The hisÂtoÂry of phiÂlosÂoÂphy tends to get mightÂiÂly abbreÂviÂatÂed. The few phiÂlosÂoÂphy proÂfesÂsors I know don’t have much truck with genÂerÂalÂist “hisÂtoÂry of ideas”-type projects, and the disÂciÂpline itself encourÂages, nay, requires, intenÂsive speÂcialÂizaÂtion. Add to this glib comÂments like Alfred North Whitehead’s on phiÂlosÂoÂphy as a “series of footÂnotes to PlaÂto,” and the emiÂnent posiÂtion of the erratÂic and comÂparÂaÂtiveÂly philoÂsophÂiÂcalÂly-unschooled autoÂdiÂdact WittgenÂstein, and you have, in modÂern phiÂlosÂoÂphy, a sad neglect of the genealÂoÂgy of thought.
But take heart, you who, like me, incline toward minor figÂures and obscure relaÂtionÂships. Ohio State proÂfesÂsor of phiÂlosÂoÂphy Kevin Scharp is a LinÂnaean taxÂonÂoÂmist of thought, comÂpilÂing charts, “InforÂmaÂtion BoxÂes,” and hand-drawn diaÂgrams of the “SociÂolÂoÂgy of PhiÂlosÂoÂphy,” like that above, which covÂers WestÂern phiÂlosÂoÂphy from 600 B.C.E. to 600 C.E. and shows the myrÂiÂad comÂplex conÂnecÂtions between hunÂdreds of indiÂvidÂual philosoÂphers and schools of thought (such as StoÂicism, SkepÂtiÂcism, Neo-PlaÂtonÂism, etc.). The secÂond masÂsive diaÂgram covÂers 600 C.E. to about 1935. Each one is about 4 feet wide and 44 feet tall, with the text at 12-pont font. Both diaÂgrams are based on SociÂolÂoÂgy of PhilosoÂphies by RanÂdall Collins.
Note: to see the diaÂgrams in detail, you will need to click the links above, and then click again on the images that appear on the new web page.
Junot DĂaz’s breakÂout 2007 novÂel The Brief WonÂdrous Life of Oscar Wao is a brilÂliant illusÂtraÂtion of “misÂpriÂsion,” the act of misÂreadÂing or misÂunÂderÂstandÂing that, in Harold Bloom’s estiÂmaÂtion, preÂcipÂiÂtates new litÂerÂary creÂation. In DĂaz’s novÂel, the expeÂriÂences of a young immigrant—a sci-fi nerd and gamer interÂactÂing with culÂture high and low—brings forth a vibrant, playÂful polyÂglot born from misÂunÂderÂstandÂing and desire.
So far, this readÂing is the stanÂdard fare of critÂiÂcal appraisals of the book. Now, howÂevÂer, we have it on authority—from the author himÂself, who has proÂvidÂed his own annoÂtaÂtions for an excerpt of Oscar Wao via “PoetÂry Genius,” a secÂtion of the popÂuÂlar site “Rap Genius,” that allows authors to annoÂtate their own work. The porÂtion of the novÂel DĂaz choosÂes to annoÂtate is packed with alluÂsions to sciÂence ficÂtion clasÂsics, includÂing Frank Herbert’s Dune, PlanÂet of the Apes, and, of course, Star Wars. In the selecÂtion below on Star Wars’ ficÂtionÂal planÂet Tatooine, DĂaz makes a humorÂous and insightÂful comÂment on nerd culÂture, race and nationÂalÂiÂty, and the yearnÂing every fanÂboy or girl has to see him or herÂself in the works they love.
DependÂing on your fanÂboy oriÂenÂtaÂtion either the first or secÂond most famous desert planÂet in nerÂdom. Again when I saw those landÂscapes in Star Wars I felt surge of kinÂship. Shit, on first viewÂing I also thought my man’s name was Juan KenoÂbi. But that’s what hapÂpens when you’re an immiÂgrant kid of colÂor in a culÂture that erasÂes your comÂmuÂniÂty comÂpleteÂly. You start inventÂing filÂiÂaÂtions.
As pubÂlishÂer Melville House’s blog notes, DĂaz’s annoÂtaÂtion often reads like a “line-by-line author talk.” Per usuÂal, the author is as comÂfortÂable in an off-the-cuff verÂnacÂuÂlar as he is in an eruÂdite litÂerÂary-critÂiÂcal voice, as when he cites David FosÂter WalÂlace, Jorge Luis Borges, Patrick ChamoiÂseau, and William VollÂmann as inspiÂraÂtions. The PoetÂry Genius site also includes the fasÂciÂnatÂing interÂview with DĂaz above. Fans of DĂaz and the novÂel won’t want to miss it.
Here’s a fasÂciÂnatÂing glimpse of the very first BloomsÂday celÂeÂbraÂtion, filmed in Dublin in 1954.
The footage shows the great Irish comedic writer BriÂan O’Nolan, betÂter known by his pen name Flann O’Brien, appearÂing very drunk as he sets off with two othÂer renowned post-war Irish writÂers, Patrick Kavanagh and AnthoÂny Cronin, and a cousin of James Joyce, a denÂtist named Tom Joyce, on a pilÂgrimÂage to visÂit the sites in James Joyce’s epic novÂel Ulysses.
The footage was takÂen by John Ryan, an artist, pubÂlishÂer and pub ownÂer who orgaÂnized the event. The idea was to retrace the steps of Leopold Bloom and othÂer charÂacÂters from the novÂel, but as Peter CostelÂlo and Peter van de Kamp explain in this humerÂous pasÂsage from their book, Flann O’Brien: An IllusÂtratÂed BiogÂraÂphy, things began to go awry right from the start:
The date was 16 June, 1954, and though it was only mid-mornÂing, BriÂan O’Nolan was already drunk.
This day was the fiftiÂeth anniverÂsary of Mr. Leopold Bloom’s wanÂderÂings through Dublin, which James Joyce had immorÂtalised in Ulysses.
To mark this occaÂsion a small group of Dublin literati had gathÂered at the SandyÂcove home of Michael Scott, a well-known archiÂtect, just below the MartelÂlo towÂer in which the openÂing scene of Joyce’s novÂel is set. They planned to travÂel round the city through the day, visÂitÂing in turn the scenes of the novÂel, endÂing at night in what had once been the brothÂel quarÂter of the city, the area which Joyce had called NightÂtown.
SadÂly, no-one expectÂed O’Nolan to be sober. By repÂuÂtaÂtion, if not by sight, everyÂone in Dublin knew BriÂan O’Nolan, othÂerÂwise Myles na Gopaleen, the writer of the Cruiskeen Lawn colÂumn in the Irish Times. A few knew that under the name of Flann O’Brien, he had writÂten in his youth a now nearÂly forÂgotÂten novÂel, At Swim-Two-Birds. SeeÂing him about the city, many must have wonÂdered how a man with such extreme drinkÂing habits, even for the city of Dublin, could have susÂtained a career as a writer.
As was his cusÂtom, he had been drinkÂing that mornÂing in the pubs around the CatÂtle MarÂket, where cusÂtomers, supÂposÂedÂly about their lawÂful busiÂness, would be served from 7:30 in the mornÂing. Now retired from the CivÂil SerÂvice, on grounds of “ill-health”, he was earnÂing his livÂing as a free-lance jourÂnalÂist, writÂing not only for the Irish Times, but for othÂer papers and magÂaÂzines under sevÂerÂal pen-names. He needÂed to write for monÂey as his penÂsion was a tiny one. But this left litÂtle time for more creÂative work. In fact, O’Nolan no longer felt the urge to write othÂer novÂels.
The rest of the parÂty, that first BloomsÂday, was made up of the poet Patrick Kavanagh, the young critÂic AnthoÂny Cronin, a denÂtist named Tom Joyce, who as Joyce’s cousin repÂreÂsentÂed the famÂiÂly interÂest, and John Ryan, the painter and busiÂnessÂman who owned and editÂed the litÂerÂary magÂaÂzine Envoy. The idea of the BloomsÂday celÂeÂbraÂtion had been Ryan’s, growÂing natÂuÂralÂly out of a speÂcial Joyce issue of his magÂaÂzine, for which O’Nolan had been guest ediÂtor.
Ryan had engaged two horse drawn cabs, of the old fashÂioned kind, which in Ulysses Mr. Bloom and his friends driÂve to poor PadÂdy DigÂnam’s funerÂal. The parÂty were assigned roles from the novÂel. Cronin stood in for Stephen Dedalus, O’Nolan for his father, Simon Dedalus, John Ryan for the jourÂnalÂist MarÂtin CunÂningÂham, and A.J. LevÂenÂthal, the RegÂisÂtrar of TrinÂiÂty ColÂlege, being JewÂish, was recruitÂed to fill (unkown to himÂself accordÂing to John Ryan) the role of Leopold Bloom.
Kavanagh and O’Nolan began the day by decidÂing they must climb up to the MartelÂlo towÂer itself, which stood on a granÂite shoulÂder behind the house. As Cronin recalls, Kavanagh hoistÂed himÂself up the steep slope above O’Nolan, who snarled in anger and laid hold of his ankle. Kavanagh roared, and lashed out with his foot. FearÂful that O’Nolan would be kicked in the face by the poetÂ’s enorÂmous farmer’s boot, the othÂers hasÂtened to resÂcue and restrain the rivals.
With some difÂfiÂculÂty O’Nolan was stuffed into one of the cabs by Cronin and the othÂers. Then they were off, along the seafront of Dublin Bay, and into the city.
In pubs along the way an enorÂmous amount of alcoÂhol was conÂsumed, so much so that on SandyÂmount Strand they had to relieve themÂselves as Stephen Dedalus does in Ulysses. Tom Joyce and Cronin sang the senÂtiÂmenÂtal songs of Tom Moore which Joyce had loved, such as Silent, O Moyle. They stopped in IrishÂtown to lisÂten to the runÂning of the Ascot Gold Cup on a radio in a betÂting shop, but evenÂtuÂalÂly they arrived in Duke Street in the city cenÂtre, and the BaiÂley, which John Ryan then ran as a litÂerÂary pub.
They went no furÂther. Once there, anothÂer drink seemed more attracÂtive than a long tour of Joycean slums, and the siren call of the long vanÂished pleaÂsures of NightÂtown.
CelÂeÂbrants of the first BloomsÂday pause for a phoÂto in SandyÂmount, Dublin on the mornÂing of June 16, 1954. From left are John Ryan, AnthoÂny Cronin, BriÂan O’Nolan (a.k.a. Flann O’Brien), Patrick Kavanagh and Tom Joyce, cousin of James Joyce.
In 1987, MarÂty Smith pubÂlished a spoof called The Jean-Paul Sartre CookÂbook in a PortÂland, OreÂgon alterÂnaÂtive newsÂpaÂper called the Free Agent. LatÂer, in 1993, it was repubÂlished in the Utne ReadÂer. And it starts with this premise:
We have been lucky to disÂcovÂer sevÂerÂal preÂviÂousÂly lost diaries of French philosoÂpher Jean-Paul Sartre stuck in between the cushÂions of our office sofa. These diaries reveal a young Sartre obsessed not with the void, but with food. ApparÂentÂly Sartre, before disÂcovÂerÂing phiÂlosÂoÂphy, had hoped to write “a cookÂbook that will put to rest all notions of flaÂvor forÂevÂer.” The diaries are excerptÂed here for your perusal.
Now for a couÂple of my favorite entries:
OctoÂber 3
Spoke with Camus today about my cookÂbook. Though he has nevÂer actuÂalÂly eatÂen, he gave me much encourÂageÂment. I rushed home immeÂdiÂateÂly to begin work. How excitÂed I am! I have begun my forÂmuÂla for a DenÂver omelet.
October 6
I have realÂized that the traÂdiÂtionÂal omelet form (eggs and cheese) is bourÂgeois. Today I tried makÂing one out of a cigÂaÂrette, some cofÂfee, and four tiny stones. I fed it to MalÂraux, who puked. I am encourÂaged, but my jourÂney is still long.
November 23
Ran into some oppoÂsiÂtion at the restauÂrant. Some of the patrons comÂplained that my breakÂfast speÂcial (a page out of RememÂbrance of Things Past and a blowÂtorch with which to set it on fire) did not satÂisÂfy their hunger. As if their hunger was of any conÂseÂquence! “But we’re starvÂing,” they say. So what? They’re going to die evenÂtuÂalÂly anyÂway. They make me want to puke. I have quit the job. It is stuÂpid for Jean-Paul Sartre to sling hash. I have enough monÂey to conÂtinÂue my work for a litÂtle while.
November 26
Today I made a Black ForÂest cake out of five pounds of cherÂries and a live beaver, chalÂlengÂing the very defÂiÂnÂiÂtion of the word “cake.” I was very pleased. MalÂraux said he admired it greatÂly, but could not stay for dessert. Still, I feel that this may be my most proÂfound achieveÂment yet, and have resolved to enter it in the BetÂty CrockÂer Bake-Off.
The School of Open is offerÂing its secÂond round of free, facilÂiÂtatÂed, online coursÂes. Through August 4, you can sign up for 7 coursÂes on open sciÂence, colÂlabÂoÂraÂtive workÂshop design, open eduÂcaÂtionÂal resources, copyÂright for eduÂcaÂtors, Wikipedia, CC licensÂes, and more. CoursÂes will start after the first week of August and run for 3 to 7 weeks, dependÂing on the course topÂic and orgaÂnizÂer. All coursÂes will offer badges for recogÂniÂtion of skills and/or course comÂpleÂtion as part of P2PU’s badges pilot. Here’s a list of the upcomÂing coursÂes, all of which have been added to our comÂpreÂhenÂsive list of MOOCs.
LitÂerÂary theÂoÂrist and scholÂar WalÂter BenÂjamin was part of a small but incredÂiÂbly sigÂnifÂiÂcant cohort of GerÂman-JewÂish intelÂlecÂtuÂals who fled the Nazis in the thirÂties. The group includÂed thinkers like Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, HanÂnah Arendt, HerÂbert MarÂcuse, and Bertolt Brecht. Of all of the names above, only BenÂjamin sucÂcumbed, comÂmitÂting suiÂcide by morÂphine overÂdose in 1940 at a CatÂalonÂian hotel, when it became clear that the SpanÂish, with whom he had sought refuge, were going to turn him back over to GerÂmany.
Of all of the thinkers above, most of whom are fairÂly well-known by U.S. stuÂdents of the libÂerÂal arts, it can (and should) be argued that BenÂjamin was the most influÂenÂtial, even if he rarely appears on a sylÂlabus, exceptÂing one well-known essay, “The Work of Art in the Age of MechanÂiÂcal ReproÂducibilÂiÂty,” a staÂple of film and media theÂoÂry classÂes. All of the thinkers listÂed above adored BenÂjamin, and all of them figÂuÂraÂtiveÂly sat at his feet. And while Benjamin—often by refÂerÂence to the aforeÂmenÂtioned essay—gets pegged as a MarxÂist thinker, he was also someÂthing else; he was a mysÂtic and a sage, the critÂiÂcal equivÂaÂlent, perÂhaps, of KafÂka.
The 1993 experÂiÂmenÂtal film above—One Way Street: FragÂments for WalÂter BenÂjamin—is part docÂuÂmenÂtary, part low-budÂget cable-access editÂing exerÂcise. The film proÂvides an introÂducÂtion to Benjamin’s life and thought through interÂviews with scholÂars, re-enactÂments of Benjamin’s last days, and monÂtages cenÂtered around his many aphoÂrisÂtic expresÂsions. One Way Street opens with an epiÂgram from Benjamin’s pupil Brecht, from the latter’s poem “On the SuiÂcide of the Refugee W.B.,” in which Brecht euloÂgizes his mentor’s prophetÂic strain: “the future lies in darkÂness and the forces of right / Are weak. All this was plain to you.” Indeed, it is this mysÂtiÂcal aspect of BenÂjamin that defies his strict catÂeÂgoÂrizaÂtion as a dogÂmatÂic MarxÂist mateÂriÂalÂist. Through the conÂsidÂerÂable influÂence of his friend GerÂshom Scholem, BenÂjamin acquired a deep interÂest in KabÂbalÂisÂtic thought, includÂing a mesÂsianÂic streak that colÂored so much of his writÂing.
In refÂerÂence to this JewÂish mysÂtiÂcism, Anson RabinÂbach, ediÂtor of New GerÂman CriÂtique sumÂmaÂrizes Benjamin’s thought above:
The world is… disÂpersed in fragÂments, and in these fragÂments, the fragÂments of the world that God has now turned his back on, reside cerÂtain presÂences, which attest to the forÂmer exisÂtence of their divine charÂacÂter. You canÂnot activeÂly go about to disÂcovÂer these divine presÂences, but they can be revealed.
AccordÂing to RabinÂbach, Benjamin’s method was, simÂiÂlar to Freud’s, an attempt to “unlock” these “emaÂnaÂtions” by “juxÂtaÂposÂing things that don’t quite necÂesÂsarÂiÂly appear to be relatÂed to each othÂer… And this is the KabÂbalÂisÂtic sense, that you canÂnot go directÂly at the task, because the disÂcloÂsure of the emaÂnaÂtion is blocked.” Benjamin’s fragÂmenÂtary “method” proÂduced prodiÂgious results—hundreds upon hunÂdreds of pages of essays, and a frusÂtratÂingÂly unfinÂished book pubÂlished as The Arcades Project.
His thought is so diverse that one comÂmenter in the film above—Michael JenÂnings, author of BenÂjamin study DialecÂtiÂcal Images—says that “the way that BenÂjamin is used most in this counÂtry, is to dip in and take a quoÂtaÂtion out of conÂtext, in supÂport of any arguÂment one could think of, and I used to take umbrage at this, until I realÂized that this was preÂciseÂly Benjamin’s own pracÂtice.” In this way, BenÂjamin occuÂpies a simÂiÂlar place in the humanÂiÂties as RussÂian litÂerÂary theÂoÂrist Mikhail Bakhtin. Where he is famous, he is famous for creÂatÂing whole conÂcepÂtuÂal fields one can invoke by utterÂing a sinÂgle word or phrase.
One of the most potent words in the BenÂjamin lexÂiÂcon is the French term flâneur. The flâneur is a “stroller, idler, walkÂer,” a “well-dressed man, strolling leisureÂly through the Parisian arcades of the nineÂteenth century—a shopÂper with no intenÂtion to buy, an intelÂlecÂtuÂal parÂaÂsite of the arcade” (as BenÂjamin webÂsite “The Arcades Project Project” defines it). The flâneur is an indiÂvidÂual of privÂiÂlege and a progÂenÂiÂtor of the male gaze: “TraÂdiÂtionÂalÂly the traits that mark the flâneur are wealth, eduÂcaÂtion, and idleÂness. He strolls to pass the time that his wealth affords him, treatÂing the peoÂple who pass and the objects he sees as texts for his own pleaÂsure.” The flâneur is not simÂply a pasÂsive observÂer; he is instead a kind of lazy urban predaÂtor, and also a dandy and proÂto-hipÂster. PerÂhaps the most sinÂisÂter repÂreÂsenÂtaÂtion of this charÂacÂter (in a difÂferÂent urban conÂtext) is the creepy SvidriÂgailov in Dostoevsky’s Crime and PunÂishÂment.
In the 1998 film above, Flâneur III: Benjamin’s ShadÂow, DanÂish direcÂtor TorÂben Skjodt Jensen and writer Urf Peter HallÂberg colÂlabÂoÂrate on an impresÂsionÂisÂtic black-and-white medÂiÂtaÂtion on Paris, overÂlaid with Hallberg’s rumiÂnaÂtions and quoÂtaÂtions from BenÂjamin. Benjamin’s fasÂciÂnaÂtion with nineÂteenth-cenÂtuÂry Paris drove his masÂsive, unfinÂished Arcades Project, an excaÂvaÂtion of the inner workÂings of moderÂniÂty. Where One Way Street is marked by a very datÂed 90’s aesÂthetÂic (which may look chic now that the decade’s back in fashÂion), the above film is both clasÂsiÂcal and modÂernist, a tesÂtaÂment to the beauÂties and conÂtraÂdicÂtions of Paris. I think in this respect, it is a more fitÂting tribÂute to the critÂiÂcal and conÂtraÂdicÂtoÂry aesÂthetÂic theÂoÂry of WalÂter BenÂjamin.
F. Scott FitzgerÂald was right. The rich realÂly are difÂferÂent from you or me. They’re more likeÂly to behave unethÂiÂcalÂly.
That’s the findÂing of a group of studÂies by researchers at the UniÂverÂsiÂty of CalÂiÂforÂnia, BerkeÂley. The research shows that peoÂple of highÂer socioeÂcoÂnomÂic staÂtus are more likeÂly to break trafÂfic laws, lie in negoÂtiÂaÂtions, take valÂued goods from othÂers, and cheat to increase chances of winÂning a prize. The resultÂing paper, “HighÂer Social Class PreÂdicts Increased UnethÂiÂcal BehavÂior,” [PDF] was pubÂlished last year in the ProÂceedÂings of the NationÂal AcadÂeÂmy of SciÂences.
PerÂhaps most surÂprisÂing, as this stoÂry by PBS NewÂsHour ecoÂnomÂics reporter Paul SolÂman shows, is that the tenÂdenÂcy for unethÂiÂcal behavÂior appears not only in peoÂple who are actuÂalÂly rich, but in those who are manipÂuÂlatÂed into feelÂing that they are rich. As UC BerkeÂley social psyÂcholÂoÂgist Paul Piff says, the results are staÂtisÂtiÂcal in nature but the trend is clear. “While havÂing monÂey doesÂn’t necÂesÂsarÂiÂly make anyÂbody anyÂthing,” Piff told New YorkmagÂaÂzine,“the rich are way more likeÂly to exhibÂit charÂacÂterÂisÂtics that we would stereoÂtypÂiÂcalÂly assoÂciate with, say, assÂholes.”
The good folks at Book Riot conÂductÂed a surÂvey of 828 readÂers, hopÂing to find out what books they’ve faked readÂing. The top five books (all availÂable in our Free eBooks and Free Audio Books colÂlecÂtions) may not come as a surÂprise:
Pride and PrejÂuÂdice by Jane Austen
Ulysses by James Joyce
Moby-Dick by HerÂman Melville
War and Peace by Leo TolÂstoy
The Bible
Nor will the remainÂing 15 astound you (give or take a couÂple). But we’ll let you head over to Book Riot for the comÂplete list. Wait! Stop! Before you leave, let us know what books you’ve fudged before. It’s anonyÂmous and all in good fun. Look forÂward to your conÂfesÂsions.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.