Hear the Nazi’s Bizzaro Propaganda Jazz Band, “Charlie and His Orchestra” (1940–1943)

As you might expect from a vicious polit­i­cal move­ment front­ed by a frus­trat­ed illus­tra­tor, the Nazi par­ty had a com­pli­cat­ed­ly dis­dain­ful yet aspi­ra­tional — and need­less to say, unceas­ing­ly fas­ci­nat­ing — rela­tion­ship with art. We pre­vi­ous­ly fea­tured their philis­tine grudge against mod­ernism that led to the “Degen­er­ate Art Exhi­bi­tion” of 1937, their mega-bud­get pro­pa­gan­da film on the Titan­ic dis­as­ter that turned into a dis­as­ter itself, and their con­trol-freak list of rules for dance orches­tras. The Nazis, as you might expect, did­n’t much care for jazz, or at least saw some polit­i­cal cap­i­tal in open­ly denounc­ing it. Yet it seems they also saw some in embrac­ing it, turn­ing the quin­tes­sen­tial­ly free art form toward, as always, their own pro­pa­gan­dis­tic pur­pos­es. What if they could come up with their own pop­u­lar jazz band and, using long-dis­tance short- and medi­um-wave broad­cast sig­nals, turn the Allies’ own music against them? Enter, in 1940, Char­lie and His Orches­tra. Anoth­er Joseph Goebbels cre­ation.

“The idea behind the Nazis’ Char­lie cam­paign,” writes the Wall Street Jour­nal’s Will Fried­wald, “was that they could under­mine Allied morale through musi­cal pro­pa­gan­da, with a spe­cial­ly devised orches­tra broad­cast­ing mes­sages in Eng­lish to British and Amer­i­can troops.” The groups’ fea­tured singer, “Char­lie” him­self (real name: Karl Schwedler), would sing not just “irre­sistible” jazz stan­dards but ver­sions with anti-British, ‑Amer­i­can, and ‑Semit­ic lyrics. You can hear much of their cat­a­log in the clips here, includ­ing what Fried­wald cites as their “weird­est record­ings”: “Irv­ing Berlin’s ‘Slum­ming on Park Avenue,’ in which Schwedler, por­tray­ing a British pilot with a mock-Eng­lish accent, sings ‘Let’s go bomb­ing!’ ” and “So You Left Me for the Leader of a Swing Band” refash­ioned as “So You Left Me for the Leader of the Sovi­ets.” Ulti­mate­ly, not only did the out­side world prove to have bet­ter taste than the Nazis, their own fight­ers did too: “Not only did the Char­lie project fail to con­vert any Allies to the oth­er side, but even Ger­many’s own troops could­n’t bring them­selves to take Nazi swing seri­ous­ly.” It don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that swing, I sup­pose — and Char­lie and his Orches­tra def­i­nite­ly did­n’t have it. More audio sam­ples can be heard over at WFMU.

via WSJ

Relat­ed Con­tent:

The Nazis’ 10 Con­trol-Freak Rules for Jazz Per­form­ers: A Strange List from World War II

The Nazi’s Philis­tine Grudge Against Abstract Art and The “Degen­er­ate Art Exhi­bi­tion” of 1937

Titan­ic: The Nazis Cre­ate a Mega-Bud­get Pro­pa­gan­da Film About the Ill-Fat­ed Ship … and Then Banned It (1943)

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on cities, lan­guage, Asia, and men’s style. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­les, A Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall or on Face­book.

In Her Final Speech, Ayn Rand Denounces Ronald Reagan, the Moral Majority & Anti-Choicers (1981)

When the Repub­li­can par­ty strug­gles to deter­mine its future direc­tion, it often looks back to its intel­lec­tu­al and polit­i­cal lead­ers of decades past. And while we often hear about nov­el ways to think of those fig­ures, we rarely hear much about what they thought of each oth­er. Such inquiries can show us the his­tor­i­cal fault lines vis­i­ble in cur­rent debates between lib­er­tar­i­an, small-gov­ern­ment types and so-called “val­ues vot­ers,” con­flicts that reach back at least to Bar­ry Gold­wa­ter, who had no sym­pa­thy for the reli­gious right in his hey­day. Even in his old age, the con­ser­v­a­tive sen­a­tor from Ari­zona was, for exam­ple, “pret­ty secure in feel­ing that dis­crim­i­nat­ing against gays is con­sti­tu­tion­al­ly wrong.” In a 1994 inter­view, Gold­wa­ter resist­ed what he called the “rad­i­cal right […] fel­lows like Pat Robert­son and oth­ers who are try­ing to take the Repub­li­can Par­ty away from the Repub­li­can Par­ty, and make a reli­gious orga­ni­za­tion out of it.” “If that ever hap­pens,” Gold­wa­ter said, “kiss pol­i­tics good­bye.”

Thir­teen years ear­li­er, in 1981, anoth­er fig­ure much-revered on the polit­i­cal right felt sim­i­lar­ly about the rise of the “moral major­i­ty” after the elec­tion of Ronald Rea­gan. Asked what she thought of Rea­gan, Ayn Rand replied, “I don’t think of him. And the more I see, the less I think of him.” For Rand, “the appalling part of his admin­is­tra­tion was his con­nec­tion with the so-called ‘Moral Major­i­ty’ and sundry oth­er TV reli­gion­ists, who are strug­gling, appar­ent­ly with his approval, to take us back to the Mid­dle Ages via the uncon­sti­tu­tion­al union of reli­gion and pol­i­tics.” Rand’s pri­ma­ry con­cern, it seems, is that this “uncon­sti­tu­tion­al union” rep­re­sent­ed a “threat to cap­i­tal­ism.” While she admired Reagan’s appeal to an “inspi­ra­tional ele­ment” in Amer­i­can pol­i­tics, “he will not find it,” remarked Rand, “in the God, fam­i­ly, tra­di­tion swamp.” Instead, she pro­claims, we should be inspired by “the most typ­i­cal Amer­i­can group… the busi­ness­men.”

Rand made these remarks in her last pub­lic lec­ture, deliv­ered in 1981 at the Nation­al Com­mit­tee for Mon­e­tary Reform con­fer­ence in New Orleans. You can see excerpts at the top of the post and the full speech above. She clar­i­fies her posi­tion on the moral major­i­ty in the sec­ond clip in the top video, claim­ing that the lob­by­ing groups and vot­ing blocks of the reli­gious right were seek­ing to impose their “reli­gious ideas on oth­er peo­ple by force.” Rand also sup­port­ed abor­tion rights, stat­ing unequiv­o­cal­ly that a politi­cian who oppos­es the right to an abor­tion is “not a defend­er of rights and not a defend­er of cap­i­tal­ism.” It’s not entire­ly clear how Rand saw reli­gious leg­is­la­tion as a threat to cap­i­tal­ism, but there can be no doubt that she did. And though—as NPR polit­i­cal blog­ger Frank James writes—many peo­ple think that a good deal of “cher­ryp­ick­ing of her ideas has to be done to claim her as a mod­ern con­ser­v­a­tive hero,” there are also obvi­ous­ly plen­ty of reli­gious con­ser­v­a­tives who can admire Rand with­out deny­ing or excus­ing her hos­til­i­ty to their faith. Yet, as the applause she received for her force­ful rejec­tion of the reli­gious right sug­gests, there may have been—at least in 1981—no small num­ber of con­ser­v­a­tives who agreed with her.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

A Free Car­toon Biog­ra­phy of Ayn Rand: Her Life & Thought

Ayn Rand Trash­es C.S. Lewis in Her Mar­gin­a­lia: He’s an “Abysmal Bas­tard”

Ayn Rand Adamant­ly Defends Her Athe­ism on The Phil Don­ahue Show (Cir­ca 1979)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness.

The 430 Books in Marilyn Monroe’s Library: How Many Have You Read?

marilyn reading

If you’re a read­er and user of social media, you’ve like­ly test­ed your life­time read­ing list against the BBC Book Quiz.

Or per­haps you’ve allowed your worth as a read­er to be deter­mined by the num­ber of Pulitzer Prize win­ners you’ve made it through.

The Nation­al Endow­ment for the Arts’ Big Read, any­one?

The 142 Books that Every Stu­dent of Eng­lish Lit­er­a­ture Should Read?

The 50 Best Dystopi­an Nov­els?

Being young is no excuse! Not when the Amer­i­can Library Asso­ci­a­tion pub­lish­es an annu­al list of Out­stand­ing Books for the Col­lege Bound and Life­long Learn­ers.

So… how’d you do? Or should I say how’d you do in com­par­i­son to Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe? The online Mon­roe fan club Ever­last­ing Star used pho­tographs, inter­views, and a Christie’s auc­tion cat­a­logue to come up with a list of more than 400 books in her pos­ses­sion.

Did she read them all? I don’t know. Have you read every sin­gle title on your shelves? (There’s a Japan­ese word for those books. It’s Tsun­doku.)

Fem­i­nist biog­ra­ph­er Oline Eaton has a great rant on her Find­ing Jack­ie blog about the phrase “Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe read­ing,” and the 5,610,000 search engine results it yields when typed into Google:

There is, with­in Monroe’s image, a deeply root­ed assump­tion that she was an idiot, a vul­ner­a­ble and kind and lov­ing and ter­ri­bly sweet idiot, but an idiot nonethe­less. That is the assump­tion in which ‘Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe read­ing’ is entan­gled.

The pow­er of the phrase Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe read­ing’ lies in its appli­ca­tion to Mon­roe and in our assump­tion that she wouldn’t know how.

Would that every­one search­ing that phrase did so in the belief that her pas­sion for the print­ed word rivaled their own. Imag­ine legions of geeks lov­ing her for her brain, bypass­ing Sam Shaw’s icon­ic sub­way grate pho­to in favor of home print­ed pin ups depict­ing her with book in hand.

Com­mem­o­ra­tive postage stamps are nice, but per­haps a more fit­ting trib­ute would be an ALA poster. Like Eaton, when I look at that image of Mar­i­lyn hunched over James Joyce’s Ulysses (or kick­ing back read­ing Walt Whit­man’s Leaves of Grass), I don’t see some­one try­ing to pass her­self off as some­thing she’s not. I see a high school dropout caught in the act of edu­cat­ing her­self. If I saw it taped to a library shelf embla­zoned with the word “READ,” I might just sum­mon the resolve to take a stab at Ulysses myself. (I know how it ends, but that’s about it.)

See below, dear read­ers. Apolo­gies that we’re not set up to keep track of your score for you, but please let us know in the com­ments sec­tion if you’d hearti­ly sec­ond any of Mar­i­lyn’s titles, par­tic­u­lar­ly those that are less­er known or have fad­ed from the pub­lic view.

Mar­i­lyn Monroe’s Read­ing Chal­lenge

(Thanks to Book Tryst for com­pil­ing Ever­last­ing Star’s find­ings)

1) Let’s Make Love by Matthew Andrews (nov­el­iza­tion of the movie)

2) How To Trav­el Incog­ni­to by Lud­wig Bemel­mans

3) To The One I Love Best by Lud­wig Bemel­mans

4) Thurber Coun­try by James Thurber

5) The Fall by Albert Camus

6) Mar­i­lyn Mon­roe by George Car­pozi

7) Camille by Alexan­der Dumas

8) Invis­i­ble Man by Ralph Elli­son

9) The Boston Cook­ing-School Cook Book by Fan­nie Mer­ritt-Farmer

10) The Great Gats­by by F Scott Fitzger­ald

11) From Rus­sia With Love by Ian Flem­ing

12) The Art Of Lov­ing by Erich Fromm

13) The Prophet by Kahlil Gilbran

14) Ulysses by James Joyce

15) Stoned Like A Stat­ue: A Com­plete Sur­vey Of Drink­ing Clich­es, Prim­i­tive, Clas­si­cal & Mod­ern by Howard Kan­del & Don Safran, with an intro by Dean Mar­tin (a man who knew how to drink!)

16) The Last Temp­ta­tion Of Christ by Nikos Kazantza­kis

17) On The Road by Jack Ker­ouac

18) Select­ed Poems by DH Lawrence

19 and 20) Sons And Lovers by DH Lawrence (2 edi­tions)

21) The Portable DH Lawrence (more…)

Free Download of The History Manifesto: Historians New Call for Big-Picture Thinking

history manifesto

Briefly not­ed…

Cam­bridge Uni­ver­si­ty Press has just pub­lished a new book called The His­to­ry Man­i­festo by Jo Gul­di (Assis­tant Pro­fes­sor, Brown Uni­ver­si­ty) and David Armitage (Chair of Har­vard’s His­to­ry Depart­ment). In a nut­shell, the book argues that his­to­ri­ans have lost their pub­lic rel­e­vance by writ­ing his­to­ries of the “short term” — essen­tial­ly “micro-scale” his­to­ries — when they could be writ­ing big­ger, deep­er his­to­ries, cov­er­ing longer peri­ods of time, that help read­ers put our world into per­spec­tive. What Gul­di and Armitage are call­ing for is a return to long, mean­ing­ful nar­ra­tives and big-pic­ture think­ing — the kind of think­ing that could per­haps pull the his­tor­i­cal pro­fes­sion out of cri­sis. As some­one who got his PhD in His­to­ry dur­ing the “micro-scale” era, all I can say is — amen to that.

Print edi­tions of The His­to­ry Man­i­festo will come out in Novem­ber. But you can already read the entire work online in both html and PDF for­mats. The book has been released under a Cre­ative Com­mons license.

H/T @NathanVM

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Down­load 78 Free Online His­to­ry Cours­es: From Ancient Greece to The Mod­ern World

800 Free eBooks for iPad, Kin­dle & Oth­er Devices

“The Civ­il War and Recon­struc­tion,” a New MOOC by Pulitzer-Prize Win­ning His­to­ri­an Eric Fon­er

Down­load the “Great Amer­i­can Com­ic Sci Fi Nov­el,” Bud­dy Hol­ly is Alive and Well on Ganymede 

Har­vard’s David Dam­rosch Presents “Intro­duc­tion to World Lit­er­a­ture” (Free Course)

Download the “Great American Comic Sci Fi Novel,” Buddy Holly is Alive and Well on Ganymede

fre buddy holly is alive and well

Back in 1991, Bradley Den­ton pub­lished Bud­dy Hol­ly is Alive and Well on Ganymede. The next year, it won the John W. Camp­bell Memo­r­i­al Award for Best Sci­ence Fic­tion Nov­el.

Writes Cory Doc­torow on Boing­Bo­ingBud­dy Hol­ly is Alive and Well on Ganymede “is the great Amer­i­can com­ic sci­ence fic­tion nov­el, a book about the quest to exhume Bud­dy Hol­ly’s corpse from Lub­bock, TX to prove that he can’t pos­si­bly be broad­cast­ing an all-pow­er­ful jam­ming sig­nal from a her­met­i­cal­ly sealed bub­ble on a dis­tant, air­less moon.”

Tak­ing advan­tage of new inno­va­tions (new since 1991), Den­ton has made the nov­el avail­able for free down­load on his web­site, pub­lish­ing it under a Cre­ative Com­mons Attri­bu­tion-Non­Com­mer­cial-NoDeriv­a­tives license. You can access the text in four parts here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4.

If you become a fan, keep an eye out for a film adap­ta­tion of the nov­el star­ring Jon Hed­er. It’s been in devel­op­ment for some time, but you can watch a trail­er online.

Bud­dy Hol­ly is Alive and Well on Ganymede will be added to our col­lec­tion, 800 Free eBooks for iPad, Kin­dle & Oth­er Devices.

You can find more free sci-fi below:

Free Sci­ence Fic­tion Clas­sics on the Web: Hux­ley, Orwell, Asi­mov, Gaiman & Beyond

33 Sci-Fi Sto­ries by Philip K. Dick as Free Audio Books & Free eBooks

Read Hun­dreds of Free Sci-Fi Sto­ries from Asi­mov, Love­craft, Brad­bury, Dick, Clarke & More

The Ware Tetral­o­gy: Free Sci­Fi Down­load

Electric Guitars Made from the Detritus of Detroit

When Frank Nor­ris plays a gui­tar made by Wal­lace Detroit Gui­tars, he says it “feels like home.” And maybe that’s because Wal­lace Detroit Gui­tars are made with reclaimed wood from aban­doned Detroit homes.

Fol­low­ing the finan­cial cri­sis of 2008, per­haps no Amer­i­can city fared worse than Detroit. The city found itself with 10,000 vacant homes. And even­tu­al­ly the city pur­chased entire blocks and razed the hous­es to the ground. Accord­ing to the Detroit web site Mod­el D, a lot of the wood [from these struc­tures] has­n’t gone to waste. The wood can be found, they write, in “trendy cof­fee hous­es, in table tops, even in the frames of sun­glass­es.” And now high-end elec­tric gui­tars.

Wal­lace Detroit Gui­tars just launched its new web site two days ago, and its first gui­tars, made of cen­tu­ry-old wood, can now be yours.

If you like play­ing gui­tars made of found objects, you might also want to check out anoth­er new com­pa­ny — Bohemi­an Gui­tars. They’ve start­ed build­ing elec­tric gui­tars made of vin­tage oil cans, tak­ing inspi­ra­tion from South African musi­cians who turn used mate­ri­als into playable instru­ments.

via Coudal

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Bri­an May’s Home­made Gui­tar, Made From Old Tables, Bike and Motor­cy­cle Parts & More

The Recy­cled Orches­tra: Paraguayan Youth Play Mozart with Instru­ments Clev­er­ly Made Out of Trash

Artist Ken But­ler Turns One Man’s Trash Into Anoth­er Man’s Quirky Stringed Instru­ment

Alain de Botton’s School of Life Presents Animated Introductions to Heidegger, The Stoics & Epicurus

Why is West­ern phi­los­o­phy so dif­fi­cult, so abstruse, and so damned wordy? Per­haps it’s sim­ply a mat­ter of job secu­ri­ty. It’s gen­er­al­ly well-known, after all, that some of the most tac­i­turn philoso­phers were also some of the poor­est—Lud­wig Wittgen­stein, who was inde­pen­dent­ly wealthy, notwith­stand­ing. But if you fol­low the for­mat Alain de Bot­ton lays out in the phi­los­o­phy depart­ment of his video series, “The Big Ideas,” you can pick up some Hei­deg­ger, a lit­tle Sto­ic thought, and the ideas of Epi­cu­rus each in under ten min­utes of light­heart­ed com­men­tary, accom­pa­nied by quirky ani­ma­tion from a stu­dio called Mad Adam (who favor a very Ter­ry Gilliam-like approach to their art). There are those crit­ics who think de Bot­ton glib and shal­low, a “self-help guru to the British middle-class—a life coach.” In a cer­tain sense, I sup­pose he’d have to agree with that assess­ment, giv­en that his “cul­tur­al enter­prise,” The School of Life, has as its tagline “good ideas for every­day life.” Do the dead Euro­pean philoso­phers of ages past have help­ful tips for our mun­dane 21st cen­tu­ry exis­tence, and do de Botton’s videos do any jus­tice to the qual­i­ty of their thought?

As to the first ques­tion, I sup­pose we’d have to answer, yes. As for the second—I leave it to the philoso­phers to weigh in. At the top of the post, we have Mar­tin Heidegger—“the most incom­pre­hen­si­ble Ger­man philoso­pher that ever lived”—in just over five min­utes. It turns out that “beneath the jar­gon, Hei­deg­ger tells us sim­ple, even at times home­spun truths” about things like mean­ing and free­dom. Once a rank­ing mem­ber of the Nazi par­ty, Hei­deg­ger, de Bot­ton says, “saw the error of his ways,” a claim peo­ple often repeat with­out a great deal of evi­dence. But Heidegger’s Nazi past aside, his thought, de Bot­ton says, helps us get back in touch with the mys­tery of exis­tence, what the philoso­pher called das sein, or “Being.” This term more or less sums up the core of Heidegger’s entire project, and I con­fess I nev­er real­ly grasped what he means by it. Maybe you will after tak­ing de Botton’s very short course.

Next up, we have the Sto­ics, not a spe­cif­ic move­ment or group as such, but an entire school of thought that “flour­ished for 480 years in ancient Greece and Rome.” Sto­icism offered a nar­row range of respons­es to the ancient prob­lem de Bot­ton defines as “Life is very dif­fi­cult,” and it appealed to com­mon­ers and aris­to­crats alike because of its uni­ver­sal con­cern with suf­fer­ing. De Bot­ton gives us the gist by refer­ring to the way we typ­i­cal­ly use the word “sto­ic” these days, as a syn­onym for “brave.” He says a bit more, of course, about Stoicism’s answers to life’s chal­lenges, lis­ten above.

Final­ly, we have Greek philoso­pher Epi­cu­rus, who “helps us think about mon­ey, cap­i­tal­ism, and our run­away con­sumer soci­ety.” This despite the fact that Epi­cu­rus pre­dates cap­i­tal­ism and con­sumer soci­ety by well over two-thou­sand years. Nonethe­less, his thought is eter­nal­ly rel­e­vant, giv­en that its pri­ma­ry con­cern, “What makes peo­ple hap­py?” is a prob­lem unlike­ly to be solved in anyone’s life­time. But Epi­cu­rus had some answers, and he pur­veyed them—like de Botton—by found­ing his own school. He and his dis­ci­ples, Epi­cure­ans, were rumored to be debauched and wicked lib­ertines steeped in exces­sive food, drink, and sex. In fact, the oppo­site was true: Epi­cu­rus was an aus­tere and sober man, who urged restraint in mat­ters sex­u­al and fis­cal, mak­ing him, in a way, a gen­uine con­ser­v­a­tive.

De Botton’s “Big Ideas” cur­ricu­lum cur­rent­ly includes two oth­er videos that func­tion as gen­er­al defens­es of the human­i­ties: “What is Art for?” and “What is Lit­er­a­ture for?” Both ques­tions might sound mean­ing­less to some refined aes­thetes, but for a great many peo­ple get­ting on with the painful, some­times drea­ry, and often har­ried busi­ness of dai­ly life, ques­tions about util­i­ty are sen­si­ble enough. New big ideas videos are on the way—in the mean­while, vis­it de Botton’s School of Life Youtube chan­nel for video shorts on “Mood,” “Rela­tion­ships,” and more.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Free Online Phi­los­o­phy Cours­es

Alain de Bot­ton Shows How Art Can Answer Life’s Big Ques­tions in Art as Ther­a­py

A Guide to Hap­pi­ness: Alain de Bot­ton Shows How Six Great Philoso­phers Can Change Your Life

Alain de Bot­ton Pro­pos­es a Kinder, Gen­tler Phi­los­o­phy of Suc­cess

Mar­tin Hei­deg­ger Talks Phi­los­o­phy with a Bud­dhist Monk on Ger­man Tele­vi­sion (1963)

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness.

The Chemistry Behind the Smell of Old Books: Explained with a Free Infographic

Aroma-Chemistry-The-Smell-of-Books-724x1024

What gives old books that ever-so-dis­tinc­tive smell? Andy Brun­ning, a chem­istry teacher in the UK, gives us all a quick primer with this info­graph­ic post­ed on his web site, Com­pound Inter­est. The visu­al comes accom­pa­nied by this tex­tu­al expla­na­tion. Writes Brun­ning:

Gen­er­al­ly, it is the chem­i­cal break­down of com­pounds with­in paper that leads to the pro­duc­tion of ‘old book smell’. Paper con­tains, amongst oth­er chem­i­cals, cel­lu­lose, and small­er amounts of lignin – much less in more mod­ern books than in books from more than one hun­dred years ago. Both of these orig­i­nate from the trees the paper is made from; fin­er papers will con­tain much less lignin than, for exam­ple, newsprint. In trees, lignin helps bind cel­lu­lose fibres togeth­er, keep­ing the wood stiff; it’s also respon­si­ble for old paper’s yel­low­ing with age, as oxi­da­tion reac­tions cause it to break down into acids, which then help break down cel­lu­lose.

‘Old book smell’ is derived from this chem­i­cal degra­da­tion. Mod­ern, high qual­i­ty papers will under­go chem­i­cal pro­cess­ing to remove lignin, but break­down of cel­lu­lose in the paper can still occur (albeit at a much slow­er rate) due to the pres­ence of acids in the sur­round­ings. These reac­tions, referred to gen­er­al­ly as ‘acid hydrol­y­sis’, pro­duce a wide range of volatile organ­ic com­pounds, many of which are like­ly to con­tribute to the smell of old books. A select­ed num­ber of com­pounds have had their con­tri­bu­tions pin­point­ed: ben­zalde­hyde adds an almond-like scent; vanillin adds a vanil­la-like scent; eth­yl ben­zene and toluene impart sweet odours; and 2‑ethyl hexa­nol has a ‘slight­ly flo­ral’ con­tri­bu­tion. Oth­er alde­hy­des and alco­hols pro­duced by these reac­tions have low odour thresh­olds and also con­tribute.

The Aro­ma of Books info­graph­ic can be viewed in a larg­er for­mat here. And because it has been released under a Cre­ative Com­mons license, it can be down­loaded for free. For anoth­er expla­na­tion of this phe­nom­e­non — this one in video — see this pre­vi­ous post in our archive:  The Birth and Decline of a Book: Two Videos for Bib­lio­philes

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. It’s a great way to see our new posts, all bun­dled in one email, each day.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

via IFLScience

Relat­ed Con­tent:

A Secret Book­store in a New York City Apart­ment: The Last of a Dying Breed

Old Books Bound in Human Skin Found in Har­vard Libraries (and Else­where in Boston)

Spike Jonze Presents a Stop Motion Film for Book Lovers

Wear­able Books: In Medieval Times, They Took Old Man­u­scripts & Turned Them into Clothes

13-Year-Old Char­lotte Bron­të & Her Broth­er Wrote Tee­ny Tiny Adven­ture Books, Mea­sur­ing 1 x 2 Inch­es

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast