The Very Concise Suicide Note by Kodak Founder George Eastman: “My Work is Done. Why Wait?” (1932)

eastman suicide

In 1932 George East­man, the 77 year old entre­pre­neur who estab­lished the East­man Kodak Com­pa­ny, pop­u­lar­ized the use of roll film, and brought pho­tog­ra­phy to the main­stream, found him­self in declin­ing health. Suf­fer­ing from lum­bar spinal steno­sis, a nar­row­ing of the spinal canal that can lead to con­sid­er­able back pain and dif­fi­cul­ty walk­ing, East­man was depressed and increas­ing­ly dis­abled. On March 14th, he com­mit­ted sui­cide by fir­ing a sin­gle gun­shot through his heart. An act as brief, and to the point, as the note he left behind. It read:

To my friends

My work is done

Why wait?

GE

If you would like to sign up for Open Culture’s free email newslet­ter, please find it here. Or fol­low our posts on Threads, Face­book, BlueSky or Mastodon.

If you would like to sup­port the mis­sion of Open Cul­ture, con­sid­er mak­ing a dona­tion to our site. It’s hard to rely 100% on ads, and your con­tri­bu­tions will help us con­tin­ue pro­vid­ing the best free cul­tur­al and edu­ca­tion­al mate­ri­als to learn­ers every­where. You can con­tribute through Pay­Pal, Patre­on, and Ven­mo (@openculture). Thanks!

Relat­ed Con­tent:

How Film Was Made: A Kodak Nos­tal­gia Moment

Ear­ly Exper­i­ments in Col­or Film (1895–1935)

Anne Sex­ton, Con­fes­sion­al Poet, Reads “Want­i­ng to Die” in Omi­nous 1966 Video

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 8 ) |

Inside the Rhapsody: A Short Documentary on the Making of Queen’s Classic Song, ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’ (2002)

“Bohemi­an Rhap­sody” by Queen is one of the most auda­cious pop songs ever made. Part bal­lad, part opera, part heavy met­al orgasm, the song has six dis­tinct sec­tions and took over a month to record.  At just under six min­utes, “Bohemi­an Rhap­sody” was con­sid­ered too long for pop radio. “The record com­pa­ny, in their infi­nite igno­rance, of course imme­di­ate­ly sug­gest­ed that we cut it down,” said Queen drum­mer Roger Tay­lor, who stood by his band­mates and refused to let the song be cut. “It real­ly was hit or miss. It was either going to be mas­sive or it was going to be noth­ing.”

“Bohemi­an Rhap­sody,” of course, went on to become one of the most pop­u­lar songs in music his­to­ry. It spent nine weeks at num­ber one in the UK fol­low­ing its release in the fall of 1975, and went back to num­ber one after the death of singer Fred­die Mer­cury in 1991. In Amer­i­ca the song peaked at num­ber nine in 1976 and re-entered the charts at num­ber two in 1992, when it was fea­tured in the movie Wayne’s World. Last year, an ITV poll in Great Britain list­ed “Bohemi­an Rhap­sody” as “The Nation’s Favorite Num­ber One” song in 60 years of music.

Above, in the 3‑part mini doc­u­men­tary Inside the Rhap­sody, Queen takes you inside the mak­ing of the song. And, along the way, gui­tarist Bri­an May goes back to the mix­ing board to explain the com­plex­i­ty of lay­ers that went into real­iz­ing Mer­cury’s vision for the song. The orig­i­nal 24-track ana­logue record­ing sys­tem was far too lim­it­ed, so the band used the ping-pong tech­nique to “bounce” lit­er­al­ly hun­dreds of over­dubs into the mix. May explains how the oper­at­ic vocal lay­ers were inspired by the “cas­cad­ing strings” effect made famous by Annun­zio Pao­lo Man­to­vani, a tech­nique May first tried out in 1974 with the gui­tar solo on “Killer Queen.”

For more on the mak­ing of “Bohemi­an Rhap­sody,” please see our post, “Lis­ten to Fred­die Mer­cury’s Won­drous Piano and Vocal Tracks for ‘Bohemi­an Rhap­sody’ (1975).” And for a reminder of how it all came togeth­er, here’s the offi­cial video:

Inside the Rhap­sody has been added to our col­lec­tion, 285 Free Doc­u­men­taries Online.

Relat­ed con­tent:

Fred­die Mer­cury at Live Aid

Queen Doc­u­men­tary Pays Trib­ute to the Rock Band That Con­quered the World

Lis­ten to Fred­die Mer­cury and David Bowie on the Iso­lat­ed Vocal Track for the Queen Hit ‘Under Pres­sure,’ 1981

Revisit Futuria Fantasia: The Science Fiction Fanzine That Ray Bradbury Published as a Teenager

futuriafantasia

Bud­ding sci­ence-fic­tion authors today know that, to get their start, they should prob­a­bly go online and pub­lish them­selves. But even before the advent of the mod­ern inter­net, many writ­ers eager to tell spec­u­la­tive tales of human­i­ty’s future strug­gle with tech­nol­o­gy, knowl­edge, and its own nature showed a sim­i­lar self-start­ing bent. They made espe­cial­ly advan­ta­geous use of pho­to­copiers and sta­plers in the sev­en­ties and eight­ies, the decades com­mon­ly con­sid­ered the hey­day of those low-cir­cu­la­tion pub­li­ca­tions known as zines. But long before before that, the for­mat already incu­bat­ed seri­ous sci­ence-fic­tion tal­ent. Take Futuria Fan­ta­sia, which pub­lished four issues between 1939 and 1940. Its edi­tor? A cer­tain Ray Brad­bury, before Fahren­heit 451, before The Mar­t­ian Chron­i­cles — before every­thing.

“Released in 1939 short­ly after Brad­bury grad­u­at­ed from high school,” says Zinewik­i’s entry on the mag­a­zine, “Futuria Fan­ta­sia was pub­lished with the help of [sci-fi pro­mot­er] For­rest J. Ack­er­man, who lent Brad­bury $90.00 for the fanzine.” The first issue, avail­able free from Project Guten­berg, includes Brad­bury’s sto­ry “Let’s Get Tech­na­tal” (writ­ten under the pseu­do­nym “Ron Reynolds”) and poem “Thought and Space.”

The sec­ond issue includes an arti­cle he wrote under “Guy Amory” and his sto­ry “The Pen­du­lum.” The third includes a Brad­bury edi­to­r­i­al, the fourth anoth­er edi­to­r­i­al and the pseu­do­ny­mous sto­ries “The Piper” and “The Flight of the Good Ship Claris­sa.” “I hope you like this brain-child, spawned from the womb of a year long inan­i­ma­tion,” the ambi­tious young Brad­bury writes in his intro­duc­tion to the sum­mer 1939 issue. “This is only the first issue of FuFa … if it suc­ceeds there will be more, bet­ter issues com­ing up.” Three more would, indeed, emerge, but sure­ly even such a pre­dic­tive mind as Brad­bury’s could­n’t imag­ine what his career real­ly held in store.

You can hear all ten sto­ries from the Spring 1940 edi­tion of Futuria Fan­ta­sia in the playlist below. It includes “Gor­gono and Slith” by Ray Brad­bury:

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Ray Brad­bury Reads Mov­ing Poem on the Eve of NASA’s 1971 Mars Mis­sion

Ray Brad­bury: Sto­ry of a Writer 1963 Film Cap­tures the Para­dox­i­cal Late Sci-Fi Author

Ray Brad­bury Gives 12 Pieces of Writ­ing Advice to Young Authors (2001)

Ray Brad­bury Offers 12 Essen­tial Writ­ing Tips and Explains Why Lit­er­a­ture Saves Civ­i­liza­tion

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on lit­er­a­ture, film, cities, Asia, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­lesA Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

“The Lost Paris Tapes” Preserves Jim Morrison’s Final Poetry Recordings from 1971

Billed and sold as the ninth and final stu­dio album by The Doors, An Amer­i­can Prayer tends to divide Jim Mor­ri­son fans. On the one hand, it’s a cap­ti­vat­ing doc­u­ment of the late singer read­ing his free-asso­cia­tive poet­ry: dark, weird­ly beau­ti­ful psy­che­del­ic lyri­cal fugues. On the oth­er hand, it’s only a “Doors album” in that the three remain­ing mem­bers con­vened in 1978 to record orig­i­nal music over the deceased Morrison’s solo read­ings. While the result­ing prod­uct is both a haunt­ing trib­ute and an immer­sive late-night lis­ten, many have felt that the band’s ren­der­ing did vio­lence to the depart­ed singer’s orig­i­nal inten­tions. (Lis­ten to and down­load it here for free.)

An Amer­i­can Prayer’s read­ings were record­ed unac­com­pa­nied in March 1969 and Decem­ber 1970. In 1971, Mor­ri­son joined his long-time lover Pamela Cour­son in Paris. That same year, Jim Mor­ri­son died, under some rather mys­te­ri­ous cir­cum­stances, at the age of 27.

Before his death, how­ev­er, he made what is said to be his final stu­dio record­ing, a poet­ry reading/performance with a cou­ple of unknown Parisian street musi­cians. Although Doors key­boardist Ray Man­zarek alleged­ly dis­missed this record­ing as “drunk­en gib­ber­ish,” Doors fans have cir­cu­lat­ed it since 1994—combined with a 37-minute poet­ry read­ing from 1968—as a boot­leg called The Lost Paris Tapes.

While it’s true that An Amer­i­can Prayer is a pow­er­ful and haunt­ing album, it’s also true that The Lost Paris Tapes rep­re­sents the unadorned, unedit­ed Mor­ri­son, in full con­trol of how his voice sounds, and with­out his famous band. I can­not help you find a copy of The Lost Paris Tapes, but many of the tracks are on Youtube, such as “Orange Coun­ty Suite” (top), an affect­ing piece writ­ten for Pamela Cour­son. Oth­er excerpts from the boot­leg, such as “Hitler Poem” (above) show Mor­ri­son in a very strange mood indeed, and show off his unset­ting sense of humor. While the work on The Lost Paris Tapes ranges in qual­i­ty, all of it pre­serves the seduc­tive voice and cryp­tic imag­i­na­tion that Jim Mor­ri­son nev­er lost, even as he began to slip away into alco­holism.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Doors Key­boardist Ray Man­zarek (1939–2013) Tells the Sto­ry of the Clas­sic Song, ‘Rid­ers on the Storm’

A Young, Clean Cut Jim Mor­ri­son Appears in a 1962 Flori­da State Uni­ver­si­ty Pro­mo Film

Ani­ma­tions Revive Lost Inter­views with David Fos­ter Wal­lace, Jim Mor­ri­son & Dave Brubeck

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Durham, NC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

Librarians Pay Tribute to Classic Beastie Boys Video; Name Henry Rollins Keynote Speaker at Conference

http://vimeo.com/66169135?r44b=no

Librar­i­ans are break­ing the mold late­ly and flirt­ing with the world of hip hop and punk. Cour­tesy of The New York Pub­lic Library Tum­blr, we have Chica­go librar­i­ans pay­ing homage to The Beast­ie Boys’s 1994 video, “Sab­o­tage,” direct­ed by Spike Jonze. Of course, the orig­i­nal 1994 video paid comedic trib­ute to TV crime shows of the 1970s, shows like Hawaii Five‑O and Starsky and Hutch. So what we have above is a trib­ute to a trib­ute.

In oth­er librar­i­an news, The Cal­i­for­nia Library Asso­ci­a­tion recent­ly announced that Hen­ry Rollins, the for­mer front­man of the punk band Black Flag (see vin­tage per­for­mance here), will be the keynote speak­er at its con­fer­ence in Novem­ber. If you’re a reg­u­lar Open Cul­ture read­er, you might not be entire­ly sur­prised. These days, Rollins has been pitch­ing edu­ca­tion as the key to reviv­ing our with­er­ing democ­ra­cy and also explain­ing why tenac­i­ty, dis­ci­pline and hard work can take young­sters a long way. He also has 15 books to his cred­it. You can sam­ple his writ­ing by pick­ing up a copy of The Portable Hen­ry Rollins.

via Media Bistro and Boing Boing

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Fight For Your Right Revis­it­ed: Adam Yauch’s 2011 Film Com­mem­o­rates the Beast­ie Boys’ Leg­endary Music Video

Hen­ry Rollins Pitch­es Edu­ca­tion as the Key to Restor­ing Democ­ra­cy

‘Beast­ie Boys on Being Stu­pid’: An Ani­mat­ed Inter­view From 1985

 

Richard Ford, Jonathan Franzen, and Anne Enright Give Ten Candid Pieces of Writing Advice Each

richard ford writing tips

The way peo­ple read on the inter­net has encour­aged the pro­vi­sion of “tips,” espe­cial­ly pre­sent­ed as short sen­tences col­lect­ed in lists. While we here at Open Cul­ture sel­dom ride that cur­rent, we make excep­tions for lists of tips by authors best known for their long-form tex­tu­al achieve­ments. Richard Ford (The Sports­writer books), Jonathan Franzen (The Cor­rec­tions and Free­dom), and Anne Enright (The Portable Vir­gin, The Gath­er­ing) here offer ten sug­ges­tions each to guide your own writ­ing habits. Though pre­sum­ably learned in the process of writ­ing nov­els, many of these lessons apply just as well to oth­er forms. I, for exam­ple, write most­ly essays, but still find great val­ue in Franzen’s instruc­tion to treat the read­er as a friend, Enright’s point that descrip­tion con­veys opin­ion, and Ford’s injunc­tion not to write reviews (or at least, as I read it, not reviews as so nar­row­ly defined).

Some of these tips have to do with tech­nique: Ford advis­es against drink­ing while writ­ing, Franzen advis­es against using “then” as a con­junc­tion, and Enright advis­es you sim­ply to keep putting words on the page. Oth­ers have more to do with main­tain­ing a cer­tain tem­pera­ment: “Don’t have argu­ments with your wife in the morn­ing, or late at night,” says Ford; “You have to love before you can be relent­less,” says Franzen; “Have fun,” says Enright. And as any suc­cess­ful writer knows, you can’t pull it off at all with­out a strong dose of prac­ti­cal­i­ty, as exem­pli­fied by Enright’s “Try to be accu­rate about stuff,” Franzen’s doubt that “any­one with an inter­net con­nec­tion at his work­place is writ­ing good fic­tion,” and Ford’s “Don’t have chil­dren.” Can we draw out an over­ar­ch­ing guide­line? Avoid dis­trac­tion, per­haps. But you real­ly have to read these authors’ lists in full, like you would their nov­els, to grasp them. The lists below orig­i­nal­ly appeared in The Guardian, along with tips from var­i­ous oth­er esteemed writ­ers.

Richard Ford

1 Mar­ry some­body you love and who thinks you being a writer’s a good idea.

2 Don’t have chil­dren.

Don’t read your reviews.

4 Don’t write reviews. (Your judg­men­t’s always taint­ed.)

5 Don’t have argu­ments with your wife in the morn­ing, or late at night.

6 Don’t drink and write at the same time.

7 Don’t write let­ters to the edi­tor. (No one cares.)

8 Don’t wish ill on your col­leagues.

9 Try to think of oth­ers’ good luck as encour­age­ment to your­self.

10 Don’t take any shit if you can ­pos­si­bly help it.

 

Jonathan Franzen

1 The read­er is a friend, not an adver­sary, not a spec­ta­tor.

2 Fic­tion that isn’t an author’s per­son­al adven­ture into the fright­en­ing or the unknown isn’t worth writ­ing for any­thing but mon­ey.

3 Nev­er use the word “then” as a ­con­junc­tion – we have “and” for this pur­pose. Sub­sti­tut­ing “then” is the lazy or tone-deaf writer’s non-solu­tion to the prob­lem of too many “ands” on the page.

4 Write in the third per­son unless a ­real­ly dis­tinc­tive first-per­son voice ­offers itself irre­sistibly.

5 When infor­ma­tion becomes free and uni­ver­sal­ly acces­si­ble, volu­mi­nous research for a nov­el is deval­ued along with it.

6 The most pure­ly auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal ­fic­tion requires pure inven­tion. Nobody ever wrote a more auto­biographical sto­ry than “The Meta­morphosis”.

7 You see more sit­ting still than chas­ing after.

8 It’s doubt­ful that any­one with an inter­net con­nec­tion at his work­place is writ­ing good fic­tion.

Inter­est­ing verbs are sel­dom very inter­est­ing.

10 You have to love before you can be relent­less.

 

Anne Enright

1 The first 12 years are the worst.

2 The way to write a book is to actu­al­ly write a book. A pen is use­ful, typ­ing is also good. Keep putting words on the page.

3 Only bad writ­ers think that their work is real­ly good.

4 Descrip­tion is hard. Remem­ber that all descrip­tion is an opin­ion about the world. Find a place to stand.

5 Write what­ev­er way you like. Fic­tion is made of words on a page; real­i­ty is made of some­thing else. It does­n’t mat­ter how “real” your sto­ry is, or how “made up”: what mat­ters is its neces­si­ty.

6 Try to be accu­rate about stuff.

7 Imag­ine that you are dying. If you had a ter­mi­nal dis­ease would you ­fin­ish this book? Why not? The thing that annoys this 10-weeks-to-live self is the thing that is wrong with the book. So change it. Stop argu­ing with your­self. Change it. See? Easy. And no one had to die.

8 You can also do all that with whiskey.

9 Have fun.

10 Remem­ber, if you sit at your desk for 15 or 20 years, every day, not ­count­ing week­ends, it changes you. It just does. It may not improve your tem­per, but it fix­es some­thing else. It makes you more free.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Writ­ing Tips by Hen­ry Miller, Elmore Leonard, Mar­garet Atwood, Neil Gaiman & George Orwell

Sev­en Tips From Ernest Hem­ing­way on How to Write Fic­tion

Sev­en Tips From F. Scott Fizger­ald on How to Write Fic­tion

Ray Brad­bury Gives 12 Pieces of Writ­ing Advice to Young Authors (2001)

Ray Brad­bury Offers 12 Essen­tial Writ­ing Tips and Explains Why Lit­er­a­ture Saves Civ­i­liza­tion

John Steinbeck’s Six Tips for the Aspir­ing Writer and His Nobel Prize Speech

The Shape of A Sto­ry: Writ­ing Tips from Kurt Von­negut

Elmore Leonard’s Ulti­mate Guide for Would-Be Writ­ers

The Shape of A Sto­ry: Sev­en Tips From William Faulkn­er on How to Write Fic­tion

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture and writes essays on lit­er­a­ture, film, cities, Asia, and aes­thet­ics. He’s at work on a book about Los Ange­lesA Los Ange­les Primer. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

CBGB’s: The Roots of Punk Lets You Watch Vintage Footage from the Heyday of NYC’s Great Music Scene

There’s a new film com­ing out about the rise of CBGB as the pre­mier site of New York punk, new wave, and art rock. And I have to agree with Dan­ger­ous Minds, it looks like this might just be “AWFUL.” But then again, maybe not. Who am I to make a crit­i­cal appraisal of a work I haven’t seen yet? Watch the trail­er and make your own pre-judg­ments.

No mat­ter how this fic­tion­al­ized ver­sion of the CBGB sto­ry turns out, we are lucky to have copi­ous footage from the real hey­day of the dirty Bow­ery club that made the careers of The Ramones, Pat­ti Smith, Tele­vi­sion, Blondie, the Talk­ing Heads and count­less oth­er New York bands who rose to semi-star­dom, or local noto­ri­ety, from CBGB’s famous, filthy bow­els. Although Alan Rick­man must sure­ly do a fine job as CBGB’s own­er Hil­lel Kristal, there’s noth­ing like hear­ing from the real thing, and you can, in the doc­u­men­tary CBGB’s: The Roots of Punk (part one above, part two below).

Kristal, who intend­ed to cre­ate a space for “Coun­try, Blue­Grass, and Blues,” end­ed up man­ag­ing a very dif­fer­ent beast when he real­ized that no one in low­er Man­hat­tan cared about his tastes. Instead, to keep the lights on, he was forced to let the lowlifes in, the “dere­licts, lost souls… hook­ers and pimps and junkies,” who came from the flop­hous­es and ten­e­ments to hear music that spoke to them.

Some­times they got it, some­times they didn’t, but for the musi­cians who used Kristal’s dive bar as a live rehearsal space, the oppor­tu­ni­ty to play, night after night, and cre­ate their own sounds and iden­ti­ties, the CBGB’s expe­ri­ence was invalu­able. You’ll hear a few of them reflect on those heady times in the film, but most­ly, CBGB’s: The Roots of Punk is a car­ni­val of vin­tage per­for­mances from New York’s sem­i­nal punk bands. Maybe the Hol­ly­wood ver­sion won’t be so bad, eh? Even so, I’d rather watch, and lis­ten to, the real thing.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Deb­bie Har­ry Turns 68 Today. Watch Blondie Play CBGB in the Mid-70s in Two Vin­tage Clips

The Talk­ing Heads Play CBGB, the New York Club that Shaped Their Sound (1975)

The Ramones in Their Hey­day, Filmed “Live at CBGB,” 1977

Josh Jones is a writer and musi­cian based in Wash­ing­ton, DC. Fol­low him at @jdmagness

 

 

Discover Alexander Calder’s Circus, One of the Beloved Works at the Whitney Museum of American Art

Alexan­der Calder’s Calder’s Cir­cus, a toy the­ater piece the artist con­struct­ed between 1926 and 1931, and per­formed for decades, has the rag bag appeal of a much-repaired stuffed ani­mal who’s loved into a state of bald­ness. This charm pre­sent­ed con­ser­va­tors at the Whit­ney Muse­um of Amer­i­can Art with a unique set of chal­lenges. Not only were the cloth and wire struc­tures frag­ile with age, they’d tak­en a beat­ing dur­ing the peri­od when they were on active duty. Should the work be restored to its pris­tine state or should the artist’s clum­sy, on-the-fly patch jobs be pre­served as evi­dence of use?

calder circus whitney

As part of the restora­tion effort, the Whit­ney’s team  of con­ser­va­tors, archivists and his­to­ri­ans delved into cir­cus his­to­ry, learn­ing that Calder’s ring­mas­ter, tightrope dancer, bare­back rid­er, and lion tamer were all based on cir­cus stars of the peri­od.

They also leaned on two films depict­ing the work in motion, Jean Painleve’s Le Grand Cirque Calder 1927  and Le Cirque de Calder by Car­los Vilarde­bo. But with more than two hun­dred live per­for­mances, it seemed a good bet that the char­ac­ters could be manip­u­lat­ed in ways oth­er than the ones cap­tured on film. An acro­bat who was con­sult­ed agreed, but also con­clud­ed that some of the moves of which these lit­tle wire fig­ures were capa­ble would be impos­si­ble for human beings.

As archivist Ani­ta Duquette notes above, even in its restored state the Cir­cus will now be a sta­t­ic affair, part­ly from the ongo­ing effort to con­serve its del­i­cate mate­ri­als, but more because the mas­ter who appar­ent­ly took such plea­sure in bring­ing it to life is not avail­able for an encore per­for­mance.

- Ayun Hal­l­i­day will take a cork-wire-and-fab­ric-scrap table­top cir­cus over a 3D CGI any old day. Fol­low her @AyunHalliday

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast