Revisit the Radio Sessions and Record Collection of Groundbreaking BBC DJ John Peel

Will any radio DJ ever draw more respect than John Peel has? It seems unlike­ly, espe­cial­ly since so many fas­ci­nat­ing arti­facts of his life and career have become avail­able on the inter­net since his death in 2004. You can now explore, thanks to the John Peel Archive, Peel’s dig­i­tized office, a repos­i­to­ry of videos, sound record­ings, pho­tos and broad­casts. But for its obvi­ous pièce de résis­tance, look no fur­ther than Peel’s record col­lec­tion, made vir­tu­al for your brows­ing enjoy­ment. There you’ll find stream­able albums, pop-cul­tur­al arti­facts, and tes­ti­mo­ny from many a famous musi­cian about the vital impor­tance of John Peel to their careers. Those too young or too non-Eng­lish to have tuned in to BBC Radio 1 dur­ing Peel’s hey­day may not real­ize that this is no ordi­nary record col­lec­tion. This is a trea­sure trove of 25,000 LPs and 40,000 sin­gles assem­bled by a man who brought to the rock-enthu­si­ast pub­lic the likes of Bil­ly Bragg, Orches­tral Manoeu­vres in the Dark, The Fall, Pave­ment Buz­zcocks, Elvis Costel­lo, David Bowie… the list goes on.

Peel show­cased such artists on his famous Peel Ses­sions, which would bring these per­form­ers into the BBC’s stu­dios to lay down four or five songs. Quick­ly mixed and read­ied for broad­cast, these songs would retain a rougher, loos­er, often more impro­vi­sa­tion­al feel than the records that made these play­ers famous. Tapes of a band’s Peel Ses­sion thus imme­di­ate­ly became a hot­ly trad­ed com­mod­i­ty among that band’s fans. Today, Peel’s own fans have help­ful­ly uploaded a selec­tion of his broad­casts, offi­cial Peel Ses­sions and oth­er­wise, to the audio-shar­ing site Sound­cloud. Per­haps you’d like to hear a snap­shot of Peel’s view or the rock world on Christ­mas Eve 1979. Or how about Octo­ber 13, 2004? Maybe April 4, 1988? Then, when you’re ready — and if you use Spo­ti­fy — make a return to the John Peel Archive and pull up his Ses­sions with a favorite band, be it The Cure, Smash­ing Pump­kins, PJ Har­vey, Cin­era­ma, or whomev­er. You’ll hear why, 45 years on from his broad­cast­ing debut and eight from his pass­ing, John Peel remains the locus clas­si­cus of knowl­edge­able, dis­cern­ing rock-radio cool.

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Jean-Paul Sartre’s No Exit: A BBC Adaptation Starring Harold Pinter (1964)

Each time I see a ref­er­ence to Jean-Paul Sartre’s play No Exit (Huis Clos), I think of the night­club scene in Bret Eas­t­on Ellis’s Amer­i­can Psy­cho, which is fit­ting since that nov­el is, in a sense, about a group of peo­ple who hate each oth­er. No Exit con­jures Sartre’s famous phrase “Hell is oth­er peo­ple,” but in the play, hell is, more accu­rate­ly, oneself—or the inabil­i­ty to leave one­self, to “take a lit­tle break,” by sleep­ing, turn­ing off the lights, or even blink­ing. Hell, in Sartre’s play, means being end­less­ly con­front­ed with the sor­did triv­i­al­i­ties of one’s self through the eyes of oth­er peo­ple. Trapped in a room with them, to be exact, for­ev­er. It’s a chill­ing con­cept.

In this BBC adap­ta­tion of Sartre’s play, called In Cam­era, cer­tain details have changed. Instead of the “Sec­ond Empire fur­ni­ture” from Sartre’s descrip­tions of the hell­ish room, we have a bright­ly-lit mod­ernist gallery space. The bronze objet d’art in Sartre’s play has been replaced by mas­sive abstract paint­ing and sculp­ture, a com­men­tary, per­haps, on the way the bour­geois space of art gal­leries impos­es arti­fi­cial deco­rum on every­one inside. It’s as incon­gru­ous with the sit­u­a­tion as the haughty draw­ing room of the orig­i­nal. Aside from the mise en scene, In Cam­era is large­ly faith­ful to the dia­logue and char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of Sartre’s play. Fea­tur­ing absur­dist play­wright Harold Pin­ter as the insuf­fer­able writer and jour­nal­ist Garcin, Jane Arden as Inez, Kather­ine Woodville as Estelle, and Jonathan Hansen as the valet, In Cam­era was part of the BBC series “The Wednes­day Play,” which ran from 1964 to 1970 and pre­sent­ed orig­i­nal work and the occa­sion­al adap­ta­tion. Only the sec­ond episode in the series, In Cam­era ran on Novem­ber 4th, 1964 and was adapt­ed and direct­ed from Sartre’s orig­i­nal by Philip Sav­ille.

via Bib­liok­lept

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Jean-Paul Sartre Breaks Down the Bad Faith of Intel­lec­tu­als

Sartre, Hei­deg­ger, Niet­zsche: Three Philoso­phers in Three Hours

Wal­ter Kaufmann’s Lec­tures on Niet­zsche, Kierkegaard and Sartre (1960)

Josh Jones is a doc­tor­al can­di­date in Eng­lish at Ford­ham Uni­ver­si­ty and a co-founder and for­mer man­ag­ing edi­tor of Guer­ni­ca / A Mag­a­zine of Arts and Pol­i­tics.

Watch Student Science Experiments Conducted on the International Space Station at 10:30 AM EDT

When YouTube Space Lab launched a com­pe­ti­tion call­ing for exper­i­ments to be con­duct­ed aboard the Inter­na­tion­al Space Sta­tion, thou­sands of high school stu­dents around the world respond­ed. The two win­ning exper­i­ments will be per­formed live Thurs­day at 7:30am PDT / 9:30am CDT / 10:30am EDT / 3:30pm BST / 4:30pm CEST. Back on Earth, we can watch astro­naut Suni­ta Williams live in the micro­grav­i­ty cap­sule as she puts the exper­i­ments to the test.

Stu­dents sub­mit­ted short videos explain­ing the sci­en­tif­ic exper­i­ments they hoped to see test­ed aboard the space sta­tion. One of the win­ning pro­pos­als, from Amr Mohamed of Egypt, asks whether zebra spi­ders, which jump on their prey, will be able to catch their food in their usu­al way in micro­grav­i­ty. The oth­er exper­i­ment, from Dorothy Chen and Sara Ma of Michi­gan, asks whether the growth of bac­te­ria deliv­ered into space will slow down when cer­tain com­pounds are added.

YouTube view­ers helped choose the win­ners from a pool of six semi-final­ists. Then mate­ri­als need­ed to con­duct the two win­ning exper­i­ments were packed into a rock­et and sent up to the space sta­tion, 250 miles above the Earth.

Watch live as Williams observes bac­te­ria and hun­gry zebra spi­ders in micro­grav­i­ty. Will the spi­ders fig­ure out a new way to hunt?

Kate Rix is a free­lance writer in Oak­land. See more of her work at .

Charade, the Best Hitchcock Film Hitchcock Never Made. Stars Cary Grant & Audrey Hepburn

Charade_se

The best Hitch­cock film Hitch­cock nev­er made. That’s how cer­tain enthu­si­asts of Amer­i­can film think of Cha­rade, Stan­ley Donen’s 1963 light­ly comedic mys­tery thriller filled with inter­na­tion­al intrigue. Its cast list draws deeply from the era’s for­mi­da­ble well of cin­e­mat­ic icons: Cary Grant, Audrey Hep­burn, Wal­ter Matthau, James Coburn, and George Kennedy. Its action takes place in no less a screen-illu­mi­nat­ing world city than Paris. The Cri­te­ri­on Col­lec­tion has seen fit to give it a schol­ar­ly, respectable DVD and Blu-Ray release. It comes scored by Hen­ry Manci­ni. It has inspired four remakes, includ­ing one in Ben­gali and one in Hin­di. It direc­tor also made On the Town, Sin­gin’ in the Rain, Fun­ny Face, and Bedaz­zled. “A ter­rif­i­cal­ly enter­tain­ing com­e­dy-thriller,” crit­ic Dave Kehr calls it, “per­fect­ly craft­ed” and “a mar­velous use of Paris.” All these qual­i­ties and more strong­ly rec­om­mend the pic­ture, at least to my mind, and if you’d like to see it for your­self, you have only to pull it up on Archive.org.


Wait — real­ly? A film of such seem­ing­ly high pro­file, made only 49 years ago? You don’t exact­ly come across the likes of Cha­rade in the pub­lic domain every day. But I have an expla­na­tion, and it will sure­ly delight those film fans who make sport of point­ing out the incom­pe­tence of major stu­dios. It seems that pre-1978 Unit­ed States copy­right law absolute­ly required you to include some sort of mark on your work indi­cat­ing your intent to claim copy­right at all — ©, for instance — and in Cha­rade’s case, Uni­ver­sal Pic­tures seemed to have just sort of for­got­ten about it. The film thus went pub­lic domain as soon as it came out. Cri­te­ri­on’s pro­vides a supe­ri­or trans­fer and a wealth of cinephilic accou­trements besides, but if you want to dip into the pic­ture right now, sim­ply click play. An unknow­able but capa­ble Cary Grant and a Givenchy-clad Audrey Hep­burn pur­sued through the ear­ly six­ties’ City of Light for gold stolen in wartime — who, espe­cial­ly those on an office lunch break, could resist?

You can, of course, find Cha­rade list­ed in our col­lec­tion, 4,000+ Free Movies Online: Great Clas­sics, Indies, Noir, West­erns, Doc­u­men­taries & More.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Hours of Clas­sic Crime and Mys­tery Movies. Dis­cov­er Our Film Noir and Alfred Hitch­cock Col­lec­tions

Detour: The Cheap, Rushed Piece of 1940s Film Noir Nobody Ever For­gets

Female Noir Direc­tor Ida Lupino’s The Hitch-Hik­er, Free Online

Col­in Mar­shall hosts and pro­duces Note­book on Cities and Cul­ture. Fol­low him on Twit­ter at @colinmarshall.

Google Releases “Course Builder,” an Open Source Platform for Building Your Own Big Online Courses

Ear­li­er this year, we saw Udac­i­ty and Cours­era take flight, two online ven­tures ded­i­cat­ed to offer­ing Mas­sive Open Online Cours­es (MOOCs) and democ­ra­tiz­ing edu­ca­tion. Caught off-guard, tra­di­tion­al uni­ver­si­ties have scram­bled to get a foothold in this brave new world of e‑learning, and 16 uni­ver­si­ties have already signed agree­ments to offer their own MOOCs through Cours­era. We wel­come that trend. But, if you talk with profs at these uni­ver­si­ties, they often ask these ques­tions: Why are we pay­ing good mon­ey to devel­op cours­es that will build Cours­er­a’s busi­ness (which is for-prof­it and VC-backed)? Or why are we cre­at­ing cours­es for a plat­form that we don’t con­trol or have a stake in? They ask these ques­tions when they’re not oth­er­wise ask­ing “what will hap­pen to our jobs and beloved uni­ver­si­ties in 20 years?”

For schools ask­ing those ques­tions, Google might have an answer. Accord­ing to an announce­ment yes­ter­day, Google is releas­ing the code base for Course Builder, a new open source plat­form that will give indi­vid­ual edu­ca­tors and uni­ver­si­ties the abil­i­ty to cre­ate MOOCs of their own. As Peter Norvig, Google’s Direc­tor of Research, explains above, the com­pa­ny gave the plat­form a test dri­ve this sum­mer when it offered Pow­er Search­ing with Google, a course attend­ed by 155,000 reg­is­tered stu­dents. Now you can try it out too and bring MOOCs in-house, under your own con­trol. You can find doc­u­men­ta­tion to get start­ed here. But, as Norvig warns, you’ll need some tech skills in your toolk­it to make ini­tial head­way. In the future, you can almost guar­an­tee that the soft­ware will become user-friend­ly for every­one straight out of the box.

Already schools like Stan­fordIndi­ana Uni­ver­si­ty, and UC San Diego are giv­ing Course Builder a look. Keep an eye on it.

Update: Stan­ford reports today that it is try­ing out its own open source plat­form. It’s called Class2Go. Learn more about it here.

Relat­ed Con­tent:

500 Free Online Cours­es from Great Uni­ver­si­ties

Free Online Cer­tifi­cate Cours­es from Great Uni­ver­si­ties: A Com­plete List

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

Fear of a Female Planet: Kim Gordon (Sonic Youth) on Why Russia and the US Need a Pussy Riot

Coura­geous fem­i­nist punk band Pussy Riot has received more pub­lic expo­sure than they ever could have hoped for since three mem­bers were arrest­ed after a Feb­ru­ary 21st per­for­mance at Moscow’s Christ the Sav­ior Cathe­dral and charged with “hooli­gan­ism.” The band formed last Sep­tem­ber in direct response to Vladimir Putin’s deci­sion to seek the pres­i­den­cy again in March 2012, and they have demon­strat­ed against his rule ever since, stag­ing con­fronta­tion­al, but non-vio­lent, protest per­for­mances in Red Square and oth­er Russ­ian land­marks. They draw much of their ener­gy and inspi­ra­tion from work­ing-class British Oi! bands of the 80s, the Amer­i­can fem­i­nist punk of the 90s Riot Grrrl move­ment, and from the stal­wart Son­ic Youth, whose three decade run has put singer/bassist Kim Gor­don in the spot­light as a musi­cian, artist, and icon.

In the video inter­view above from Explod­ed View, Gor­don offers her take on Pussy Riot’s sig­nif­i­cance and their rel­e­vance to the polit­i­cal strug­gles of women in the U.S.. Gor­don reads Pussy Riot as “dis­si­dent art… tar­get­ed as a weapon” against a sys­tem, and its author­i­tar­i­an leader, that has wide­ly sup­pressed dis­sent. Like the noto­ri­ous online col­lec­tive Anony­mous and their end­less­ly pro­lif­er­at­ing Guy Fawkes masks, Pussy Riot eschews the trap­pings of indi­vid­ual fame, wear­ing bal­a­clavas to obscure their iden­ti­ties. As they state in a Vice Mag­a­zine inter­view before the arrests, “new mem­bers can join the bunch and it does not real­ly mat­ter who takes part in the next act—there can be three of us or eight, like in our last gig on the Red Square, or even 15. Pussy Riot is a pul­sat­ing and grow­ing body.” The band keeps its focus on the body, as a grow­ing col­lec­tive or as a sym­bol of resis­tance to patri­ar­chal con­trol. One mem­ber explains the band’s name in the Vice inter­view:

A female sex organ, which is sup­posed to be receiv­ing and shape­less, sud­den­ly starts a rad­i­cal rebel­lion against the cul­tur­al order, which tries to con­stant­ly define it and show its appro­pri­ate place. Sex­ists have cer­tain ideas about how a woman should behave, and Putin, by the way, also has a cou­ple thoughts on how Rus­sians should live. Fight­ing against all that—that’s Pussy Riot.

The choice of name—which has forced dozens of news­cast­ers to say the word “pussy” with a straight face—is, in all seri­ous­ness, a point­ed ref­er­ence to what Gor­don calls a “fear of women,” which may explain what near­ly every­one who has an opin­ion on the case char­ac­ter­izes as an extreme­ly dis­pro­por­tion­ate sen­tence for the three con­vict­ed mem­bers. As Gor­don says above, “Clear­ly Putin is afraid.” Relat­ing the events in Rus­sia to the back­lash against women’s leg­isla­tive gains in this coun­try, Gor­don says, “what’s going on in Wash­ing­ton is real­ly indica­tive of that [fear],” and she won­ders “why there aren’t more men who aren’t con­cerned about it or bring­ing it up. It’s beyond a women’s issue.” Nev­er­the­less, she strong­ly implies that the U.S. is ripe for a “pussy riot”—a new punk-rock women’s movement—since “women make nat­ur­al anar­chists and rev­o­lu­tion­ar­ies because they’ve always been sec­ond-class cit­i­zens and had to claw their way up.”

Pussy Riot has cit­ed Son­ic Youth’s “Kool Thing” (above) as an influ­ence, a taunt­ing fem­i­nist retort to male come-ons that asks its tar­get “are you gonna lib­er­ate us girls / From male white cor­po­rate oppres­sion?” The unstat­ed answer is, no, he isn’t. As Gor­don implies above, and as Pussy Riot explain in an inter­view with The Guardian below, the only response to so-called “wars on women” every­where may be a “fem­i­nist whip”:

Josh Jones is a doc­tor­al can­di­date in Eng­lish at Ford­ham Uni­ver­si­ty and a co-founder and for­mer man­ag­ing edi­tor of Guer­ni­ca / A Mag­a­zine of Arts and Pol­i­tics.

 

Classic Ray Charles Performance: ‘What’d I Say’ Live in Paris, 1968

Late one night in 1958, Ray Charles and his band were near­ing the end of a very long per­for­mance at a dance some­where in the Mid­west when they found them­selves in a jam. They were out of mate­r­i­al. What Charles came up with that night to kill a lit­tle time would wind up mak­ing music his­to­ry.

In his mem­oir Broth­er Ray: Ray Charles’ Own Sto­ry, co-writ­ten with David Ritz, Charles describes the scene:

It was near­ly 1:00 A.M., I remem­ber, and we had played our whole book. There was noth­ing left that I could think of, so I final­ly said to the band and the Raeletts, “Lis­ten, I’m going to fool around and y’all just fol­low me.”

So I began noodling. Just a lit­tle riff which float­ed up into my head. It felt good and I kept on going. One thing led to anoth­er, and sud­den­ly I found myself singing and want­i­ng the girls to repeat after me. So I told ’em, “Now!”

Then I could feel the whole room bounc­ing and shak­ing and car­ry­ing on some­thing fierce. So I kept the thing going, tight­en­ing it up a lit­tle here, adding a dash of Latin rhythm there. When I got through, folk came up and asked where they could buy the record. “Ain’t no record,” I said, “just some­thing I made up to kill a lit­tle time.”

The song, “What’d I Say,” became a hit not only on the rhythm and blues charts, where Charles had already had some suc­cess, but on the pop charts as well. It was Charles’s first cross-over hit, and his first gold record. It was wide­ly cov­ered by oth­er artists and became Charles’s sig­na­ture song, the one he end­ed his con­certs with.

The video above was made almost exact­ly ten years after “What’d I Say” was writ­ten. It’s from one of a pair of con­certs Charles gave on Octo­ber 8 and 9, 1968, at the Salle Pleyel in Paris. The orches­tra was led by Wal­lace Dav­en­port, and the back-up singers, the Raeletts, were: Susaye Greene, Ver­lyn Fle­naugh, Bar­bara Ann Lesure, and Bar­bara Nell Ter­rault.

Despite the even­tu­al tri­umph of “What’d I Say,” the song encoun­tered strong resis­tance when it was first released by Atlantic Records in 1959. Some radio sta­tions banned it. “They said it was sug­ges­tive,” writes Charles. “Well, I agreed. I’m not one to inter­pret my own songs, but if you can’t fig­ure out ‘What I Say,’ then some­thing’s wrong. Either that, or you’re not accus­tomed to the sweet sounds of love.”

Relat­ed con­tent:

‘Willie and the Hand Jive,’ by the Late Great John­ny Otis

The Queen of Soul Con­quers Europe: Aretha Franklin in Ams­ter­dam, 1968

Artists Paint Paris, Berlin and London with High-Tech Video Graffiti

Ear­li­er this year, Blake Shaw and Bruno Levy, two artists who form the mul­ti­me­dia per­for­mance col­lab­o­ra­tion Sweat­shoppe, head­ed to Euro­pean cities (Berlin, Bris­tol, Bel­grade, Lon­don and Paris) and past­ed videos on build­ings, some famous, some not. They call their art “Video Paint­ing,” and it’s all done with cus­tom soft­ware that “tracks the posi­tion of paint rollers and projects video wher­ev­er [the artists] choose to paint.” Every­thing that you see above was shot live, using no actu­al paint or post pro­duc­tion. You can check out more of Sweat­shoppe’s mul­ti­me­dia work here.

via The Atlantic

Relat­ed Con­tent:

Prague Mon­u­ment Dou­bles as Artist’s Can­vas

3D Light Show from Ukraine to Your Liv­ing Room

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast