Comments We Love to Hear

In one of our recent pieces, we high­light­ed a video that fea­tured law pro­fes­sor Cass Sun­stein inter­pret­ing the sec­ond amend­ment and ques­tion­ing whether it con­ferred the right to bear arms. In response, one of our read­ers offered this com­ment:

“Reeeeeal­ly good talk. My friend and I sat down to watch it, and before we start­ed, we laid out our posi­tions, basi­cal­ly one on each side of the debate. Sun­stein pro­ceeds to explain how we’re both wrong. Awe­some.”

I men­tion this sim­ply because it’s great to see the media (videos/podcasts) fea­tured here being used in this way. It’s great to see read­ers real­ly engag­ing with the mate­r­i­al and allow­ing it to shape their views. It’s the ulti­mate com­pli­ment in some ways. Thanks Ben.

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Waves Freeze in Newfoundland

This counts as sci­ence, right?

Also see 18 Stun­ning Bridges From Around The World via Metafil­ter.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 4 ) |

The Future of Ideas: Download Your Free Copy (and More)

thefutureofideas.jpgIn 2001, Stan­ford law pro­fes­sor Lawrence Lessig pub­lished The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Com­mons in a Con­nect­ed World. Here, Lessig launched a cam­paign against Amer­i­can copy­right law, argu­ing that it has become so restric­tive that it sti­fles cul­tur­al inno­va­tion and social progress .… which under­mines the orig­i­nal point of copy­right law. Back in 1787, the found­ing fathers includ­ed the “copy­right clause” in the Amer­i­can con­sti­tu­tion, look­ing to give authors a short-term incen­tive to inno­vate and ulti­mate­ly con­tribute to the pub­lic good. (Arti­cle I, Sec­tion 8 empow­ers Con­gress “To pro­mote the Progress of Sci­ence and use­ful Arts, by secur­ing for lim­it­ed Times to Authors and Inven­tors the exclu­sive Right to their respec­tive Writ­ings and Dis­cov­er­ies.”). At the out­set, copy­right law pro­tect­ed forms of expres­sion — and let authors prof­it from them — for a min­i­mum of 14 years and a max­i­mum of 28. Then, the mate­r­i­al went into the pub­lic domain. But over time, the pro­tec­tions placed on cul­tur­al expres­sion have been extend­ed, and now works are pro­tect­ed so long as an author is alive, and then anoth­er 70 years. That’s poten­tial­ly up to 140 years or more. All of this has hap­pened because Con­gress has been suc­cess­ful­ly lob­bied by large media cor­po­ra­tions (e.g. Dis­ney), want­i­ng to mon­e­tize their media assets (think, Mick­ey Mouse) indef­i­nite­ly.

Any­way, this is a long way of telling you that you can now down­load The Future of Ideas for free. Lessig per­suad­ed Ran­dom House to release the book under a “Cre­ative Com­mons” license, using the argu­ment that free e‑books will actu­al­ly stim­u­late sales of paper copies. (Do you real­ly want to read 350 pages on your com­put­er screen?)

This is not the first time that Lessig has worked with this mod­el. One of his pre­vi­ous books, Free Cul­ture: How Big Media Uses Tech­nol­o­gy and the Law to Lock Down Cul­ture and Con­trol Cre­ativ­i­ty, was also made freely avail­able in dig­i­tal for­mat. (You can down­load a free audio­book ver­sion or buy the paper ver­sion here.)

As a final note, I should men­tion that Lessig will be leav­ing behind his focus on these copy­right issues, and turn­ing his sights to cor­rup­tion in Wash­ing­ton. Below you can watch him out­line the prob­lem that he’s look­ing to tack­le.

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 5 ) |

Steve Jobs’ 90 Minute Keynote Boiled Down to 60 Seconds

Want the quick overview of what Apple has in the pipeline for ’08? Here it is:

The Second Amendment: Does It Really Let You Bear Arms?

What does the Sec­ond Amend­ment mean? It’s some­thing that the Supreme Court has nev­er real­ly said. In this hour long video, Cass Sun­stein, a very well known law pro­fes­sor from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Chica­go, takes a crack at inter­pret­ing this amend­ment and see­ing whether its orig­i­nal mean­ing actu­al­ly con­fers the right to bear arms. Originalists/conservatives prob­a­bly won’t like his con­clu­sions, and they may be inclined to dis­miss this as a talk giv­en by anoth­er lib­er­al elit­ist. But they should keep in mind that Sun­stein actu­al­ly saw the Bush admin­is­tra­tion’s wire­tap­ping as hav­ing a plau­si­ble legal basis, and he’s had any­thing but a harsh assess­ment of John Roberts’ track record as a judge.

This talk was record­ed on Octo­ber 23, 2007.

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 3 ) |

Jimi Hendrix Vintage Footage

Astound­ing­ly good footage of Hen­drix play­ing Voodoo Chile live. The date is 1969, in Lon­don. (Video is added to our YouTube Playlist.)

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 2 ) |

Resolving the Omnivore’s Dilemma: Pollan’s New Book

Com­ing off of the run­away suc­cess of Omni­vore’s Dilem­ma, Michael Pol­lan has just pub­lished a log­i­cal sequel — In Defense of Food: An Eater’s Man­i­festo. His new book tells us what to eat, what not to eat, and how to stay healthy. Gen­er­al­ly speak­ing, his advice can be boiled down to a few words: “Eat food. Not too much. Most­ly plants.” But there is obvi­ous­ly much more to it than that. To fill in the gaps, you can buy the book or lis­ten to two recent inter­views with Pol­lan:

1.) The Leonard Lopate Show (Jan­u­ary 9) : MP3 — iTunes — Feed — Web Site 

2.) Sci­ence Fri­day (Jan­u­ary 4): MP3 — iTunes — Feed — Web Site

Sub­scribe to Our Feed

by | Permalink | Make a Comment ( 1 ) |

Library of Congress Adds 3,000 Photos to Flickr

Check them out here.

via Life­hack­er

« Go BackMore in this category... »
Quantcast
Open Culture was founded by Dan Colman.