since 1991), Den­ton has made the nov­el avail­able for free down­load on his web­site, pub­lish­ing it under a Cre­ative Com­mons Attri­bu­tion-Non­Com­mer­cial-NoDeriv­a­tives license. You can access the text in four parts here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.

If you become a fan, keep an eye out for a film adap­ta­tion of the nov­el star­ring Jon Hed­er. It’s been in devel­op­ment for some time, but you can watch a trail­er online.

Bud­dy Hol­ly is Alive and Well on Ganymede will be added to our col­lec­tion, 800 Free eBooks for iPad, Kin­dle & Oth­er Devices.

You can find more free sci-fi below:

Free Sci­ence Fic­tion Clas­sics on the Web: Hux­ley, Orwell, Asi­mov, Gaiman & Beyond

33 Sci-Fi Sto­ries by Philip K. Dick as Free Audio Books & Free eBooks

Read Hun­dreds of Free Sci-Fi Sto­ries from Asi­mov, Love­craft, Brad­bury, Dick, Clarke & More

The Ware Tetral­o­gy: Free Sci­Fi Down­load

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.