RecordÂed live in front of an audiÂence at the Upright CitÂiÂzens Brigade TheÂatre in Los AngeÂles, The Dead Authors PodÂcast—“UnscriptÂed, bareÂly researched, all fun!”—showcases rauÂcous conÂverÂsaÂtions between “time-travÂelÂer” H.G. Wells (Paul F. TompÂkins) and varÂiÂous “dead authors.” Some of Wells’ guests have includÂed Aesop, Dorothy ParkÂer, Gertrude Stein, Carl Sagan, and Jorge Luis Borges, all played by comeÂdiÂans like Andy Richter (as EmiÂly DickÂinÂson) and BriÂan Stack (as P.G. WodeÂhouse).
In the episode above, Wells welÂcomes the notoÂriÂousÂly misogÂyÂnisÂtic and allegedÂly anti-SemitÂic Friedrich NietÂzsche (James AdoÂmiÂan) and the notoÂriÂousÂly racist writer of “weird tales” H.P. LoveÂcraft (Paul Scheer). As the podÂcast descripÂtion has it, “if you are easÂiÂly offendÂed, you may find this one a bit chalÂlengÂing.” The offense is mitÂiÂgatÂed by the fact that the disÂcusÂsion “very rarely makes any sense AT ALL,” and that it’s damned funÂny.
Both “authors” spout exagÂgerÂatÂed parÂoÂdies of their philosoÂphies, in ridicuÂlous accents, and (as you can see from the phoÂto above), look equalÂly ridicuÂlous to an audiÂence that someÂtimes laughs along, someÂtimes doesn’t, as will hapÂpen in live comÂeÂdy. The actors are game, ad-libÂbing with ease and conÂfiÂdence and clearÂly havÂing a great time. The only moments that aren’t improÂvised are when the actors playÂing NietÂzsche and LoveÂcraft read from the writÂers’ actuÂal texts. In this conÂtext (and in these voicÂes), the two both indeed make litÂtle sense. They’ll surÂvive the takedown—these are two dead authors who tend to be takÂen far too seriÂousÂly by their devoÂtees. So, go ahead, lisÂten to NietÂzsche huff and puff his way through his bomÂbasÂtic and oracÂuÂlar proÂnounceÂments; hear LoveÂcraft hiss through his florid and paraÂnoid prose. It’s all for a good cause. The Dead Authors podÂcast benÂeÂfits 826LA, a non-profÂit writÂing and tutorÂing cenÂter for kids age 6–18.
You can find real works by NietÂzsche and LoveÂcraft in our colÂlecÂtion of Free eBooks and Free Audio Books.
Josh Jones is a docÂtorÂal canÂdiÂdate in EngÂlish at FordÂham UniÂverÂsiÂty and a co-founder and forÂmer manÂagÂing ediÂtor of GuerÂniÂca / A MagÂaÂzine of Arts and PolÂiÂtics.
Did the UnitÂed States of AmerÂiÂca lose much of its will to explore outÂer space when the SoviÂet Union’s colÂlapse shut off the engine of comÂpeÂtiÂtion? CritÂiÂcal observers someÂtimes make that point, but I have an alterÂnaÂtive theÂoÂry: maybe the decline of proÂgresÂsive rock had just as much to do with it. Both that musiÂcal subÂgenre and AmerÂiÂcan space exploÂration proudÂly posÂsessed their disÂtincÂtive aesÂthetÂics, the potenÂtial for great culÂturÂal impact, and ambiÂtion borÂderÂing on the ridicuÂlous. Though we didÂn’t have mash-ups in the years when shutÂtle launchÂes and four-side conÂcept albums alike capÂtured the pubÂlic imagÂiÂnaÂtion, we can now use modÂern techÂnolÂoÂgy to douÂble back and directÂly unite these two late-twenÂtiÂeth-cenÂtuÂry pheÂnomÂeÂna. Behold, above, Pink FloyÂd’s jam “MoonÂhead” lined up with footage of ApolÂlo 17, NASA’s last moon landÂing.
But givÂen the recent passÂing of astroÂnaut Neil ArmÂstrong, none of us have been thinkÂing as much about the last moon landÂing as we have about the first. Pink Floyd actuÂalÂly laid down “MoonÂhead” at a BBC TV stuÂdio durÂing the descent of ApolÂlo 11, the misÂsion on which ArmÂstrong would take that one giant leap for mankind. The band’s improÂviÂsaÂtion made it to the ears of EngÂland’s moon-landÂing viewÂers: “The proÂgramÂming was a litÂtle loosÂer in those days,” rememÂbers guiÂtarist David Gilmour, “and if a proÂducÂer of a late-night proÂgramme felt like it, they would do someÂthing a bit off the wall.” British rockÂ’s fasÂciÂnaÂtion with space proved fruitÂful. David Bowie put out the immorÂtal “Space OddÂiÂty” mere days before ApolÂlo 11’s landÂing (to say nothÂing of “Life on Mars?” two years latÂer), and the BBC played it, too, in its live covÂerÂage. Even as late as the earÂly eightÂies, no less a rock innoÂvaÂtor than BriÂan Eno, charmed by AmerÂiÂcan astroÂnauts’ enthuÂsiÂasm for counÂtry-westÂern music, would craft the album ApolÂlo: AtmosÂpheres and SoundÂtracks. If we want more interÂestÂing popÂuÂlar music, perÂhaps we just need to get into space more often.
In art, cerÂtain themes are everÂgreen. They nevÂer go out of date. Among them are love, death, and the intrinÂsiÂcalÂly dehuÂmanÂizÂing nature of corÂpoÂraÂtions.
In 1983 MonÂty Python tapped into one of the Great Themes with their short film The CrimÂson PerÂmaÂnent AssurÂance. It tells the stoÂry of a group of elderÂly accounÂtants, “strained under the oppresÂsive yoke of their new corÂpoÂrate manÂageÂment,” who rise up against The Very Big CorÂpoÂraÂtion of AmerÂiÂca and set sail on the high seas of interÂnaÂtionÂal finance as a maraudÂing band of pirates.
The film was origÂiÂnalÂly conÂceived by direcÂtor TerÂry Gilliam as an aniÂmatÂed sequence for incluÂsion in MonÂty Python’s The MeanÂing of Life, but as the idea grew he talked the group into letÂting him develÂop it into a live-action film. The CrimÂson PerÂmaÂnent AssurÂance was evenÂtuÂalÂly shown both on its own and as a proÂlogue to The MeanÂing of Life. The title was inspired by the 1952 Burt LanÂcastÂer advenÂture film The CrimÂson Pirate. The cast is made up mostÂly of unknown actors, but if you watch closeÂly you’ll catch a glimpse of most of the Python memÂbers. Gilliam and Michael Palin have cameo roles as winÂdow washÂers, and Eric Idle, TerÂry Jones and GraÂham ChapÂman appear very briefly at the beginÂning of the boardÂroom scene.
The CrimÂson PerÂmaÂnent AssurÂance is a delightÂful litÂtle film–and just as relÂeÂvant now as ever, a reminder of the utter absurÂdiÂty of the claim that “corÂpoÂraÂtions are peoÂple too.”
You will find The CrimÂson PerÂmaÂnent AssurÂance added to our colÂlecÂtion of 500 Free Movies Online.
YesÂterÂday we postÂed about the TalkÂing Heads’ days playÂing at CBGB, the LowÂer East Side nightÂclub rock hisÂtoÂriÂans now disÂcuss in hushed, revÂerÂent tones. (Full name: CBGB OMFUG, or “CounÂtry, BlueÂgrass, Blues, and OthÂer Music for UpliftÂing GorÂmanÂdizÂers.”) Though the place finalÂly closed its doors in a rent disÂpute six years ago, you can still visÂit it on the interÂnet through this virÂtuÂal tour. You’ll have to guide yourÂself, but much of the fun comes in the freeÂdom to explore. BeginÂning your jourÂney in the womÂen’s restroom, you can then proÂceed howÂevÂer you like, clickÂing from room to room and examÂinÂing the legÂenÂdarÂiÂly gritÂty surÂroundÂings in all 360 degrees. If you once played or freÂquentÂed CBGB, the expeÂriÂence may well take you back, albeit with much brighter lightÂing than you rememÂber. Or if, like me, you once played a lot of graphÂic advenÂture games on the comÂputÂer, the tour’s interÂface will cerÂtainÂly take you back to that as well.
Purists will have objecÂtions to a virÂtuÂal tour of a place of such raw physÂiÂcalÂiÂty as CBGB: you can’t feel the stickÂiÂness of the floors, you can’t smell the mixÂture of aggresÂsive odors, you can’t trip over that one irregÂuÂlar step on the stairs, and you espeÂcialÂly can’t hear the awe-inspirÂing ampliÂfiÂcaÂtion sysÂtem. But you can look close and long at the club’s culÂturÂal palimpsest of stickÂers, grafÂfiÂti, fliers, and hard-knocked cement. ConÂverÂsaÂtions sproutÂed up on MetaFilÂter both when CBGB closed and when this virÂtuÂal tour debuted: some comÂmenters loved the place, while othÂers couldÂn’t bear it; some comÂmenters regretÂted its passÂing, while othÂers thought it had long since become a shadÂow of itself. Some seemed to feel all of this at once. As one MeFite said, “Those bathÂrooms are just as disÂgustÂing as I rememÂber them being. I miss the hell out of that place.”
If you’re anyÂthing like me, you yearn to become a good writer, a betÂter writer, an inspirÂing writer, even, by learnÂing from the writÂers you admire. But you neiÂther have the time nor the monÂey for an MFA proÂgram or expenÂsive retreats and workÂshops with famous names. So you read W.H. Auden’s essays and Paris Review interÂviews with your favorite authors (or at least PR’s TwitÂter feed); you obsesÂsiveÂly trawl the archives of The New York Times’ “WritÂers on WritÂing” series, and you relÂish every Youtube clip, no matÂter how lo-fi or trunÂcatÂed, of your litÂerÂary heroes, speakÂing from beyond the grave, or from behind a podiÂum at the 92nd Street Y.
Well, friend, you are in luck (okay, I’m still talkÂing about me here, but maybe about you, too). The WashÂingÂton, DC-based non-profÂit AcadÂeÂmy of AchieveÂment—whose misÂsion is to “bring stuÂdents face-to-face” with leadÂers in the arts, busiÂness, polÂiÂtics, sciÂence, and sports—has archived a series of talks from an incredÂiÂbly diverse pool of poets and writÂers. They call this colÂlecÂtion “CreÂative WritÂing: A MasÂter Class,” and you can subÂscribe to it right now on iTunes and begin downÂloadÂing free video and audio podÂcasts from Nora Ephron, John Updike, Toni MorÂriÂson, CarÂlos Fuentes, NorÂman MailÂer, WalÂlace StegÂnÂer, and, well, you know how the list goes.
The AcadÂeÂmy of Achievement’s webÂsite also feaÂtures lengthy profiles–with text and downÂloadÂable audio and video–of sevÂerÂal of the same writÂers from their “MasÂter Class” series. For examÂple, an interÂview with forÂmer U.S. poet-lauÂreÂate Rita Dove is illuÂmiÂnatÂing, both for writÂers and for teachÂers of writÂing. Dove talks about the averÂsion that many peoÂple have for poetÂry as a kind of fear inculÂcatÂed by clumÂsy teachÂers. She explains:
At some point in their life, they’ve been givÂen a poem to interÂpret and told, “That was the wrong answer.” You know. I think we’ve all gone through that. I went through that. And it’s unforÂtuÂnate that someÂtimes in schools — this need to have things quanÂtiÂfied and gradÂed — we end up doing this kind of mulÂtiÂple choice approach to someÂthing that should be as ambiguÂous and ever-changÂing as life itself. So I try to ask them, “Have you ever heard a good joke?” If you’ve ever heard someÂone tell a joke just right, with the right pacÂing, then you’re already on the way to the poetÂry. Because it’s realÂly about using words in very preÂcise ways and also using gesÂture as it goes through lanÂguage, not the gesÂture of your hands, but how lanÂguage creÂates a mood. And you know, who can resist a good joke? When they get that far, then they can realÂize that poetÂry can also be fun.
Dove’s thoughts on her own life, her work, and the craft of poetÂry and teachÂing are well worth reading/watching in full. AnothÂer parÂticÂuÂlarÂly notable interÂview from the AcadÂeÂmy is with anothÂer forÂmer lauÂreÂate, poet W.S. MerÂwin.
MerÂwin, a two-time Pulitzer Prize winÂner, disÂcussÂes poetÂry as origÂiÂnatÂing with lanÂguage, and its loss as tanÂtaÂmount to extincÂtion:
When we talk about the extincÂtion of species, I think the endanÂgered species of the arts and of lanÂguage and all these things are relatÂed. I don’t think there is any doubt about that. I think poetÂry goes back to the invenÂtion of lanÂguage itself. I think one of the big difÂferÂences between poetÂry and prose is that prose is about someÂthing, it’s got a subÂject… poetÂry is about what can’t be said. Why do peoÂple turn to poetÂry when all of a sudÂden the Twin TowÂers get hit, or when their marÂriage breaks up, or when the perÂson they love most in the world drops dead in the same room? Because they can’t say it. They can’t say it at all, and they want someÂthing that addressÂes what can’t be said.
If you’re anyÂthing like me, you find these two perÂspecÂtives on poetry—as akin to jokes, as sayÂing the unsayable—fascinating. These kinds of obserÂvaÂtions (not mechanÂiÂcal how-to’s, but origÂiÂnal thoughts on the process and pracÂtice of writÂing itself) are the reaÂson I pore over interÂviews and semÂiÂnars with writÂers I admire. I found more than enough in this archive to keep me satÂisÂfied for months.
We’ve added “CreÂative WritÂing: A MasÂter Class” to our ever-growÂing colÂlecÂtion of Free Online CoursÂes.
Image via Angela RadÂulesÂcu
Josh Jones is a docÂtorÂal canÂdiÂdate in EngÂlish at FordÂham UniÂverÂsiÂty and a co-founder and forÂmer manÂagÂing ediÂtor of GuerÂniÂca / A MagÂaÂzine of Arts and PolÂiÂtics.
High on the list of hisÂtorÂiÂcal periÂods I regret havÂing missed, I would place ManÂhatÂtan’s LowÂer East Side in the sevÂenÂties. Despite being someÂthing less than a shinÂing time for major cities, espeÂcialÂly AmerÂiÂcan major cities, and espeÂcialÂly New York City, that era’s seemÂingÂly holÂlowed-out downÂtowns offered craÂdles to many a culÂturÂal moveÂment. David Byrne’s band the TalkÂing Heads count as a major one unto themÂselves. GenÂerÂaÂtion X author DouÂglas CouÂpÂland memÂoÂrably asked only one quesÂtion to deterÂmine whether one belongs to that parÂticÂuÂlar cohort: do you like the TalkÂing Heads? In an entire book he wrote about the band’s 1979 album Fear of Music, novÂelÂist Jonatham Lethem rememÂbers this of his own enthuÂsiÂasm: “At the peak, in 1980 or 81, my idenÂtiÂfiÂcaÂtion was so comÂplete that I might have wished to wear the album Fear of Music in place of my head so as to be more clearÂly seen by those around me.”
TalkÂing about the oriÂgin of the TalkÂing Heads, we must talk about CBGB, the BowÂery nightÂclub that hostÂed forÂmaÂtive shows for such punk, new wave, and culÂturÂalÂly proxÂiÂmate but difÂfiÂcult to catÂeÂgoÂrize acts like TeleÂviÂsion, the Cramps, Blondie, the PatÂti Smith Group, and the B‑52s. Byrne and comÂpaÂny began playÂing there in the mid-sevÂenÂties, and would evenÂtuÂalÂly drop the place’s name in the track “Life DurÂing Wartime.” (“This ain’t no Mudd Club or CBGB…”) At the top of this post, you’ll see their 1975 perÂforÂmance of “PsyÂcho Killer” at CBGB, along with “TenÂtaÂtive DeciÂsions” and “With Our Love.” Though CBGB shut down in 2006, its essence lives on in the influÂenÂtial music it shaped. “It is the venue that makes the music scene hapÂpen just as much as the creÂativÂiÂty of the musiÂcians,” wrote Byrne himÂself in CBGB and OMFUG: ThirÂty Years from the Home of UnderÂground Rock. “There is conÂtinÂuÂalÂly and forÂevÂer a pool of talÂent, enerÂgy, and expresÂsion waitÂing to be tapped—it simÂply needs the right place in which to express itself.”
BrazÂda, who lived as an openÂly gay man in the thirÂties, was conÂvictÂed under ParaÂgraph 175 in 1937 and served a term of six months. He thought this might be the extent of his harassÂment by the Nazis, but ultiÂmateÂly, he was arrestÂed and sent to BuchenÂwald in 1942, where he would spend three years. In the video above, BrazÂda mostÂly tells his own stoÂry, in GerÂman with EngÂlish subÂtiÂtles. It’s not the first time he has done so. Brazda’s stoÂry was promiÂnentÂly feaÂtured in a book by author Jean-Luc Schwab (who also appears above), ItinÂerÂary of the Pink TriÂanÂgle (ItinÂeraire d’un TriÂanÂgle rose), which recounts the dehuÂmanÂizÂing expeÂriÂences of gay men durÂing the HoloÂcaust. Schwab’s book and the brief interÂview above preÂserve imporÂtant tesÂtiÂmoÂny from a man who was “very likeÂly the last vicÂtim and the last witÂness” of the Nazi perÂseÂcuÂtion of homoÂsexÂuÂal men in the 30s and 40s. BrazÂda’s willÂingÂness to tell his stoÂry has been invaluÂable to scholÂars and activists seekÂing to docÂuÂment this litÂtle-known (and often denied) hisÂtoÂry.
Josh Jones is a docÂtorÂal canÂdiÂdate in EngÂlish at FordÂham UniÂverÂsiÂty and a co-founder and forÂmer manÂagÂing ediÂtor of GuerÂniÂca / A MagÂaÂzine of Arts and PolÂiÂtics.
Have you ever wonÂdered how the HubÂble Space TeleÂscope and othÂer satelÂlites can be pointÂed in any direcÂtion at the will of sciÂenÂtists on the ground? GivÂen the enerÂgy conÂstraints for satelÂlites designed to stay in space for years, the techÂniÂcal chalÂlenges are immense.
In this video from the “Smarter Every Day” YouTube series we learn a litÂtle about two clever methÂods sciÂenÂtists use to conÂtrol the attiÂtude, or oriÂenÂtaÂtion, of satelÂlites with very litÂtle enerÂgy. The first method exploits the powÂer of the EarthÂ’s magÂnetÂic field by using elecÂtric curÂrent to selecÂtiveÂly actiÂvate elecÂtroÂmagÂnets and nudge the satelÂlite in a desired direcÂtion, rather like the neeÂdle of a comÂpass. The secÂond and, in some ways, more fasÂciÂnatÂing method takes its inspiÂraÂtion from the amazÂingÂly agile cat. It has long been known that cats can fall from any iniÂtial oriÂenÂtaÂtion and almost always land on their feet. They can reoriÂent themÂselves 180 degrees withÂout vioÂlatÂing the conÂserÂvaÂtion of anguÂlar momenÂtum. They do it by adjustÂing their shape and thus rearÂrangÂing the mass, and changÂing the moment of inerÂtia, withÂin their bodÂies. SciÂenÂtists employ a simÂiÂlar tacÂtic using movÂing parts withÂin satelÂlites.
The host of the “Smarter Every Day” videos goes only by the name of “DesÂtin,” and is reportÂedÂly a misÂsile engiÂneer at the U.S. Army’s RedÂstone ArseÂnal, near Huntsville AlabaÂma. Some viewÂers will, like us, find the tone and senÂsiÂbilÂiÂty of this video juveÂnile and annoyÂing, with its overuse of the words “cool” and “aweÂsome” and with the graÂtuÂitous cat-dropÂping scenes (note to future YouTube auteurs: conÂsidÂer using stock footage) but the sciÂence itself is, withÂout a doubt, fasÂciÂnatÂing.
We're hoping to rely on loyal readers, rather than erratic ads. Please click the Donate button and support Open Culture. You can use Paypal, Venmo, Patreon, even Crypto! We thank you!
Open Culture scours the web for the best educational media. We find the free courses and audio books you need, the language lessons & educational videos you want, and plenty of enlightenment in between.